SUPERMAN: Me Decepcionou | Crítica Sincera (Com Spoilers)

Summary

The reviewer expresses disappointment with the portrayal of Superman in the latest movie, criticizing its overuse of humor and James Gunn's direction that undermines the character's integrity. While acknowledging Superman's symbol of goodness and Krypton's elements as positive aspects, the reviewer feels that the film's tone makes it hard to take the character seriously. They also note a lack of political depth and humor that detracts from the story. Ultimately, the reviewer gives the film a low rating, highlighting the struggle to reconcile the movie's flaws with its potential.

Takeaways

• 😀 The reviewer feels the film fails to represent Superman as a hero, calling it a poor depiction of the character.
• 😀 Despite the criticism, the reviewer acknowledges that Superman is portrayed as a genuinely good guy in the film.
• 😀 The film is criticized for its humor, with many jokes falling flat and detracting from the serious tone of the story.
• 😀 The reviewer finds some jokes unnecessary and ineffective, with a specific mention of a post-credit scene involving Mr. Incredible.
• 😀 James Gunn’s direction is seen as a key factor that diminishes the film's impact, with too many attempts at humor undermining the character’s seriousness.
• 😀 The reviewer expresses concern that the film could tarnish Superman’s image, making it difficult for future portrayals to recover.
• 😀 A significant criticism is that the film doesn't take itself seriously, which leads to a lack of genuine connection with the character.
• 😀 The film attempts political commentary but ultimately removes any real political weight, making the narrative feel shallow.
• 😀 The reviewer suggests that the film relies too much on jokes and superficial moments, instead of focusing on the core values of Superman.
• 😀 Despite all the criticisms, the reviewer appreciates the depiction of Krypton and Superman’s inherent goodness, though they feel it’s overshadowed by other elements.
• 😀 The reviewer rates the film 4.5/10, citing both positive and negative elements but ultimately feeling disappointed with how the character was portrayed.

Q & A

What is the main criticism the reviewer has about the film's portrayal of Superman?

The reviewer criticizes the film for not effectively portraying Superman as a good, serious character. They feel that the movie doesn't capture the essence of Superman's goodness and instead turns him into a somewhat ridiculous figure due to the director's choices.

What aspects of the film did the reviewer find humorous?

The reviewer mentions that a few jokes worked, particularly one involving Guy Gardner and the 'Justice Gang.' They found it funny when Gardner reacted to the name 'Justice Gang,' calling it a cool name.

How does the reviewer feel about James Gunn's direction of the film?

The reviewer is critical of James Gunn's direction, believing that his approach makes Superman and other characters appear ridiculous, which detracts from the overall impact of the film and undermines the characters' seriousness.

What are the reviewer's thoughts on the film's use of humor?

The reviewer finds many of the jokes in the film forced or ineffective, feeling that they undermine the tone of the movie. They mention that humor should serve the narrative, but in this case, it often feels out of place or unnecessary.

How does the reviewer evaluate the portrayal of Superman’s character in the film?

The reviewer feels that Superman’s character is not portrayed well in the film. They believe the character's essence as a good, heroic figure is overshadowed by unnecessary humor and the ridiculousness of certain scenes.

What is the reviewer's opinion on the film's political commentary?

The reviewer notes that the film avoids strong political commentary, specifically citing a line from Maxwell Lord about both political sides agreeing on Lex Luthor being a horrible person. They feel this removes any political depth the film might have had.

What is the reviewer's overall rating of the film and the reasoning behind it?

The reviewer gives the film a 4.5/10, citing that while Superman's goodness and Krypton are positive aspects, James Gunn’s direction and the ridiculous tone of the film significantly hinder its quality.

How does the reviewer feel about the future of the DC universe after watching this movie?

The reviewer expresses disappointment with the movie, stating that it diminishes the hope they had for the future of the DC universe. They feel that if this film represents the direction DC is going, it might be difficult for them to take the characters or stories seriously.

What was the reviewer's reaction to the second post-credits scene?

The reviewer found the second post-credits scene disappointing, where a joke about Superman calling a building crooked undermines the character of Mr. Incredible. They felt it was a silly and unnecessary addition to the film.

What does the reviewer think about the film's balance of humor and drama?

The reviewer believes the film fails to balance humor and drama effectively, with too many forced jokes that detract from the more serious aspects of the story. They argue that humor should complement the narrative, but here it undermines the drama and seriousness of the characters.