EX-JUÍZA DE CURITIBA DESMASCARA MORO E LAVA JATO

Summary

A former judge reflects on her disillusionment with Brazil's judicial system, particularly the Lava Jato operation. She recounts personal experiences of systemic corruption, political influence, and unethical behavior within the judiciary. Highlighting manipulations in judicial appointments and the suppression of legal documents, she critiques the corporatist environment that favors political connections over justice. Despite the troubling nature of her experiences, she emphasizes the need for reform, underscoring the stark contrast between the elitist judiciary and the working-class citizens it serves.

Takeaways

• 😀 The judicial system in Curitiba during the Lava Jato operation had significant internal conflicts, with judges and officials often acting outside procedural and constitutional rules.
• 😀 The speaker reflects on her career as a judge and her growing concerns about the corruption and mismanagement within the judicial system.
• 😀 There were multiple instances of alleged misconduct, including hidden documents, unaccountable shifts, and interference from secretariats linked to the 13th court.
• 😀 The speaker describes how Moro, a key figure in Lava Jato, had a limited intellectual capacity and showed signs of social inadequacy, which raised suspicions about his suitability for the position.
• 😀 The speaker experienced aggression from Moro and began suspecting a network of collusion within the justice system, which she reported to the ombudsman.
• 😀 The speaker's personal safety was threatened, leading her to purchase an armored car and relocate to a safer area with her family.
• 😀 There was a failure to investigate numerous illegalities within the Lava Jato operation, with focus mainly placed on financial matters rather than the broader corruption.
• 😀 The speaker witnessed fraud and misconduct by key figures in the judicial system, including the erasure of critical documents from the EPROC system.
• 😀 A corporatist network within the judicial system, linked to Lava Jato, maintained control over key positions and continued to manipulate investigations and careers.
• 😀 The speaker sees the injustices and corruption within the judicial system as a major threat to democracy, and highlights how elitism within the judiciary undermines the goals of the 1988 Constitution.

Q & A

What issue is the speaker discussing regarding the 13th Court (TRF4)?

The speaker discusses a controversial electoral maneuver aimed at removing judges who could act on certain facts, leading to the formation of a court structure that ensured unanimity in decisions.

What did the speaker find strange about the shifts at TRF4?

The speaker found it odd that all the shifts were already assigned by the secretariat of the 13th Court, bypassing procedural and constitutional rules.

How does the speaker describe Sérgio Moro, the judge at the time?

The speaker describes Sérgio Moro as a limited individual, both intellectually and socially, and compares him to Dorian Gray, a metaphor for his hidden flaws and corruption.

What incident involving Moro stands out to the speaker?

The speaker recalls an encounter with Moro in an elevator, where he was described as aggressive and mean, leading the speaker to suspect a possible 'gang' of three controlling the system.

Why did the speaker decide to report the hidden documents and irregularities in the court?

The speaker reported hidden documents and irregularities because the on-duty judge was kept in the dark about important decisions, and the system was being manipulated to cover up actions by certain individuals.

What actions did the speaker take after feeling threatened by the situation at TRF4?

The speaker reported the irregularities to the ombudsman, moved to a safer neighborhood, and even purchased an armored car due to the increasing sense of danger and intimidation.

What does the speaker compare the situation in Brazil's judicial system to?

The speaker compares the situation in Brazil's judicial system to the climate during the military dictatorship in the 1960s, especially after the AI-5 decree, suggesting a pattern of persecution against dissenters.

What impact did the speaker's visit to the Lula Livre movement have on them?

The speaker was deeply impacted by the humble people supporting Lula, and they became convinced of Lula's innocence, recognizing the injustice being perpetrated in the judicial system.

How does the speaker describe the broader issue with Brazil's judicial system?

The speaker criticizes the judicial system for being elitist and corporatist, where career advancement is tied to aligning with political factions, and how the system often ignores illegalities and injustices.

What does the speaker believe needs to be done regarding the judiciary and its functioning?

The speaker believes the justice system needs fundamental changes, focusing on investigating all illegal activities, including those hidden by key figures like the two directors mentioned, to restore fairness and transparency.