MOSI 2 - NSDC 2023 Jenjang SMA/MA Seleksi Tingkat Provinsi

Summary

The script critiques the flawed nature of major award shows like the Grammys, Oscars, and Tonys, arguing that they are biased and influenced by executives and media manipulation. It proposes a new system where artists are validated by their supporters instead of being judged by industry giants. The piece stresses the importance of artists staying true to their craft without compromising for mass appeal or awards. Ultimately, it advocates for preserving the integrity and authenticity of art, suggesting that recognition from true supporters holds more value than the artificial validation from award shows.

Takeaways

• 😀 Art is meant for authentic self-expression, not for satisfying profit-driven motives of executives or award committees.
• 😀 Award shows like the Grammys and Oscars often lack fairness, with unfair wins and biases based on race, connections, and media influence.
• 😀 The loss of interest in prestigious awards like the Grammys and Oscars is due to their diminishing credibility and perceived unfairness.
• 😀 Award shows create unhealthy competition among artists, pressuring them to conform to majority preferences rather than express their unique artistic visions.
• 😀 Art should not be judged based on popularity or commercial success; its value is subjective and based on the emotional connection it creates with the audience.
• 😀 Many artists are disillusioned by the competition for awards, as it undermines the true purpose of art, which is personal expression rather than external validation.
• 😀 The pressure to win awards can lead artists to create formulaic or 'safe' works, diminishing their authenticity and the variety of artistic expression.
• 😀 Instead of seeking recognition through awards, artists should be validated by their supporters and fans, creating a more meaningful and personal connection to their work.
• 😀 The focus on awards often marginalizes minority artists and those who produce more niche or unconventional art forms, perpetuating inequality in the industry.
• 😀 In a world where fans and supporters determine an artist's success, artists can thrive without the pressure to conform to mainstream tastes, fostering more authentic and diverse creativity.

Q & A

What is the main argument of the script regarding award shows like the Grammys, Oscars, and Tonys?

The script argues that award shows are flawed, biased, and do not provide a fair or meaningful recognition of artists. It suggests that artists should gain validation from their supporters rather than through these industry-driven awards.

What are the key reasons the script states that award shows are flawed?

The script points to unfair wins, lack of diversity, and conflicts between artists and executives. It mentions how certain artists are unfairly excluded or marginalized, and how awards often reflect industry politics rather than true artistic merit.

How does the script explain the loss of interest in award shows like the Grammys and Oscars?

The script argues that many audiences have lost interest because they no longer view award shows as fair or prestigious. The unjustified wins and lack of representation have made these events seem less meaningful and have eroded their value.

What is proposed as an alternative to traditional award shows?

The script proposes that artists should derive validation from their fans and supporters instead of industry awards. This would allow artists to create work that is authentic to their style without the pressure to conform to the preferences of award show organizers.

How does the script view the impact of competition in the arts, especially related to award shows?

The script suggests that competition can be harmful in the arts because it forces artists to prioritize popularity over authenticity. It argues that comparing different art forms or performances based on awards is counterproductive, as art is subjective and personal.

What effect does the script claim award shows have on an artist's work?

Award shows can cause artists to focus on creating work that is designed to win awards, rather than work that is true to their own artistic vision. This can lead to a loss of self-identity in their music or performances, and can even result in art that lacks originality or depth.

Why does the script argue that awards can diminish the value of art?

The script argues that awards often prioritize mainstream appeal over artistic integrity. This creates a situation where artists may create work to meet the expectations of the majority, rather than expressing themselves authentically. It also diminishes the diversity of art by promoting only what is popular at the time.

What does the script suggest about the relationship between art and the audience?

The script suggests that art should be a deeply personal expression of emotion, and that it resonates most when it connects with the artist’s own feelings and experiences. The true value of art lies in its ability to touch people, not in its ability to win awards.

How does the script address the issue of representation in award shows?

The script points out that many award shows, such as the Oscars, have historically been biased, with a lack of representation for minorities. It criticizes how white artists have dominated these awards and highlights instances where deserving minority artists, such as Angela Bassett, were overlooked.

What is the ultimate vision proposed in the script for the future of art and recognition?

The script envisions a future where artists are validated by their supporters rather than through industry awards. It advocates for a more democratic and accessible system where artists are motivated by their own interests and the appreciation of their unique fan base.