جعفر پناهی " سیاه نمایی" کرده!

Summary

In this impassioned speech, the speaker criticizes the Iranian regime and its supporters, expressing that they have no legitimacy in commenting on political or cultural matters. They argue that while political influence is undeniable in award ceremonies, the real 'blackening' of Iran comes from the government's oppressive actions. The speaker highlights corruption, violence, and suppression of freedom, contrasting this with the portrayal of Iran in international films. They assert that the true harm comes from the actions of those in power, and the regime’s manipulation of media to hide these realities is a form of whitewashing. The speech concludes by stating that any attempt to downplay Iran's struggles would only perpetuate the regime's control.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker expresses skepticism about the political motivations behind awards and emphasizes the role of politics in influencing such decisions.
• 😀 The speaker criticizes the Iranian government's handling of culture and arts, labeling their supported work as substandard.
• 😀 The speaker highlights how political figures and the Iranian regime have used oppressive methods, such as employing advanced technologies for suppression rather than public welfare.
• 😀 The speaker draws attention to the hypocrisy of those who label others as 'nationalists' when they were previously against such ideologies, citing the contradictory actions of figures like Khomeini.
• 😀 The speaker asserts that the negative portrayal of Iran in films is not as damaging as the government's actions, such as human rights abuses, which are responsible for creating a bleak image of the country.
• 😀 The speaker emphasizes that real 'black portrayal' of Iran comes from the government's actions, like using force against citizens and spreading corrupt leadership, rather than filmmakers.
• 😀 The speaker points out the inconsistency in the Iranian government's portrayal of their internal problems, suggesting that any negative depiction of the country is dismissed as 'black portrayal,' regardless of the reality.
• 😀 The speaker argues that the Iranian government's actions—such as imprisoning critics, mishandling resources, and promoting corruption—are far more damaging to the nation's image than any film or media portrayal.
• 😀 The speaker discusses the double standards in labeling actions as black portrayal, pointing out that any negative news about the regime is often dismissed as political while government corruption and mismanagement continue.
• 😀 The speaker concludes by suggesting that the only way for the Iranian government to 'whitewash' its image is to suppress all negative news, a task which has become increasingly difficult in the modern era due to global access to information.

Q & A

What is the speaker's main opinion about the political influence on award selections?

The speaker acknowledges that political factors may influence award decisions, but emphasizes that the Iranian government and its supporters have no legitimacy to comment on these matters. They believe the government’s actions make it unqualified to evaluate political issues or cultural awards.

What does the speaker think about the portrayal of Iran in films by directors like Jafar Panahi, Asghar Farhadi, and Saeed Roostaie?

The speaker argues that these directors are not responsible for portraying Iran negatively. Instead, they believe that the Iranian government and its oppressive actions, such as police brutality and the misuse of resources for suppression, are what create a negative image of the country.

How does the speaker view the Iranian government's use of resources?

The speaker criticizes the government for using advanced tools and resources meant for public welfare to instead suppress and control the people. This includes using ambulances for prisoner transportation and committing torture in prisons, which the speaker believes is more damaging to Iran's image than any film.

What does the speaker mean by 'blacklisting' or 'black portrayal' in the context of Iranian cinema?

The speaker challenges the notion of 'black portrayal' in films. They suggest that the real 'black portrayal' comes from the Iranian government's actions, such as corruption, human rights abuses, and the suppression of free speech, rather than from the films shown at international festivals.

What example does the speaker give of the Iranian government's corruption?

The speaker refers to a recent example where the Iranian government allegedly overpaid for two Chinese airplanes, with a report revealing a discrepancy of over $170 million. The speaker emphasizes that such corruption within the government is more damaging than the portrayal of Iran in films.

What does the speaker think about the government's stance on national pride and patriotism?

The speaker criticizes the government's manipulation of national pride, pointing out that figures who once condemned nationalism, like Khomeini, now suddenly embrace it when it suits their political agenda. The speaker sees this as hypocritical and damaging to Iran's integrity.

How does the speaker view the relationship between the Iranian government and the people?

The speaker believes that there is no real connection between the Iranian people and the government. They argue that the government is an occupying force and that internal conflicts should not be mistaken for disputes between the Iranian people and the Iranian government.

What is the speaker's perspective on media and censorship in Iran?

The speaker criticizes the Iranian government's control over the media, noting how it censors information and manipulates the portrayal of events. They argue that the government is engaged in 'whitewashing' by preventing the spread of truth and real news about Iran's problems.

Why does the speaker bring up the case of Faezeh Hashemi?

The speaker uses the case of Faezeh Hashemi, who was allegedly sentenced to 20 years in prison for criticizing the leadership, to illustrate the oppressive environment in Iran. They argue that such harsh punishments are evidence of the regime's failure to uphold basic rights and freedoms.

What conclusion does the speaker draw about the future of Iran under the current regime?

The speaker concludes that as long as the current regime remains in power, Iran will continue to deteriorate. They argue that it’s impossible to hide the truth through censorship, and the reality of the country's situation will be exposed despite the government's efforts to conceal it.