Why We Can't Have Red Dead Redemption 3

Summary

In this video, the creator explores the concept of *Red Dead Redemption 3*, debating whether a direct sequel would make sense given the rich lore and the completed arc of the main characters. They suggest that continuing the franchise with a fresh perspective, rather than rehashing past stories, would be the best way forward. The video touches on the themes of redemption and the limits of storytelling within the *Red Dead* universe, highlighting the difficulty of crafting a meaningful follow-up. Ultimately, the video encourages viewers to think about new ideas for the series' future.

Takeaways

• 😀 The main story of Red Dead Redemption is considered complete, with an immense amount of lore, dialogue, and cutscenes that explore the backstory of the characters.
• 😀 Arthur Morgan and John Marston, the primary protagonists, have complex character arcs with multiple endings based on their honor levels, reinforcing the completion of their stories.
• 😀 Red Dead Redemption 3 doesn't make sense from the perspective of continuing the story with the same characters or setting, as the narrative feels finished.
• 😀 The idea of a new Red Dead game focusing on a fresh perspective or location is suggested, instead of simply continuing the old storylines.
• 😀 The concept of Red Dead Redemption 3 could be based on different themes or characters, breaking away from the constraints of the past to ensure the franchise evolves.
• 😀 The potential title for the next Red Dead game should be something that fits the theme but also sparks creativity and innovation, like 'Red Dead Revolution' or 'Red Dead Revenge.'
• 😀 Many of the side quests in Red Dead Redemption 2 can be completed by both Arthur and John, contributing to their storylines and deepening player immersion.
• 😀 Arthur's Journal, which contains numerous entries about his thoughts and experiences, is a rich source of lore that fans have yet to fully explore.
• 😀 The speaker reflects on the idea that the Red Dead Redemption franchise can't remain shackled to past characters and needs to move forward to remain relevant.
• 😀 The speaker encourages viewers to share their thoughts and theories on Red Dead Redemption 3, emphasizing the importance of creativity and new ideas for future installments.

Q & A

Why does the speaker believe *Red Dead Redemption 3* should not happen?

The speaker feels that the story of *Red Dead Redemption* is complete, with rich lore, character development, and multiple endings. They believe continuing with a third installment would undermine the closure provided by the previous games.

What is the speaker’s opinion on the idea of Jack Marston as the protagonist for *Red Dead Redemption 3*?

The speaker dismisses this idea, stating that Jack's story in the first game was a fitting conclusion, and bringing him back would detract from the emotional impact and closure of his journey.

Why does the speaker reject the theory of a prequel focusing on the Van der Linde gang?

The speaker argues that exploring the backstory of the Van der Linde gang or the Blackwater Massacre would spoil the mystery and intrigue of *Red Dead Redemption 2*, leaving nothing left to the imagination for players.

What is the issue with making a prequel about Landon Ricketts?

The speaker believes that Landon Ricketts’ character arc in *Red Dead Redemption* is already complete and further exploration of his backstory would not add value to the series. They suggest that he works best as a supporting character with a sense of closure.

What is the speaker's stance on the franchise's future direction?

The speaker advocates for the franchise to move on from the established characters and settings, suggesting that the series should evolve with new narratives, perspectives, and ideas, rather than being shackled to the past.

How does the speaker feel about continuing the *Red Dead* series with familiar characters?

The speaker believes that continuing the series with familiar characters like Arthur Morgan or John Marston would limit creative possibilities and prevent the series from moving forward. They emphasize that looking back too much could hinder fresh storytelling.

What new titles does the speaker propose for a potential *Red Dead* game?

The speaker suggests potential titles like *Red Dead Revolution* or *Red Dead Revenge* to signify a fresh direction for the franchise, focusing on new themes while maintaining the spirit of the series.

What is the key message Arthur Morgan delivers in *Red Dead Redemption 2*?

Arthur Morgan’s message, particularly towards the end of *Red Dead Redemption 2*, is that when the time comes, it’s important to leave the past behind and move forward. The speaker interprets this as a call for the franchise to do the same.

What is the speaker's opinion on the idea of 'Red Dead Regression' as a future game title?

The speaker rejects 'Red Dead Regression' as a title, seeing it as a representation of the franchise staying stuck in the past, rather than progressing forward with fresh stories and perspectives.

Why does the speaker overanalyze *Red Dead Redemption 2*?

The speaker mentions that they have been overanalyzing the story of *Red Dead Redemption 2* as part of their process of preparing in-depth content and videos, which they are excited to share with their audience.