KAMETO explique le DRAMA avec Riot Games

Summary

In this candid discussion, the speaker opens up about the frustration surrounding technical pauses during the VCT IMY matches. They explain their efforts to address the ongoing issue, including contacting Team Liquid and other teams, aiming to send a strong message to Riot Games for better conditions. The speaker highlights the challenges, including the impact on their players, staff, and potential consequences of further action. Despite the obstacles, they remain focused on ensuring fair play and improved conditions for future matches, with the goal of maintaining integrity and the competitive spirit of Valorant tournaments.

Takeaways

• 😀 The team is frustrated with recurring technical pauses during VCT matches that disrupt gameplay and lead to long delays.
• 😀 Since the start of the season, the technical pauses have become excessive, causing significant frustration within the team.
• 😀 The team tried to communicate with other teams and Riot Games in order to address the ongoing technical issues and improve match conditions.
• 😀 Despite their efforts, other teams were hesitant to speak out due to fear of losing their league spots with the upcoming slot renewal.
• 😀 The team emphasized that their goal was not to create conflict with Riot but to ensure fair and competitive conditions for all players.
• 😀 The team pushed for a match remake due to the unfairness of playing under disrupted conditions, but Riot ultimately refused a remake.
• 😀 After significant internal discussion, Riot agreed to change the map pool in order to create a fairer competitive environment for the rematch.
• 😀 The team was vocal about the issue because they were most affected by the technical problems, even though other teams seemed less concerned.
• 😀 The team recognized that pushing further could result in serious consequences such as financial penalties, disqualification, or loss of sponsorships.
• 😀 Ultimately, the team accepted the decision to continue with the match starting at a 0-1 disadvantage but remains focused on playing for fair play and improvement in the future.

Q & A

What was the main issue faced by the team during the VCT IMY match?

The main issue was the excessive technical pauses during the match, which disrupted the flow of the game and led to frustration among the players and staff. This became a recurring problem throughout the season, affecting the team's performance and causing delays in matches.

Why did the team consider quitting the match instead of continuing?

The team considered quitting the match to send a strong message to Riot Games about the ongoing technical issues. They believed that leaving the match would pressure Riot to address the technical problems in the studio, as the situation was becoming unbearable with multiple 20-minute tech pauses.

What was the team's stance on the other teams' responses to the technical issues?

The team felt that most other teams were hesitant to speak up about the issues due to fears of jeopardizing their spots in the VCT or facing potential sanctions. Only a few teams were willing to openly discuss and take action regarding the tech pauses.

What was the outcome of the team's efforts to address the tech pauses?

The team managed to escalate the issue to Riot Games, resulting in a change to the map pool for future matches, though Riot did not agree to a full remake of the match. The team expressed their dissatisfaction with the decision, feeling that the match should have been restarted from scratch due to the unfair conditions.

Why did the team not pursue a boycott of the VCT despite their frustration?

The team did not pursue a boycott because they understood that such a move could have severe consequences, including financial penalties, disqualification, and potential damage to their organization and players' careers. The risk of losing sponsors, facing exclusion, and impacting their future in the VCT was a significant deterrent.

What role did Daniel from Riot play in addressing the issue?

Daniel from Riot helped the team by facilitating communication with Riot's global officials and the head referee, allowing them to present their case. He was supportive and worked to ensure that the team had an opportunity to voice their concerns and potentially resolve the situation.

How did the team feel about Riot's decision to keep the original match score and not allow a remake?

The team was frustrated with Riot's decision to maintain the original score and not allow a full remake, feeling that the match conditions were unfair due to the multiple tech pauses. However, they acknowledged that Riot's policy did not allow for remakes, even if they believed it was the fairest option.

What impact did the technical issues have on the team's performance and mental state?

The constant technical issues and interruptions put immense stress on the team, as the matches were taking longer than expected and disrupting their focus. This led to frustration, with some players even considering stepping away from casting or competition until the issues were resolved.

Why was there a shift in the team's approach to handling the technical issues over time?

The team initially wanted to send a strong message by quitting the match, but over time, they realized that pushing too far could lead to negative consequences for both the players and the organization. They had to balance their frustration with the need to protect their future in the VCT and avoid risking everything for a protest.

What was the team's perspective on fairness and sportsmanship during the VCT IMY event?

The team emphasized the importance of fair play and wanted to ensure that all teams could compete under equal conditions. They expressed a desire for Riot to improve the infrastructure to avoid such issues in the future, ensuring that matches were not affected by technical disruptions and that sportsmanship prevailed.