명문대의 마지노선은 어디까지일까? 명문대 ,비명문대 기준 정리

견해

30 May 202202:45

Summary

TLDRThe video script addresses the controversial topic of defining 'elite' universities in South Korea, dismissing the common online debate that often degrades into personal attacks. It proposes a realistic standard, excluding specialized institutions like KAIST, and identifies ten universities as the country's prestigious 'Ivy League', including Seoul National University and Yonsei University. The script also highlights the achievements of graduates from these schools, who make up 80% of the nation's political and economic leaders, and encourages viewers to respect the efforts of students, reminding them that 90% of the population may not have access to these top-tier universities.

Takeaways

😀 The script discusses the controversial topic of what constitutes a 'prestigious university' in Korea and the common dismissive comments found in online discussions.
🏫 It mentions that excluding KAIST and other specialized universities, the top general universities considered prestigious in Korea are Seoul National University, Yonsei University, Korea University, Sungkyunkwan University, Sogang University, Hanyang University, and six others.
🌟 The script emphasizes that attending these universities is seen as representing the country and potentially leading the nation in the future, with 80% of the political and economic leaders being alumni of these schools.
📚 The speaker argues for a realistic standard rather than an internet-based one, aiming to put an end to the controversy.
📉 The script points out that there are over 109 four-year universities and 130 junior colleges in Korea, with the national average grade being 5th grade.
🔍 It criticizes those who make derogatory comments online, suggesting they are often people with no achievements to boast about, or those who have not experienced university life themselves.
🎓 The speaker suggests that the next tier of universities after the top ones includes schools like Konkuk University, Dongguk University, Hongik University, Pusan University, and Sookmyung Women's University.
🚀 The script acknowledges that while these universities may not be considered top-tier, they are still part of the top 10% in the country and should not be underestimated.
💼 It highlights the importance of not belittling others' efforts and achievements, as 90% of the population may not have access to the top universities.
📈 The script implies that even those who did not study hard might still find themselves in the top 3% of the general track, suggesting a broader perspective on academic achievement.
📺 The speaker ends by asking for support for the video through likes and subscriptions, indicating the intention to continue providing content on this topic.

Q & A

What is the main topic addressed in the script?
-The script discusses the perceived prestige of various universities in South Korea and the societal attitudes towards different tiers of educational institutions.
Which universities are commonly referred to as prestigious in South Korea according to the script?
-The universities commonly referred to as prestigious include Seoul National University, Yonsei University, Korea University, Sungkyunkwan University, Hanyang University, and several others.
What common comments are mentioned in the script when discussing university prestige online?
-Common comments include dismissive remarks about non-SKY universities being of equal standing and derogatory comments about people attending lower-tier schools.
How does the script describe people who leave negative comments about universities online?
-The script describes these commenters as often being people from lower-tier universities, those who have nothing else to boast about except their educational background, or individuals who have never experienced the college admission process.
What societal issue does the script aim to address?
-The script aims to address the issue of unfairly criticizing and belittling people based on the universities they attend and to challenge the unrealistic standards set by internet commenters.
Which universities are listed as leading institutions in South Korea?
-Leading institutions listed include Seoul National University, Yonsei University, Korea University, Sungkyunkwan University, Hanyang University, and several others.
What percentage of South Korea’s political and business leaders are said to have attended these top universities?
-According to the script, 80% of South Korea’s political and business leaders have attended these top universities.
What argument is made about the societal value of attending a prestigious university?
-The argument is made that attending a prestigious university should be viewed with pride and respect, as these institutions are considered to produce the future leaders of the country.
What does the script suggest about the validity of internet-based standards for university prestige?
-The script suggests that internet-based standards are often unrealistic and misleading, and it advocates for a more reality-based perspective on university prestige.
How does the script propose changing the discussion around university prestige?
-The script proposes ending the debate on university prestige by establishing a more realistic and fair standard, acknowledging the efforts of students regardless of their institution.
What is the underlying message of the script regarding academic achievement?
-The underlying message is that academic achievement should be respected and valued without undue emphasis on the perceived prestige of the institution, recognizing that many capable students attend a variety of universities.

Outlines

00:00

🔍 The Threshold for Prestigious Universities

The author questions the minimum standard for prestigious universities in Korea. Common responses on this topic often degrade universities outside of SKY (Seoul National University, Korea University, and Yonsei University). The author criticizes such comments, suggesting they come from three types of people: those from provincial universities, individuals with no significant achievements beyond their educational background, and those with no experience in college entrance exams who waste their time on trivial internet activities. The author emphasizes that Korea has over 430 universities and the average high school grade is around the 5th level. The video aims to establish a realistic standard for prestigious universities.

🏛️ Defining Prestigious Universities in Korea

In this video, the author sets out to define prestigious universities in Korea based on realistic criteria. Excluding specialized institutions like KAIST, the author lists ten universities as prestigious: Seoul National University, Yonsei University, Korea University, Sungkyunkwan University, Sogang University, Hanyang University, Chung-Ang University, Kyung Hee University, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, and Seoul City University. The author argues that attending these universities means being part of the top tier in the country and highlights that 80% of Korea's political and economic leaders are graduates of these institutions.

📝 Elite and Mid-Tier Universities

The author discusses mid-tier universities, mentioning that despite being mocked online, they remain significant. Universities like Konkuk University, Dongguk University, Hongik University, Pusan National University, Kookmin University, and Soongsil University fall into this category. While these institutions may not be viewed as prestigious by some, they still represent the top 10% of universities in Korea. The author argues that dismissing these universities as subpar undermines the efforts of many students and emphasizes that only a small percentage of people get into even these mid-tier institutions.

📊 Recognizing Efforts and Achievements

The video concludes by urging viewers to respect the efforts of others and not to easily dismiss their achievements. The author highlights that only 10% of students can get into the mentioned mid-tier universities, and the remaining 90% should not be disrespected. The author encourages viewers to appreciate their own efforts and the efforts of others, concluding the video with a request for subscriptions and likes.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Prestige University

A 'Prestige University' refers to an institution that is widely recognized for its high academic standards, reputation, and the quality of its graduates. In the context of the video, the term is used to discuss the societal perception and the criteria for what constitutes a prestigious university in South Korea. The script mentions specific universities like Seoul National University, Yonsei University, and Korea University as examples of such institutions.

💡Social Tier

The concept of 'Social Tier' in the video script implies a stratification within society, often based on education, wealth, or social status. The video discusses how attending a prestigious university can affect one's social standing and mentions that the top 10% of universities in South Korea are often considered part of the higher social tier.

💡Academic Hierarchy

The 'Academic Hierarchy' refers to the ranking or perceived order of educational institutions based on their prestige, quality of education, and other factors. The script critiques the common perception of an academic hierarchy in South Korea, suggesting that the top universities are not as exclusive as people believe.

💡Internet Trolls

'Internet Trolls' are individuals who post inflammatory, irrelevant, or off-topic messages in an online community with the intent to provoke readers into displaying emotional responses. The video script refers to the negative comments and derogatory remarks made by such individuals in response to discussions about prestigious universities.

💡Eligibility Line

The 'Eligibility Line' is a term used to describe the minimum standard or requirement for something, in this case, for being considered a prestigious university. The video aims to establish a new 'Eligibility Line' based on real-world criteria rather than internet perceptions.

💡National Average Grade

'National Average Grade' refers to the mean academic performance level across a country's student population. The script uses the term to highlight that the majority of South Korean students are not attending top-tier universities, suggesting that the perception of what constitutes a 'good' university may be skewed.

💡Elite

The term 'Elite' is used in the script to describe a select group of individuals who are considered to be at the top of their field or society, often due to their education, wealth, or social status. The video discusses the high percentage of South Korea's political and economic leaders who are graduates of prestigious universities.

💡Educational Inequality

'Educational Inequality' refers to disparities in access to or quality of education among different groups in society. The video script touches on this issue by pointing out that a significant portion of the population does not have access to prestigious universities, which may limit their opportunities.

💡Public University

A 'Public University' is an institution that is funded by the government and typically offers lower tuition fees compared to private universities. The script mentions public universities as part of the discussion on the broader access to higher education in South Korea.

💡Social Mobility

'Social Mobility' is the ability of individuals or families to move up or down the social hierarchy. The video implies that attending a prestigious university can affect one's social mobility, with the suggestion that it can lead to better opportunities in the political and economic sectors.

💡Cyberbullying

Cyberbullying involves the use of electronic communication to bully individuals, typically by sending messages of an intimidating, threatening, or hurtful nature. The script alludes to the negative behavior of internet trolls as a form of cyberbullying in the context of online discussions about education.

Highlights

Discussion on the controversial topic of what constitutes a prestigious university in Korea.

Common internet comments that dismiss the value of non-sky (S. Korea's top 3 universities) schools.

The speaker's intention to set a realistic standard for what is considered a prestigious university, excluding exceptional cases like KAIST.

List of 10 universities considered prestigious in Korea, including Seoul National University, Yonsei University, Korea University, and others.

Claim that attending one of these universities is a representation of being among the top leaders of the country.

Statistic that 80% of Korea's political and financial leaders are alumni from these top schools.

Commentary on internet trolls and their lack of real-world experience or achievements.

Mention of the societal 'four major evils' and the number of universities in Korea.

The average national grade level is fifth grade, suggesting a wide range of educational standards.

Argument that the criteria for a prestigious university should be based on real-world standards, not internet opinions.

Discussion on the next tier of universities after the top 10, such as Konkuk University and Dongguk University.

The speaker's view that these universities are still part of the top 10% in the country.

Critique of people who belittle the efforts of students who did not attend top-tier universities.

A call to respect the hard work of students and not to easily dismiss their achievements.

The speaker's closing remarks, thanking the audience and asking for subscriptions and likes.