Belum Dibayar Rp 1 M, Pemilik Dapur MBG Kalibata Malah Ditagih Rp 400 Juta oleh Yayasan

Summary

The video discusses a complex situation involving financial discrepancies with an organization called Kayasan. The speaker expresses confusion about a large invoice and claims they have not received adequate proof of the charges. A specific issue is highlighted with a food-related contract, where payments were made for a service that was not properly fulfilled. There is also confusion over contract terms, with discrepancies in the agreed-upon amount for food services, leading to significant financial strain. The speaker plans to submit additional evidence to clarify the situation.

Takeaways

• 😀 A communication took place with the Kayasan party regarding an issue with billing.
• 😀 The Kayasan party is demanding a payment of 100 million IDR from Ibu Ira.
• 😀 Some invoices include discrepancies, with amounts exceeding 100 million IDR, but they are not backed by evidence or receipts.
• 😀 There is confusion about a bill for 'Omprank,' a food service related to a contract with the Kayasan party.
• 😀 Ibu Wira purchased 'Omprank' worth 100 million IDR, but the payment is being charged through the MBG mechanism.
• 😀 'Omprank' refers to a free meal service, and the contract with the Kayasan party required the purchase of this service.
• 😀 The Omprank purchase has already been paid, but there is no additional payment from the Kayasan party as per the contract.
• 😀 A contract with the Kayasan party specified a meal price of 15,000 IDR per portion, with 2,500 IDR allocated for the Kayasan foundation.
• 😀 However, there were inconsistencies in the portion sizes, with some portions being 13,000 IDR or 15,000 IDR, which was not as agreed.
• 😀 The Kayasan party has been aware of these discrepancies for a long time but has not addressed them, causing further confusion and frustration.
• 😀 Despite changes in the agreement, the amount for the foundation has still been deducted, and there is a significant financial shortfall, leaving the costs unbalanced.

Q & A

What was the issue with the invoice provided by the foundation?

The invoice contained discrepancies. Some invoices indicated amounts that were higher than expected, but they were presented only as letters without any supporting evidence, and the person had not received them yet.

What was the confusion regarding the 'omprank' charge?

The 'omprank' refers to a food service that was included as part of the agreement with the foundation. The foundation required purchasing 'omprank,' which was paid for, but it was mixed with other charges, causing confusion in the billing process.

How much was paid for the 'omprank' and how did it factor into the bill?

The 'omprank' was purchased for 100 million, but it was later included in the billing under MBG mechanisms, causing further confusion since it was unrelated to the initial agreement.

What was the contract agreement regarding the food service payment?

The contract specified a rate of 15,000 per portion, with 2,500 deducted for the foundation. However, there were inconsistencies in the number of portions, with some being billed at 13,000 or 15,000, which was not in line with the contract.

What issue arose from the payment and service discrepancies?

The service was not delivered as agreed, and the costs were not reimbursed. Despite paying for the agreed-upon services, there was no reimbursement for the provided meals, and the billing was inconsistent.

How did the situation evolve regarding the meal portions and payments?

Despite the contract specifying 15,000 per portion, the meal service fluctuated between 13,000 and 15,000 portions. The billing was confusing and included further deductions, which did not align with the agreed terms.

What was the reaction to the reduced payment of 2,500 per portion?

The speaker expressed frustration as the deduction of 2,500 per portion was inconsistent and unfair, especially since they had already invested heavily in the service without receiving the expected payments.

What additional evidence was brought to support the claims?

The speaker mentioned that they had gathered a bundle of supporting documents that would be presented to clarify the situation and provide additional evidence regarding the billing and service discrepancies.

Why were there delays in the payments from the foundation?

The payments from the foundation were delayed due to administrative issues, which included incorrect billing practices and failure to honor the agreed-upon terms in the contract.

What was the impact of the contract violations on the overall business?

The contract violations, including inconsistent payments and unfulfilled services, caused significant financial strain, as the speaker had already invested a considerable amount of resources without receiving adequate compensation or reimbursement.