JUVE-EMPOLI 1-1, CHIRICO: 'Perché il Var interviene solo su Milik? Rocchi, arbitri, adesso basta!'
Summary
TLDRThe speaker analyzes Juventus' 1-1 draw with Empoli. He criticizes referee Rocchi for hastily ejecting Juve's Milik early on, arguing it negatively impacted the match. He notes inconsistent VAR interventions, recalling no red cards given to Sassuolo and Genoa players for similar fouls against Juve. Though admitting Juve's faults, he decries unfair officiating singling out Juve, referencing allegiances and the title race. He implores uniform rule application, saying referees ignore warnings and repeat mistakes.
Takeaways
- 😠 The Juventus player Milik was sent off early, negatively impacting the game
- 😤 The referee's decisions were perceived as biased against Juventus
- 😟 Juventus reverted to a defensive style after going down to 10 men
- 🤔 Questions raised about consistency in refereeing decisions using VAR
- 😑 Juventus failed to hold onto their lead before and after going down to 10 men
- 😐 Empoli dominated possession and chances created
- 😞 The referee allowed time wasting tactics from Empoli in closing stages
- 😫 Allegri's tactical decisions criticized, especially subbing on Milik
- 🧐 Lack of attacking intent once ahead criticized as costing Juventus
- 😠 Calls for referees and VAR to be more consistent in decision making
Q & A
What was the final score of the Empoli vs Juventus match?
-The match ended 1-1.
Why was Milik sent off early in the match?
-Milik made a dangerous high tackle on an Empoli player and was shown a red card after just 14 minutes.
How did the red card impact the match?
-Going down to 10 players so early in the game significantly affected Juventus. They struggled being a man down and it changed the dynamic of the match.
What controversial incidents are mentioned from previous matches?
-Incidents where Juventus opponents Berardi (Sassuolo) and Malinovskyi (Genoa) were not sent off for dangerous fouls are referenced.
What point is being made about consistency of refereeing decisions?
-The speaker argues that dangerous fouls should always be treated the same way, but referees seem to be more harsh on Juventus players.
How did Juventus play after taking a 1-0 lead?
-The speaker says Juventus sat back and defended too much after going 1-0 up, instead of continuing to attack.
What happened leading to Empoli's equalizing goal?
-Juventus switched off defensively, allowing Empoli to score with a shot from Baldanzi that caught Szczesny off guard.
What criticisms are made of Juventus' performance?
-That they made poor tactical decisions, did not make the most of being 1-0 up, and retreated into defensive mode too much after the red card.
What referee decisions late in the game are criticized?
-Letting Empoli waste time and commit fouls without punishment as they tried to hold on to a draw.
What is the overall conclusion about the match?
-While the red card heavily impacted the game, Juventus still made poor decisions and have to take responsibility for dropping points.
Outlines
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowMindmap
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowKeywords
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowHighlights
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowTranscripts
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowBrowse More Related Video
ALLEGRI post Juve-Empoli 1-1 conferenza stampa: "Rifarei la scelta Milik perché Yildiz non..."
ESCÂNDALO O VAR DO FLAMENGO X PALMEIRAS NÃO CHAMAR PRA ENTRADA DO VEIGA NO TORNOZELO DO PULGAR!
SFORZA FECHA COM VASCO e MÍDIA FICA REVOLTADA COM JUIZ "VASCO FOI ASSALTADO" VERGONHA DO CARIOCA
SONO UNA BESTIA!!! COME AVETE FATTO????? || MILAN-BOLOGNA 2-2
🔴 LIVE ● Sedang Berlangsung ● TIMNAS INDONESIA VS AUSTRALIA ● 16 Besar PIALA ASIA 2024 ● Ilustrasi
Nuevo escándalo: filtran un audio del VAR del Real Madrid-Almería
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)