Antara NU dan Muhammadiyah, Yudha Khan Bingung Mana yang Benar | Berbeda Tapi Bersama Eps 45

Summary

This transcript reflects a personal journey of religious exploration, with the speaker recounting experiences from childhood to adulthood in various Islamic communities. From navigating differing practices in his Madura-based family (NU and Muhammadiyah), to his exposure to Hizbut Tahrir's views on establishing a Khilafah, and later exploring Jamaah Tabligh, the speaker discusses the contrasts in beliefs and practices within Islam. His story touches on the influence of cultural and religious ideologies, highlighting the tension between tradition, modernity, and personal spiritual understanding. The video offers insights into the complexity of religious identity and the search for truth in a diverse religious landscape.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker comes from a family with diverse Islamic affiliations, with his father being from the Madura NU and his mother from the Muhammadiyah movement.
• 😀 He describes his early exposure to Islamic teachings, influenced by both his father’s and mother’s religious practices, and the occasional differences in their beliefs, such as when to observe fasting.
• 😀 The speaker had a curiosity to explore different Islamic groups and was introduced to Hizbut Tahrir, an organization advocating for the establishment of a Khilafah state and opposing democracy.
• 😀 Despite his interest, the speaker eventually distanced himself from Hizbut Tahrir due to its rejection of democracy, which he found ironic, as they used demonstrations to promote their ideals.
• 😀 He discusses the differences between Hizbut Tahrir and traditional organizations like NU, especially their belief in the return of Prophet Isa (Jesus) during the end times, which Hizbut Tahrir rejects.
• 😀 The speaker also recalls his involvement in studying with Hizbut Tahrir, attending their sessions to understand their stance, particularly their rejection of certain religious practices like the use of music, which they view as a distraction from remembering God.
• 😀 The discussion touches on the way Hizbut Tahrir emphasizes a political approach to Islam, focusing on the concept of a Khilafah state rather than individual spiritual practices.
• 😀 The speaker describes the experience of joining various religious groups, including Liqo (study circles), where he encountered teachings that had a significant impact on his views, including strict practices such as avoiding 'haram' activities like using musical instruments.
• 😀 He reflects on the conflict of seeing Islam used in a highly politicized way, which he felt clashed with his more traditional views on faith and spiritual practice.
• 😀 Eventually, the speaker distanced himself from these groups after feeling that their rigid interpretations of Islam and their emphasis on political activism over spiritual growth did not resonate with him.

Q & A

What is the main topic discussed in the transcript?

The main topic of the transcript revolves around the speaker's personal experiences with various Islamic organizations and ideologies, including Hizbut Tahrir, Muhammadiyah, NU (Nahdlatul Ulama), Jamaah Tabligh, and their personal religious journey and reflections.

What is the significance of the speaker's family background in their religious exploration?

The speaker’s family background plays a crucial role in their religious exploration. Their father is from Madura and part of NU (Nahdlatul Ulama), while their mother is from Klaten and involved in Muhammadiyah. This creates a foundation for their exploration of different Islamic views and practices.

What were the speaker's initial religious beliefs before exploring other ideologies?

Initially, the speaker followed the practices of their family, which were influenced by both NU and Muhammadiyah traditions. This included celebrating Eid with different timing based on their father's and mother's differing religious affiliations.

What sparked the speaker’s interest in Hizbut Tahrir?

The speaker’s interest in Hizbut Tahrir was sparked by their curiosity about the organization’s call for the establishment of an Islamic Caliphate and their rejection of democracy. The speaker wanted to understand whether these beliefs were the correct path, leading them to explore Hizbut Tahrir's teachings.

What was the speaker's experience with Hizbut Tahrir's ideology?

The speaker attended teachings from Hizbut Tahrir and was initially intrigued, particularly by their anti-democracy stance. However, after further exploration, the speaker realized that their ideas, including the belief that Jesus would not return in the end times, did not resonate with them, leading them to move away from Hizbut Tahrir after about six months.

How did the speaker’s experiences with Liqo and Islamic studies influence their religious journey?

The speaker joined Liqo (study groups) and Islamic gatherings, where they learned about various religious practices, including the rejection of music due to its perceived distraction from God. While they gained a lot of positive knowledge, the speaker also encountered strict teachings and a very particular interpretation of Islam that eventually did not sit well with them.

What was the speaker's view on music within religious teachings?

The speaker was taught by some religious groups that music is forbidden because it distracts from the remembrance of God. This view was emphasized during their time with Hizbut Tahrir and Liqo, where musical instruments and even singing were discouraged.

What role did the concept of the Islamic Caliphate play in the speaker's religious exploration?

The concept of the Islamic Caliphate was central to the speaker’s exploration of Hizbut Tahrir’s ideology. They were drawn to the idea of an Islamic state but became disillusioned when they found that the practical and political aspects of this ideology were not fully aligned with their personal beliefs or understanding of Islam.

Why did the speaker leave Liqo after two years of involvement?

The speaker left Liqo after two years because they felt that the approach was too rigid and extreme. They found the teachings to be disconnected from practical and rational understanding, particularly when certain religious concepts were presented as rigid doctrines without room for personal interpretation.

How did the speaker view their own religious identity after encountering various Islamic movements?

The speaker's religious identity evolved as they encountered different movements. They realized that they were more interested in a balanced approach to Islam, appreciating both traditional teachings and modern interpretations, while rejecting extreme views that they felt were disconnected from their personal beliefs.