Evaluasi Model CIPP

cahyo hasanudin
31 May 202108:40

Summary

TLDRIn this video, Cahyo Hasanuddin explains the CIPP evaluation model, a comprehensive framework for assessing programs. The model consists of four key evaluations: Context, Input, Process, and Product, each serving a unique purpose in improving program effectiveness. He discusses the characteristics, working steps, advantages, and potential drawbacks of the model, highlighting its thorough approach. The video also offers recommendations based on the success level of a program, suggesting improvements, quality enhancements, or expansion based on the evaluation results. This model is presented as a valuable tool for decision-making and program development.

Takeaways

  • 😀 CIPP is a comprehensive evaluation model that assesses four key areas: Context, Input, Process, and Product.
  • 😀 The model is useful for evaluating programs and can help improve planning, decision-making, and continuous program development.
  • 😀 Context evaluation focuses on identifying needs, problems, assets, and opportunities to set clear goals and priorities.
  • 😀 Input evaluation helps determine the necessary resources, strategies, and procedures to achieve program goals effectively.
  • 😀 Process evaluation assesses the implementation of the program and helps identify areas for improvement.
  • 😀 Product evaluation measures the success of the program by comparing outcomes with the set objectives.
  • 😀 The CIPP model is considered the most complete model of evaluation because it covers all aspects of a program's development and performance.
  • 😀 The strengths of the CIPP model include its comprehensive approach, ability to provide feedback, and usefulness in decision-making.
  • 😀 The CIPP model can also contribute to improving and developing a program by providing valuable data for future planning.
  • 😀 A limitation of the CIPP model is that evaluator perspectives may sometimes differ from decision-makers, affecting program planning.
  • 😀 Recommendations based on the CIPP evaluation should be tailored according to the level of program success: low, moderate, or high.

Q & A

  • What is the CIPP evaluation model?

    -The CIPP evaluation model is a comprehensive evaluation model that assesses four key areas: Context, Input, Process, and Product. It is considered one of the most complete models for evaluating programs.

  • What are the four main components of the CIPP model?

    -The four main components of the CIPP model are Context Evaluation, Input Evaluation, Process Evaluation, and Product Evaluation.

  • What is the purpose of Context Evaluation in the CIPP model?

    -Context Evaluation is designed to assess the needs, problems, assets, and opportunities to help policymakers set priorities and goals, and guide other stakeholders in determining objectives and potential outcomes.

  • What does Input Evaluation aim to achieve in the CIPP model?

    -Input Evaluation helps decision-makers organize and determine the resources, strategies, and procedures needed to achieve the program’s goals. It evaluates the feasibility of the planned approach and resources.

  • What is the focus of Process Evaluation in the CIPP model?

    -Process Evaluation focuses on collecting data to assess how well the program is being implemented. It identifies whether the program is being carried out as planned and what adjustments may be necessary.

  • How does Product Evaluation contribute to the CIPP model?

    -Product Evaluation assesses the success of the program in achieving its intended goals. It helps to determine whether the program should continue, be modified, or terminated based on its outcomes.

  • What are the strengths of the CIPP model of evaluation?

    -The strengths of the CIPP model include its comprehensive approach, as it evaluates not just outcomes but also context, inputs, and processes. It aids in program improvement, informs decision-making, and provides feedback for ongoing program development.

  • What are the weaknesses or limitations of the CIPP model?

    -A potential weakness of the CIPP model is that evaluators' perspectives may differ from decision-makers’ views, leading to disagreements on program components. Additionally, the focus on program outcomes might not always be aligned with the broader evaluation goals.

  • What factors should be considered when making recommendations based on the CIPP model?

    -Recommendations should be based on the evaluation of the program's success level, whether it is low, moderate, or high. For low success, improvements to planning and strategy are recommended, while for higher success, the focus should be on enhancing or expanding the program.

  • What role does feedback play in the CIPP model?

    -Feedback in the CIPP model is crucial for informing stakeholders about the effectiveness of the program and guiding necessary adjustments. It supports continuous improvement and ensures that programs are responsive to the needs of the participants and stakeholders.

Outlines

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Mindmap

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Keywords

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Highlights

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Transcripts

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
CIPP ModelEvaluationProgram PlanningEducational ToolsAssessmentImprovementStrategyProgram DesignDecision MakingFeedback