Kesadaran : Bukan Pencerahan namun MENERIMA KEGELAPAN - ENDARKMEN

Summary

This transcript delves into the philosophical contrast between light and darkness. The speaker challenges the conventional association of light with life and divinity, proposing that true enlightenment may actually reside in darkness. They introduce the concept of 'endakmen,' representing a process of 'darkening' or embracing the unknown rather than seeking light. Through personal reflections and spiritual experiences, the speaker explores how darkness encompasses everything, while light merely defines and divides. The discussion encourages a shift in perspective, inviting an exploration of darkness as a source of wisdom and connection.

Takeaways

• 😀 The concept of light is often linked to life, while darkness is associated with death. However, the speaker suggests that the true nature of the world is dark, not light.
• 😀 The speaker explains that in spiritual teachings (e.g., SNS), divinity is often described as total darkness, not light. Light is only a product of atoms colliding and exploding.
• 😀 In many religious and philosophical traditions, light symbolizes divinity, but the speaker finds this odd, arguing that divinity is better understood as darkness.
• 😀 The speaker suggests that the true essence of divinity and existence is found in darkness, as light only appears against a dark backdrop (e.g., when the sun rises).
• 😀 The idea of searching for enlightenment through light is criticized by the speaker, who advocates instead for 'darkening' or exploring the depths of darkness.
• 😀 The term 'enlightenment' is rejected, with the speaker coining the new term 'endakment' to describe the process of embracing darkness instead of light.
• 😀 Darkness is often feared and associated with evil (e.g., demons, ghosts) in various cultures, but the speaker argues that darkness is all-encompassing and neutral.
• 😀 In complete darkness, all things blend together, with no distinctions between objects, which is seen as a unifying force.
• 😀 Light, on the other hand, is seen as something that creates separation and form, offering distinctions between different objects (e.g., different types of cars).
• 😀 The speaker encourages others to experiment and become comfortable with darkness, using personal experiences (such as trying to summon spirits in a dark room) to challenge the fear of darkness.

Q & A

What is the symbolic significance of light and darkness in the script?

In the script, light is often associated with life, whereas darkness is symbolized as death. However, the speaker challenges this view by suggesting that the true nature of existence is rooted in darkness, rather than light.

How does the speaker describe the essence of divinity or spirituality?

The speaker describes divinity or spirituality as being linked to complete darkness rather than light. According to the speaker, divinity represents a total absence of light, contrasting with common beliefs that associate divinity with light.

Why does the speaker reject the idea of enlightenment being about light?

The speaker rejects the idea of enlightenment as being about light because light is a product of a physical phenomenon, like the collision of atoms. Instead, they suggest that true enlightenment comes from 'darkness,' or what they term 'penggelapan,' a deeper form of spiritual understanding.

What is the term 'penggelapan' that the speaker proposes?

'Penggelapan' is a new term coined by the speaker to describe a form of enlightenment or awakening that arises from embracing darkness rather than seeking light. It challenges traditional ideas of enlightenment, which often focus on seeking illumination or clarity.

What does the speaker mean when they say darkness is all-encompassing?

The speaker suggests that in true darkness, there is no distinction or separation—everything blends together. In total darkness, one cannot differentiate between objects, similar to how light shapes perception by creating boundaries and forms.

How does the speaker describe the impact of light on perception?

The speaker states that light provides boundaries and shapes perceptions. While darkness is uniform and undifferentiated, light allows for distinctions between objects and creates visible forms, thus separating the world into categories.

What is the relationship between 'penggelapan' and traditional spiritual beliefs?

'Penggelapan' contrasts with traditional spiritual beliefs that emphasize light as a symbol of purity, goodness, and divinity. The speaker introduces 'penggelapan' as a deeper, more nuanced approach to spiritual growth that focuses on embracing darkness rather than merely seeking light.

How does the speaker relate personal experiences with darkness to spiritual practice?

The speaker refers to personal experiences, like being in a dark room, as part of a process of connecting with darkness. They mention cultural practices where darkness is used to invoke spiritual experiences, challenging the fear associated with darkness by suggesting it can be a comfortable and enlightening space.

What does the speaker imply about traditional fears associated with darkness?

The speaker implies that darkness is often feared, with cultural traditions associating it with negative forces like ghosts or spirits. However, the speaker challenges this view, suggesting that darkness should be embraced and explored rather than feared.

How does the speaker suggest people approach the concept of darkness in their own spiritual practices?

The speaker encourages a new approach where individuals should 'befriend' darkness rather than fearing it. They suggest experimenting with darkness in a safe space to experience its potential for personal transformation, implying that true spiritual insight may arise from embracing this often-overlooked aspect of existence.