민주당 대책위 입장문 , 유동규 법정진술 난리났다! 박찬대 집요하다! 이재명 수사 뒤집히나?

Summary

The video is abnormal, and we are working hard to fix it.
Please replace the link and try again.

Takeaways

• 😡 The Democratic Party issued an emergency statement criticizing the prosecution's political oppression and investigation fabrication.
• 😞 A key witness testified that prosecutors coerced him to change his testimony by promising not to detain him.
• 🤔 The witness heard from prosecutors that they would not detain him if he changed his testimony against Lee Jae-myung.
• 😠 The Democratic Party accused prosecutors of using investigations and trials to remove political opponents.
• 😤 The Party warned the prosecution would be held responsible for misusing its power.
• 😕 A Democratic Party leader said a key witness recently testified prosecutors pressured him.
• 😳 The witness said he changed his testimony because prosecutors promised not to detain him.
• 🤨 This suggests prosecutors fabricated testimony to accuse Lee Jae-myung.
• 😡 If true, this is a national disgrace and shows prosecutors manipulating investigations.
• 😠 The prosecution's misconduct under Yoon Suk-yeol must face judgement.

Q & A

What did the Democratic Party emergency committee release over the weekend?

The Democratic Party's committee on responding to the prosecutorial dictatorship and political oppression released a statement on February 27th.

What did Yoo Dong-gyu reveal in his testimony?

Yoo Dong-gyu revealed that he heard from Nam Wook that the reason his testimony changed was because the prosecution team had a policy of not detaining him.

What did the Democratic Party accuse the prosecution of doing?

The Democratic Party accused the prosecution of using detention as a means of enticement and intimidation to make witnesses change their testimonies.

What did Park Chan-dae say about the recent trial revelations?

Park Chan-dae said the trial revealed the prosecution's enticement and pressure on a key witness, since the prosecution relied solely on witness statements without presenting physical evidence.

What did Yoo Dong-gyu testify about Nam Wook's changed testimony?

Yoo Dong-gyu testified that he heard from Nam Wook himself that the reason his testimony changed was due to the prosecution's policy to not detain him.

What is the implication of Yoo Dong-gyu's testimony?

The implication is that the prosecution made an improper deal with Nam Wook to coerce his testimony against Lee Jae-myung.

Why did the head prosecutor Kim resign recently?

It is speculated that Kim resigned to avoid responsibility, given the changing testimonies and insufficient evidence in the case.

How has news coverage of Lee Jae-myung changed recently?

News coverage critical of Lee Jae-myung from the prosecution has dramatically decreased compared to before.

What does this situation reveal about the prosecution?

It reveals the prosecution's politicized investigations and trial tactics to target opponents without conclusive evidence.

What potential impact could this have on the prosecution?

The improper investigation tactics could further discredit the prosecution and lead to calls for reform and accountability.