AP Seminar Performace Task 2: Transitioning to the Individual Multimedia Presentation (IMP)

Summary

In this educational video, Mrs. Malloy guides seminar students through the transition from their Individual Written Assignment (IWA) to the Individual Multimedia Presentation (IMP). She emphasizes the importance of transforming the written argument into a concise, persuasive presentation suitable for an audience, focusing on key points and evidence within a time limit. The video covers the presentation's structure, design, delivery, and the subsequent oral defense, offering strategies for effective communication and engaging the audience. It also outlines the criteria for scoring the IMP, highlighting the need for a clear, logically organized argument with credible evidence and a compelling conclusion.

Takeaways

• 📚 The Individual Multimedia Presentation (IMP) is a transition from the Individual Written Assignment (IWA), requiring students to transform their argument for a presentation format.
• 🔍 Understanding the task of the IMP is crucial for effective transformation of the argument, ensuring it fits within the time limit and presentation medium.
• ✂️ The transformation process involves narrowing down the scope of the argument to key points and evidence, refining it for the multimedia presentation.
• 📈 Designing the presentation involves creating visually appealing and purposeful slides that enhance the argument and are geared towards the audience's understanding.
• ⏱️ Time management is key; the presentation should be delivered within a 6 to 8-minute time frame, excluding the oral defense.
• 🎯 Scoring for the IMP is similar to the IWA, focusing on understanding, analysis, logical organization, evidence incorporation, and argument establishment.
• 🗣️ The presentation should be conversational and engaging, avoiding a monotone recitation of the IWA.
• 📑 The presentation should include a title, context for significance, research question, main claim, key claims and evidence, and citations.
• 🤔 The oral defense requires students to reflect on their research process and establish arguments in response to specific questions, demonstrating engagement with the material.
• 📝 Authenticity in the oral defense is emphasized, with students encouraged to think deeply about their answers rather than preparing scripted responses.
• 📝 The importance of logically organizing the presentation to ensure the audience can follow the argument, as they have no written material to refer back to.

Q & A

What is the main purpose of the Individual Multimedia Presentation (IMP)?

The main purpose of the IMP is to transform a student's written argument from their Individual Written Assignment (IWA) into a concise and persuasive multimedia presentation suitable for an oral defense and within a specified time limit.

Why is it necessary to transform the argument from paper to presentation?

Transformation is necessary because the presentation format requires a different approach. It must be engaging, visually appealing, and tailored to fit within a time constraint, ensuring that the argument is clear and convincing to the audience.

What are the key components that should be included in the IMP?

Key components include a title, context for significance, research question, main claim, key claims and supporting evidence, oral and written citations, discussion of strengths, limitations, and implications, and a conclusion or summary.

How should the evidence in the IMP differ from the evidence in the IWA?

In the IMP, students should select the strongest pieces of evidence that support their key claims. The evidence should be presented in a way that enhances the audience's understanding and does not simply repeat the IWA content.

What is the time limit for delivering the IMP?

The presentation should be delivered within a 6 to 8-minute time frame, ensuring that the argument is concise and focused.

How does the scoring for the IMP relate to the IWA?

The scoring for the IMP is similar to the IWA, focusing on understanding and analyzing context, logical organization, persuasive argumentation, synthesis of evidence, and alignment of the presentation. It also includes the ability to engage the audience and present conversationally.

What is the significance of oral and written citations in the IMP?

Oral and written citations are crucial as they provide credibility and relevance to the argument. They should be integrated naturally into the presentation to support claims and enhance the audience's understanding.

How should the presentation design contribute to the argument?

The presentation design should be visually appealing and purposeful, enhancing the argument by making it more clear, accessible, and convincing. Slides should align with talking points and support the audience's understanding of the argument.

What is the role of the oral defense in the IMP process?

The oral defense is a part of the IMP process where students answer specific questions related to their presentation. It assesses the student's ability to reflect on their research and establish arguments supported by relevant and specific evidence.

How should students prepare for the oral defense questions?

Students should prepare by thoroughly understanding their research and the process they went through to create their IMP. They should be able to articulate detailed responses and explain the significance of their inquiry using relevant and specific details.

Outlines

00:00

📚 Transitioning from IWA to IMP

Mrs. Malloy introduces the Individual Multimedia Presentation (IMP) process to AP Seminar students. She emphasizes the importance of understanding the task of transforming the written argument from the Investigative Writing Assignment (IWA) into a concise and effective multimedia presentation suitable for an oral defense. The focus is on refining the argument to fit within a time limit and making sure the transformation process retains the depth and convincing nature of the original argument.

05:01

🎯 Scoring Rubric and Task Overview

The speaker outlines the scoring criteria for the IMP, drawing parallels to the IWA. Key aspects include setting up a research question with value and complexity, logically organizing the argument, using evidence persuasively, synthesizing relevant evidence from multiple perspectives, and presenting detailed resolutions or solutions. The presentation design should enhance audience understanding, and the delivery should be conversational. The speaker also highlights the importance of planning the presentation content and organization.

10:01

📈 Designing the Multimedia Presentation

The paragraph discusses the components that should be included in the IMP slideshow. It stresses the need for a clear title, context for significance, research question, and main claim. The presentation should focus on key claims and supporting evidence, avoiding the inclusion of the entire paper. Oral and written citations are crucial for credibility, and the presentation should discuss the strengths, limitations, and implications of the argument. The conclusion or summary should align with the initial claims, potentially including a call to action.

15:01

🧠 Organization and Delivery of the Presentation

This section emphasizes the importance of logical organization in presentations, as the audience relies solely on the information provided by the presenter. Visual cues and transitional phrases are recommended to guide the audience through the argument. The presenter should avoid expecting the audience to read and listen simultaneously, ensuring that the delivery is accessible and comprehensible. The focus is on making the argument cohesive and easy to follow for the audience.

20:02

🗣 Preparing for Oral Defense

The final paragraph focuses on preparing for the oral defense portion of the IMP. It explains the importance of reflecting on the process and providing detailed, specific responses to questions. The speaker advises against preparing pre-scripted answers, instead encouraging students to engage authentically with the questions based on their experiences throughout the project. The goal is to demonstrate a deep understanding of the work done and the ability to articulate the significance of the inquiry.

Keywords

💡Individual Multimedia Presentation (IMP)

The IMP is the central focus of the video, referring to a student's task to transform their written argument into a multimedia format suitable for oral presentation. It is a key part of the academic process described, where students must condense and adapt their lengthy written work for a different medium, ensuring clarity and persuasiveness within a time constraint. The script emphasizes the importance of this transformation, noting that it is not merely a matter of reading the written work but involves a thoughtful adaptation to the presentation format.

💡Transformation

Transformation is a pivotal concept in the video, highlighting the process of converting a written argument into a presentation format. It is not about simply transferring content from paper to slides but involves strategic refinement to fit the multimedia format and time limitations. The script uses this term to emphasize the active and thoughtful changes students must make to their arguments to ensure they are effectively communicated to an audience.

💡Argument

The term 'argument' in the video refers to the main claim or thesis that a student is presenting, which is derived from their written work (IWA). The argument must be clearly defined, with supporting sub-claims and evidence. The script discusses the importance of narrowing down the scope of the argument to key points for the presentation, maintaining its depth and persuasiveness while being concise.

💡Scope

Scope, in the context of the video, pertains to the limits of what a student can cover in their IMP. Given the time constraints, students must select the most critical aspects of their argument to include in their presentation. The script advises students to focus on key points and evidence to ensure the presentation remains compelling and does not lose depth.

💡Design

Design in the video refers to the visual and structural composition of the presentation slides or multimedia elements. It is important that the design enhances the argument, making it clearer and more accessible to the audience. The script mentions that while visual appeal is considered, the primary focus should be on how the design aids in delivering a stronger argument.

💡Practice

Practice is highlighted in the video as an essential step in preparing for the IMP. Students are advised to rehearse their presentations to ensure they can deliver their argument within the allotted time of six to eight minutes. The script stresses the importance of not going into the presentation unprepared, as this could lead to a disjointed or rushed delivery.

💡Oral Defense

Oral defense is the final component of the IMP process, where students answer questions about their presentation. The script outlines that there will be two specific questions related to reflection and argument establishment. This part of the process assesses the student's understanding and ability to articulate their research question, argument, and the significance of their inquiry.

💡Rubric

The rubric mentioned in the video is the grading criteria used to assess the IMP. It includes various rows or categories that evaluate different aspects of the presentation, such as understanding and analyzing context, logical organization, use of evidence, and alignment of the argument. The script provides an overview of what is assessed in each category to help students understand how they will be scored.

💡Citations

Citations in the video refer to the references and sources used to support the student's argument. The script emphasizes the importance of including oral or written citations to lend credibility to the argument and to clarify the meaning of presented evidence. Citations should be integrated naturally into the presentation, rather than being an afterthought or附录.

💡Logically Organized

Being 'logically organized' is a key aspect of the IMP, as it helps the audience follow the argument being presented. The script explains that unlike written work, where readers can reread sentences, presentation audiences rely solely on what is said and shown. Therefore, it is crucial for the presentation to be structured in a way that guides the audience through the argument clearly and coherently.

Highlights

Transition from Iwa to Imp and oral defense process

Understanding the task of the IMP is crucial for effective transformation of the argument

Transformation from paper to presentation involves narrowing down the scope and focusing on key points and evidence

Designing a presentation includes creating visually appealing and purposeful slides to enhance the argument

Practice is essential to ensure the presentation fits within the 6-8 minute time frame

Scoring criteria for the IMP parallels Iwa assessment with a focus on argument presentation and evidence synthesis

Incorporate and synthesize relevant evidence from multiple perspectives to develop the argument

Align the presentation with the main claim and ensure the conclusion considers limitations and implications

Engage the audience through design and conversational presentation style

Plan the multimedia presentation to include a title, context, research question, and main claim

Select key claims and supporting evidence for the presentation to maintain argument depth

Include oral and written citations to enhance credibility and relevance of the argument

Discuss the strengths, limitations, and implications of the argument for complexity and conviction

Use visual cues and transitional phrases to guide the audience through the argument logically

Ensure the audience can follow the argument by avoiding distractions and being logically organized

Prepare for the oral defense by reflecting on the process and being ready to answer specific questions

Authentic responses in the oral defense are preferred over pre-scripted answers

The importance of understanding the task for a successful transformation and presentation of the argument

Transcripts

hey ap seminar students it is mrs malloy

and i am here today

to talk to you about the imp

or the individual multimedia

presentation

so we are at that point in the process

where we can transition

from your iwa to your imp

and oral defense so it is very exciting

more specifically what are we going to

learn today

well today we're going to focus on

understanding the task of the imp

because clearly understanding the task

ensures that you can

effectively transform your argument to

make it suitable for

presenting and possible within the time

limit that we're going to have as it

pertains to

the inp so if you remember in this

process that we started at the beginning

of these videos we have come

a long way but now we're at the place

where we're going to transform your

argument from paper to presentation

and one of the words that you've heard

me say multiple times now is transform

because this is not a matter of just

your paper being ready

to present we have to really work on

transformation so

today we'll talk about transforming our

argument from paper to presentation

we'll talk about the actual um creation

and a little bit about the delivery of

your presentation and then we'll talk

about the oral defense

okay so task overview

what we are not doing here is reading

your iwa

so many students think well i'm just

going to get my paper

i'm going to cut it up or put it on note

cards and then i've already written it

so my argument's already there

that is not what you are going to do

that is not the task itself rather the

task can be

divided or separated into a few sections

the first thing we have to do is go back

to your iwa

and i know for some of you at this point

oh i've spent so much time on my iwa

and it seems like so many words but it's

not right it's somewhere around

2000 words so it's not that much to dig

back through

but you also should have done a good job

at the beginning of this process

when we encouraged you to make an

outline you have an outline of your

argument

you have the paper of your argument so

between those two things

as you're reviewing you need to define

your argument

2000 words is a lot more than you're

gonna have

um time for in your individual

multi-presentation or multimedia

presentation

so after you go back and review your

argument the goal is to make sure you

know what's your main claim

main idea argument what are those sub

claims or reasons what evidence do i

want to use

we need to then narrow down the scope to

those key points and evidence

so some students will say well i have

three claims and two counter claims in

my long

iwa but maybe you only have time for in

your presentation

two claims and one counter claim because

you really want to cover them in depth

so this is an

actual transformation process that has

to happen because you have to narrow

down

to those key points and those key pieces

of evidence

you don't want your argument to lose any

depth

or any of its convincing nature

so we want to be really really

thoughtful and careful about this

process it's going to take you time

after you narrow down the scope of your

argument you've refined it you know what

those key points and evidence are

you're actually the next step is to

design your presentation

we want to think about things that we

thought about with the tmp we want

slides that are visually appealing

but that's not most important what's

most important is that the slides are

going to

enhance our argument for our readers

these slides are not for you as a

speaker they are for your audience

anything that can make your argument

more clear more accessible

um or just more convincing that's what

we're putting on those slides they

should align with our talking points but

they should be purposeful in what they

can do to help

the audience you then want to make sure

you practice your presentation

you do not want to go into this

presentation having not rehearsed it at

all

and then you're going to deliver that

presentation

in six to eight minutes just like the

tmp you are given a time range

so in the tmp you had eight to ten

minutes in the individual it's just

you presenting by yourself but you will

have six to eight

minutes anything after the eight minute

mark is not going to count so it's

really really important that you take

that transformation process seriously

so by the time you get to practicing

you're not running a

25 minute presentation and trying to

cram it into six to eight minutes we

don't want that

we want you to present an argument in

those six to eight minutes

so as you're practicing it make sure

that you are keeping an eye

on time you'll deliver your presentation

in six to eight minutes

then your time will stop your teacher

will then follow up by asking you two

specific world defense questions and

we'll talk more about each of these

steps as we go through the process

but this overview is what the task

entails

so how are you going to be scored and

again

i'm going to give you big picture here

because you don't want me to sit here

um and talk you through this and then

not have time to actually talk you

through the process but we just need to

understand

big picture what's being assessed in

each of these rows so

a lot of this is going to look very

similar to your iwa which is really

exciting because it

it makes it um more accessible um

for you as you're thinking about what i

did for the other tasks the iwa and what

i'm doing for the imp it's just some

some

transformation like we talked about so

to get to that high score on row

one which talks about understand and

analyze context

what we're looking at here is that

you're setting up your research question

um with value and complexity so what we

want you to do to get a high score is to

tell us what your research question is

tell us why it matters

but also make sure that you're connected

to the stimulus material so somewhere

within your argument we still want to

see you using the stimulus

material like you would have in your

paper

that's going to be important and we we

want to be able to see its connection

so if you feel like you are weakly

connected you may need to take a little

bit more time to establish your theme

but if you're clearly connected then

again we're really just focused on your

use of the stimulus material within

your argument for row two to get that

high score

this is going to feel very similar to

what you did in the iwa

we're looking at the presentation um in

terms of the argument that you're making

that your presentation is logically

organized it's well reasoned and it's

complex

and which we just talked about in one of

the past videos

that it persuasively is connecting

evidence to claims

um to establish a clear and convincing

argument so this is all about your

ability to argue and to convince us

okay does your argument feel um focused

and narrow and complex

and organized all the things that your

paper should have been

then when we look at row 3 that is your

incorporation

and they use the word here synthesis of

relevant

evidence from multiple perspectives so

are you using multiple sources that are

credible relevant do you have a

sufficient amount of evidence

and then are you using those sources to

develop your argument

okay and really when we're looking at

synthesis is what we've talked about

before

is your argument in control of the

presentation or are we veering into it

feeling more

about sources and not about your

argument because everything here

like those two rows to establish an

argument to support and develop an

argument

so we're seeing that argument play a key

role here

for row four it goes back to establish

argument and now we're looking at

alignment the presentation

offers detailed plausible resolutions

conclusions and or solutions

and it's considering the limitations

implications of any of those

so really we want to see the complexity

number one we want to see that your

paper is aligned

you said you were arguing this this was

your research question main claim

is that really consistent throughout so

by the time you get to the conclusion

everything feels aligned and consistent

right if you argue for position paper

now is not the time to add a solution so

you really just need to know your goal

the other thing that we want to do is we

want to consider those limitations and

implications

of the argument or the conclusion being

very complex with what we're doing so we

can

ensure that you know we are being

thoughtful because if you're trying to

convince someone you want to really

think about the limitations or the

boundaries in which your argument

has to live okay um

when we look at five and six these are

very similar to the tmp

so to get to the high score and engage

audience for row five

this is looking at your design the

selection and emphasis of information

that you're including

what are you doing to enhance this

information for

your audience um because that's the key

word that we're really going to think

about in this row is that the design

what you're putting on your slides it's

not just there to hang out in the

background because you wanted to talk

about happiness and so you put a smiley

face

no this should be purposeful and it

should help enhance the understanding of

the audience

and then um for row six we're looking at

your ability to present

we do not want you to sound like

pre-recorded robots

we want you to be conversational now i

understand that some of you this year

are going to be presented we're

presenting virtually that's what my

students are going to have to do

some of you will be home but those

techniques are still the same

while you guys are watching this video

you probably notice that i talk with my

hands because i do it all the time

but if i start doing this while i'm

presenting that becomes distracting

and so we want to think about the same

things if i was standing up in front of

the classroom

how i would use my hands to gesture how

i would make eye contact

how i would vary my voice those are the

things where we want you to sound

conversational

we do not want you to get up there and

then read

to us in a very monotone way that seems

like

you have practiced this so many times

right you're bored i'm bored we don't

want that so be

conversational that's what we're looking

at but we can judge your ability to

present

over a screen as well as we can do it in

person okay

so let's talk about the planning of your

presentation

so your individual multimedia

presentation

the actual slideshow itself or whatever

format you're using to present

should include a few things the first of

which is a title we want to make it very

clear

to our audience what the focus of our

presentation is going to be

we also need to include our context for

significance so like

why does this topic matter what's the

value here

what's the point of tension use evidence

to do that

our research question and again why our

research question matters

and then our objective or purpose or

main claim

what are you going to argue or how are

you going to try to convince us

right is it a position um or is it a

solution

and that name claim should really be the

same main claim that you had in your iwa

because that's the focus of all of this

okay

then the difference between the iwa and

the imt is now we can't include the

entire paper

um so we need to pick out those key

claims and those strongest pieces of

supporting evidence

to then make our claims because what we

don't want again is to just read the

paper

there's too much there we want to make

sure that we're picking out those key

claims so that our argument

isn't becoming less convincing it's

still as complex as it could be but we

just can't include all of the pieces

that we have so if you are making a

point and you have four pieces of

evidence maybe there's only three that

you get to include

um for your presentation but you're

going to have to do the work you're the

one who's transforming this

we also want to make sure that we have

oral and written citations

and that's really really important

because if you've ever listened to a

presentation a ted talk

um or any kind of report that you see on

tv

what we see a lot of times is not that

people are like

you know 100 of the kids who had recess

in elementary school are happier than

the kids that didn't

what the heck does that mean right one

who says that

because we need to know the credibility

the relevance right

you need to be giving those tags so that

we know what that means

right according to bernie sanders and

then i can talk about

why right according to elizabeth warren

student debt should be

um forgiven because when you throw in

those

oral or written citations you can put

them on the screen itself but a lot of

times it makes more sense to actually

say them

because those citations give your

argument instant

credibility when it comes to the

audience if they are sources that have

credibility

right we don't want to be told stuff

especially in a world with so much

misinformation

and people who try to manipulate

information to say whatever they want

we have to really make sure that we

vetted and that's the way that we prove

to the audience that this is what it

means

okay so really make sure you have those

citations don't just save them until

your reference page or works cited at

the end

because kids do that and then they're

like oh here's a bunch of little tiny

citations splash and then they're done

they're not really being a natural part

of your argument like they should be

like they are in your paper we also want

to make sure we're discussing the

strengths limitations and implications

of our argument

but that sometimes comes with our

individual reasons as well

because that's where we get the

complexity that's how you convince

people

that your claim and your argument is

valid

you have to be fair and well-rounded in

addressing both the positives and the

negatives

and then you want to come back to a

conclusion or summary here

that is aligned with what you said you

were doing i also like to include

possibly a call to action but that's not

adding something new it's just saying if

we were to continue

this work after your presentation what's

the next step where do we go from here

um but it's not necessarily adding

anything new it's just giving us

some kind of direction or hope for where

we go okay

so these are all the things that you

need to include how you do that what

that looks like it's up to you

but we are not going to just put these

all

um just you know copy parts of our paper

and throw big paragraphs on a slide

that's not what we're doing here

so now that we've talked through what

needs to be included in terms of content

now we need to think about how we're

going to

organize our presentation and the reason

that this is so

important is because although in your

paper

your readers can go back to your words

and they can reread a sentence if it

doesn't make sense

for a presentation your argument is

what you say is all that the audience

can take away so logically organized in

your paper is helping

them because there's so much text to

look at so it's helpful when we

organize things so they can see

alignment and how things connect but

when it comes to your presentation

it's really important that you be

logically organized because what you say

is all the audience has to go off of as

they're trying to make sense of the

argument that you're making so it's

really really important that we be

logically organized

and so if you've ever thought about what

it's like to be in a classroom

with a teacher and i'm sure we all have

experience with that right whether it's

over a screen or in an actual classroom

your teachers do a really good job of

accounting for the fact that they are

presenting

information to you and so anything that

they are saying orally

they think about all of the things where

you might be distracted or you might

forget that something is there and so

we want to do the same thing in our

presentation to make sure that we are

logically organized and giving the

audience a chance

to actually follow the argument that we

are making

so the first thing that we want to do is

use visual clues to

visual cues to guide the audience

through our argument

so rather than say this is my claim and

just have the word

claim on a slide why don't we actually

give them

the claim and put that out there right

the united states

needs universal basic income because

right and so

if i can't write out a whole sentence

because that feels like a lot maybe i

can put

ubi equals and then um

you know it stimulates the economy or it

helps make sure people

have the basic necessities whatever

that's looking

like the more specific i can be on my

slide

for the information i want the audience

to take away

the more organized i'm being but the

more i can ensure that the information

that i want them to leave my

presentation with or my argument with

that they actually have okay the next

thing is that

we can't expect our audience to read the

text and listen to words at the same

time

now you might be thinking well you you

just clicked on that while you talked

about it

but i explained it to you so i didn't

expect you to read it

but if you weren't paying attention to

me now it's on the screen so you can go

back and do that

what we see often in presentations is

sometimes people will put up a quote

and they're like okay you guys read this

quote and i'm going to keep talking

about my argument because i'm running

out of time

and i feel like i just need to keep

going but i'm going to expect you to do

two things at the same time

that becomes distracting to your

audience if your audience needs to hear

it

tell it to them if you want them to read

something

pause for a second have them read it and

then you need to tell us

why you paused and we needed to read

that information

the audience's job is not to make sense

of your argument it's not to

um try to put together the pieces of

your argument

you have to expect that the audience is

only taking away whatever

information you are giving them so if

you want them to hear something

don't be distracting and ask them to

read something at the same time

that you are asking them to listen to

what you're saying

okay we also want to use transitional

phrases as we speak to indicate to the

audience where you

are in the audience or in the argument

and so one of the great things about

doing that is those transitions also

give us

those clues to what we're actually what

we've been saying so if someone has

drifted off for a second we can remind

them by saying

as we as this claim proves but instead

of saying this claim

as we saw with universal basic incomes

ability to

create equality when it comes to

marginalized groups it also can so now

we're starting to see that connection of

hey i'm reminding you of the point that

we made previously

but now i can connect it to the point

that i'm making so i can start to build

cohesion between my argument

but also make it so that you as the

audience can see

how the parts of my argument are working

together simple transitions are also

effective when you say things like

next right those terms help us see in

addition to

those kind of things build your argument

up again the big takeaway when it comes

to your presentation the delivery as

well as the content

is that you are responsible for any

information you want your audience to

take away

they have nothing to go off of but what

you put on the slide

and what you say so everything on that

slide

needs to be in the function or the

purpose of enhancing

the understanding of the audience and

making your argument

accessible logically organized and

comprehensible right we want them to be

able to

know what you're saying but big picture

see how all of the parts are working

together so the

last part of this process is the oral

defense

after you've put together the imp we're

now going to prepare for

our oral defense so on the rubric there

are two rows that align for the oral

defense

the first row is going to ask you

questions that ask you to reflect and

the second row is going to ask you to

establish arguments and so if we look at

the high score the oral defense

articulates a detailed response to a

question

supported by relevant and specific

evidence and we see

for row two the order the oral defense

explains the significance of the inquiry

using relevant and specific details to

the context of the question

so what's really important to get high

scores here is you answer the question

that's being asked

and that you make your answers specific

enough that they don't feel like they

could apply

to just anything that exists we want it

to apply to this

specific process or project okay

so here on the screen you will see and

feel free to

pause this video if you want to look at

the oral defense questions

these are examples of questions that

your teachers may ask you they cannot

tell you in advance what those questions

are but we'll talk about this on the

next slide of

how we're going to answer them okay so

let's say that your teacher

asks you um what information did you

need that you weren't able to find or

locate

okay um we want to as we answer those

questions we want to

listen listen to the question being

asked

so we can pause before we respond

if any of you ever become celebrities or

important

um in any kind of world and have to do

an interview maybe you've already done

these so far

they will not air you know journalists

are not going to air

dead air so they count on people

in the spotlight or people they're

interviewing to speak first so that they

have

right i'm not a crook right those kinds

of things because if you pause

you don't make mistakes it's the same

thing here

your teacher is okay it's actually

recommended that you hear the question

and you take a second and think

now we're not going to take 10 minutes

to figure out the answer to these

questions because these questions are

so obvious for you if you've reflected

the entire

process like if you've truly engaged

these questions are easy points for you

to give

authentic answers for what you've done

throughout the process so you're going

to listen

you pause then you're going to respond

okay but really think about what you're

going to say

before you respond now one of the

misconceptions that students have and

i'm going to flash back to the last

screen

is that they think when i see these

questions because they already

exist i should have my answers already

done

i should get out a note card and on

paper i should write what i would say

for every answer

that's not authentic and that totally is

against the process

why do you need to prepare answers for

things that you already know

right what we want you to do is show off

your thinking here and to reflect on

what you've already done we don't want

you to walk in with pre-scripted answers

where you're like oh question three let

me grab that note card okay here's my

answer

because that's not what we want we want

you to be prepared so that

you understand what's being asked in

each of these questions that's why we

give you the questions in advance we

don't give them to you

so you can write out the answers we also

don't want to give

garbage answers so what information did

you find that you weren't able to find

or locate let's say i answer that

well i had a really hard time finding

sources because

i was really busy so a lot of the

information was really hard

um the databases were a little bit

harder to navigate so it was like all of

my information

that is an answer that is very surface

level and isn't true to this

presentation

but instead if you said surprisingly

um they do not i wanted to look at

motivation in high school students

and i noticed through my research that

there's a lot of stuff on the idea of

senioritis

or of motivation as it applies to

college students but i really struggled

to find stuff as it applied to high

school students because

most of the research that already exists

is on this older population and without

this information

i couldn't do these specific things

within my argument

that shows that you're actually engaged

in this process but that's not something

so complex that i needed to be prepared

for it

in advance okay so we're gonna listen

we're gonna pause

and then we're gonna respond and you

will do really well on these oral

defense questions okay

so what's our takeaway from today well

our takeaway

is that hopefully you clearly understand

the task because now that you understand

the task you

understand that you need to transform

your argument

to make it suitable for presenting and

to make sure it's possible within the

time limit

presenting to an audience is very

different than having someone read your

paper

they can't go back and reread certain

points they are only relying on what you

are giving to them

so make your presentation organized

right and focused but also accessible

for an audience

as always thank you for watching we hope

that you have learned a lot from

um performance task two as we walked you

through the process

and i hope you find some joy in your day

bye