Pandangan Gus Baha Tentang HTI dan FPI

Summary

The speaker discusses the complex nature of Islamic organizations, emphasizing that these groups are often formed based on the desire to unite Muslims but may end up creating divisions. The discourse touches on the challenges of unity in the Muslim world, citing examples from Indonesia, Egypt, and Iraq. The speaker also critiques the creation of new organizations for personal agendas, urging adherence to existing groups for the sake of solidarity. Additionally, the speaker reflects on Indonesia’s historical political movements and the impact of democracy, illustrating how ideological conflicts, like those seen in the past, can hinder true unity.

Takeaways

• 😀 Creating new organizations in Islam often leads to division rather than unity, as each group may focus on its own agenda.
• 😀 The speaker warns against being swayed by organizations that claim to unite Muslims but may contribute to fragmentation in reality.
• 😀 Historical organizations like Ikhwanul Muslimin (Muslim Brotherhood) and Ba'ath Party in Egypt and Iraq show how political ideologies can influence religious movements.
• 😀 The formation of new groups in the name of unity can sometimes create more confusion and disunity within the Muslim community.
• 😀 Unity within Islam is best achieved by adhering to core Islamic principles found in the Quran and Sunnah, rather than following the latest political or ideological trends.
• 😀 The speaker emphasizes that the intention behind any movement is important, but the execution must be aligned with Islamic teachings to avoid negative consequences.
• 😀 Soekarno's attempt to unify Indonesia through 'Nasakom' (Nationalism, Islam, and Communism) demonstrates how well-intentioned movements can fail if not well-structured.
• 😀 The Quranic verse 'Wa’atasimu bihablillahi jami'an' (Hold firmly together to the rope of Allah) is cited as a reminder of the importance of unity among Muslims.
• 😀 There is a critical view of creating factions or movements under different names as it adds to the complexity and divisions within the Muslim world.
• 😀 The speaker highlights that both historical and contemporary political events show the dangers of fragmented movements in Islam, urging the community to seek unity in line with Islamic values.

Q & A

What is the main argument presented about religious organizations in the script?

The speaker argues that religious organizations, such as Ikhwan, Baath Party, or Golkar, emerge out of specific historical and societal contexts, often driven by the desire to unite or reform the Muslim community. However, these organizations can also contribute to division when individuals or groups create new ones based on personal grievances or ideological differences.

How does the speaker view the creation of new religious organizations?

The speaker is critical of the creation of new religious organizations, especially when they are formed out of dissatisfaction with existing groups. They suggest that such efforts often lead to further fragmentation and division, rather than unity, among the Muslim community.

What does the speaker say about the concept of unity within Islam?

The speaker emphasizes the importance of unity within Islam, referencing Quranic verses like 'wa'tasimu bihablillahi jami'an wala tafarraqu' (hold fast to the rope of Allah all together and do not divide). They argue that efforts to form separate organizations based on ideological differences only undermine this unity.

What is the speaker's stance on democracy?

The speaker discusses democracy in the context of both Western and Islamic principles, noting that democracy allows individuals to make choices but must be practiced within a framework of laws. They emphasize that people should be free to choose their beliefs and behaviors, but this freedom should not violate others' rights or the established rules of society.

What does the speaker mention about the political history of Indonesia?

The speaker references Indonesia's political history, particularly the formation of organizations like Serikat Islam (Islamic Union) led by HOS Cokroaminoto. These movements were established to counter colonial influence and promote Islamic unity. The speaker also touches upon Soekarno's efforts to unite Indonesia under the concept of 'Nasakom' (Nationalism, Religion, and Communism), highlighting the challenges of balancing unity with ideological diversity.

How does the speaker view the role of Islamic organizations in modern Indonesia?

The speaker sees modern Islamic organizations in Indonesia as important but also cautions that they should not contribute to division. They mention organizations like Muhammadiyah and NU, which play a significant role in societal development, but stress the need for these organizations to focus on unifying rather than fragmenting the Muslim community.

What critique does the speaker offer regarding religious movements or organizations?

The speaker criticizes religious movements or organizations that are formed with the sole purpose of being 'better' than others or driven by personal grievances. They argue that such movements often create more division than unity, failing to serve the greater purpose of Islamic solidarity.

What is the speaker's view on the tension between Islamic law and modern practices?

The speaker highlights the tension between traditional Islamic law (sharia) and modern societal practices, particularly in the context of political and social issues such as polygamy and democracy. They argue that adherence to sharia should remain central, but also acknowledge the complexity of applying it in the contemporary world.

What does the speaker say about the concept of 'Nasakom' in Indonesia's history?

The speaker explains that 'Nasakom' (Nationalism, Religion, and Communism) was an attempt by Soekarno to unite Indonesia under a single national identity. However, the implementation of this concept led to conflict, especially with the inclusion of the Communist Party (PKI), demonstrating the challenges of integrating diverse ideologies into a cohesive political framework.

How does the speaker relate the creation of organizations to personal motivations?

The speaker argues that the creation of new organizations is often driven by personal motivations or ideological dissatisfaction with existing groups. They warn against the temptation to form organizations simply to challenge others or to gain acceptance, as this leads to fragmentation and disunity rather than progress.