Mungkinkah Polisi Indonesia Tak Pegang Pistol? | Narasi Daily

Summary

The video explores the ongoing issue of police shootings in Indonesia, focusing on a recent incident where a student was killed by police. It highlights the troubling frequency of such events, with 35 police shootings and 94 civilian casualties recorded since 2019. The video discusses the regulations governing police use of firearms, the debate over disarming officers, and the cultural and institutional factors that contribute to misuse. Drawing comparisons with countries like Finland and Norway, it calls for stronger oversight, better training, and possible reforms to reduce police violence and improve accountability.

Takeaways

• 😀 The recent shooting of Oktavandi, an SMK student in Semarang, Indonesia, adds to a growing list of police shootings of civilians, raising concerns about the use of firearms by the police.
• 😀 Since 2019, there have been at least 35 incidents of police shootings in Indonesia, resulting in 94 civilian casualties, according to the Indonesian Legal Aid Foundation (YLBHI).
• 😀 Regulations governing the use of firearms by police, such as Perkapolri No. 1/2009 and No. 8/2009, state that firearms should only be used when officers' safety is threatened or when it is necessary to prevent the escape of a dangerous criminal.
• 😀 Some members of the Indonesian House of Representatives have suggested that police officers should no longer be armed with firearms, with the idea gaining support from studies conducted in other countries.
• 😀 19 countries globally do not arm their police officers with firearms, opting instead for non-lethal tools like batons and pepper spray for routine police work.
• 😀 The culture of policing and supervision within law enforcement agencies is a key factor in determining whether officers misuse firearms. Proper oversight and a disciplined culture are essential to preventing abuse.
• 😀 In countries like Finland and Norway, police are not allowed to use firearms without explicit permission from a senior officer, and such regulations are in line with the European Convention on Human Rights.
• 😀 Studies suggest that arming police officers does not necessarily reduce crime but increases the likelihood of fatal shootings by law enforcement.
• 😀 In Indonesia, the lack of strong oversight of police firearm usage, combined with tolerance for violations, exacerbates the problem of abuse and misuse of weapons.
• 😀 Regular checks on weapons and ammunition, as well as ensuring firearms are returned to storage after shifts, are essential to prevent misuse. Certain police units with higher risks, such as anti-crime units, may require firearms, while other units could manage with less lethal options like batons.

Q & A

What recent incident sparked the debate over police use of firearms in Indonesia?

The recent incident involving Oktavandi, a student from Semarang, who was shot and killed by police on November 24, 2024, has sparked renewed discussions about the use of firearms by the police in Indonesia.

How many cases of police shootings involving civilians were recorded between 2019 and 2024 in Indonesia?

Between 2019 and 2024, there were at least 35 incidents of police shootings resulting in the deaths of 94 civilians, according to the Indonesian Legal Aid Foundation (YLBHI).

What regulations govern the use of firearms by Indonesian police officers?

The use of firearms by Indonesian police officers is regulated by Polri Regulations No. 1/2009 and No. 8/2009, which allow officers to use firearms only if their safety is directly threatened, if there are no alternative actions, or to prevent a suspect from fleeing when public safety is at risk.

What is the key issue identified with the current regulation and enforcement of firearm use by Indonesian police?

The key issue is weak enforcement and supervision, with police leadership often failing to strictly oversee and implement the regulations. This has led to misuse of firearms and violations of regulations.

What proposal has been suggested regarding the use of firearms by Indonesian police?

Some members of the Indonesian Parliament's Commission 3 have proposed that police officers should no longer be routinely armed with firearms. Instead, they suggest equipping officers with non-lethal tools such as batons and pepper spray for everyday duties.

How do other countries manage the use of firearms by police officers?

In some countries, such as Finland and Norway, police officers are not allowed to use firearms unless authorized by a senior officer. These countries rely on non-lethal tools like batons and pepper spray for regular police duties, reserving firearms for high-risk situations.

What international examples are referenced in the transcript regarding the disarming of police forces?

The transcript references 19 countries where police officers are not routinely armed with firearms. These countries equip their officers with batons and pepper spray, and firearms are used only in specific, high-risk situations.

What is the relationship between the routine arming of police officers and crime rates?

Studies, including one from Australia, suggest that routinely arming police officers does not correlate with lower crime rates. In fact, it has been linked to an increased likelihood of fatal shootings by police.

What is the cultural challenge regarding the use of firearms by police officers in Indonesia?

The cultural challenge in Indonesia lies in the inconsistent enforcement of regulations and the lack of discipline within the police force. Many officers misuse firearms as a symbol of authority, or to intimidate civilians, rather than using them appropriately for public safety.

What is the potential benefit of not routinely arming police officers in Indonesia?

Not routinely arming police officers could reduce the likelihood of fatal shootings, improve public trust in law enforcement, and align with international best practices where police are equipped with non-lethal alternatives and use firearms only in extreme circumstances.