Tannenbaum Schmidt Leadership Continuum

EPM
17 May 201908:49

Summary

TLDRThe Tannenbaum-Schmidt Leadership Continuum explores the relationship between a leader's level of authority and the freedom given to their team. It outlines seven leadership styles, ranging from authoritarian approaches where the leader makes decisions alone to more democratic styles where the team plays a significant role in decision-making. The model emphasizes flexibility, suggesting that effective leaders adapt their style based on personal preferences, team readiness, and situational factors. While the continuum offers advantages like adaptability and experimentation, it lacks guidance on cultural norms and the post-decision process.

Takeaways

  • 😀 The Tannenbaum-Schmidt Leadership Continuum models the relationship between the level of authority a leader uses and the freedom given to their team.
  • 😀 At one end of the continuum, managers use full authority, telling their team what to do; at the other end, managers give their team complete freedom.
  • 😀 Most leaders fall somewhere in the middle, adjusting their leadership style depending on the situation and the team.
  • 😀 Leadership models often focus on a single leadership style, but in practice, leaders may need to borrow elements from other styles for specific team members or situations.
  • 😀 There are three key factors to consider when choosing a leadership style: the leader's preferences, the team's readiness, and the specific situation.
  • 😀 The seven leadership styles on the continuum range from manager-centered to subordinate-centered styles, offering a spectrum of approaches.
  • 😀 'Tells' is an authoritarian style where the leader directs the team with no input, useful in urgent situations but potentially frustrating for experienced team members.
  • 😀 'Sells' involves the leader making a decision and explaining it to the team to ensure understanding, but without seeking input.
  • 😀 'Suggests' is a style where the leader makes the decision, explains it, and invites questions from the team to clarify the rationale.
  • 😀 The 'Consults' style allows the leader to present a provisional decision to the team, encouraging feedback that can influence the final decision, though the leader maintains control.
  • 😀 Subordinate-centered styles include 'Joins,' where the leader collaborates with the team to solve a problem, and 'Delegates,' where the team makes decisions within set limits, with the leader remaining accountable.
  • 😀 'Abdicates' is the most hands-off approach, where the team is fully responsible for both identifying problems and deciding how to solve them. This style works best with very experienced teams.
  • 😀 The Tannenbaum-Schmidt Continuum offers advantages, such as flexibility and the ability to adapt leadership styles based on the situation, but it also has drawbacks, like ignoring cultural norms and soft factors.

Q & A

  • What is the Tannenbaum-Schmidt Leadership Continuum?

    -The Tannenbaum-Schmidt Leadership Continuum is a model that illustrates the relationship between the level of authority a leader uses and the freedom given to their team. It ranges from highly authoritative to highly delegative leadership styles.

  • What are the two extremes of the continuum?

    -The two extremes are: at one end, managers who tell employees what to do (authoritative), and at the other, managers who give their team complete freedom (delegative).

  • How does the continuum work in practice?

    -In practice, most leaders use a blend of styles depending on the situation, allowing them to adjust the balance of authority and freedom based on factors like the team, situation, and their own values.

  • What are the three main factors to consider when selecting a leadership style?

    -The three factors to consider are: the leader’s own preferred style and values, the readiness and enthusiasm of the team, and the specifics of the situation (e.g., importance of the work, deadlines, and organizational culture).

  • Can leadership styles change based on the situation?

    -Yes, leadership styles should adapt to the situation. A leader might switch between styles or adjust their approach depending on team readiness, urgency, and other situational factors.

  • What is the 'Tells' leadership style?

    -The 'Tells' style is highly authoritarian, where the leader makes decisions and expects the team to follow them. This style is useful in urgent situations but can be frustrating for experienced team members.

  • What is the difference between the 'Sells' and 'Suggests' styles?

    -In the 'Sells' style, the leader makes decisions and explains the reasoning behind them, but does not seek team input. In the 'Suggests' style, the leader explains their decision and invites questions, though they are unlikely to change the decision.

  • How does the 'Consults' leadership style work?

    -The 'Consults' style involves the leader presenting a provisional decision to the team and inviting feedback. The team’s input can influence the final decision, but the leader remains in control of the ultimate decision.

  • When would a leader use the 'Joins' style?

    -A leader would use the 'Joins' style when the team is experienced or has specialized knowledge. The leader presents the problem, and the team works together to solve it collaboratively.

  • What are the risks of the 'Abdicates' leadership style?

    -The 'Abdicates' style can be risky because it gives the team total autonomy, which can lead to poor decisions if the team lacks the experience or expertise needed. This style is typically used only with senior, experienced teams.

  • What are the key advantages of the Tannenbaum-Schmidt Leadership Continuum?

    -Key advantages include the flexibility to adapt leadership styles to different situations, the ability to experiment with team autonomy, and the ability to adjust the level of authority as the situation evolves.

  • What are the limitations of the Tannenbaum-Schmidt Leadership Continuum?

    -The model focuses only on the delegation of tasks and does not address what happens after tasks are given. It also overlooks soft factors like office politics and cultural norms and leaves the decision on the best leadership style to the leader.

Outlines

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Mindmap

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Keywords

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Highlights

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Transcripts

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Leadership StylesManagement TheoryTeam DynamicsDecision MakingAuthority vs FreedomLeadership ModelsTeam CollaborationEmployee MotivationManagement SkillsBusiness Strategy