Yurisdiksi - Hambatan Pelaksanaan Yurisdiksi Pidana

Indonesian Center for International Law UNPAD
24 Aug 202014:48

Summary

TLDRThis video lesson explores the challenges of applying criminal jurisdiction, especially in international contexts. Key barriers include the lack of universal jurisdiction, statute of limitations, practical issues like extradition and evidence gathering, and obstacles such as amnesty agreements and immunity. The speaker highlights how immunity for high-ranking officials, like presidents and diplomats, prevents prosecution, while state immunity safeguards a country from being sued in foreign courts. The lesson encourages further study of international law to better understand these complex issues in the enforcement of justice.

Takeaways

  • 😀 Jurisdiction is a complex legal concept, and this video discusses the challenges countries face in applying their criminal jurisdiction.
  • 😀 One of the main challenges is the lack of legal provisions in some countries, which prevents them from applying universal jurisdiction, as seen in Indonesia's legal system.
  • 😀 Universal jurisdiction allows a country to apply its laws to international crimes, but not all countries adopt this principle in their legal frameworks.
  • 😀 Expiry (or statute of limitations) is a significant issue in applying criminal jurisdiction. Some crimes, like international crimes, do not have a time limit, but national laws may impose one, hindering prosecution.
  • 😀 Jurisdictions are further complicated when crimes occur outside a country's borders, making it difficult to gather evidence or arrest suspects.
  • 😀 Amnesty agreements, often part of peace deals, can prevent the prosecution of offenders, which conflicts with the universal jurisdiction principle of eradicating impunity.
  • 😀 Immunity, particularly diplomatic immunity, can hinder criminal jurisdiction. High-ranking officials, like presidents and foreign ministers, enjoy immunity due to their official status.
  • 😀 Absolute immunity provides complete protection from prosecution while in office, but once a leader leaves office, their immunity changes to functional immunity, limiting the scope of protection.
  • 😀 Functional immunity protects officials only when their actions relate to their official duties, meaning they can be prosecuted for private actions outside of their functions.
  • 😀 State immunity prevents one country from prosecuting another country for actions taken within the latter’s jurisdiction, reinforcing the idea that countries have equal sovereignty and cannot be judged by others.

Q & A

  • What is the main topic discussed in this video?

    -The video discusses the challenges and obstacles in the implementation of criminal jurisdiction, focusing on issues related to national jurisdiction and international crimes.

  • What is universal jurisdiction, and why does it pose a challenge for some countries?

    -Universal jurisdiction refers to the authority of a country to apply its criminal laws to international crimes, regardless of where they occurred or the nationality of the perpetrators. Some countries, like Indonesia, do not recognize universal jurisdiction, limiting their ability to apply criminal law to international crimes that do not have direct connections to their territory or citizens.

  • What is the issue with statutes of limitations in the context of international crimes?

    -While international crimes generally do not have a statute of limitations, many national legal systems impose time limits for prosecuting crimes. This discrepancy can prevent a country from prosecuting international criminals if the statute of limitations has expired under its national law.

  • How does amnesty affect the application of criminal jurisdiction?

    -Amnesty is a form of pardon granted by a country as part of a peace agreement, where a nation agrees not to prosecute certain individuals. This can hinder the application of criminal jurisdiction, especially when dealing with international crimes, as amnesty may shield perpetrators from prosecution.

  • What is the difference between immunity and impunity?

    -Immunity refers to the legal protection granted to certain individuals (such as heads of state) from prosecution while performing their official duties. Impunity, on the other hand, refers to the condition where an individual is not held accountable for crimes, often due to lack of jurisdiction or legal obstacles.

  • What are the different types of immunity mentioned in the video?

    -The video distinguishes between absolute immunity, which protects individuals like presidents and foreign ministers from prosecution for actions taken while in office, and functional immunity, which protects diplomats only for acts related to their official duties. Functional immunity is limited to official functions and does not protect individuals from prosecution for private acts.

  • How does state immunity affect legal proceedings against foreign governments?

    -State immunity prevents one country from prosecuting or bringing legal actions against another country's government or its officials. This principle ensures that countries are immune from being sued in foreign courts for actions related to their sovereign functions.

  • What is the relationship between state immunity and diplomatic immunity?

    -Both state immunity and diplomatic immunity protect government officials from prosecution. However, state immunity relates to actions by a foreign government, while diplomatic immunity protects individuals like ambassadors and foreign ministers from legal action in their host country, particularly for official acts.

  • What challenges arise when criminal acts occur in another country?

    -When criminal acts take place outside a country's borders, challenges include difficulties in arresting suspects, gathering evidence, and coordinating legal actions with other nations. These obstacles can prevent a country from applying its criminal jurisdiction effectively.

  • Why is immunity considered beneficial despite its limitations?

    -Immunity is seen as beneficial because it facilitates diplomatic relations and cooperation between countries. It ensures that government officials can carry out their duties without fear of being prosecuted, which helps maintain international stability and fosters peaceful relations between nations.

Outlines

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Mindmap

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Keywords

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Highlights

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Transcripts

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Criminal JurisdictionInternational LawImmunityAmnestyUniversal JurisdictionLegal BarriersInternational CrimesState ImmunityForeign MilitaryDiplomatic ImmunityLegal Framework