Review phim NGÀY XƯA CÓ MỘT CHUYỆN TÌNH

Summary

This video review critiques the film adaptation of Nguyễn Nhật Ánh’s *Ngày Xưa Có Một Chuyện Tình*, highlighting its failure to faithfully capture the essence of the original characters and themes. The reviewer expresses disappointment with the portrayal of the main characters Vinh, Phúc, and Miền, arguing that the film oversimplifies their complexities and sacrifices their depth for a more formulaic, superficial narrative. Despite the film’s visual appeal, including strong cinematography and emotional scenes, it ultimately falters due to a lackluster script that reduces the story to a conventional love triangle, missing the profound emotional core of the novel.

Takeaways

• 😀 The movie adaptation of Nguyễn Nhật Ánh's book 'Ngày Xưa Có Một Chuyện Tình' struggles to capture the depth and soul of the original novel.
• 😀 Director Trịnh Đình Lê Minh's strength lies in creating emotional depth through cinematography, focusing on close-ups and intimate moments.
• 😀 The film succeeds in conveying the natural bond between the main characters, Vinh, Phúc, and Miền, especially through shared scenes and facial expressions.
• 😀 While the film is visually successful, its narrative structure and character development fail to live up to the expectations set by the book.
• 😀 The portrayal of Vinh in the film is criticized for being too passive and lacking the idealism and strength that defined his character in the book.
• 😀 The movie simplifies Phúc's character, turning him into a selfish figure, which reduces the complexity of his role in the novel.
• 😀 Miền’s character in the film is also underdeveloped, missing the maturity and wisdom she showed in the book, making her seem less evolved than in the original story.
• 😀 The film alters the ending, turning Phúc into a villain, which detracts from the emotional weight and moral complexity of the original work.
• 😀 The screenplay oversimplifies key relationships, particularly the dynamic between Vinh, Phúc, and Miền, leading to a loss of the subtle tension present in the book.
• 😀 Despite the film's success in certain technical areas, the overall adaptation fails to faithfully capture the depth and nuance of the beloved literary work.

Q & A

What is the primary issue raised by the reviewer regarding the film adaptation of 'Ngày Xưa Có Một Chuyện Tình'?

The primary issue raised is the film's inability to capture the emotional depth and complexity of the characters in the novel. The reviewer criticizes the simplification of the characters, particularly Vinh, Phúc, and Miền, and how the film's narrative fails to reflect the original themes of self-respect, maturity, and love.

How is the character of Vinh portrayed in the film compared to the novel?

In the film, Vinh is depicted as weak and indecisive, with a lack of moral conviction. In contrast, the novel presents him as a character with strong ideals about love and sacrifice, particularly his willingness to put his friends' happiness above his own.

What does the reviewer think about the portrayal of Phúc in the film?

The reviewer feels that Phúc is reduced to a selfish and destructive character in the film, stripping away the complexity of his role in the novel. In the book, Phúc's internal conflict regarding his feelings for Miền is much more nuanced, and his character grapples with moral dilemmas.

What role does Miền play in the story, and how is her character represented in the film?

Miền is portrayed as a mature, introspective character in the novel, shaped by her difficult upbringing. However, in the film, she is depicted as naive and indecisive, losing the depth of her character from the book. Her internal struggles and wisdom are not fully explored in the film.

How does the reviewer describe the cinematography and direction of the film?

The reviewer acknowledges the film’s visually appealing cinematography, particularly the close-up shots that focus on characters' emotions and interactions. The director, Trịnh Đình Lê Minh, uses intimate, close framing to highlight subtle expressions, but this technical achievement is not enough to save the film from its weak script and shallow characterizations.

What specific scene does the reviewer mention as being a disappointment in the film’s adaptation?

The reviewer highlights the scene where Vinh proposes to Miền, which is portrayed in a simplistic and formulaic way. Unlike in the novel, where Vinh carefully crafts his confession, the film reduces the moment to a basic, unremarkable interaction, stripping it of emotional depth.

How does the reviewer feel about the overall script of the film?

The reviewer is deeply disappointed by the script, criticizing it for being overly simplistic and failing to capture the novel’s original emotional weight. The film’s characters are reduced to stereotypes, and the themes of the book are lost in the adaptation, making the story feel shallow and predictable.

What does the reviewer think about the film’s ending, particularly the transformation of the characters?

The reviewer is upset by the film’s change in the ending, where Phúc is turned into a villain and the choices of Vinh and Miền are made more straightforward. This simplification of the characters' development undermines the complexity of their relationships in the original book.

What does the reviewer suggest is the reason behind the film’s failure to live up to the novel?

The reviewer suggests that the filmmakers may have prioritized making the film more commercially appealing and easier to understand for a mass audience, potentially fearing that a more complex narrative would alienate viewers. As a result, the film simplifies the story and the characters.

Does the reviewer believe that the film adaptation could have been more faithful to the novel?

Yes, the reviewer believes that a more faithful adaptation could have maintained the depth and maturity of the characters and the themes of the novel. The film could have conveyed the subtleties of the story without sacrificing its emotional complexity, making it more meaningful to audiences familiar with the book.