The Ethics of Necromancy

Summary

The video script explores the ethical implications of necromancy in fantasy settings, particularly the use of reanimated corpses as a labor force. It delves into questions of whether people have souls, if souls can be reunited with bodies, and if undead creatures possess souls. Using Dungeons & Dragons (D&D) as a reference, the script discusses the consent system in D&D that prevents unwilling creatures from being revived. It also raises concerns about the autonomy of souls, especially when powerful necromancers can control even those with souls. The video ponders on the possibility of ethically sourcing undead labor, considering societal norms, health, and safety. It suggests using the bodies of criminals who have passed away during their prison terms as a potential ethical solution, with the undead serving the remainder of their sentences as laborers. The script concludes by inviting viewers to share their thoughts on how to make undead labor more ethically viable.

Takeaways

• 🧐 **Ethical Considerations of Necromancy**: The script explores the ethical implications of using necromancy for labor purposes, considering the autonomy and rights of the deceased.
• 🌐 **Fantasy World Beliefs**: It is essential to understand the beliefs about souls and afterlife within a fantasy world, as they greatly influence the ethical perspective on necromancy.
• ⚖️ **Utilitarianism in Fantasy**: The script discusses how utilitarianism could justify the use of undead labor in a post-Enlightenment fantasy world.
• 🧟 **Undead and Souls**: The presence of souls in undead creatures like revenants, willow wisps, and ghosts complicates the ethical landscape of necromancy.
• 🛡️ **Consent in Resurrection**: D&D's rules often require consent for resurrection, but this concept is not extended to all forms of reanimation, raising ethical questions.
• 🦴 **Skeleton Labor**: The script suggests using skeletons instead of zombies for undead labor due to health and safety concerns, as well as societal comfort.
• 👻 **Reincarnation and Undead**: The concept of reincarnation adds another layer to the ethical debate, questioning the rights of souls to their former bodies.
• 🏛️ **Historical Punishment and Undead Labor**: The script proposes that the use of deceased criminals for undead labor could be ethically justified within a regulated system.
• 🌱 **Animal Corpses for Labor**: It is suggested that using animal corpses for labor might be more ethically acceptable due to societal norms and historical practices.
• 🎭 **Disguise and Deception**: The use of illusions or disguises to make undead laborers seem less unsettling is proposed as a way to reduce societal discomfort.
• 🔍 **Regulation and Transparency**: The importance of a transparent and regulated system for the ethical use of undead labor is emphasized to prevent abuse and maintain societal consent.

Q & A

What are the primary ethical considerations of using necromancy for labor in fantasy settings according to the script?

The primary ethical considerations include the autonomy of the soul, the conditions of its consent for reanimation, and the implications of using undead creatures for labor. The ethics of whether undead beings like ghosts or revenants are treated justly, and the broader societal implications of employing such creatures are also highlighted.

How does D&D address the issue of soul consent in resurrection and reanimation?

In D&D, the system incorporates a consent mechanism where a creature cannot be revived unless it is free and willing to return, thus respecting the autonomy of the soul in cases of resurrection. However, this consent does not typically apply to reanimation, where a necromancer's magic is used to animate the dead without the soul's return or consent.

What ethical issues arise from reanimating creatures like willow wisps and ghosts in D&D?

Ethical issues arise because willow wisps and ghosts are considered to be souls themselves. Reanimating these entities without their consent can be seen as a violation of their autonomy. This is particularly problematic when necromancers can overpower these beings, thus blurring the lines between voluntary and involuntary servitude.

What implications does the existence of an afterlife have on the ethics of necromancy?

The existence of an afterlife complicates the ethics of necromancy because it involves making judgments about whether a soul is better off in the afterlife or being returned to the mortal world. This can involve a potential infringement on a soul’s right to its chosen afterlife, especially if the soul is unaware or unconsenting to its reanimation.

How do different fantasy worlds potentially vary in their approach to the ethics of necromancy?

Different fantasy worlds may have varied beliefs about the soul, the afterlife, and magic, which can lead to different ethical frameworks and practices concerning necromancy. These variations can dictate whether necromancy is considered a grave violation of rights or a more acceptable practice under certain circumstances.

What are the challenges of using undead labor in terms of health and safety?

Challenges include the potential spread of diseases from decomposing bodies, attracting wild animals, and causing general public discomfort or fear. The script discusses how more 'sanitized' forms of undead, like skeletons, could mitigate some health and safety issues compared to more decomposed zombies.

How does the Enlightenment influence the ethical debate on necromancy?

The Enlightenment, with its emphasis on rationality, empiricism, and possibly atheism, challenges traditional views on spirituality and ethics, possibly redefining the acceptability of using undead labor. This period of questioning and discovery could lead to new, possibly more secular ethical frameworks where utilitarian benefits of necromancy might be emphasized.

What solution does the script propose for ethically justifiable use of undead labor?

The script suggests using skeletons of criminals who have not completed their sentences, ensuring that their souls are not attached and that the bodies are sanitized and anonymized. This approach tries to balance ethical concerns with practical utility, while integrating societal norms and legal frameworks.

Why is it problematic to reanimate recognizable individuals from one's community, according to the script?

Reanimating recognizable individuals can cause emotional distress and societal disruption. It could violate personal and communal sanctities and norms, particularly if the undead are used in visible roles within the same community where they once lived.

What role do societal and cultural norms play in the acceptance of necromancy?

Societal and cultural norms significantly influence the ethical acceptance of necromancy. Norms determine how the dead are traditionally treated, the respect afforded to the deceased, and the boundaries of acceptable uses of magic, all of which frame the community’s response to the use of necromancy.

Outlines

00:00

🧐 Ethical Considerations of Necromancy

The first paragraph introduces the ethical dilemma of necromancy, particularly its use as a labor-saving device. It questions whether raising the dead is ethical and if it can be made ethical. The discussion is framed within the context of fantasy settings, using Dungeons and Dragons (D&D) as a reference point. It explores the existence of souls, the possibility of reuniting souls with bodies, and the status of undead creatures concerning souls. The narrative also touches on the complexities added when considering the afterlife and the autonomy of souls, as well as the D&D mechanics of resurrection and reanimation, including the consent system and the ability of powerful necromancers to control souls.

05:01

🤔 The Ethical Quandaries of Undead Labor

The second paragraph delves into the ethical implications of using undead as a labor force. It discusses the common recycling argument and its shaky foundation when considering the souls of evil beings like will-o'-wisps. The narrative ponders the ethical stance under different belief systems, including the possibility of reincarnation and its impact on the use of bodies. It also contrasts the Enlightenment era's ethical systems, such as utilitarianism, with the use of undead labor in a modern context. The paragraph ends with a hypothetical scenario where undead labor could be legalized under strict ethical conditions.

10:01

🏳️‍🦱 The Human Problem with Undead Labor

The third paragraph examines the practical and ethical issues of sourcing and using reanimated corpses for labor. It discusses societal aversions to corpses and the health risks associated with decaying bodies. The narrative suggests using skeletons instead of decaying corpses to mitigate these issues but acknowledges the deep-seated human discomfort with the use of human remains. It explores alternatives like using animal corpses or creating non-humanoid undead laborers to reduce ethical objections. The paragraph also considers the societal acceptance of using such labor forces.

15:02

🦴 Ethical Reanimation: The Case of Criminals

The fourth paragraph proposes a solution to the ethical use of undead labor by suggesting the use of the bodies of criminals who have passed away before serving their full prison terms. It discusses the historical context of capital punishment and the moral evolution of crime and punishment. The narrative outlines a system where criminals could serve the remainder of their prison terms as undead laborers, provided their souls are elsewhere and their bodies are viewed as reprehensible by society. It also addresses the need for anonymization and the potential issues of long-lived species in such a system.

20:04

🧙‍♂️ The Regulation of Ethical Necromancy

The fifth and final paragraph summarizes the ethical framework proposed for an undead labor force, emphasizing transparency, regulation, and accountability. It discusses the potential for abuse and the need for oversight of necromancers managing such a program. The narrative concludes by inviting viewers to provide their own ethical theories and solutions for creating an undead labor force, either in a medieval fantasy society or a post-Enlightenment world, and encourages further discussion on the topic.

Keywords

💡Necromancy

Necromancy refers to the practice of communicating with and reanimating the dead, often for the purpose of utilizing their labor or gaining knowledge. In the video, it is discussed as a controversial topic with ethical implications, especially when viewed as a labor-saving device in a fantasy world.

💡Ethics

Ethics is the branch of philosophy that deals with moral principles and values. The video explores the ethical considerations of raising the dead, including the autonomy of souls, the nature of undead, and the societal impact of using the deceased for labor.

💡Soul

A soul, in various religious and philosophical contexts, is the immaterial essence of a person, often associated with consciousness, personality, and individuality. The video discusses whether souls exist, can be reunited with bodies, and whether undead creatures possess souls, which are fundamental to the ethical debate on necromancy.

💡Undead

Undead refers to beings that are deceased but still animated, often through supernatural means. The video examines the ethical treatment of undead, particularly in the context of Dungeons & Dragons (D&D) rules, where undead are typically not considered to possess souls.

💡Resurrection

Resurrection is the act of bringing back to life, often with religious or magical connotations. In the video, it is contrasted with reanimation, and the ethical implications of resurrecting individuals against their will or without their consent are discussed.

💡Reanimation

Reanimation refers to the process of animating a lifeless body, often through magical means. The video explores the ethical dilemmas associated with reanimation, especially when it involves the use of unwilling souls or beings that may have had souls.

💡Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that the best action is the one that maximizes utility, often defined in terms of the greatest good for the greatest number of people. The video suggests that under utilitarianism, using undead for labor might be justified if it serves the collective good.

💡Enlightenment

The Enlightenment was an intellectual and philosophical movement in the 17th and 18th centuries that emphasized reason, individualism, and skepticism. The video discusses how a fantasy world's philosophical climate, like one undergoing an Enlightenment, might influence ethical perspectives on necromancy.

💡Zombies

Zombies are a type of undead creature, often depicted as reanimated corpses that feed on the living. In the video, they are mentioned as an example of a problematic choice for an undead labor force due to health and safety concerns.

💡Skeletons

Skeletons, in the context of the video, are the cleaned and prepared remains of deceased individuals, which could potentially be used as an undead labor force. The video discusses the ethical considerations of using skeletons as opposed to other forms of undead.

💡Justice System

The justice system refers to the institutions and processes that aim to enforce the law and ensure fair treatment. The video suggests that an ethical necromancy system could involve the use of deceased criminals, who have served their prison terms, as an undead labor force as part of their punishment.

Highlights

The ethical implications of necromancy in world-building are explored, considering whether raising the dead can be justified.

Fundamental questions about the existence of souls, their reattachment to bodies, and the soul status of undead are discussed in the context of fantasy settings.

The impact of D&D rules on the perception of necromancy, where souls can be brought back and undead are typically soulless, is analyzed.

The importance of consent in resurrection and the ethical dilemmas it presents, especially when the deceased's wishes are unknown, are highlighted.

The concept of 'ethically sourced' undead labor and the complexities of ensuring health and safety compliance in a fantasy setting are examined.

The potential for using the bodies of criminals for undead labor as a form of posthumous punishment and restitution is proposed.

The ethical challenges of using animal corpses for labor in a fantasy world, considering societal norms and potential objections.

The use of illusions or non-humanoid forms to make undead labor more palatable to society, addressing the psychological discomfort associated with the dead.

The historical context of the Enlightenment and its impact on ethical considerations, including the rise of utilitarianism and its potential application to undead labor.

The potential for abuse of power by necromancers and the need for oversight and regulation in any system that uses undead labor.

The idea that undead labor could be made more acceptable if the deceased had no social connections or were widely considered to have forfeited their rights.

The suggestion that undead laborers could serve a limited term corresponding to their remaining prison sentence, adding a layer of ethical justification.

The proposal for a system where undead labor is transparent, regulated, and serves the public good, while minimizing deception and societal discomfort.

The consideration of anonymity for undead laborers to prevent the identification and potential exploitation of specific individuals.

The discussion on the potential for a fantasy society to accept undead labor if it adheres to strict ethical guidelines and societal norms.

The video concludes with an invitation for viewers to comment with their own ethical theories and considerations regarding undead labor in fantasy settings.

Transcripts

in many settings that engage in

extrapolative World building we find an

individual a group or a nation that

determines that necromancy isn't that

bad it's an excellent labor saving

device after all it's basically

recycling it's not like the dead are

using their bodies for anything in

particular right these are all examples

of arguments commonly made but I I think

what people often miss in these

broad abstractions are the real effects

that such policies place on people so is

raising the dead ethical or can we make

it

ethical let's figure this

[Music]

out there are a few questions which are

really fundamental to establish answers

to for our Quest here one do people have

souls two can these Souls be reunited

with their bodies and three do Undead

creatures have souls for every fantasy

world these answers are going to differ

drastically so let's stick with one of

the most influential and Broad fantasy

properties and one which allows us the

full spectrum from Resurrection to

reanimation DND D so in a world playing

by D and D's rules the answers are

generally yes people have souls

generally yes Souls can be brought back

heun back together with bodies and

generally no Undead are usually not

considered insold but there is a fourth

very important question who knows these

things if our fantasy citizens are

working with incomplete data they may

find poor ethical Solutions in the case

that a person believed that Undead

created from a specific type of ritual

do actually have their souls return to

them then reanimation becomes in effect

no different to Resurrection as seen in

Eon with the areni with their undying

Court of ancestors still walking among

the populace if an individual becomes

aware by a trusted Authority that an

afterlife is real and which afterlife

their loved one has gone then we add

further complexity a value judgment must

be made on soul behalf whether their

happiness is best served by remaining in

their afterlife or returning to the

mortal world thus in some settings that

are not D and for a reason we'll talk

about later even

Resurrection is sometimes unethical as

it Robs a soul of its autonomy and a

chance at Bliss or an afterlife at this

particular moment or alternatively

perhaps Resurrection becomes a moral

imper imperative if you know that a soul

is to be tortured eternally unless we

adopt a particularly fatalistic Outlook

that their choices are what has led them

to this particular afterlife as a

consequence of their actions and nothing

should intercede in that process as

mentioned earlier D and D sidesteps this

particular Problem by instituting a

consent system by which a creature

cannot be revived if it is not free and

willing so in this system a soul can

refuse Resurrection no such availability

however is made for reanimation this is

ostensibly because the reanimating force

is not the soul but the Caster's magic

right well not always see there are some

creatures who are Undead and either have

or are explicitly Souls that remain in

the Mortal realm creatures like

revenants Willow wisps and ghosts for

instance in fifth edition there is

currently no way to summon a willowwisp

or Revenant directly but with summon

Undead you can absolutely summon a quote

ghostly Spirit whether we describe it as

bending a local ghost to your service or

creating one a new from your own magic

this raises some serious questions this

is without mentioning that Necromancer

wizard can quite literally take control

of the autonomy of unwilling Souls at

14th level including any ghosts Willow

wisps or revenants who can even be

player options so the line is incredibly

mudded we cannot differentiate between

spells which require the Soul's consent

and spells which require no consent from

the soul because necromancers of

sufficient power can overpower even

beings which have souls or which are

souls Willow wisps are quite literally

described in the monster manual as The

Souls of evil beings the common

recycling argument is looking a little

more shaky now especially because ghosts

and Willow wisps are souls specifically

divorced from bodies but both the body

and the Soul exist in the same plane of

existence in the case of an evil

individual who drowns alone in a bog and

returns as a wisp this creature exists

as a corpse and a soul in the same local

in the same very bog should a

necromancer pull the body out of the bog

and invy it with animated spirit is that

a violation of the Soul's autonomy or

not it's very very unclear one assumes

that the created Willows would have

something to say about that particular

violation although because Willow wisps

are inherently evil creatures maybe

that's in some way ethically justifiable

I'm not going to even get into the

notion

of codified evil creatures in this point

but this is all very Christian coded

what if we're actually operating under

other systems or assumptions if for

example there's a possibility of

reincarnation how do we decide which

body is which Souls surely if someone

has moved on to a new form their old

body is just there to feed the worms

there to exist in nature maybe it is at

this point simple

recycling if we can prove it DN D does

have a spell which reincarnates

individuals and it is my personal

favorite form of Resurrection mechanics

in in in storage telling but that's kind

of by the by reincarnation opens up this

whole other can of worms if there's a

long and broken chain of bodies that

Soul has inhabited over the past what

can we do or what can't we do with those

bodies does the soul have a right to

them or not and is that right waved if

in the process of Resurrection

especially if that Resurrection is

consented to by a spellcaster using

magic I think it's about time to discuss

the ethics of the Enlightenment in our

world this was a period of extreme

change in Social Moray atheism was

beginning to become a legitimate

philosophical movement and rationality

and empiricism had taken root in the

minds of the socialized intellectual

Elites this was a time for questioning

the established order and the time of

the Scientific Revolution which sought

to describe describe the physical

Material World entirely separately from

the world of divinity and

spirit for pretty much the first time

please feel free to fact check me on

that as such we get some pretty

historically alien ethical systems being

developed most notably

utilitarianism this posits that the

greatest good is served by maximizing

good for every person it in essence

considering animated skeletons and

zombies are not usually considered among

the ranks of insol persons making use of

these creatures for the collective good

of people may be a marbly justifiable or

a morally necessary act under

utilitarianism indeed in the post

Enlightenment hyper capitalistic modern

world which in many countries assumes

Faith to be a secondary concern I can

easily Envision a zombie Workforce

properly controlled to be championed as

a novel if morbid labor saving device

indeed if we got over the shock of magic

being real I would not be surprised if

the UK eventually legalized Undead labor

as long as they were ethically sourced

and health and safety compliant the

thing is many any fantasy worlds are not

currently undergoing a philosophical

Enlightenment where the role of faith is

unsteady and unstable in stark contrast

to a rising tide of discoveries in the

observable dynamics of the material

world although to be honest if there are

any fantasy settings like that I I would

love to learn about them maybe kind of

like the late disc World Books but with

more plcape thrown in it sounds like a

really really fun time so please do link

me if if you know of any settings in

that in the throws of this thorny

question anyway even putting aside the

absurdity of a world with real provable

deities undergoing such a movement let's

actually unpack the human problem ethics

is an abstracted study it is intended to

provide both context and Frameworks for

dealing with some specific real world

scenarios but real life is infinitely

complex and messy let's actually

interrogate what ethically sourced and

healthy and safe reanimated corpses

might actually look like first things

first they're not zombies the thing is

ever since we have started exhibiting

social

behavior the corpse has been an object

of disgust we bury them we burn them or

we leave them away from the food or

Living Spaces

why well it's not like our ancestors

knew enough about bacteria to understand

the health risks of having corpses

nearby but they understood their own

experiences leave a corpse out and wild

animals come close to feed on it so to

keep your clan safe you have to solve

this issue either you put your dead away

from civilization as a distraction for

the beasts or bury them so deep that

while animals won't dig them up or smell

them easily leaving them somewhere near

people also causes bad smells annoying

insects and an increase in people

feeling unwell so keep the dead away all

of these are learnable behaviors within

just a few generations of existence and

thought and many of these are practiced

by animals as well so health and safety

isn't quite as modern and absurd a all

as you might think so zombies would make

a really bad choice for any Undead labor

force because of all of these issues

they spread disease and wild animals

will want a pieace so what about corpses

that have finished rotting well clean

bones are more hygienic than rotten

flesh and we have the added benefit that

it is hard to pick out identifying

features of skeletons unless an

individual has died in a very specific

way or is physically deformed in some

manner or incredibly tall and remarkable

in that sense we can assume that most

folks won't raise the same stink as they

might if they see their grandmother

reanimated as a zombie doing fieldwork

so skeletons solve a few of our health

and safety concerns as long as the

necromancers can control them properly

and safeguards are put in place in case

something goes wrong with their's magic

but can we create a situation where

ethically we are justified in using

skeleton labor after all as Julia chisa

tells us the corpse is a primary symbol

of objection it stands invariably

outside the norms and acceptableness of

society however much we are desensitized

to representations of the skeleton in

our media fact remains that the bones

the actual bones of a person stir

something within people be that a primal

discomfort or simply thoughts that this

is a bit maab even if we clean our

theoretical skeletons completely using

fire acid or magic the fact remains that

they are still a corpse and we are hard

wired to reject the corpse from society

it is abject so how could this be solved

well you could try bodies which seem

less personlike depending on the moral

compunctions of your world or Society

creatures bred for meat or servitude may

actually elicit different

reactions as creatures seen as people as

long as your Society is all in agreement

that these folks are not people goblins

and Cobalts are interesting examples of

this of course the ethics of this are

questionable at best but it is true that

in a fantasy world the line gets far

fuzzier when there are folks who can you

know talk to animals and monsters who

are more intelligent than seemingly

humanoid people your best bet if your

magic system does allow for it are

animal corpses as they do tend to elicit

less disgust among people and we have

historically exploited the them for

labor forever although we have also

historically exploited our fellow man um

so that's not a great argument and I'm

pretty sure any nature loving

individuals be they Druids or otherwise

in your setting may have a lot to say

about the exploitation of animals even

in death a solid choice for solving both

the health concerns and the

squeamishness concerns uh is creating a

shell sealant or other disgust eyes for

your uh Undead labor force it may be a

somewhat tired Trope but acting like

your Undead labor force is actually

animated scarecrows or some topof the

range new automaton or simply just a

conjured Workforce using Illusions might

be a solid way to cause the least harm

by placing Undead in and amongst your

fields workers however Canan ethics

still would not approve of the attempt

to deceive a mass group of people this

would be an ethical ill so how could we

possibly create a system where Undead

are working out in the open or at least

people are cognizant that Undead are

working out in the open without this

objection and disgust taking hold and

without lying to the general populace

the the only way I can see a standard

fantasy Society accepting this is really

a combination of everything we have

discussed so far reanimation of strictly

skeletons cleared and prepared to be

relatively sterile such a society would

need to ensure that these individuals

Souls were certainly elsewhere either

through divination Magics or a deal with

some extra planer entity and that the

bodies used were considered to be

reprehensible by the populace to avoid

the bad Optics of kindly grandmas being

drafted into the undead horde so we are

left with one obvious choice criminals

throughout history most human societies

have held capital punishment as part of

their Justice systems the moral failings

of such a system were really first

discussed properly in the Enlightenment

at least as best as I can tell meaning

we have a lot of human history where the

ritual punitive sacrifice of criminals

lives and limbs was standard and ethical

by the standards of the time however to

make the best argument we can this

acceptable ethical necromancy will not

be killing for the purpose of creating

Undead workforces instead perhaps we can

exploit the fact that even inter

modernity sentencing for crimes putting

criminals Behind Bars involves prison

terms terms upon the Fulfillment of

which the individual is released out

into the public for serious offenses

maybe these terms can stretch beyond the

expected lifespan of an individual for

the most serious criminals it may be the

only ethical choice to keep them

imprisoned for the remainder of their

life for the safety of their fellow man

again the ethics of Crime and Punishment

are a little beyond the scope of this

video um so please if you do find that

interesting get in the comments and uh

Tear Me Apart as such any individual who

dies before their prison term is

served may have the choice or perhaps be

forced by law to spend the rest of this

term as an undead laborer working to

repay the community even in modernity we

see a distinctive lack of sympathy for

prisoners which though quite personally

distressing does mean that this would

most likely be a popular policy measure

but we're not here to be popular we are

here to be ethical and the attempt is to

make an undead labor force at least

ethically

justifiable and as such co-operating the

justice system as long as the system is

just seems like a reasonable way to go

bodies would in this system only be able

to remain animated Undead as long as

they have left in their stated terms

perhaps that may be made permanent for

some of the worst offenders to assuage

any doubts that these Undead criminals

may go back to their old ways um they

would need to be anonymized and fully

covered in some more sightly trappings

than a walking skeleton for sensitivity

purposes and to avoid any of those

unpleasant feelings of disgust

immediately taking place um especially

for visitors to this area or children

guarantees would likely be made that

criminals who operated and victimized a

specific local area would be transferred

far away from this area before being put

to work and on completion of the term

all criminals uh would be given a bual

perhaps this would be an incentive for

um opting into this program whereby

criminals can serve the rest of their

terms as Undead before being laid to

rest in a proper Ceremony this might In

fairness unintentionally create a rather

problematic tearing of species

though as hiding all identifying markers

such as height build or you know

horns might be tricky and also longer

lived species would be far less commonly

uh put to work in this way in fact an

elf who is punished thusly May well be

the only corpse of the elv and

persuasion making this whole anonymity

thing a little purposeless nonetheless

this is about the best I can do corpses

that are determined to hold absolutely

no and sold connection are put to work

for the good of the public who they have

wronged under a regulated and

transparent system which minimized his

deception while avoiding unpleasant

associations which also holds recorded

accountability Among The Justice System

including limited terms of use of course

there are abuse cases and questions that

must be asked of the necromancers who

might be running this program but that's

about as good as I can get it do let me

know if you think it can be done better

more ethically please do get in the

comments and give me your own theories

your own workings out to make this as

ethically viable as we can either in the

context of a pseudo medieval fantasy

Society or as I'm I've tried to do in

this video in a mid uh to post

Enlightenment world and if you want more

videos in this vein please do let me

know by subscribing and and letting me

know in the comments it is of course

October after all the spookiest month of

them all but with that said thank you so

much for watching I have been Tom

otherwise known as the Great D master

and I will see you in the next video