9 Most Shocking P. Diddy 'Freak Off' Party Details Revealed in Indictment
Summary
TLDRIn the case against rapper Sean 'Diddy' Combs, the term 'freak off' has become central to allegations of sex trafficking and abuse. The indictment details how Combs allegedly used his influence to coerce women into participating in these orchestrated sexual performances, often involving drugs and commercial sex workers. The government's case includes evidence such as videos, witness testimonies, and records of payments. Despite the serious charges and public scrutiny, it is claimed that Combs continued these activities even while under investigation, highlighting a pattern of alleged criminal enterprise.
Takeaways
- π The term 'freak off' has become synonymous with Shawn 'Diddy' Combs and is central to his federal sex crimes case.
- π¨ Diddy is facing serious charges including racketeering, conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution, which could lead to 15 years to life in prison.
- π€ The indictment alleges that Diddy led a criminal enterprise that involved the abuse of women, sex trafficking, force labor, and prostitution.
- π 'Freak offs' are described as elaborate, orchestrated sex performances that Diddy allegedly arranged, directed, and recorded for his pleasure.
- π During these performances, Diddy is accused of distributing controlled substances to victims to keep them obedient and compliant.
- π After 'freak offs', Diddy and victims reportedly received IV fluids to recover from the physical exertion and drug use.
- ποΈ The government claims that 'freak offs' have been happening since 2009 and involved drugs like ketamine, GHB, and ecstasy.
- πΉ There is evidence of Diddy keeping videos of the 'freak offs' without the victims' knowledge, which could be problematic if true.
- πΌ The indictment suggests that multiple employees and associates of Diddy's business allegedly facilitated the 'freak offs' by booking hotel rooms, stocking supplies, and arranging travel.
- π« Despite being aware of the criminal investigation, Diddy allegedly continued to engage in 'freak offs', use narcotics, and contact multiple witnesses.
Q & A
What is the term 'freak off' as mentioned in the script?
-The term 'freak off' refers to elaborate and produced sex performances that Shawn 'Diddy' Combs allegedly arranged, directed, and participated in, which are now at the center of his federal sex crimes case.
What are the major accusations against Shawn 'Diddy' Combs as described in the script?
-The major accusations against Shawn 'Diddy' Combs include racketeering, conspiracy, sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, transportation to engage in prostitution, and the distribution of drugs.
What could be the potential sentence Shawn 'Diddy' Combs is facing according to the script?
-Shawn 'Diddy' Combs could be facing 15 years to life in prison based on the severity of the charges against him.
How does the script suggest that the 'freak offs' were organized?
-The script suggests that 'freak offs' were organized by Shawn 'Diddy' Combs and members of his enterprise, who booked hotel rooms, stocked them with supplies, arranged for travel, and facilitated payments to commercial sex workers.
What role did the associates of Shawn 'Diddy' Combs play in the 'freak offs' as per the script?
-According to the script, associates of Shawn 'Diddy' Combs played a significant role in facilitating the 'freak offs' by booking hotel rooms, stocking them with required supplies, arranging travel, and cleaning up after the events.
What substances were allegedly distributed during the 'freak offs' as mentioned in the script?
-The script mentions that controlled substances such as ketamine, GHB, and ecstasy were distributed to victims during the 'freak offs'.
How does the script indicate that the 'freak offs' were not just consensual sexual encounters?
-The script indicates that the 'freak offs' involved force, threats, and coercion, and that participants were sometimes subjected to physical, emotional, and verbal abuse to make them participate.
What evidence does the government have to support the allegations of 'freak offs' according to the script?
-The government has evidence including video recordings of 'freak offs', witness testimony, travel records, hotel records, and electronic devices that were seized.
What is the significance of the 2016 incident mentioned in the script in relation to the 'freak offs'?
-The 2016 incident, where Shawn 'Diddy' Combs allegedly assaulted Cassandra Ventura, is significant as it ties to the 'freak offs' allegations. Ventura claimed she was trying to escape a 'freak off' when the assault occurred.
How does the script suggest that the 'freak offs' were continuing even after legal troubles began for Combs?
-The script suggests that even after being sued and after the term 'freak off' was publicized, Shawn 'Diddy' Combs allegedly continued to engage in 'freak offs', as evidenced by the government's claim that he engaged in multiple 'freak offs' after being aware of the criminal investigation.
What is the potential impact of the 'freak offs' on Shawn 'Diddy' Combs' reputation as outlined in the script?
-The script outlines that the 'freak offs' could significantly and negatively impact Shawn 'Diddy' Combs' reputation, as the government has substantial evidence that is highly sensitive and could damage his public image.
Outlines
π¨ Shawn Colmes' 'Freak Off' Allegations
The paragraph discusses the allegations against Shawn 'Diddy' Combs, commonly known as 'freak offs', which involve sexual abuse and trafficking. The term 'freak off' has become synonymous with Combs due to his federal sex crimes case. The speaker, Jesse Weber, explains the major accusations and details surrounding these incidents, including physical, emotional, and verbal abuse aimed at forcing victims to participate. Combs is facing serious charges such as racketeering, sex trafficking, and more, which could lead to a life sentence. The paragraph also mentions other civil lawsuits that involve similar allegations of 'freak offs'.
π Evidence and Legal Strategy
This section delves into the evidence that supports the allegations of 'freak offs', including witness testimonies and physical evidence like videos and electronic records. The government is moving forward with the case, suggesting that the concept of 'freak offs' is substantiated by more than just witness accounts. The defense may argue that these acts were consensual, despite the wild nature of the accusations. The paragraph also discusses the potential impact of such allegations on Combs' reputation and the strategy of using the term 'freak off' in court.
π¨ Hotel Damages and Continued Allegations
The paragraph discusses specific instances where hotel rooms were damaged during 'freak offs', with one example being a $46,000 damage claim in Manhattan. It also mentions the ongoing nature of the 'freak offs', suggesting that they continued even after Combs was aware of the criminal investigation against him. The government is using this continued behavior as evidence of Combs' lack of regard for the law and as a reason for his detention.
π The Extent of the Criminal Enterprise
This final paragraph outlines the extent of the alleged criminal enterprise, involving high-ranking supervisors, security staff, and personal assistants who facilitated the 'freak offs'. It discusses the roles these individuals played, such as booking hotel rooms, stocking supplies, and cleaning up after the events. The paragraph also mentions the seizure of various 'freak off' supplies from Combs' residences, including narcotics and large quantities of baby oil and lubricant. The government's case is building on the consistency of witness testimonies and the collection of physical evidence.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Freak off
π‘Indictment
π‘Racketeering
π‘Sex trafficking
π‘Coercion
π‘Bail
π‘Enterprise
π‘Force, fraud, or coercion
π‘IV fluids
π‘Consent
π‘Criminal case
Highlights
Shawn 'Diddy' Combs is facing serious federal sex crimes charges including racketeering, conspiracy, sex trafficking, and more.
The term 'freak off' has become synonymous with Combs and is central to his case.
Freak offs are alleged to be elaborate, produced sex performances arranged by Combs.
Combs' bail was denied twice due to the severity of the accusations and potential flight risk.
The indictment alleges that Combs led a criminal enterprise to engage in abuse of women, sex trafficking, and other crimes.
Freak offs allegedly involved the use of force, threats, and coercion to make victims participate.
The government claims that freak offs have been happening since 2009 and involved drugs like ketamine, GHB, and ecstasy.
Combs may argue that the freak offs were consensual, though the government has substantial evidence to the contrary.
The government has video recordings, witness testimonies, and other evidence to support their case.
Freak offs allegedly resulted in significant hotel room damages, with one instance costing over $46,000.
The indictment suggests that Combs used violence and threats to coerce victims into participating in freak offs.
Combs allegedly used recordings of freak offs as collateral against victims.
The government claims that freak offs continued even after Combs was aware of the criminal investigation.
Over 50 victims and witnesses have been interviewed, with many corroborating each other's accounts.
The government has seized a large number of electronic devices that may contain evidence of the freak offs.
Members and associates of Combs' enterprise allegedly facilitated the freak offs by booking hotel rooms and arranging travel.
The government alleges that Combs attempted to bribe hotel security to cover up an assault related to a freak off.
The investigation is ongoing, and more witnesses may come forward or cooperate with the government.
Transcripts
when Colmes didn't get his way he was
violent and he subjected victims to
physical emotional and verbal abuse so
that they would participate in the freak
offs the Freak off a term that has now
not only become synonymous with Shawn
Diddy comes but it is at the center of
his Federal sex crimes case we're going
to explain some of the major accusations
and details surrounding the freak offs
and what this could mean for the
indicted rapper welcome to sidebar
present by law on crime I'm Jesse
Weber there is one term that has gone
viral since the indictment of Shawn
Diddy combes more than anything else
you've heard it here on sidebar you've
heard it Amplified in the media it is
called a freak off this alleged sexual
performance that is at the center of
this criminal case facing the rapper and
producer sha Diddy Combs and I'm going
to go over some of the details of these
freak off sessions as laid out in the
government's indictment and in their
subsequent letters that they filed with
the court when they argued against
colm's bail which by the way was denied
twice now he's currently locked up in
the Brooklyn Detention Center comes is
facing charges of racketeering
conspiracy sex trafficking by force
fraud or coercion transportation to
engage in prostitution we've mentioned
it before but he could be looking at 15
years to life in prison that's how
serious these charges are but the main
theme Here the main allegation is that
comes led a criminal Enterprise and the
goal of this criminal Enterprise other
than to operate a global media and
entertainment business was to engage in
the abuse of women sex trafficking Force
labor prostitution the distribution of
drugs to use violence and threats to
commit crimes like kidnapping arson
bribery obstruction of justice to carry
out their goals their missions all the
while making sure to satisfy the sexual
desires of Shawn Colmes and one of those
desires as alleged by the government by
prosecutors and also alleged by several
Colmes accusers in separate civil
lawsuits that they filed against him
were the commission of freak offs so
with that in mind now we're going to get
into these shocking details surrounding
these freak offs and I guess we should
start with saying what are freak offs
right well let's go to the indictment it
says quote comes and other members and
Associates of the comes Enterprise
wielded the power and Prestige of com's
role at the com's business to intimidate
threaten and lure female victims into
com's orbit often under the pretense of
a romantic relationship coms then used
Force threats of force and coercion to
cause victims to engage in extended sex
acts with male commercial sex workers
that comes referred to as among other
things freak offs freak offs were
elaborate and produced sex performances
that comes arranged directed pleasured
himself during and often electronically
recorded now while this indictment came
down I said at the time this may be a
term that is foreign to any person that
was not familiar with Shawn comes but
for me who's been following this whole
Saga for what a year now I have heard
this term multiple times because in the
Cassandra Ventura lawsuit com's ex-girl
and Rodney little Rod Jones lawsuit this
is com's former producer they discussed
the freak offs in their again their
sexual assault lawsuits now Ventura
alleged among other things that Colmes
would demand her participation in freak
offs and that she would have to be
forced to hire the male sex workers and
that this could happen at any random
moment Jones alleged among other things
that com's son Justin comes and DJ and
record producer Stevie Jay would engage
in freak offs now to be clear those
specific allegations those names those
details were not mentioned as part of
the criminal case I will tell you though
that the idea of this freak off now that
it is officially part of the criminal
case now that it's mentioned multiple
times this makes me wonder two things
from a legal point of view number one it
is such a wild concept and a phraseology
that it's hard to believe that that this
is something that was just made up by
com's accusers and when I say com's
accusers could that be ventor yes could
that be Jones yes perhaps the government
got this information these this idea of
the freak offs originally from them and
by the way when I say com's accusers
could be Ventura could be Jones perhaps
the government got this idea of the
freak offs from them originally but we
don't know to be clear we do not know
for sure we do not know who the accusers
are the victims are in this criminal
case who the government's Witnesses are
whoever those people may be because we
don't know for sure who is cooperating
with the government right now but the
bottom line is the idea of the Freak off
there's enough there to substantiate it
that the government is moving forward
with this and again it is so wild it's
such a wild concept to come up with that
I wonder if an argument will be made
that look jury this has to be true no
one can honor ly make something like
this up and as you'll see it doesn't
appear it was just witness testimony
that corroborates the idea of the freak
offs happening the existence of these
freak offs but there's more and I'll get
to that but this also leads me to a
secondary point that based upon what we
are already seeing from com's defense
Council during bail arguments they may
not deny that these freak offs happened
or even that Colmes called them freak
offs they may say yeah you know what he
engaged in freak offs that's what he
called them but they were consensual
that's the idea they were consensual
this is not a crime talking about sha
comes and these allegations does it not
show you just how scary the world can be
how unpredictable the world can be and
you know what you know what one of the
most unpredictable things can be in life
something that is truly terrifying that
comes out of nowhere if you get injured
right that comes out of nowhere but it's
important to realize that at those
moments what your rights are and whether
you could be compensated for your injury
well that's where our sponsor and proud
partner of sidebar Morgan and Morgan
comes in this is America's largest
injury Law Firm they have an army of
over a thousand attorneys who will fight
for what you deserve they have the track
record to prove it in the past few
months Morgan and Morgan won verdicts
like 12 million in Florida $26 million
in Philadelphia $6.8 million in New York
and mind you these are all considerably
higher than the highest insurance offers
in these cases truly your case could be
worth millions of dollars and even if
it's not why not start a claim and get
the money that you do deserve seeing if
you have a case can be done in eight
clicks or less also totally free it's
absolutely free unless you win they're
only getting paid if you get paid so if
you're injured you can easily start a
claim at forthepeople.com LC sidebar or
you can click the link in the
description and pinned in the comments
and I want to explore that a little bit
more let's explore a little bit more
details of these freak offs so the
indictment continues quote freak offs
occurred regularly sometimes lasted
multiple days and often involved mult
multiple commercial sex workers during
freak offs comes distributed a variety
of Controlled Substances to victims in
part to keep the victims obedient and
compliant sometimes unbeknownst to the
victims Colmes kept videos he filmed of
victims engaging in sex acts with
commercial sex workers after freak offs
Colmes and the victims typically
received IV fluids to recover from the
physical exertion and drug use that is
something and the government would
allege that these freak offs they have
been happening since
2009 that those drugs consisted of
ketamine GHB ecstasy now in terms of the
defense of consent the defense could say
well these people knowingly and
voluntarily took drugs but if it's true
that combms kept videos that these
participants didn't know about that
could be problematic for him especially
since we learned the government may have
the goods to back all of this up in
their bail letter to the judge they
write quote the evidence against the
defendant which would be made public a
trial includes substantial evidence that
is highly sensitive and has the
potential to significantly and
negatively impact the defendant's
reputation for example dozens of video
recordings created by the defendant of
freak offs with victims I mean we
wondered what was collected by federal
authorities after they raided com's
homes in La and Miami back in March
there were reports that they collected
did digital evidence in fact further on
in the government's letter prosecutors
write quote setting aside devices seized
in connection with the defendants arrest
the government has obtained over 90 cell
phones laptops cloud storage accounts as
well as over 30 other electronic and
storage devices such as hard drives
thumb drives cameras and a surveillance
system the government also wrote victim
testimony regarding freak offs is at
times corroborated by other Witness
testimony Communications with the
defendant and Commercial sex workers
travel records Hotel records videos of
the freak offs and Records reflecting or
indicating payment by the way you're
talking about evidence of freak offs
prosecutors revealed one other way that
they can prove that these freak off
events happen because in the
government's bail letter it states the
defendant arranged freak offs with the
assistance of members and Associates of
the Enterprise including employees of
his business bus and the hotel rooms
where they were staged often sustain
significant damages so the prosecution's
letter goes on to state that for example
in approximately 2012 in Manhattan the
defendant paid over
$46,000 to cover damages to a penthouse
hotel room following a freak off yeah
now I imagine the government plans to
produce receipts of this some
documentation or witness testimony to
corroborate that account cuz it'll be
tough for the the defense to say why
else did that hotel room sustain
allegedly $46,000 worth of Damages if it
wasn't for this wild sexual performance
event but again you could see why the
government's putting that evidence
forward to suggest that these freak offs
occurred now going back to that idea of
consent this defense of consent I couple
that with something else that I've been
hearing I've seen people say why are
these freak offs a crime right you might
be wild sexual encounters but why is
this sex trafficking why is this
racketeering well as laid out in the
indictment but also this was articulated
by Damen Williams the United States
Attorney for the southern district of
New York here's what he had to say in a
press conference after the unsealing of
this indictment as alleged Combs used
Force threats of force and coercion to
cause victims to engage in extended
sexual performances with male commercial
sex workers some of whom he transported
or caused to be transported over state
lines when Colmes didn't get his way he
was violent and he subjected victims to
physical emotional and verbal abuse so
that they would participate in the freak
offs and that Combs hit kicked through
objects at and dragged victims at times
by their
hair on one occasion in March of 2016
that conduct was captured on video and
later reported in the media specifically
comes kicked dragged and threw a vase at
a victim in a Los Angeles hotel when the
victim was attempting to
flee as alleged these assaults often
resulted in injuries to the victims
which took days or weeks to
heal in addition to the violence the
indictment alleges that Combs threatened
and coerced victims to get them to
participate in the freak offs he used
the embarrassing and sensitive
recordings he made of the freak offs as
collateral against the victims and
that's the key it's using power violence
threats coercion Force to get people to
participate in sexual activity that is
illegal sex trafficking is when you use
such methods for the purposes of
commercial sex usually over state lines
commercial sex is when money is offered
for sexual services or something else of
value and one of the things that the
indictment mentions is how coms would
allegedly dangle Promises of career
opportunities or threatening to withhold
financial support to get people to do
what he wanted now you heard Damen
Williams mention that 2016 incident so
even if you hadn't been following the
Colmes legal Saga for the past year
everyone saw that video that was
published by CNN of Colmes allegedly
beating Cassandra Ventura back in 2016
at the Intercontinental Hotel in La all
while wearing a robe this is something
that Ventura alleged had happened when
she filed her lawsuit back in November
of 2023 but when that video was released
we all saw with our own eyes what
apparently transpired and we know Shan
Colmes issued an apology on Instagram
two days after the release of that tape
but how this ties to the Freak off well
the allegation was the reason he was in
a towel the reason she was allegedly
running away the reason he allegedly
beat her was because she was trying to
escape a freak off and as ventur alleged
prosecutor SE Holmes tried to cover up
this event in the bail letter
prosecutors write quote when a member of
hotel security staff intervened the
defendant attempted to offer the hotel
security officer a stack of cash to
ensure his silence after the security
guard refused the defendant's bribe and
after coordination between the defendant
and his employees the defendant staff
contacted other members of hotel
security at the same time staff members
were in close communication with the
victim of the assault as well all in an
effort to cover up the defendant's
assault and to prevent the incident from
being publicly disclosed within days of
the incident the surveillance video
disappeared from the hotel's server by
the way that brings me to another point
about the freak offs how many people
allegedly helped Combs do this as the
indictment reads quote members and
Associates of the comes Enterprise
including high- ranking supervisors
security staff household staff personal
assistants and other com's business
employees facilitated the freak offs by
among other things booking hotel rooms
for the freak offs stocking the hotel
rooms in advance with the required freak
off supplies including Controlled
Substances baby oil lubricant extra
Linens and lighting cleaning the hotel
rooms after the freak offs to try to
mitigate room damage arranging for
travel for victims commercial sex
workers and combs to and from Freak offs
re supplying Combs with requested
supplies delivering large sums of cash
to Combs to pay the commercial sex
workers and scheduling the delivery of
IV fluids in or about March 2024 during
searches of com's residences in Miami
Florida and Los Angeles California law
enforcement seized various freak off
supplies including narcotics and more
than 1,000 bottles of baby oil and
lubricant wow so assuming the government
did in fact C all of this evidence again
I don't think there's a great defense
for why someone would have that much
baby oil in lubricant so the defense
will probably be like yeah my client
engaged in these sexual sessions but hey
that's not illegal on its face everyone
agreed to it's all consensual but here's
the larger Point first you can see how
this supports the racketeering
conspiracy charge that comes faces right
the idea that there was an agreement to
create and further a criminal Enterprise
comes can't do this alone prosecutors
need to prove he conspired with others
in this criminal Enterprise to break the
law so you see this alleged coordination
between multiple people at his behest
but this also helps explain potential
witnesses that may be working with the
government those people that used to
work for Combs associated with Combs
help facilitate these alleged freak offs
that may now be key Witnesses at a
future trial after all what did the
prosecution write in their letter to the
judge the government has conducted
interviews with over 50 victims and
Witnesses many of whom saw or experience
the defendants abuse many of these
Witnesses corroborate one another and
their accounts are similarly consistent
with the other types of evidence
discussed below the government only
expects that number to continue to grow
given that the investigation which is
now public is ongoing and we did another
sidebar on the potential that people
will come forward or take deals to
cooperate with the government you can
check it out on our long crime YouTube
page but if you thought that all of that
wasn't shocking enough when it comes to
the freak offs I want to leave you with
one final allegation regarding these
freak offs and this is something that
prosecutors mentioned in their second
letter regarding bail so let's not
forget Colmes was first denied bail by a
Magistrate Judge he appealed that
decision to a district court judge and
that judge is supposed to review this
with fresh eyes doesn't have to provide
necessarily deference to what this other
judge did so the government doubled down
to show how much of a danger sha Colmes
is how he can't be trusted on the
outside how he needs to be detained
pending trial and in their second letter
they write quote indeed since at least
in or about January
2024 when the defendant was
unquestionably aware of the criminal
investigation the evidence shows that he
is engaged in multiple freak offs some
involving the interstate transportation
of individuals to participate has
continued to use narcotics and has
contacted multiple Witnesses so if true
the government is saying these freak
offs are not years old they are
essentially still happening this was
after he had already been sued and after
the idea of the Freak off had become
publicized through those lawsuits people
were talking about in the media and he
still allegedly engaged in this Behavior
that's huge for prosecutors and of
course here we know that Colmes was
denied bail Again by that secondary
judge so there you have it a full
breakdown of the Freak off allegations
how they tie into the larger overall
case and to be clear I'm sure this is
not the last time we will hear this term
or we will hear more details surrounding
the freak offs that's all we have for
you right now here on sidebar everybody
thank you so much for joining us and as
always please subscribe on Apple podcast
Spotify YouTube wherever you get your
podcasts I'm Jesse Weber I'll speak to
you next time
[Music]
Browse More Related Video
"Diddy Is Done" - Diddy ARRESTED On Sex Trafficking Charges, Denied Bail Over 'Freak Off' Parties
5 Pieces of Evidence P. Diddy Might Get Convicted For
Meek Mill's Lawyer Speaks on P. Diddy's Next Moves After Trafficking Arrest
The P. Diddy Situation is Crazier Than It Seems
Surviving Diddy - The Rise & Fall of Sean "P Diddy" Combs
13 Celebs SHOWN In Court On Diddyβs Disturbing Freak-Off Footage (UNSEEN)
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)