Forensic Files (HD) - Season 13, Episode 25 - Family Ties - Full Episode

FilmRise True Crime
5 Mar 202121:15

Summary

TLDREl caso de Peter y Joan Porco, un asesinato y un intento de asesinato que sacudió a una comunidad. Peter, un empleado del Tribunal Supremo de Nueva York, es brutalmente asesinado y Joan, su esposa, sobrevive a un ataque salvaje con heridas graves. La investigación apuntaba inicialmente a su hijo Christopher, pero luego se descartó. Sin embargo, la evidencia, incluyendo un jeep amarillo y una tarjeta de peaje con su ADN, lo vincula con el crimen. Christopher es condenado a 50 años de prisión, a pesar de que su madre sigue creyendo en su inocencia.

Takeaways

  • 🔍 El caso involucra un asesinato y un intento de asesinato en la入侵 de una vivienda, con heridas inimaginables y un patrón de 'asesinato de firma'.
  • 👨‍👩‍👦 La víctima, Peter Porco, era un empleado del Tribunal Supremo del Estado de Nueva York, y su hijo Christopher es el principal sospechoso.
  • 🩸 Se descubre que Peter fue golpeado 16 veces en la cabeza con un hacha, mientras que su esposa, Joan, recibió tres golpes.
  • 🤕 A pesar de ser gravemente herida, Joan sobrevivió y inicialmente acusó a su hijo Christopher, pero luego retractó su declaración.
  • 🧬 Se encontró ADN de Christopher en un boleto de peaje, lo que vinculaba su presencia en la autopista en la noche del ataque.
  • 🚗 Un jeep amarillo similar al de Christopher fue capturado en video saliendo de la universidad y regresando horas después del ataque.
  • 💸 Existen indicios de que Christopher estaba en problemas financieros, había falsificado las firmas de sus padres y necesitaba dinero desesperadamente.
  • 🏦 Se descubre que Peter y Joan tenían una póliza de seguro de vida por un millón de dólares, lo que podría haber sido un motivo del crimen.
  • 🔎 Se investiga la posibilidad de que el crimen estuviera relacionado con la mafia debido a la conexión de un pariente de Peter con actividades ilícitas.
  • 🏢 Christopher tenía un historial de gasto excesivo y fracaso académico, lo que podría haberlo llevado a cometer el crimen por la póliza de seguro de vida.
  • 🏛️ El caso se juzga en un tribunal, donde la evidencia circunstancial es abrumadora, y Christopher es encontrado culpable y condenado a 50 años de prisión.

Q & A

  • ¿Qué tipo de crimen fue cometido en el caso de Peter y Joan Porco?

    -El crimen cometido fue un asesinato y un intento de asesinato en una invasión a la vivienda. Peter fue asesinado y Joan fue gravemente herida.

  • ¿Cómo se describe el método utilizado para el asesinato según el guion?

    -El método utilizado fue un ataque con hacha, lo que se denomina un 'asesinato de firma', lo que sugiere una ejecución deliberada y brutal.

  • ¿Qué implicaciones tenía la lesión de Peter después del ataque?

    -A pesar de haber sido golpeado 16 veces en la cabeza, Peter recuperó la conciencia y realizó tareas diarias como hacer las labores matinales y recoger el periódico, debido a que su neocórtex, que controla las funciones superiores, estaba gravemente dañado, pero su paleocórtex, que controla los instintos primarios, estaba intacto.

  • ¿Por qué inicialmente se sospecha de Christopher Porco?

    -Inicialmente, Joan Porco, en un momento de conciencia, asintió que su hijo Christopher era el responsable del ataque. Además, Christopher tenía un posible motivo financiero, ya que había falsificado las firmas de sus padres para tomar prestado dinero y estaba en problemas financieros.

  • ¿Cómo se descarta la sospecha sobre Christopher Porco después de que su madre se recupera?

    -Joan Porco, después de sobrevivir y recuperarse, declaró abiertamente que Christopher no tenía nada que ver con el ataque y pidió al fiscal que lo dejara en paz y buscara al verdadero asesino.

  • ¿Qué evidencia forense vinculó a Christopher Porco con el crimen?

    -El análisis de vídeo mostró que el jeep amarillo de Christopher salió de la universidad y regresó en un horario que coincidía con el ataque. Además, se encontró su ADN en un boleto de peaje que no había sido registrado por su Easy Pass.

  • ¿Qué implicaciones tenía la vida de Christopher Porco antes del crimen?

    -Christopher estaba pasando por problemas financieros, había malgastado dinero en lujos y estaba failing en sus cursos universitarios, lo que podría haberlo llevado a actuar desesperadamente por dinero.

  • ¿Cuál fue la sentencia de Christopher Porco tras ser encontrado culpable?

    -Christopher Porco fue sentenciado a una pena mínima de 50 años de prisión por el asesinato de su padre y el intento de asesinato de su madre.

  • ¿Qué teoría alternativa se exploró en el caso para explicar el ataque?

    -Se exploró la posibilidad de que el ataque pudiera estar relacionado con la mafia, debido a la conexión de un pariente de Peter Porco con el crimen organizado, pero esta teoría fue descartada debido a la falta de evidencia directa.

  • ¿Qué evidencia se encontró que contradecía la afirmación inicial de Joan Porco sobre su hijo?

    -A pesar de que inicialmente Joan Porco señaló a su hijo como el atacante, la evidencia forense, incluyendo el ADN de Christopher en un boleto de peaje y el jeep amarillo en el lugar del crimen, contradecía su afirmación.

Outlines

00:00

🔍 Asesinato y crimen familiar

El primer párrafo relata un caso de asesinato y lesiones en un hogar, donde las heridas son descritas como 'inimaginables'. Se menciona que podría haber estado involucrado un familiar, Frankie 'El Bombero' Porco, con posibles conexiones con la mafia. La policía es criticada por no resolver el caso, pero se sugiere que están cerca de descubrir al asesino. Se introduce a Peter Porco, un empleado respetado en la Corte Suprema de Nueva York, y su esposa Joan, quienes son víctimas de un ataque brutal con hacha. Peter es encontrado muerto y Joan gravemente herida, pero consciente. Se describe la escena del crimen y cómo Peter, a pesar de ser gravemente herido, se levantó y realizó sus tareas diarias, debido a daños en su neocórtex. Se revela que Christopher, su hijo de 21 años, es el principal sospechoso.

05:01

👨‍⚖️ Dos hijos con alibi y la recuperación de la madre

El segundo párrafo explora la vida de Peter y Joan Porco, quienes tenían dos hijos: Jonathan, un oficial de la marina de los Estados Unidos, y Christopher, un estudiante universitario. Ambos tenían alibis para la noche del ataque. Sin embargo, Joan, en un momento de conciencia, señaló a Christopher como el responsable, aunque luego reculó y declaró su inocencia. Se describe la recuperación milagrosa de Joan y cómo la evidencia forense, como la ausencia de sangre en el vehículo de Christopher y la falta de registros de su Easy Pass, apoya su historia. Se menciona un presunto amenaza de muerte contra Peter y una carta anónima que podría ser del verdadero asesino.

10:01

🚔 Investigación detallada y descubrimiento de pruebas

El tercer párrafo sigue la investigación policial, que incluye la revisión de videos de seguridad, análisis de códigos de seguridad y la búsqueda de un móvil en el crimen. Se descubre que el jeep de Christopher dejó la universidad y regresó horas después del ataque. Se analiza la posibilidad de que haya pagado las peajes en efectivo para evitar dejar una pista y se encuentra su Easy Pass en el suelo de su jeep. Se sugiere que Peter y Joan tenían una poliza de seguro de vida valiosa y que Christopher había solicitado información financiera antes del asesinato, lo que podría indicar un móvil económico.

15:01

🔎 Hallazgos finales y el juicio

El cuarto párrafo describe cómo se encontró la prueba definitiva: una boleta de peaje con la DNA de Christopher. Se expone la teoría del fiscal de que Christopher, necesitado de dinero, asesinó a sus padres para la poliza de seguro de vida. Se narra cómo Christopher deshabilitó el sistema de seguridad, atacó a sus padres y luego regresó a la universidad. Se mencionan las dudas y preguntas sin respuesta, como la ubicación de la ropa ensangrentada y la implicación inicial de Christopher por parte de su madre. Finalmente, se relata el juicio y la condena de Christopher a 50 años de prisión.

20:03

🏢 El veredicto y la reacción de la familia

El último párrafo cubre la reacción de la familia y la comunidad ante el veredicto. Se destaca la firme creencia de la inocencia de Christopher por parte de su madre, a pesar de la evidencia contundente presentada en el juicio. Se describe el impacto emocional del caso en los miembros del jurado y la rareza de un caso así, con la esperanza de que no se repita.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Asesinato

El asesinato es el acto de quitar la vida a una persona de manera intencional y premeditada. En el guion, el asesinato es el núcleo del caso, donde Peter Porco es brutalmente asesinado con un hacha y su esposa, Joan, es gravemente herida. Este término es fundamental para entender la gravedad del crimen y la trama del video.

💡Hacha

La hacha es el arma utilizada en el asesinato descrito. Se menciona que Peter fue golpeado 16 veces en la cabeza con una hacha, lo que indica la brutalidad del ataque. La hacha es un elemento clave en la narrativa, ya que es el instrumento del crimen y un indicio físico crucial en la investigación.

💡Investigación

La investigación es el proceso de recopilar información y evidencia para resolver un caso, como el asesinato presentado. En el guion, la investigación es llevada a cabo por la policía y los detectives, quienes buscan respuestas y justicia. Este concepto es central en el video, ya que muestra los esfuerzos por descubrir la verdad detrás del crimen.

💡Sospechoso

Un sospechoso es una persona que es considerada responsable de un crimen basándose en la evidencia o las circunstancias. En el video, Christopher Porco, el hijo de las víctimas, inicialmente es señalado como sospechoso por su madre, Joan, aunque luego ella rectifica su declaración. La figura del sospechoso es crucial para seguir el desarrollo de la trama y la resolución del misterio.

💡Circunstancial

La evidencia circunstancial es cualquier dato que no prueba directamente la culpabilidad de una persona, pero que puede sugerir su involucramiento en un crimen. En el guion, la evidencia circunstancial contra Christopher incluye su jeep cerca de la escena del crimen y su ADN en un boleto de peaje. Este término es importante para entender cómo la policía construye su caso.

💡Familia

La familia es un grupo de personas relacionadas por lazos de parentesco. En el video, la dinámica familiar es compleja y clave en la historia, ya que el asesinato y el intento de asesinato afectan directamente a los miembros de la familia Porco. La relación entre los sospechosos y las víctimas, así como la implicación de la familia en el caso, son fundamentales para la narrativa.

💡Seguro de vida

El seguro de vida es un tipo de seguro que proporciona una suma de dinero a los beneficiarios en caso de la muerte del asegurado. En el guion, se menciona que Peter y Joan tenían una suma asegurada de un millón de dólares, lo que podría haber sido un motivo para el crimen. Este concepto es relevante para entender las posibles motivaciones detrás del asesinato.

💡Mafia

La mafia es una organización criminal que a menudo está involucrada en actividades ilícitas. En el guion, se sugiere una posible conexión de la familia con la mafia a través de un pariente, lo que podría haber influido en el crimen. Este término es importante para explorar las teorías sobre quién podría estar detrás del asesinato.

💡Autopsia

Una autopsia es un examen médico forense realizado en un cuerpo para determinar la causa de la muerte. En el video, el informe de autopsia revela detalles cruciales sobre el modo en que Peter fue asesinado, lo que ayuda a la investigación. Este término es esencial para comprender cómo la ciencia forense contribuye a resolver el caso.

💡Culpabilidad

La culpabilidad es la responsabilidad legal o moral de haber cometido un delito. En el guion, la determinación de la culpabilidad es un tema central, ya que la evidencia y los testimonios llevan a la convicción de Christopher. Este concepto es crucial para entender el desenlace del caso y la justicia que se busca.

Highlights

Un ataque a una vivienda y asesinato con heridas inimaginables.

Se considera un asesinato con signatura y se sugiere la posible participación de un familiar.

Frankie 'El Bombero' Porco, un pariente del victimario, es mencionado en relación con la mafia.

Peter Porco, un empleado del Tribunal Supremo de Nueva York, es encontrado asesinado en su hogar.

Joan Porco, la esposa de Peter, sobrevive pero con heridas graves; se encuentra un hacha cerca de ella.

Análisis de la sangre muestra que Joan fue golpeada tres veces en la cabeza mientras dormía.

Peter fue golpeado 16 veces en la cabeza, pero su cuerpo fue encontrado en la planta baja.

Peter, a pesar de ser gravemente herido, se levantó y realizó tareas diarias como si nada hubiera pasado.

Joan, en un breve momento de conciencia, acusa a su hijo Christopher de ser el atacante.

Christopher tenía una excusa de不在场证明 y se ofreció para pruebas de ADN y análisis de lesiones.

Joan, después de recuperarse, declara que Christopher no tuvo nada que ver con el ataque.

No se encontró evidencia forense que vinculase a Christopher con el crimen en su vehículo o en la autopista.

Peter había recibido una amenaza de muerte previamente, pero el autor tenía una excusa de不在场证明 para la noche del asesinato.

Se recibe una carta anónima tomando crédito del asesinato, pero no se encuentran huellas dactilares en la carta.

Se descubre que Peter y Joan tenían una póliza de seguro de vida por un millón de dólares.

Christopher había solicitado consejo financiero antes del asesinato, hablando de recibir millones de dólares.

Se descubre que el código utilizado para desactivar el sistema de seguridad era conocido por miembros de la familia.

Se obtiene video de seguridad que muestra el jeep de Christopher saliendo de la universidad y regresando horas después del ataque.

Se encuentra ADN de Christopher en un boleto de peaje, lo que apoya la teoría de que él estuvo en el lugar del crimen.

Christopher fue encontrado culpable y condenado a 50 años de prisión.

A pesar de la condena, su madre sigue creyendo en su inocencia.

Transcripts

play00:00

[Music]

play00:04

up next

play00:05

a home invasion and murder the injuries

play00:08

that she sustained are

play00:09

unimaginable it was what they call a

play00:11

signature killing

play00:12

was a family member involved allegations

play00:15

of mafia

play00:16

involvement the relative is frankie the

play00:18

fireman porco

play00:20

the press says the police can't solve it

play00:22

every day on the news

play00:23

talking about they've botched this

play00:25

investigation they can't do anything

play00:27

right

play00:27

but the police are one step ahead of the

play00:30

press

play00:31

and the killer

play00:34

[Music]

play00:41

working for the supreme court of new

play00:43

york state is a prestigious job

play00:47

for 52-year-old peter porco a clerk for

play00:50

an appeals judge

play00:51

it was the perfect way to end his legal

play00:54

career

play00:55

until one day everything

play00:58

changed it started off as any other day

play01:01

until peter porco didn't show up for

play01:02

work

play01:03

and people began to get worried because

play01:05

that wasn't like him

play01:06

a court officer went to the parcco's

play01:08

home and immediately saw signs of

play01:11

trouble he walked up to the front of the

play01:13

house

play01:13

and in the door he saw a key a key by

play01:16

itself

play01:17

in the door lock the door was ajar he

play01:20

looks down and he sees on the cement

play01:22

steps some drops of blood

play01:25

inside was a bloodbath he

play01:28

looked over to his right and he saw a

play01:30

body laying there

play01:31

whom he recognizes peter parkou

play01:34

peter porco had been bludgeoned to death

play01:38

it was a scene of shocking horror

play01:41

something that

play01:42

most people who saw it find it difficult

play01:44

to talk about

play01:46

upstairs in the master bedroom was his

play01:49

wife joan

play01:50

who was still alive but just barely a

play01:53

three-foot axe

play01:54

was next to her investigators could see

play01:57

her brain

play01:58

while they were trying to save her life

play02:00

she was also hit with the axe along her

play02:02

arms

play02:03

to give oxygen they're supposed to put a

play02:05

bag over her mouth and

play02:06

they couldn't figure out where her mouth

play02:08

was

play02:10

joan was rushed to the hospital her life

play02:13

hanging

play02:13

in the balance blood spatter analysis

play02:17

showed

play02:18

that joan porco was struck three times

play02:20

in the head with the axe while sleeping

play02:22

peter parkout had been struck 16 times

play02:26

in the head

play02:30

but why was peter's body found

play02:33

downstairs

play02:35

apparently sometime after the attack

play02:38

peter regained

play02:39

consciousness and started to go about

play02:41

his morning tasks

play02:43

he had actually pulled on some clothes

play02:45

over the top of some wounds

play02:47

and began walking around the house

play02:50

that's because

play02:51

the top part of peter's brain the

play02:53

neocortex which controls higher

play02:56

functions like

play02:56

thought language and reasoning was

play02:59

severely

play03:00

damaged in the attack the autopsy

play03:03

revealed

play03:04

his paleocortex underneath was intact

play03:08

this controls his primal instincts and

play03:10

second nature habits

play03:14

this explains why he got up went

play03:17

downstairs

play03:18

made breakfast performed the same tasks

play03:21

he did

play03:22

each and every morning unaware

play03:25

he was mortally wounded the blood

play03:28

evidence shows

play03:29

he even went out to get the morning

play03:32

newspaper

play03:33

and that the front door locked behind

play03:35

him

play03:39

he used the house key hidden in the

play03:41

flower pot to open it

play03:44

then lost consciousness due to blood

play03:47

loss

play03:48

and died

play03:52

i am surprised that he was able to move

play03:53

around the residents as he did

play03:56

before joan porco went into surgery an

play03:59

alert investigator who was also

play04:01

a friend of the family asked joan a key

play04:04

question

play04:04

while she was still conscious i said to

play04:07

her can you hear me and she shook her

play04:09

head visibly

play04:10

up and down in the yes notion that she

play04:12

could the officer asked her

play04:14

if she knew who attacked her she shook

play04:17

her head again

play04:18

in the yes notion up and down i asked

play04:20

her did christopher do this to you

play04:23

and she clearly again sh nod her head up

play04:26

and down

play04:27

yes christopher was her 21 year old son

play04:32

[Music]

play04:35

the medical examiner concluded that

play04:37

peter porco

play04:39

was the intended target of the brutal

play04:41

axe attack in his home

play04:42

since he was struck 16 times in the head

play04:46

joan was hit three times

play04:50

nothing was missing from the porco's

play04:51

home either which pointed to only

play04:54

one conclusion leads them to believe

play04:56

that maybe this is someone who

play04:58

was angry with someone in the family

play05:00

that there was something more to this

play05:03

peter and joan porco had two children 23

play05:06

year old jonathan was a lieutenant in

play05:08

the u.s

play05:09

navy serving on a nuclear submarine

play05:12

hundreds of miles away

play05:14

21 year old christopher attended the

play05:16

university of rochester

play05:18

a three-hour drive away

play05:21

both had alibis for the night of the

play05:23

attack

play05:24

but why did joan parco tell police her

play05:27

son

play05:28

christopher was responsible your mother

play05:30

is communicating

play05:32

she's saying you were there i don't know

play05:34

why she said

play05:36

she knows i hope she does i was not

play05:39

there

play05:41

he was cooperating he let them take a

play05:43

dna sample

play05:44

he let them look at his body to make

play05:47

sure that there weren't marks or signs

play05:49

of a struggle like bruises

play05:52

three weeks after the attack joan porco

play05:55

regained

play05:56

consciousness everybody was very

play05:58

surprised it was a miracle

play06:00

she obviously had a strong will to to

play06:03

live

play06:04

and the doctors just did an amazing job

play06:08

and joan now told police that

play06:11

christopher

play06:12

had nothing to do with the attack she

play06:14

said

play06:15

it couldn't have been christopher leave

play06:17

my son alone

play06:18

joan also made a public statement

play06:21

supporting her son

play06:22

i am absolutely positive that my son was

play06:25

in no way

play06:26

involved in this heinous crime i implore

play06:29

the district attorney's office to leave

play06:31

my son alone and to search for peter's

play06:33

real killer

play06:35

and the forensic evidence or lack of it

play06:37

corroborated

play06:38

christopher's story investigators found

play06:42

nothing in christopher's jeep the yellow

play06:45

jeep was searched for

play06:46

blood and or bloody clothing any type of

play06:49

blood transfer whatsoever which would be

play06:50

indicative of the attack

play06:52

there was no no blood located in the

play06:54

vehicle whatsoever

play06:56

police also found no evidence that

play06:58

christopher had been

play06:59

on the highway between his school and

play07:02

his home

play07:03

there was no recording of his easy pass

play07:05

going through the tolls that night

play07:08

forensic analysts found no fingerprints

play07:11

or blood

play07:11

other than the victims on the axe

play07:15

then police learned that peter parker

play07:18

had once received a death threat

play07:22

it was from a man who lost custody of

play07:24

his children

play07:25

in a case before the new york state

play07:27

supreme court

play07:28

the man had vowed revenge

play07:32

the man told him he was going to get a

play07:33

gun and he was going to come

play07:35

and kill the judge and peter porco

play07:39

but that man had an alibi for the night

play07:41

of the murder

play07:44

then there was an anonymous letter sent

play07:47

to the local newspaper from someone

play07:49

claiming to be peter porco's killer

play07:53

peter porca was not even a challenge

play07:56

once i got inside

play07:58

i repeatedly hit him in the head and

play08:00

neck with a small axe i brought with me

play08:02

i ignored all his pleading screams also

play08:06

i beat

play08:06

joan porco but unfortunately she

play08:09

survived

play08:10

the writer took credit for another local

play08:13

murder and warned

play08:14

he'd kill again if you ever want to find

play08:17

me

play08:18

you might want to stop going after easy

play08:20

suspects

play08:21

show me some respect i deserve catch me

play08:23

if you can

play08:25

police found no fingerprints on the

play08:28

letter

play08:28

and they needed to find out who wrote it

play08:37

while searching for the person

play08:38

responsible for the brutal acts attack

play08:41

investigators first tried to uncover the

play08:44

motive

play08:45

we don't have ax murders here it was

play08:48

just an alarming

play08:49

tremendously alarming case police

play08:52

learned that peter parker

play08:54

had a relative and organized crime who'd

play08:56

been in trouble with the law

play08:58

the relative is frank porco known as

play09:01

frankie the fireman

play09:02

porco frankie porco was serving time in

play09:05

federal prison for loan sharking

play09:08

there were rumors that frankie parker

play09:10

would turn state's evidence

play09:12

and provide information in return for a

play09:15

lighter sentence

play09:17

it was what they call a signature

play09:19

killing you know that the mob would do

play09:21

and it was the fireman's act because it

play09:23

was retaliation for frankie the firemen

play09:25

but a background check on frankie the

play09:27

firemen cast doubt on this theory

play09:30

he was in prison because he wasn't a

play09:32

snitch you know

play09:33

he had been made the offers to cooperate

play09:36

with the authorities

play09:37

to avoid prison and he didn't so he

play09:39

ended up in prison

play09:42

then investigators learned that peter

play09:44

and joan porco had life insurance

play09:47

policies totaling

play09:48

one million dollars investigators also

play09:52

learned

play09:53

that christopher parker asked for

play09:56

investment advice

play09:58

before the murder christopher had gone

play10:00

to

play10:01

a financial counselor and asked him to

play10:03

write up a portfolio for him

play10:05

he told him he was receiving millions of

play10:07

dollars from a relative

play10:09

and before his father's death

play10:11

christopher emailed him

play10:12

asking for all sorts of personal

play10:15

financial information

play10:17

yo pops if i could have you and mom's

play10:20

social security numbers and your new

play10:22

york state driver's license numbers

play10:24

i need them for paperwork related to

play10:26

financial info for next semester

play10:28

hope you're having a good day love chris

play10:33

then investigators checked the code

play10:35

numbers used

play10:37

to deactivate the porco's home security

play10:40

system

play10:41

on the night of the attack

play10:43

[Music]

play10:44

the security system's computer showed

play10:47

that whoever

play10:47

deactivated the alarm and presumably

play10:51

cut the phone lines was someone known

play10:54

by the family the alarm had been

play10:57

disarmed

play10:58

at approximately two o'clock in the

play10:59

morning so this was the master code that

play11:02

was used

play11:03

um which was the code the family had as

play11:06

well as possible possibly one or two

play11:08

other people

play11:09

so despite joan porco's claim that her

play11:12

son christopher

play11:13

wasn't responsible for the attack

play11:16

investigators took a fresh look

play11:18

at where he was on the night of the

play11:20

crime

play11:22

christopher claimed he was in his dorm

play11:24

room 220 miles away

play11:27

investigators obtained security video

play11:30

from the university of rochester campus

play11:32

and from all the major highways and toll

play11:35

booths in between the parco's home

play11:38

and the campus they screened all of it

play11:41

looking for christopher's yellow jeep

play11:44

the average person is videotaped 18 to

play11:47

22 times a day

play11:49

so there's a tremendous amount of media

play11:51

that's available to the

play11:52

to law enforcement at 10 30 p.m

play11:55

they saw a yellow jeep leaving the

play11:58

university campus

play12:00

the security alarm at the porco's home

play12:03

was deactivated

play12:04

a little more than three and a half

play12:06

hours later at 2

play12:08

14 a.m the porco's phone line was cut

play12:12

at 4 59 a.m and the same

play12:16

yellow jeep returned to the campus three

play12:19

and a half hours later

play12:21

at 8 30 in the morning the timeline

play12:25

fit perfectly but was this

play12:29

christopher's jeep there are actually

play12:32

more yellow jeeps than you might imagine

play12:34

in the state of new york there are

play12:36

thousands of yellow jeeps

play12:39

video analyst james kennedy ran the

play12:41

security camera images through

play12:43

a computer filter so it's not like our

play12:46

filtering software

play12:48

all of a sudden makes this stuff appear

play12:50

what it does it provides us

play12:52

with in some cases subtle in some cases

play12:54

dramatic

play12:55

clarifications kennedy found

play12:58

specific details on the jeep like mud on

play13:01

the passenger side door

play13:04

the passenger side window had a torn

play13:06

parking sticker

play13:08

and there was a political sticker on the

play13:10

back tire cover

play13:12

those were compared to photographs of

play13:15

christopher's jeep taken by police

play13:17

the day of the murder we were able to

play13:20

conclude that it was in fact

play13:23

the suspect's jeep unfortunately

play13:26

the photographic analysis couldn't

play13:28

identify who

play13:30

was driving was it christopher

play13:34

or someone else

play13:38

through forensic analysis investigators

play13:41

now knew

play13:42

that christopher parkou's jeep left the

play13:44

university of rochester

play13:46

four hours before the axe attack on his

play13:49

parents

play13:49

[Music]

play13:54

and returned to the campus ten hours

play13:56

later

play13:58

it was possible for him to get down to

play14:00

albany

play14:01

do what happened at the house

play14:04

and then make it back up to the campus

play14:07

in the morning

play14:08

for him to make it in that time he would

play14:10

have had to use the new york state

play14:10

throughway

play14:12

but investigators had no proof that

play14:14

christopher porco's

play14:16

jeep was on the throughway that night or

play14:19

if it was christopher who was driving

play14:22

there were no easy pass records of

play14:23

christopher coming home that night

play14:25

but investigators found christopher's

play14:28

easy pass tag on the floor

play14:30

of his jeep on the morning of the attack

play14:32

they tell me if you take it off the

play14:34

windshield

play14:35

and you get it down on the floor and or

play14:38

you know

play14:38

put it away somewheres it won't register

play14:41

was it possible

play14:43

christopher paid the highway tolls with

play14:45

cash

play14:46

to avoid leaving a trail i don't believe

play14:50

that those lanes are

play14:51

surveilled with video cameras

play14:53

investigators asked the toll collectors

play14:56

if they recalled seeing a yellow jeep

play14:59

that night

play15:00

one toll collector said she remembered a

play15:02

yellow jeep driving through

play15:04

right before quitting time around 11 pm

play15:07

but she couldn't remember anything about

play15:10

the driver

play15:11

when they hand you the ticket it's

play15:13

stamped it's got the time on

play15:16

only a dozen cars went through that

play15:18

tollbooth around that time

play15:20

investigators sent those 12 toll tickets

play15:23

to the forensic lab for testing

play15:26

what we were looking for were any kind

play15:28

of skin cells if your hands

play15:30

are sweaty and you touch a toe ticket

play15:32

there's a possibility that

play15:34

dna sources such as epithelial cells

play15:37

may be transferred onto these toll

play15:38

tickets scientists found

play15:41

skin cells on several tickets

play15:44

they performed mitochondrial dna testing

play15:48

on those skin cells

play15:49

and compared those dna profiles

play15:52

to christopher parco's dna profile

play15:57

one ticket contained christopher porco's

play16:00

dna

play16:03

we have a toll ticket that ultimately

play16:05

has christopher's dna on it

play16:06

when that dna came in that was the top

play16:09

of the mountain

play16:10

it was what i considered a mountain of

play16:11

circumstantial evidence

play16:14

the possibility that the dna on the toll

play16:16

ticket belonged to someone other than

play16:18

christopher porco

play16:20

was very small you would expect to see

play16:23

that sequence and 0.04 percent of the

play16:25

population

play16:27

prosecutors believe the motive was money

play16:31

investigators found evidence that

play16:33

christopher had forged his parents

play16:34

signatures

play16:35

on bank loan documents and borrowed 31

play16:39

000

play16:40

without their permission they also found

play16:43

evidence

play16:44

that peter and joan porco knew about the

play16:47

forgery

play16:48

chris i want you to know that if you

play16:50

abuse my credit again

play16:52

i will be forced to file forgery

play16:54

affidavits in order to disclaim

play16:55

liability

play16:56

you should come home so we can talk we

play16:59

may be disappointed in you

play17:00

but your mother and i still love you and

play17:02

care about your future

play17:05

christopher was not only spending huge

play17:07

sums of money on luxury items like his

play17:09

jeep

play17:09

but he was also failing his college

play17:12

courses

play17:14

his world was crumbling around him a

play17:16

world he had created a persona he'd

play17:18

created a lifestyle he'd created

play17:21

and he had to do something to try to

play17:23

salvage it

play17:25

prosecutors believe christopher was

play17:28

desperate for money after his father had

play17:30

cut off his funds

play17:32

so christopher chose to murder his

play17:34

parents

play17:35

for their life insurance money

play17:39

surveillance video shows christopher

play17:41

left his college campus around 10

play17:44

30.

play17:49

[Music]

play17:50

he removed the easy pass tag from his

play17:53

car because he knew

play17:54

this would leave a trail of his

play17:56

movements

play17:58

so he paid cash for the tolls and left

play18:02

his dna on a ticket

play18:03

[Music]

play18:10

he entered his parents home a little

play18:12

after 2 a.m

play18:14

and deactivated the security system with

play18:17

a code

play18:18

known only to family members

play18:25

prosecutors say christopher used an

play18:28

axe to attack his parents

play18:33

[Music]

play18:35

he struck his father 16 times and his

play18:38

mother

play18:39

three times and left them both for dead

play18:44

christopher smashed the security system

play18:46

panel

play18:47

thinking this would destroy the evidence

play18:49

that he used the master code

play18:51

but that information was stored

play18:53

elsewhere

play18:55

he cut the phone lines into the house at

play18:57

4 59

play18:59

then drove back to the campus

play19:02

in full view of the cameras at 8

play19:05

30 a.m

play19:08

perhaps the most unsettling aspect of

play19:11

the case

play19:12

was that peter porco regained

play19:14

consciousness

play19:15

and walked through the house after the

play19:18

attack

play19:18

even going outside for the morning paper

play19:22

before he died in the foyer

play19:26

there still remain unanswered questions

play19:30

i think one of the main questions that

play19:31

we just don't have the answer to is

play19:34

where are the bloody clothes and why did

play19:38

joan porco

play19:39

implicate christopher on the morning of

play19:41

the attack but had no recollection of it

play19:44

following surgery it's not uncommon

play19:47

when you have a head injury to lose

play19:49

memory in the time surrounding the event

play19:52

a year after the attack christopher

play19:55

porco went on trial for the murder of

play19:58

his father

play19:59

and the attempted murder of his mother

play20:02

with their face surgically repaired joan

play20:05

parco stood by her son during the entire

play20:08

trial

play20:09

steadfastly maintaining his innocence

play20:13

it was going to take a lot to convince a

play20:15

jury ultimately that the kid in front of

play20:17

them

play20:18

could have taken an axe to his parents

play20:21

but the evidence

play20:22

was simply overwhelming the jury found

play20:25

christopher parker guilty and he was

play20:28

sentenced to a minimum

play20:30

of 50 years in prison we really wanted

play20:33

to find

play20:34

something that made him innocent you

play20:36

know and that we could say that no the

play20:38

prosecution's evidence just doesn't add

play20:39

up it doesn't match up

play20:41

he didn't do this to his parents thank

play20:42

god but we didn't find that that's not

play20:45

how we found our verdict to this day

play20:48

his mother believes he's innocent

play20:52

i spoke with her immediately after that

play20:54

verdict she was stunned

play20:56

and shocked and that's all she really

play20:58

had to say at that point

play20:59

she hasn't really spoken with anyone

play21:01

since i've never seen a case like this

play21:04

before this and i hope to never see

play21:06

a case like this after this

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Crimen FamiliarAsesinatoInvestigaciónVida UniversitariaPresunto AsesinoSeguridad DomésticaTestigos OcularesSentencia PenalDinámica FamiliarConflicto Económico
Do you need a summary in English?