The Stanford Prison Experiment (Summary + Lessons)
Summary
TLDRThe Stanford Prison Experiment, a 1971 study led by Philip Zimbardo, aimed to explore the effects of power dynamics by assigning 24 students roles as guards or prisoners in a simulated jail. The experiment was cut short after six days due to severe psychological distress among participants. The film adaptation of the experiment raises questions about the ethics of psychological research and the line between simulation and reality. Critics argue that the experiment's results may have been influenced by researcher guidance, casting doubt on its legitimacy as a psychological study.
Takeaways
- 🎥 The Stanford Prison Experiment movie, released in 2015, is based on the notorious 1971 study that aimed to explore the psychological effects of perceived power and authority.
- 👥 The experiment involved 24 college students, half assigned as 'prisoners' and the other half as 'guards', to observe how roles influence behavior.
- 🏫 Conducted by Philip Zimbardo at Stanford University, the study was designed to last two weeks but was terminated after only six days due to the extreme psychological effects.
- 🔒 The 'prison' was set up in a basement, with participants arrested in public, fingerprinted, and subjected to degrading tasks to simulate a real prison environment.
- ⚖️ Zimbardo and his team played roles within the experiment, including the prison superintendent and parole board members, to maintain the simulation's realism.
- 🚨 Guards quickly began to abuse their power, resorting to physical and psychological abuse, including sleep deprivation and humiliation, leading to the early termination of the experiment.
- 🤯 Prisoner 8612's breakdown, including crying and screaming, was a pivotal moment that highlighted the severity of the psychological distress inflicted.
- 🚨 Zimbardo's girlfriend, a former student, was instrumental in the decision to end the experiment early after witnessing the abuse and threatening to break up with him.
- 🤔 The experiment's ethical considerations have been heavily debated, questioning the limits of subjecting participants to distress for scientific purposes.
- 🗣️ Critics have challenged the authenticity of the study, suggesting that Zimbardo's team coached the guards and that some prisoners may have exaggerated their responses.
- 🔍 The Stanford Prison Experiment has had a lasting impact on psychology, raising questions about power dynamics, obedience, and the ethical conduct of experiments.
Q & A
What is the Stanford Prison Experiment?
-The Stanford Prison Experiment was a psychological study conducted in 1971 by Philip Zimbardo to explore the effects of perceived power and authority on human behavior. It involved 24 college students who were randomly assigned roles as prisoners or guards in a simulated prison environment.
Why was the experiment terminated early?
-The experiment was terminated after six days instead of the planned two weeks due to the severe psychological effects it had on both the guards and prisoners. The guards began to abuse their power, and the prisoners experienced extreme stress and emotional trauma.
What role did Philip Zimbardo play in the experiment?
-Philip Zimbardo played the role of the prison superintendent, overseeing the experiment and ensuring that it was conducted as a realistic simulation.
What were the main rules for the guards during the experiment?
-The guards were given free reign over how they treated the prisoners with two main rules: they could not hit the prisoners, and they could not put prisoners in solitary confinement for more than an hour.
How did the guards abuse their power?
-The guards used both physical and psychological abuse, including sleep deprivation, degrading tasks, and humiliation, to punish and intimidate the prisoners.
What was the ethical controversy surrounding the experiment?
-The ethical controversy arose from the psychological abuse that the prisoners endured, raising questions about the ethics of subjecting human subjects to such distress and trauma for scientific research.
What criticisms have been made about the authenticity of the experiment's results?
-Critics have suggested that the results were not as natural as portrayed, with evidence suggesting that Zimbardo's team coached the guards and that some prisoners may have been faking their responses.
How has the Stanford Prison Experiment been compared to real-world situations?
-The experiment has been compared to actions at the Abu Ghraib detention center, with Zimbardo himself writing about the case and its parallels to the prison experiment.
What lasting questions does the experiment raise for the field of psychology?
-The experiment raises questions about where psychologists should draw the line when it comes to subjecting participants to distress for science, and how easily the lines can be blurred between an experiment, a simulation, or a drama.
What was the role of Zimbardo's girlfriend in ending the experiment?
-Zimbardo's girlfriend, who was also his former student, visited the experiment and was horrified by the conditions. She asked Zimbardo to end the experiment immediately, which he did on the sixth day.
How has the Stanford Prison Experiment impacted the understanding of power dynamics and obedience?
-The experiment demonstrated how quickly people can abuse power when given authority, but it also raised more questions than it answered about power dynamics and obedience, leading to ongoing debates within the field of psychology.
Outlines
🎥 The Stanford Prison Experiment: A Film and Its Impact
The script discusses the 2015 film 'The Stanford Prison Experiment,' which depicts the notorious 1971 study led by psychologist Philip Zimbardo. The experiment aimed to explore the effects of perceived power roles on behavior by assigning 24 college students to be either prison guards or inmates in a simulated environment. The study was intended to last two weeks but was terminated after six days due to severe psychological distress experienced by both guards and prisoners. The film and the experiment raise questions about obedience, power dynamics, and the abuse of authority. Zimbardo's team faced controversy for the unethical treatment of participants, including psychological abuse and the potential coaching of guards. Critics argue that the experiment's results may have been influenced by the researchers' guidance, rather than being a natural outcome of the roles assigned. The experiment's legacy continues to spark debate about the ethics of psychological research and the line between scientific study and dramatization.
🔍 Controversies and Ethical Considerations of the Experiment
This paragraph delves into the lasting controversies and ethical dilemmas surrounding the Stanford Prison Experiment. It questions the appropriateness of subjecting participants to extreme distress for scientific purposes and the blurred lines between an experiment and a simulation or drama. The paragraph also highlights the experiment's prison consultant, Carlo Prescott, who claimed that some of the cruel treatments were his personal experiences and not spontaneously devised by the guards. This casts doubt on the authenticity of the experiment's findings. The discussion concludes by pondering the broader implications for psychology, such as the limits of ethical conduct in research and the challenges in interpreting the results of such studies.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Stanford Prison Experiment
💡Philip Zimbardo
💡Power Dynamics
💡Psychological Abuse
💡Ethics in Psychology
💡Obedience
💡Guards and Prisoners
💡Controversy
💡Abuse of Power
💡Simulation
💡Critics and Criticism
Highlights
The Stanford Prison Experiment movie was released in 2015, detailing the infamous 1971 study.
24 college students participated, with half assigned as prisoners and half as guards.
The experiment was intended to last two weeks but ended after six days due to psychological effects.
Philip Zimbardo led the study to explore the impact of a person's role on their behavior.
Participants were selected for their mental soundness and paid $15 per day.
The experiment was set in a simulated prison environment in Stanford's basement.
Prisoners were arrested in public, fingerprinted, and strip searched to enhance realism.
Guards had significant freedom in how they treated prisoners, with minimal rules.
Guards quickly began to abuse their power, with physical and psychological abuse reported within a day.
Prisoner 8612's breakdown led to his release, highlighting the psychological impact.
The experiment was terminated on the sixth day due to the severity of the psychological effects.
Critics argue the experiment's results were influenced by the researchers' coaching of the guards.
Some participants have claimed their reactions were more performative than genuine.
The experiment's prison consultant, Carlo Prescott, revealed his past experiences influenced the study's methods.
The Stanford Prison Experiment raises questions about the ethics of psychological research and the line between experiment and drama.
The experiment's lasting impact includes debates on power dynamics, obedience, and the ethics of psychological studies.
The video invites viewers to explore more about social psychology and the complexities of the human psyche.
Transcripts
in 2015 the stanford prison experiment
was released in theaters
the movie detailed the infamous 1971
experiment in which
24 college students were put in prison
now while the experiment was supposed to
last for two weeks it was terminated
after six days due to psychological
effects that it was having on both the
guards
and the prisoners so what actually
happened during the stanford prison
experiment
why is it so infamous and does the movie
get everything right or is it just a
dramatization
this video will briefly explain the
experiment its impact on the world of
psychology
and the controversy that it's facing 45
years in the future
so first off what is the stanford prison
experiment
after milgram's experiment rocked the
world of psychology
many people were left with questions
about obedience power dynamics and the
abuse of power
philip zimbardo a professor at stanford
wanted to then explore these questions
further
and with a grant from the navy zimbardo
set up something called the stanford
prison experiment he wanted to see could
a person's role
influence their behavior zimbardo and
his team interviewed 70 applicants at
stanford who were willing to participate
in the study for 14 days and receive 15
a day they wanted to make sure that they
chose the brightest and the most
mentally sound participants
and after narrowing down their
applicants to 24 the researchers flipped
the coin and assigned
the roles half of the participants would
be prisoners
and the other half would be guards now
the researchers then set up a basement
at stanford to make it look like a real
prison they were very serious about
treating the experiment like a
simulation
prisoners were actually arrested in
public and taken into prison
they were even booked fingerprinted and
strip searched
now zimbardo's team also gave prisoners
numbers that were meant to be used
instead of their real name they claimed
that it would help give the prisoners a
sense of anonymity and help the
experiment
guards had pretty much free reign over
how they could treat the prisoners while
they had two main rules
they could not hit the prisoners and
they could not put prisoners in solitary
confinement for more than an hour
philip zambardo played the role of the
prison superintendent
his graduate students and research
partners also played roles as members of
the parole board and the prison warden
prisoners were tasked with certain
activities like writing a letter home to
their visitors and making a case to the
parole board about why they should be
let off
guards also subjected the prisoners to
counts in which they forced the
prisoners to do
jumping jacks push-ups and other
degrading tasks
now it did not take long for these
guards to start to abuse their power
within one day a guard actually hit one
of the prisoners with his night stick
on the second day the prisoners tried to
rebel and so their beds were taken away
to punish these prisoners the guard shot
a fire extinguisher into the cell
guards used physical and psychological
abuse including things like sleep
deprivation to punish and intimidate the
prisoners throughout this study
the prisoners were forced to wear
dressings and stocking caps the whole
time
and at some point the guards would put
bags over the prisoner's heads
and since the study has ended it has
since been compared to actions at the
abu ghraib detention center
zimbardo has written about the case and
its parallels to the prison experiment
since so why did this experiment get
shut down
well very quickly the guards started to
abuse their power the prisoners
started to spiral on the third day
prisoner number 8612 started to cry
and scream uncontrollably he threatened
to harm himself and call a lawyer
to avoid potential psychological damage
or a lawsuit he was let go
two other prisoners were let go in the
next two days one actually refused to
eat
and on the fifth day zimbardo's
girlfriend which was actually his former
student
came to visit the experiment zimbardo
and his team had been monitoring the
experiment
and playing their roles in it 24 7. and
when she saw the horrors that was going
on in the prison
she asked zimbardo to end the experiment
immediately she even threatened to break
up with him well
eventually on the sixth day he ended the
experiment this experiment
showed the world how quickly people can
abuse power when it's given to them
but it remains as one of the most
controversial experiments in the world
of psychology
and there's a few reasons why the first
one is obvious and it's the case for
psychological abuse that the prisoners
endured during the study
is it ethical to put human subjects
through that kind of distress and trauma
so much so that many couldn't even
endure the experiment
now zimbardo claims that none of the
participants have suffered long-term
psychological consequences
but the point still stands and in more
recent years critics have come forward
to say that the results were not as
natural as zimbardo and their team may
want you to think
transcripts and audio recordings from
the stamford prison experiment show that
zimbardo's team
coached these guards they told him to be
tough for the sake of the experiment
even the prisoners may have been faking
their responses prisoner number 8612 who
is most well known for his blood
curdling quote
i'm burning up inside he has come
forward to say that his time in the
stanford county jail was more of an
improv exercise many critics have
likened the experiment to a drama rather
than a legitimate psychology experiment
carlo prescott the experiments prison
consultant has also come forward to say
that the experiment's more cruel
treatments were not naturally thought up
and executed by the guards alone
he wrote the following in an op-ed ideas
such as bags being placed over the heads
of prisoners
inmates being bound together with chains
and buckets being used in place of
toilets in their cells
were all experiences of mine at the old
spanish jail section of san quentin and
which
i dutifully shared with the stanford
prison experiment brain trust
months before the experiment started to
allege that all these carefully tested
psychologically solid
upper-middle-class caucasian guards
dreamed this up on their own is absurd
so you can take that for what you will
but let's talk a little bit about the
lasting effect of the stanford prison
experiment
it seems to have raised more questions
than it answered where should
psychologists draw the line when it
comes to subjecting participants to
distress for science
and how easily can psychologists blur
the lines of an experiment versus a
simulation
or a drama and if the stanford prison
experiment doesn't exactly answer its
original questions about power dynamics
and obedience what similar experiments
can
these are just some of the questions
that psychologists face today about the
experiment
anyways i hope you enjoyed this video
and learned something about the stanford
prison experiment
if you have any questions at all feel
free to leave them below or you can
watch the rest of my videos on social
psychology to learn a little bit more
about how the human
psyche works thanks for watching
Browse More Related Video
Psychology: The Stanford Prison Experiment - BBC Documentary
The Stanford Prison Experiment Was One of the Most Disturbing Studies Ever
Stanford Prison Experiment - Edited for the Classroom
Stanford Prison Experiment
Zimbardo: Conformity to social roles - Social influence [ A Level Psychology ]
Psychology Experiment - The Monster Study (One Of The Most Unethical Study Ever Conducted)
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)