A relação entre Literatura e Sociedade

Prof. Thiago Falcão
22 Jun 201808:34

Summary

TLDRThis lecture explores the intricate relationship between literature and society through Antônio Cândido's work, emphasizing the historical and social factors shaping literary production. It discusses the evolution of Brazilian literature from its colonial roots to modern times, highlighting the writer's role in reflecting societal values and the public's influence on literary development. The discussion also touches on the writer's political engagement and the impact of industrialization on literature's quality and public reception.

Takeaways

  • 📚 The script discusses the relationship between literature and society, emphasizing how literature is not isolated from societal issues but deeply connected to them.
  • 👨‍🏫 Antonio Candido, a renowned literary critic, is introduced as an expert in evaluating the philosophical, historical, and economic aspects of literature and their connections to societal power dynamics.
  • 🌟 Literature is portrayed as a reflection of society, with its evolution and quality influenced by the dynamics between the producers (writers) and consumers (readers) of literature.
  • 🎭 The physical elements of a book, such as pages and letters, are acknowledged as the building blocks, but the script highlights that the true essence of a book lies in the ideas and emotions it conveys.
  • ✍️ The role of the writer is explored, showing how they are part of the social fabric and cannot escape the influences of historical context, politics, and power relations.
  • 🗣️ The public's expectations and the writer's response to them are crucial in shaping literature, with the writer needing to engage in a dialogue with their audience.
  • 🏛️ The historical context of Brazil is used to illustrate how the formation of national identity, independence struggles, and patriotism have influenced the country's literature.
  • 📈 The script points out a shift in the 20th century where the development of the publishing industry and a more discerning public led to an improvement in the quality of literature.
  • 🔍 Antonio Candido criticizes the lack of complexity in literature, suggesting that writers often catered to elite tastes rather than addressing broader societal issues.
  • 🌐 The script concludes by emphasizing the interdependence of the public, the work, and society, suggesting that the evolution of literature is a collective effort involving both writers and readers.

Q & A

  • What is the main theme of the text 'Literature and Society' by Antônio Cândido?

    -The main theme of the text is the relationship between literature and society, focusing on how literature reflects and is influenced by philosophical, historical, economic aspects, and power relations within society.

  • How does Antônio Cândido view the role of literature in society?

    -Antônio Cândido sees literature as deeply connected to societal issues, rather than being disconnected. He argues that literature is involved in societal dynamics, reflecting the context of social, historical, political, and power relations.

  • What is the significance of the physical elements of a book according to Cândido?

    -Cândido suggests that while physical elements like pages, covers, and letters are part of a book, it would be naive to think that a book is composed only of these. He emphasizes that the soul of a book lies in the words that bring it to life beyond its physical form.

  • What is the role of the writer in the context of social dynamics as per Cândido's perspective?

    -According to Cândido, the writer is not isolated from social dynamics. The writer is part of society, participating in its dynamics, and cannot escape it. The writer's work converges with the social context, historical reality, politics, and power relations.

  • How does Cândido describe the relationship between the producer (writer) and the receiver (reader) of literature?

    -Cândido describes the relationship between the writer and the reader as a dialogue where the writer must correspond to the expectations of the readers. The writer and the public are interdependent, with the author's image being shaped by the opinion of the readers.

  • What historical period does Cândido discuss in relation to the formation of Brazilian literature?

    -Cândido discusses the formation of Brazilian literature during the colonial period, highlighting the characteristics of the readership and the role of writers in that era.

  • What term does Cândido use to describe the early role of writers in Brazil?

    -Cândido uses the term 'militância intelectual' (intellectual militancy) to describe the early role of writers in Brazil, where their writings were closely tied to the quest for freedom and the voice of the people.

  • How did the relationship between writers and the state evolve over time according to Cândido?

    -Cândido explains that over time, the state legitimized the role of writers, conferring prestige and favors upon them while also repressing excesses. This led to a separation between writers and the masses, with writers becoming more aligned with the state and writing for smaller, culturally poor elites.

  • What changes does Cândido observe in the 20th century regarding literature and its consumers?

    -Cândido notes that in the 20th century, with the development of the publishing industry, the growth of a more demanding readership, and the possibility of specific remuneration, the quality of literary works improved. Writers sought to occupy a differentiated role in society, and consumers became more discerning.

  • How does Cândido conclude the discussion on the evolution of literature in Brazil?

    -Cândido concludes by emphasizing the interdependence between the public, the work, and society. He suggests that the literature's intensity evolved as both writers and their public matured, and he calls for a recognition that readers are as responsible for the evolution of literature as the writers themselves.

Outlines

00:00

📚 Literature and Society: The Role of Writers and Readers

This paragraph discusses the relationship between literature and society, focusing on the work of literary critic Antônio Cândido. It emphasizes how literature is not isolated from societal issues but deeply connected to them, including power dynamics. The paragraph explores the physical elements of a book and the idea that a book is more than just its physical components. It delves into the social forces that shape a book, including the historical, political, and power contexts. The role of the writer is highlighted as someone who cannot escape social dynamics and is influenced by the social context, historical reality, and power relations. The paragraph concludes by suggesting that literature is a reflection of society, shaped by the interplay between the producer and the receiver of the literary work.

05:00

🎭 The Evolution of Literature: From Colonial Times to Modernity

The second paragraph continues the discussion on literature's development, particularly in Brazil. It touches on the historical context of writers and their roles, which were initially not considered a profession but evolved with the fight for freedom and the identification with the masses. The paragraph discusses how the writer's role became politicized and how they were separated from the general public, leading to a focus on writing for cultural elites. It also mentions the lack of complexity in literature due to this separation. However, with the 20th century's industrial and societal developments, there was a shift towards a more demanding readership and a higher quality of literary works. The paragraph ends by emphasizing the interdependence of the public, the work, and society, suggesting that the evolution of literature is tied to the evolution of its readers and writers, and that the intensity of literature has grown as these relationships have become more complex.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Literature and Society

Literature and Society is a central theme of the video, exploring how literature reflects and interacts with societal structures, philosophies, and power dynamics. The video discusses how literature is not isolated from societal issues but is deeply involved in them, as seen in the exploration of Antônio Cândido's work, which evaluates the philosophical, historical, and economic aspects of society and their relation to literary works.

💡Antônio Cândido

Antônio Cândido is a prominent literary critic mentioned in the script, known for his competent analysis of literature. His work 'Literature and Society' is highlighted, which provides a sociological approach to understanding literature's role and evolution within historical contexts, emphasizing the interplay between literature and societal power structures.

💡Sociological Approach

A sociological approach is used in the video to analyze literature, focusing on the relationship between the producer (writer) and the receiver (reader) of literary works. This approach is evident in the discussion of how literature's development is influenced by social dynamics, historical reality, and power relations, rather than purely aesthetic considerations.

💡Public and Writer

The relationship between the public and the writer is a key concept in the video. It discusses how the writer's work is shaped by the expectations of the reading public and how the writer's image is influenced by the public's reception of their work. The video emphasizes the interdependence between the public's tastes and the literature produced.

💡Colonial Brazil

Colonial Brazil is mentioned as a context for understanding the early development of Brazilian literature and its readership. The video describes how the public in colonial Brazil was shaped by religious ceremonies, public celebrations, and discourse, influencing the characteristics and demands of literature at the time.

💡Intellectual Militancy

Intellectual militancy is a term used by Cândido to define the role of writers in the early history of Brazil. The video explains how writers were not just producing literature but were also voices of the people, fighting for freedom and contributing to the formation of national identity and patriotism.

💡Literary Production

Literary production is discussed in the context of how it is influenced by social context, historical reality, and power relations. The video suggests that literature is not just a product of an author's imagination but is deeply connected to the society in which it is created, reflecting and shaping societal norms and culture.

💡Oral Tradition

The oral tradition is mentioned as an influence on literature, particularly in the context of early Brazilian literature. The video notes the persistence of oral storytelling and melodic verbal expressions in written literature, even as the literary scene evolved, indicating a connection to the first audiences of literature.

💡Literary Evolution

Literary evolution is a key theme, with the video tracing the development of literature from its early forms to more complex and dense works. It discusses how literature has evolved in response to societal changes, the growth of the reading public, and the writers' quest for a distinct role in society.

💡Readers and Writers in Construction

The concept of readers and writers being 'in construction' is used to illustrate the idea that both are evolving entities, shaped by and shaping the literature and society they are part of. The video suggests that the development of literature is a collective effort, involving both the creators and consumers of literary works.

💡Conformity and Standardization

Conformity and standardization are discussed as influences on literature, particularly in the context of writers catering to the expectations of the state and elite audiences. The video suggests that these forces can limit the complexity and diversity of literature, although there is an optimistic view towards the 20th century with the rise of a more discerning readership and writers seeking a differentiated role in society.

Highlights

The text discusses the relationship between literature and society, emphasizing how literature reflects and interacts with societal power structures.

Antonio Candido's work 'Literature and Society' is introduced as a critical analysis of the philosophical, historical, and economic aspects of literature.

Literature is not disconnected from societal issues; it is deeply involved in them, contrary to common misconceptions.

The physical components of a book, such as pages and letters, are not its only constituents; the social context and historical reality also play a significant role.

The writer is a social being who cannot escape the dynamics of society, and this influences their literary production.

Literature is produced within a social context, influenced by historical reality, politics, and power relations.

The book 'Literature and Society' by Antonio Candido encourages readers to see literature as a product of its historical record and societal role.

The literary work's reception by the public and its maturation are approached sociologically rather than aesthetically.

Literature is a dialogue between the producer (writer) and the receptor (reader), with the writer needing to meet the expectations of the readers.

The heterogeneity of literature reflects the diversity of its audience, and it mediates the relationship between the author and the public.

Antonio Candido raises questions about the identity of the public and the writer, suggesting that both have evolved over time.

In colonial Brazil, the public was shaped by religious ceremonies, public celebrations, and discourse, influencing the demand for literature.

Literature in Brazil has been characterized by a focus on morality and poetics, reflecting the formation of Brazilian identity.

The role of the writer in Brazilian history has been closely tied to the struggle for freedom and the voice of the people.

The state's recognition of the writer's role and the subsequent political ties have influenced the writer's relationship with the public.

Writers began to write for smaller, culturally poor elites, leading to a lack of complex literature according to Antonio Candido.

The 20th century saw a shift with the development of the publishing industry, a more demanding readership, and writers seeking a distinguished role in society.

The importance of oral tradition and verbal melody in literature is discussed, as it attempts to please remnants of the early public.

The conclusion emphasizes the interdependence of the public, the work, and society, and the responsibility of both readers and writers in the evolution of literature.

Literature is a mirror of society, reflecting customs and culture, and is in a constant state of construction along with the country and its ideas.

Transcripts

play00:00

lá o seu professor que a falcão estamos

play00:02

aqui novamente pra pensarmos juntos a

play00:05

respeito de literatura dessa vez eu

play00:07

trouxe um texto que eu amo sendo pedro

play00:09

clar a faculdade é para uma cadeira

play00:12

chamada de estudo e produção de texto

play00:14

argumentativo

play00:16

é nesse período a gente estava chegando

play00:18

a respeito do crítico literário antônio

play00:21

cândido também conhecido no brasil

play00:24

inclusive fora de um crítico muito muito

play00:27

competente naquilo que faz e claro que a

play00:30

obra literatura e sociedade ela traz em

play00:32

si uma avaliação dos aspectos

play00:35

filosóficos históricos econômicos é

play00:38

todas elas dizem todas essas relações de

play00:41

poder que existe na sociedade e qual a

play00:44

relação dessas de todas essas questões

play00:46

com a obra literária e aí a gente tem a

play00:50

oportunidade de estabelecer é essa

play00:53

conexão com as vidas que imagina que a

play00:55

literatura é totalmente desconectada de

play00:57

questões como essas não encontraram é

play01:00

totalmente envolvido nessas questões

play01:02

e aí a gente vai através do meu texto

play01:05

descobrir um pouco como foi essa

play01:06

formação da literatura dessa nossa

play01:09

literatura e quando foi que ela começou

play01:10

a ganhar consistência aquela sempre foi

play01:12

consistente desde o começo em que foi

play01:14

produzida

play01:15

não sei vamos viajar juntos agora

play01:17

através do texto como for já das letras

play01:20

nas páginas sociais capa folhas e letras

play01:23

são elementos físicos que compõem o

play01:25

livro mas seria ingenuidade imaginar que

play01:28

seja composto apenas por isso para

play01:31

produzir nessas áreas e que pensa que

play01:33

está mergulhado no mundo

play01:34

nasce então alma nas palavras as letras

play01:37

que conseguiu de mudas e de costas

play01:39

o livro não é de crer si mesmo logo é

play01:42

necessário alguém que produza nasce o

play01:44

escritor não existe homem que não trata

play01:46

a relação com os outros

play01:48

esse homem participa de toda a dinâmica

play01:49

social não podem fugir dela para o livro

play01:53

convergem forças do contexto social da

play01:56

realidade histórica da política e das

play01:58

relações de poder

play02:00

mas quase não percebendo os aspectos

play02:02

quando nos debruçamos sobre um livro e

play02:05

temos a impressão que foi produzido fora

play02:07

de um contexto

play02:09

é por esse universo que são os

play02:11

produzidos por antonio cantu no seu

play02:13

livro e literatura e sociedade somos

play02:15

levados a crer que nossa literatura

play02:17

dentro de um recorde histórico

play02:18

identificando o papel no escrito a

play02:21

recepção da obra pelo público e o

play02:23

amadurecimento de nossa literatura numa

play02:26

abordagem mais sociológica do que

play02:28

estética

play02:30

a criação deste caso literária ela nasce

play02:33

da relação entre o grupo produtor eo

play02:36

grupo receptor

play02:38

sendo assim o produtor deve corresponder

play02:40

às expectativas de seus impérios

play02:43

receptores desenvolvendo uma relação de

play02:45

diálogo é justamente dessa aproximação

play02:50

que resultou poder que a literatura tem

play02:52

de modificar certos comportamentos dos

play02:55

grupos que recebem a obra é tão

play02:58

heterogênea quanto é o seu público

play03:00

ela também mediadora em que o autor e

play03:03

esse público

play03:04

a imagem do autor se revela na opinião

play03:07

do outro e cria uma relação de

play03:10

dependência dos que opinaram sobre sua

play03:12

obra

play03:13

antonio candido após as colocações acima

play03:16

explicitado nos deixa escalar duas

play03:20

perguntas quem é esse público e quem é

play03:23

esse escritor é a resposta da primeira e

play03:26

da segunda pergunta foi buscá-la no

play03:28

brasil colônia e com poucas palavras

play03:31

deve ser o perfil desse leitor e desse

play03:34

escritor também vamos a resposta então

play03:36

da primeira pergunta

play03:39

o público desse brasil grafia foi

play03:43

construído pela cerimônia religiosa pela

play03:45

comemoração pública discurso e pelo seu

play03:48

irmão

play03:49

é nessa realidade que ele terá requer

play03:51

literatura recebe uma característica

play03:53

marcante de horário idade e valorização

play03:56

da ética da poética demonstra me levar

play03:59

em consideração a formação da identidade

play04:00

do brasil

play04:02

a luta pela independência um patriotismo

play04:05

e nacionalismo que permeou os acerto

play04:07

dessa sociedade

play04:09

vejamos agora não posso dar segunda

play04:11

pergunta militância intelectual é o

play04:14

termo usado

play04:15

por cândido para definir o que

play04:17

escrevemos embora no começo de nossa

play04:19

história o papel do escritor não fosse

play04:21

considerar um ofício pois era praticado

play04:24

em segundo plano

play04:26

nesse contexto a busca da liberdade de

play04:28

um povo é a voz do escritor era um grito

play04:31

da multidão resultando na identificação

play04:34

recíproca por isso nossa literatura se

play04:38

ocupou durante tanto tempo a descrever

play04:40

as palmeiras onde canta o sabiá o

play04:44

veículo tão forte que chegue ao coração

play04:46

do povo não poderia passar despercebido

play04:49

pelas instituições governamentais

play04:51

o estado passa legitima o papel do

play04:53

escritor conferindo a este prestígio e

play04:56

favores ao mesmo tempo que reprime os

play05:00

excessos vinculou-se então o papel do

play05:02

escritor a política ea mudou favores

play05:06

imperiais

play05:07

tudo isso provocou a separação do

play05:09

escritor da massa

play05:10

o público não remunerava os autores que

play05:13

logo juntaram-se ao estado para receber

play05:17

a retribuição pelo seu ofício de

play05:19

escritor passou a escrever para pequenas

play05:21

elites que eram pobres culturalmente

play05:25

antonio cantu já revela é inculcado para

play05:29

a falta da complexidade da literatura

play05:31

que segundo ele é de qualidade rara

play05:35

nós escritores voltaram-se para a elite

play05:37

e letrada e sem refinamento até o

play05:40

moderno mesmo não encontrou o autor

play05:43

difícil porque buscava se apenas

play05:46

rebuscamento global era a sede que tenha

play05:50

os primeiros leitores ao jato nas

play05:52

igrejas nos sermões não havia público de

play05:56

qualidade que exige dos escritores é uma

play05:59

literatura com densidade é nossas letras

play06:03

continuar a produzir a reproduzir na

play06:07

verdade a realidade

play06:09

valorizando o conformismo ea

play06:11

padronização do apartamento

play06:13

os autores continuarão a exercer outras

play06:17

atividades deixando o ofício de escrever

play06:19

uma segunda prática é possível observar

play06:23

uma posição mais otimista no texto a

play06:25

partir do século 20 porque o

play06:28

desenvolvimento em que com a indústria

play06:30

editorial o desenvolvimento do público

play06:33

o inconformismo de alguns autores com a

play06:35

realidade ea possibilidade de uma

play06:38

remuneração específica o que é elevou a

play06:42

qualidade das obras

play06:43

os consumidores de livros passaram assim

play06:45

mais exigentes e os escritores buscaram

play06:48

ocupar um papel diferenciado na

play06:50

sociedade

play06:51

porém persiste a valorização da

play06:53

oralidade e da melodia verbal tentando

play06:58

agradar os resquícios dos primeiros

play07:00

públicos

play07:01

dessa maneira nos foi mostrado à

play07:03

independência a interdependência entre

play07:06

público excluído obra em sociedade

play07:09

esses são elementos que não podem ser

play07:11

desvinculadas as últimas afirmações que

play07:15

colocam público no centro da discussão e

play07:19

tirar a soberania do escritor que se

play07:21

colocar acima dos seus de pegas dos seus

play07:24

leitores e decolando desvinculado da

play07:26

sociedade nós eleitores somos tão

play07:30

responsáveis pela evolução de nossa

play07:32

literatura quanto são nossos escritores

play07:35

toda a produção literária espelho da

play07:37

sociedade e explicita nossos costumes e

play07:40

nossa cultura

play07:42

chegamos a está a conclusão que somos um

play07:45

país em construção assim como são idéias

play07:49

somos leitores e escritores em

play07:51

construção que a intensidade dessa

play07:55

literatura só evoluiu quando o uso e

play07:57

descritos escritores e também seu

play07:59

público emanuel com ele nem sempre foi

play08:03

tão fácil esse papel ocupado esse avanço

play08:06

dessa literatura no nosso país e

play08:08

acredito que nos outros países também

play08:10

talvez a gente traga essa discussão em

play08:12

outro momento a respeito dessa evolução

play08:18

nem sempre foi tão bom que foi produzido

play08:20

no brasil né mas acho que foi

play08:22

gradativamente ganhando densidade quando

play08:24

a gente se desvencilhou de certos

play08:26

aspectos que foram tratados aqui no

play08:28

texto

play08:29

espero que tenham gostado de 50 na

play08:31

próxima vez

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
LiteratureSocietyBrazilianHistoryCritiqueAntonio CandidoWritersReadershipCultural IdentityIntellectual Militancy