Belgique : projet d'attentat au Botanique et suivi des mineurs radicalisés - RTBF Info
Summary
TLDRThe script discusses a joint French-Belgian counter-terrorism operation that led to the arrest of three teenagers aged 15 to 17 in France and four young men in Belgium, suspected of planning an Islamist attack on the Botanical Garden. The investigation focuses on the minors, with one showing more advanced plans. Despite the serious threat, no weapons or explosives were found during the arrests. The judicial system's approach to handling radicalized minors is highlighted, emphasizing individualized measures and de-radicalization efforts, with the aim of protecting society and the youth's future.
Takeaways
- 🔍 France and Belgium share intelligence on terrorism cases, leading to the arrest of three teenagers aged 15 to 17 in France.
- 🕵️♂️ The teenagers are suspected of having contact with four young men arrested in Belgium for an Islamist attack plot against the Botanical Garden.
- 📱 Analysis of a suspect's phone indicates potential surveillance of the stadium, suggesting a more serious threat.
- 🚨 The investigation focuses on one of the minors who seemed to have more concrete plans, including potential execution and reconnaissance.
- 🔫 No weapons or explosives were found during the weekend arrests, indicating the threat level is still under assessment.
- 🤝 The commonality among the arrested minors is their participation in messaging groups discussing Islamic extremism, jihadism, and violent action.
- 👨👩👧👦 The judicial system treats young radicalized individuals like any other minor delinquent, with a focus on their personality, the facts, and the potential danger they pose.
- 🏢 Young radicalized individuals are handled by the youth court and may be placed in a youth protection institution (IPPJ) with a tailored approach.
- 👨🏫 The young person is then supported by a multidisciplinary team trained in deradicalization, aiming to protect society and help the individual reconsider their path.
- ⏳ A stay in an IPPJ can last several months, and after release, a support team helps the young person reintegrate into society.
- 📝 The reports from the support team cover both the personality of the young individuals and their families, as well as their relationship to the facts of the case.
- 🌟 Radicalized youth represent a minority of the cases seen by the Youth Court.
Q & A
What is the main focus of the investigation involving the adolescents arrested in France and Belgium?
-The main focus of the investigation is on the potential terrorist activities, specifically an Islamist attack plot, and the adolescents' involvement in such plans, including their communication with the suspects arrested in Belgium.
How many adolescents were arrested in France, and what were they suspected of?
-Three adolescents, aged 15 to 17, were arrested in France. They are suspected of having been in contact with the four young men arrested in Belgium and are accused of association with terrorists.
What was found during the analysis of the phone of one of the suspects arrested over the weekend?
-The analysis of the phone indicated the existence of surveillance at the current stadium, suggesting a potential target for an attack.
What was the age range of the minors arrested, and how does the judicial system handle such cases?
-The minors arrested were between 15 and 17 years old. The judicial system handles their cases through the youth court, with a judge taking charge of their dossiers and considering their personalities, the severity of their actions, and the potential danger they pose to society.
What happens to the minors arrested for radicalization and potential terrorist activities?
-They are placed under the supervision of a multidisciplinary team, including psychologists, social workers, and specialized educators, with the aim of deradicalization and reintegration into society.
What is the role of the public institution for the protection of youth (IPPJ) in handling these cases?
-The IPPJ can place the young radicalized individuals in either an open or closed regime, where they are then guided by professionals trained in deradicalization efforts.
How long can a stay in the IPPJ last, and what happens after release?
-A stay in the IPPJ can last for several months. After release, a support team helps the young person reintegrate into society, with reports covering both the individual's personality and their relationship with the facts of the case.
Are there any differences in how young radicalized individuals are treated compared to other minors accused of different crimes?
-There is no specific treatment for young radicalized individuals; they are treated based on the same criteria as any other young person, with the law prioritizing family placement unless deemed necessary to place them in an IPPJ.
What was the outcome for the four suspects arrested in Belgium?
-Three of the four suspects were handed over to an investigative judge, and due to their age, they were placed in a closed institution for minors.
How does the judicial system ensure the protection of society and the individual in these cases?
-The system ensures protection by prioritizing the interests of society and the individual, with a focus on deradicalization and providing support for the young person to question their beliefs and consider a new path to prevent recidivism.
What is the role of the Brussels judge mentioned in the script?
-The Brussels judge is involved in the evaluation of the cases, considering the facts, the young person's denial or admission of the facts, and the progress made in relation to the case.
Outlines
🔍 Joint Counter-Terrorism Efforts and Arrests
The script discusses the collaboration between France and Belgium in sharing intelligence on terrorism, leading to the arrest of three teenagers aged 15 to 17 in France. These individuals are suspected of having contact with four young men arrested in Belgium for planning an Islamist attack on the Botanical Garden. The investigation focuses on one of the minors who appeared to have more concrete plans, including potential reconnaissance and search for weapons or explosives. The script also mentions that no weapons or explosives were found during the arrests, and three of the four suspects have been handed over to a judge for investigation, with one minor placed in a youth institution due to his age. The judicial system's approach to young radicals is highlighted, emphasizing individualized measures and the importance of deradicalization efforts.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Terrorism
💡Intercepted
💡Suspects
💡Botanique
💡Radicalization
💡Judicial System
💡De-radicalization
💡Youth Court
💡IPPJ
💡Rehabilitation
💡Recidivism
Highlights
France and Belgium share intelligence on terrorism cases.
Three adolescents aged 15 to 17 were arrested in France, suspected of contact with four young men arrested in Belgium for an Islamist attack plot.
The Botanical Garden was a potential target for the attack, as indicated by the analysis of a suspect's phone.
One of the minors seemed to have more concrete plans, including potential execution and reconnaissance.
No weapons or explosives were found during the weekend arrests.
Three minors aged 15 to 17 were arrested in France for virtual association with terrorists.
The commonality among the arrested minors is their participation in messaging discussing Islamic extremism, jihadism, or violent action.
Three of the four suspects arrested have been handed over to an investigative judge and placed in a closed institution for minors due to their age.
The judicial system treats young radicalized individuals like any other minor, with no specific treatment applied.
The focus is on tailored work based on the individual's personality, the facts, and the potential danger to the young person and society.
The law requires prioritizing keeping the young person in the family before considering placement in a public youth protection institution (IPPJ).
A multidisciplinary team, including psychologists and social workers, will work on deradicalization and the young person's protection and autonomy.
The young person's stay in IPPJ can last several months, and after release, a support team helps with societal reintegration.
Reports will address the young person's personality, family relationships, and their involvement in the alleged acts.
Young radicalized individuals represent a minority of the cases seen by the Youth Court.
Transcripts
la France et la Belgique partagent les
informations dans les dossiers de
terrorisme c'est ainsi que trois
adolescents âgés de 15 à 17 ans ont ét
interpelés dans trois villes de France
ils sont soupçonnés d'avoir été en
contact avec les quatre jeunes hommes
arrêtés dimanche en Belgique pour un
projet d'attentat islamiste contre le
Botanique le point sur l'enquête Rachel
crivelaro photo à l'appui le degré de
menace se précise un peu plus le
Botanique cible potentiel d'un att
l'analyse du téléphone d'un des suspects
arrêtés ce weekend indique en tout cas
l'existence de repérage au stade actuel
où on en est de l'enquête il apparaît
que un des mineurs semblait avoir des
projets plus aboutis que les autres donc
c'est plutôt sur un des mineurs que
l'enquête se concentre projet plus
abouti ça veut dire un peut-être début
d'exécution potentiel début d'exécution
et notamment par d'éventuels repérages
éventuelles recherch d'arbres
d'éventuelles recherch d'explosif c'est
plutôt dans cette sphère- làà que on est
alors menace sérieus ou fanfaronade
d'adolescents lors des arrestations de
ce weekend ni armes ni explosif n'ont
été
retrouvé par ailleurs dans la foulée de
l'intervention chez nous trois mineurs
de 15 à 17 ans ont été arrêtés en France
pour association de malfaiteurs
terroristes en contact virtuel avec
certains des suspects arrêtés en
Belgique il ne serait toutefois pas
impliqué dans le projet visant le
Botanique évidemment ce qui se passe en
France doit être évalué avec les
autorités françaises mais le point
commun entre l'ensemble des mineurs
arrêtés c'est leur participation à des
messageries dans lesquell il est
question d'intégrisme islamique de
djihadisme voir d'action violente ce qui
ne signifie pas que l'un ou l'autre des
personnes d'une ou l'autre des personnes
qui sont dans cette messagerie et un
projet concret d'attentat chez nous
trois des quatre suspects arrêtés ont
été mis à disposition d'un juge
d'instruction de terr monde et en raison
de leur âge placé dans une institution
fermé pour
mineurs alors justement que fait notre
système judiciaire lorsque de jeunes
radicalisés pouvant commettre un
attentats sont arrêtés où sont-ils
placés lorsqu'ils sont mineurs sont-ils
traités différemment d'autres mineurs
qui sont poursuivis pour d'autres faits
et bien réponse avec Stéphanie Lepage et
David
Brichard comme tout mineur délinquent le
sort d'un jeune radicalisé est placé
entre les mains du tribunal de la
jeunesse un juge va se saisir de son
dossier mais pas question d'appliquer un
traitement spécifique comme pour tous
les jeunes nous faisons un travail sur
mesure en fonction de la personnalité
des faits évidemment on en tient compte
et de la gravité des faits et du danger
que cela peut représenter pour le jeune
et pour la société donc on tient compte
des mêmes critères euh que pour
n'importe quel jeune et en fonction de
ça la loi nous impose d'ailleurs de
toujours privilégier un maintien en
famille avant d'envisager un placement
s'il est envoyé en IPPJ institution
publique de protection de la jeunesse le
jeune radicalisé pourra y être placé en
régime ouvert ou fermé il sera ensuite
encadré par des professionnels formés
aux enjeux de la déradicalisation donc
prise en charge par une équipe
plridisciplinaire donc composée de
psychologues assistants sociaux
éducateurs spécialisés où on va vraiment
essayer prioritairement hein de de
travailler dans l'intérêt évidemment de
la protection de la société mais bien
évidemment aussi de la protection donc
du jeunne et l'intérêt du jeune pour
amener le jeûne justement à PIR pouvoir
davantage autonomiser à pouvoir se
remettre en question et envisager une
une nouvelle trajectoire pour
effectivement infin éviter un maximum le
risque de récidive un séjour en IPPJ
peut durer de nombreux mois à la sortie
le jugement date alors une équipe
d'accompagnement pour aider au retour du
jeune dans la société ses services lui
font ensuite rapport les rapports
concernent autant la la personnalité des
jeunes et leurs familles que leur
rapport au fait qui leur sont reprochés
et donc inévitablement les rapports
qu'on va recevoir y compris du délégué
du du service de la protection de la
jeunesse vont aborder les faits la
manière dont le jeune à bord de lui-même
les fait s'il est dans le dénis et et
quel recul il a ou non par rapport au
fait selon cette juge bruxelloise les
jeunes radicalisés représent une
minorité des dossiers rencontrés par le
Tribunal de la
jeunesse
Browse More Related Video
ASIO boss explains why mixed ideologies have seen terror threat rise | 7.30
Tragedi Carok Bangkalan Madura Berujung Maut | Kabar Utama tvOne
Knife attacker stabs MULTIPLE people on LIVE STREAM in German city as armed police rush to scene...
Juvenile Status Offenders / Educational Video PSA
The Man Who Set Off The Biggest White and Mexican Race Riots in California - José Díaz
Les révélations de deux anciens espions français sur l’Algérie
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)