Understanding Teamwork
Summary
TLDRChapter 10 of the transcript delves into the dynamics of teamwork and its increasing prevalence in organizations. It explores the reasons behind teams' popularity, such as leveraging individual talents and fostering flexibility. The chapter distinguishes between groups and teams, highlighting the coordinated effort and shared goals that define a team. It outlines various types of teams, including problem-solving, self-managed, cross-functional, and virtual teams, and discusses the importance of context, composition, and process in creating effective teams. The chapter also addresses the challenge of transforming individuals into team players, especially in individualistic cultures, and emphasizes the need for managers to select the right team members, provide training, and establish a reward system that encourages teamwork. Finally, it advises on when teams are the best solution, suggesting that not all tasks are suited for team efforts.
Takeaways
- π€ Teams are popular because they can leverage collective talents and are more flexible and responsive to change, potentially increasing motivation and job satisfaction.
- π The use of teams in organizations has grown significantly over the last decade due to their ability to enhance employee talents and encourage participation in decision-making.
- π There is a distinction between groups and teams; groups share information without joint effort, while teams work in coordinated efforts towards a common goal.
- π₯ Teams require a synergy where the collective performance is greater than the sum of individual efforts, unlike groups where synergy is neutral.
- π There are different types of teams: problem-solving teams, self-managed teams, cross-functional teams, and virtual teams, each with unique characteristics and purposes.
- π‘ Effective teams are characterized by adequate resources, effective leadership, a climate of trust, and performance evaluations tied to team contributions.
- 𧩠Team composition is crucial for success, with factors such as member abilities, personality, roles, diversity, and team size playing significant roles.
- π― Teams must have a strong commitment to a common purpose, specific and challenging goals, and the belief in their ability to succeed, known as team efficacy.
- π The process of a team, including how it handles conflict and social loafing, can significantly impact its effectiveness.
- π Virtual teams, which use technology to connect members, are becoming more prevalent but require strategies to overcome challenges like time zones and limited direct interaction.
- π€ Not all situations call for teams; managers should consider the complexity of work, common purpose, and interdependence of tasks when deciding whether to use a team or an individual.
Q & A
What is the main focus of Chapter 10 on understanding work and teams?
-The main focus of Chapter 10 is to analyze the growing popularity of teams in organizations, understand why organizations are developing more diverse teams, and to explore how to create effective teams and when to use individuals instead of teams.
Why have teams become increasingly popular in organizations?
-Teams have become popular because they can achieve more collectively, utilize individual employee talents better, are more flexible and responsive to change, and can help keep employees engaged and motivated.
What is the difference between a group and a team?
-A group primarily shares information and makes decisions without requiring joint effort, whereas a team works together in a coordinated effort to achieve a specific goal, with each person's work directly linked to others.
What are the five types of teams mentioned in the script?
-The five types of teams mentioned are problem-solving teams, self-managed teams, cross-functional teams, virtual teams, and multi-team systems.
What is the role of problem-solving teams in an organization?
-Problem-solving teams are put together to brainstorm potential solutions to problems and present them to top managers for decision-making, but they are rarely given the authority to implement their suggestions.
How do self-managed teams differ from traditional teams?
-Self-managed teams are larger groups of employees who perform highly related and interdependent jobs and take on the responsibilities of their supervisors, such as work planning and scheduling, without a direct boss.
What challenges do virtual teams face, and how can they be overcome?
-Virtual teams face challenges like less direct interaction, time zone differences, and difficulties in establishing trust. They can be overcome by using technology effectively, finding ways to establish trust, and having close monitoring and publicizing of results.
What are the key elements of creating effective teams according to the script?
-The key elements include context (adequate resources, leadership, structure, climate of trust, performance evaluations, and rewards), composition (abilities, personality, roles, diversity, size, and flexibility), and process (common purpose, specific goals, team efficacy, conflict levels, and social loafing).
Why is trust important in teams, and how does it contribute to team success?
-Trust is important in teams because it is essential for group cohesiveness, allowing team members to open up, share ideas, and work together effectively, which contributes to the team's success.
How can managers ensure that teams are composed of the right members?
-Managers can ensure the right team composition by carefully selecting members based on the required skills and abilities, considering personality traits, assigning appropriate roles, and maintaining diversity to encourage idea generation.
What is the role of conflict in team effectiveness, and how can it be managed?
-Conflict can impact team effectiveness positively or negatively. Teams with lower levels of conflict are more effective as they avoid wasting time on counterproductive personality clashes. Managing conflict involves navigating through disagreements and fostering an environment where conflicts can be resolved constructively.
When might teams not be the best solution for a task or project?
-Teams might not be the best solution when the work is simple and does not require diverse perspectives, when there is no common purpose larger than individual goals, or when tasks are not interdependent, meaning each member's work does not affect the others.
What are the implications for managers when creating and managing teams?
-Managers should consider the need for trust, smaller team size, opportunities for significant contributions, and team self-belief. They should also provide training in problem-solving, communication, negotiation, conflict management, and cooperation skills, and establish rewards that support team efforts.
Outlines
π Introduction to Teamwork and Organizational Dynamics
This paragraph introduces Chapter 10, focusing on understanding work and teams. It discusses the increasing prevalence of teams in organizations due to their ability to leverage collective talents, adapt to change, and potentially boost motivation and job satisfaction. The script differentiates between groups and teams, emphasizing that teams require coordinated effort towards a common goal, unlike groups that may share information but do not necessarily work interdependently. The paragraph also outlines the objectives of the chapter, which include analyzing team popularity, understanding the development of diverse teams, and identifying characteristics of effective teams.
π Types of Teams and Their Distinctive Features
The second paragraph delves into the various types of teams, including problem-solving teams that brainstorm solutions but lack implementation authority, self-managed teams that operate without direct supervision, cross-functional teams that combine diverse expertise, and virtual teams that work remotely using technology. The paragraph highlights the unique challenges and benefits of each team type, such as the autonomy of self-managed teams and the geographical flexibility of virtual teams, while also discussing the importance of synergy, accountability, and complementary skills within a team.
π Creating Effective Teams: Context, Composition, and Process
This paragraph discusses the factors that contribute to the effectiveness of teams, categorized into context, composition, and process. Context includes providing adequate resources, effective leadership, and a structure that facilitates success. Trust and performance evaluations that reward team contributions are also emphasized. Composition factors involve the abilities and personalities of team members, the allocation of roles, diversity, and team size. Process aspects include having a common purpose, specific goals, and managing conflict and social loafing to maintain group health and effectiveness.
π Enhancing Team Performance and Overcoming Challenges
The fourth paragraph continues the discussion on team effectiveness by examining the team process and its impact on overall performance. It introduces the formula for group effectiveness, which accounts for potential gains and losses due to process issues. The importance of a strong commitment to a common purpose, setting specific and challenging goals, and fostering team efficacy are highlighted. The paragraph also addresses the need to navigate through conflict and social loafing to maintain a productive team environment.
π€ Transforming Individuals into Team Players and Selecting the Right Team Members
This paragraph explores the challenges of turning individualistic employees into effective team players, especially in cultures that emphasize individualism. It stresses the importance of selecting employees who are predisposed to teamwork and the need for training in problem-solving, communication, and conflict management. The paragraph also discusses the role of rewards in encouraging cooperative efforts over individual ones and the importance of managers in creating an environment conducive to teamwork.
π€ Deciding When to Use Teams and When Not To
The final paragraph of the script wraps up the chapter by summarizing the key points discussed, including the growth of teams in organizations, the characteristics of effective teams, and the strategies for creating better team players. It also addresses the question of when teams are the appropriate solution, suggesting three criteria to consider: complexity of work, the presence of a common purpose, and interdependent tasks. The paragraph concludes by emphasizing the importance of managers knowing when to deploy teams and when individual work might be more effective.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Teamwork
π‘Diverse Teams
π‘Group vs. Team
π‘Synergy
π‘Accountability
π‘Self-Managed Teams
π‘Cross-Functional Teams
π‘Virtual Teams
π‘Team Composition
π‘Team Process
π‘Social Loafing
π‘Team Player
π‘Interdependence
Highlights
Teams are popular for achieving more collectively, enhancing individual talents, and increasing flexibility and motivation.
Organizations develop diverse teams to remain competitive in the global market.
Teams have grown exponentially in organizations due to their ability to adapt and engage employees.
Groups and teams differ in their goals, synergy, accountability, and required skills.
Work groups primarily share information, while work teams collaborate for collective performance.
There are five types of teams: problem-solving, self-managed, cross-functional, virtual, and multi-team systems.
Self-managed teams eliminate the supervisory role and require high coordination and efficiency.
Cross-functional teams combine diverse perspectives to solve complex company-wide problems.
Virtual teams use technology to connect members across the globe, overcoming time and space constraints.
Creating effective teams involves context, composition, and process considerations.
Trust is essential for team cohesiveness and success.
Team composition should include a balance of abilities, personality, roles, and diversity.
Team process involves commitment to a common purpose, specific goals, and managing conflict and social loafing.
Not all employees are team players, and cultural differences can affect teamwork.
Managers should select team members carefully and discourage social loafing to ensure team effectiveness.
Teams are not always the best solution; three questions help determine if a team approach is appropriate.
Managers should foster trust, provide opportunities for significant contributions, and encourage team belief in its capabilities.
Allowing teams to form themselves can increase ownership and reduce conflicts among members.
The chapter concludes with an analysis of when to use teams versus individuals, considering team burnout and individual problem-solving capabilities.
Transcripts
hi and welcome to chapter 10
understanding work
teams so in this chapter we are going to
talk about
teamwork and after studying this chapter
you should be able to analyze the
growing popularity of teams and
organizations understand why
organizations are developing more and
more diverse teams and team strategies
contrast groups and teams contrast to
five types of teams identify the
characteristics of effective teams show
how organiz ations can create team
players and decide when to use
individuals instead of teams so why are
teams so popular well basically they're
popular because you can achieve more in
a team so the increased competition from
companies
worldwide has forced companies to become
more competitive and one way to become
more competitive and more efficient is
to develop teams and teamwork so teams
can come together to better utilize
individual employee talents collectively
they're more flexible and responsive to
change and they also serve to possibly
motivate people so over the last Deca
decade we have seen the use of teams
grow exponentially in organizations
there are a number of reasons why this
is true teams can enhance the use of
employee talents and tend to be more
flexible and responsive to change teams
can help to keep employees engaged in
their work and increase the
participation in decision- making and
thus increasing their m motivation and
job satisfaction however teams are not
always effective uh so it is important
to take a look at how to deploy teams
and when to best use
them groups and teams are not the same
thing a group is primarily there to
share information and make decisions no
real joint effort is required a teamwork
however a team is more coordinated in
effort to achieve a particular goal so a
group is just any group of people who
are working in a
company that are all working to the same
goal maximizing shareholders well
however they're not working closely
together like a team
would okay so that's that's an important
thing to new so there a lot of work
groups
departments um and organ organizations
that can be considered a group but a
team has to be something that is people
working together in a coord ated effort
with one
another that are where each person's
work is directly linked or tied to
someone else's
effort okay so let's so group groups or
work groups and work teams differ in
their goals level of synergy
accountability and skills uh their
function is different so work groups
share information while work teams work
together for more Collective
performance the the Synergy in groups is
neutral whereas
Teamworks teams have more of a positive
Synergy so Synergy is really that adage
1 + 1 equals 3 so the Synergy in a team
means that the team can produce more
results than groups of people working
individually so accountability can be
individual for both um groups or teams
but is uh is more often Mutual in teams
the skill in a group can be varied
wherever the skill in the team need to
be complimentary meaning that they the
skills
are together the combination of skills
of the people on the team help to create
something more powerful more effective
at work so here in this diagram we have
you know work groups of just people who
may share information work for the same
company uh neutral individual working in
their own offices working on their own
tasks and it's kind of random and Vary
where work teams are more Collective and
this is so this is the connectivity so
it's more Collective performance it's a
more positive experience where people
are are um working directly on the same
type of work often the same projects um
and
assignments so and their skills are more
complimentary to each
other okay now there are four different
types of teams there's a team
specifically put together to solve a
problem there are self-managed teams
where the the teams themselves don't
have a super supervisor or a direct boss
they manage themselves in producing
their
returns they're are cross functional
teams which are teams of people that are
pulled from multiple places within the
in the company's hierarchy and there are
virtual teams teams that work online or
in an alternative work
space okay so problem solving teams
members are can often be from the same
department or the same group so they
share ideas and suggest and suggestions
for improvement but they're rarely given
the authority to implement their
suggestions they're sort of a
brainstorming team so they come together
to POS potential solutions to problems
which will probably present the top
manager to decide what to do now the
self-managing teams this could be teams
a little bit bigger teams maybe 10 to 15
employees um and they're comprised
groups of people who perform highly
related and interdependent jobs and take
on the responsibilities of their for
supervisors so the effectiveness of this
type of group greatly depends on the
situation and the goals of the group so
you know so team the team itself is sort
of eliminating the supervisory role of a
manager and they are doing their own
work planning and scheduling their own
task assignments uh this their operating
decisions actions working with the
customers
now this can be a very difficult team to
put together and work effectively
because some teams do better when you
have a leader or supervisor motivating
directing them so a self-managed team
would really have to be a group of
Highly coordinated efficient team
members people who are good at working
in teams if you're not good at working
in a team you're probably not good at
being a part of a self-managed team it's
one of the most difficult teams to set
up and and establish but can be one of
the most cost effective and efficient
teams once is going and working well
cross functional teams are a gather
workers from many different work areas
that come together to accomplish a task
that needs to utilize multiple
perspectives so this type of group is
good at developing new ideas and solving
problems or coordinating complex
projects across the company you know
given that their tasks are normally
complex and diverse it takes some time
for the groups to develop into a more
effective and efficient productive teams
so the cross functional teams solve
problems that affect generally affect
the whole company so it's some sort of
problem that you would need people from
sales and marketing Finance and
Accounting and operations to be involved
to help solve so uh so you get a very
diverse group of individuals who have a
diverse background and knowledge about
all areas of the company so that's what
helps to solve problems that affect that
generally affect the entire Company by
having pulled in experts from each area
of different departments in the company
okay so virtual team this is going to be
something that's going to be much more
uh prevalent in the future and you may
have already been part of a virtual team
and you're basically just using
technology like Skype uh Adobe Connect
to connect teams across the world so it
can be difficult because when you're not
meeting face to face there can be less
direct interaction less social
opportunities you know but virtual teams
are increasing in their use that's for
sure and this type of Team uses computer
technology to bring people together to
achieve that common goal typically these
team these types of teams get to work
with little socializing but they need to
overcome time and space constraints um
to accomplish their task and one big
problem could be time zones so if you
have multiple people in multiple time
zones it's hard to find a time that's
convenient for everybody um so in order
to be effective virtual teams need to
find ways to establish trust among the
members and have and have close
monitoring and results to be publicized
so dispersing information can be
challenging in an online team research
shows that virtual teams are better at
sharing unique information but they tend
to share less information overall can
also be challenging to find the best
amount of the best way to communicate so
low levels of virtual communication can
mean high levels of information sharing
but high levels of virtual communication
can hinder information sharing so
basically you know low levels of virtual
communication could be something like
email where you can share a lot of data
um but very high levels of virtual
communication like Skype May hinder some
information
sharing mostly because the time it takes
to meet up and the limited time you have
to talk in those uh and some of the
connectivities issues with something
like Skype okay multi-team system so
research shows that multi-team systems
perform better when they have
um boundary spanners who um whose job is
to coordinate the members of the sub
teams so the multi-team system can be
bet can be the best choice when teams
are too large to be effective or when
teams are with distinct functions need
to be highly coordinated so this is
managing groups of teams so collections
are two more teams that need to be
coordinated so and that's getting more
and more true in work world today that
there are managers dealing with multiple
multiple teams that they have to keep on
track and keep
coordinated okay so creating effective
teams we have uh context
composition and
process so for each of
these
um we're going to talk about the each of
these a little bit moving forward but
for each of these you know for the
context adequate resources you know
basically these three components of
effective teams um have Sub sub areas so
in context is adequate resources
leadership and structure climate of
trust performance evaluations and
rewards on
composition uh abilities of members
personality allocating roles diversity
size of teams member flexibility member
preferences and process common purpose
specific goals team efficacy conflict
levels and social loafing so let's talk
about the these are all elements in
making the team
effective um understanding the context
is important for teams to be effective
the team needs the right resources to do
the job well members also need effective
leadership and structure to facilitate a
process that will help the team succeed
it's important that teams fit together
so they can successfully utilize the
individual skills inside the group so
trust is also an important aspect of
teams and essential for group
cohesiveness as is
seen as we've seen previously finally
the reward system need to be adequate
and based on team contributions so these
are some cont context factors in making
a successful team so you could see how
um a team is going to need adequate
support and resources without that
they're really not going to be
successful having effective leadership
and structure is critical for team to
function and the climate trust is
probably the most important element here
where team members trust each other in
their leadership that they're going that
they have the the tools to become
successful and that the their team
members are people they can trust people
they can open up to uh on a work level
and people that they can share their
success with and that ties into
performance evaluations as far as how
you perform in a team and the type of
reward reward you receive for being an
effective team member or being a part of
an effective team and one of those
generally are bonuses that are
specifically tied to team
membership so team composition and
success so the ability of the
members is definitely a key aspect so a
manager must play coose attention to how
a team is put together to assure the
group's cohesiveness and Effectiveness
so each member should have been selected
based on the type of skills and
abilities needed to accomplish the task
at hand however abilities are not the
only characteristic that managers need
to pay attention to personality is also
important uh that the team can bond form
trust together and that the team has the
P personalities of the team work well
together because fighting in um people
not getting along due to personalities
is probably the biggest reasons teams
fail so in addition manager must be sure
he assigns the right people to fill the
roles as needed but maintaining adequate
diversity so the idea generation can
still occur so the manager must also pay
attention to the size of the team to
ensure that the members want to be on
the team and enjoy the
teamwork uh
organizational organizational diversity
um in attributes such as age
uh can help predict better team
formations so let's just back up for
minut so if you're going to have a
successful team the members should have
you know technical expertise problem
solving skills interpersonal skills the
ability to get along with people the
personality of the team members team
member you have better team members with
people who are very conscientious and
thoughtful and open-minded you know
people who will readily listen to ideas
think about them research them and not
just reject them just because they
personally feel a certain way or reject
them out of their ignorance
um and the allocation of roles so the
roles that people play Within the team
need to be defined so they understand
what how and what they are going to
contribute and of course the diversity
of members helps
to bring strengths to the team you don't
want all like-minded people on the team
you want people from different
experiences different backgrounds to
help make a more well-rounded team that
can make more well-rounded
decisions okay
all right so the team process and
success so you have potential
um
potential group
Effectiveness plus process gains minus
process Lo losses equal actual group
Effectiveness so team should create so
team's output should be greater than the
sum of the inputs so this is just
basically a graphical representation of
the impact and the group's overall
effectiveness so
whatever the team or group does they're
ultimately achieving for Success
Solutions and
Effectiveness in their
performance so A team's process can have
a big impact on its Effectiveness teams
must have a strong commitment to the
common purpose that provides Direction
but yet incorporate you know
reflectivity so that it plans can be
adjusted when necessary the goals of the
team must be set up so they're specific
measurable and realistic yet challenging
in order to keep the team members
engaged um members must believe they can
succeed and have the group have a mental
map of how to get the work done to
assist the process of accomplishing
their task um and the members must na
navigate through conflict and social
loafing to encourage a healthy and
effective group so for a team to be
successful there has to be a road map or
purpose for what this team is doing
specific goals um to what they're
looking to achieve now team efficacy is
what efficacy is basically believing the
team having faith and believing that the
team put together can solve the task
that they can do it that they have the
skills and they just need to roll up the
sleeves and get it done so it's really a
confidence in the team
um so teams with lower levels of
conflict among team members are more
effective because a lot of time and
effort can be wasted in
counterproductive personality conflicts
you know and one of the biggest gripes
of any team you've been on student teams
and you know this where you have social
loafing so you you get a team together
maybe to do a simulation or to do a
project and one person kind of just sits
back and through sheer laziness is very
unreactive and waits for other team
members to complete the project to do
their work and really is really
difficult to bring them in to get them
to contribute that's a difficult
solution how do you solve that you know
you don't want to be you know seeming
like you have the personality conflict
about with when you complain about this
person so dly the best solution is for
the team members to try to encourage the
social loafer to stop being a loafer and
participate and contribute to the team
and if that doesn't work at a certain
point the team members need to get
together and talk to a superior and say
listen this person isn't working out
they're not contributing please find a
better team or better fit for them uh
because it's really affecting our
ability and we really feel that you know
we're not going to work hard if
someone's just going to sit here and get
all the credit for what we're doing and
they're doing nothing it's really it's a
really uh demotivating to have a social
loafer on your
team okay turning individuals into team
players okay so not all employees are
team players and specifically in States
it's a more individualistic culture that
can create challenges for people to work
in teams that's why if you're a student
in the United States you or you're from
the United States and you're currently a
student you know you hate Teamwork
because you want to do things by
yourself it's easier to work by yourself
it's a more individualistic Society you
grew up in so teamwork does not come so
naturally to you like it may for other
societies so in fact it's not always
possible to turn everyone into a team
player so so when formulating teams it's
important to carefully select the right
employees who are more tuned to the
teamwork and manager should be careful
to craft or reward system encourage
cooperation um efforts rather than
competitive efforts so in addition while
managers need to recognize individual
contributions to the team they also need
to discourage social loafing so if it's
easier it's always easier to work by
yourself because it's more effective
more and efficient and deciding what to
do do in doing something may not be more
successful as far as the results of your
efforts and your Solutions as a team but
most people prefer working alone because
you don't have to deal with other people
and that's that's a huge for a lot of
people it's a huge struggle to deal with
other people so for managers you really
have to select the right people who have
the interpersonal skills and technical
skills to succeed in the team and then
you have to train you know people in the
workforce need to be trained on their
problem solving skills communication
skills negotiation Conflict Management
these coaching skills and coaching
skills and Cooper skills of cooperating
so a lot of times employees need to be
retrained and then the rewards have to
support um the efforts of the team over
uh individual ones when someone's
involved in the team effort so if the if
the team there's no reward for being
part of the team uh or the team
successes it's discouraging okay um
teams aren't always the answer so um
we've looked at a number of ways to make
teams effective and encourage good
teamwork however teams are not always
the answer there are three questions um
to ask whether team whether team
solution fits the situation so number
one um is the work complex and is there
a need for different perspectives number
two does the work create a common
purpose or set of goals for the group
that is larger than the aggregate goal
of the individual and three are members
of the group involved in interdependent
tasks so if the if these questions can
all be answered with a yes then a team
might be a solution so you really have
to think about the complexity of the
work can a group do it can a team do it
better than an individual person the
common person does the the common um
purpose does the does the work create a
common purpose or a set of goals that
people um in a team can more
successfully achieve and are the members
of the team of the group interdependent
meaning does their work touch each
other's work in a way that um trying to
solve the problem you need all the
pieces of the puzzle not just the one
piece that you complete okay so
implications for managers um there are a
number of common characteristics of
effective teams that can be um the
manager should keep in mind such as the
need for trust uh small small in size a
chance to contribute significant tasks
and a team who believes in itself so
managers need to to modify the Environ
that help team succeed and pay closer
attention uh careful attention to the
makeup of the team and the members to
ensure success so for managers if you
have successful teams you'll get more
done and you'll be a more successful
manager
but you have to know how to create
effective teams you know they're they're
common characteristics ICS that make
teams effective uh and often times
smaller teams work better than larger
teams um Team you have to as a
manager get your members of your teams
to believe in themselves and believe in
the capabilities and commitment to their
purpose you know so selecting the
individuals who have the best
interpersonal skills to be effective
team players team members team leaders
and providing training and and teamwork
skills uh and reward for individuals for
Cooperative efforts will definitely help
your teams become more effective as a
manager but keep in mind um if a team
can uh properly select its members it
will be more effective so the the um
this solution can be based on the
ability skill and appc the traits based
on the situation so if non-personnel
conflicts can be fostered it may lead to
better team decisions so basically we're
saying here that
um sometimes the in making a proper
selection
um teams should sometimes be giving be
allowed to have inputs on who their team
members should be and so even though the
manager is going to most often puts a
team together it's important to allow
team members um to decide and who they
want to work with in some cases so let
sometimes it may make sense to let teams
form
themselves and this and this way if it's
possible if they feel they have
ownership in the creation of the team
then they're more likely to work
together and get along I found this
directly I found this concept to be very
effective for me as when I teach your
classes with teamwork when I used to
just Auto assign people into teams and
just randomly put people in teams I
found was a lot of conflict and a lot of
problems so then allowing members you
know putting students in the group and
saying okay I want you guys to self-
select inform form teams of four and
giving the team the responsibility of
picking their team members or the people
coming together in in groups of teams
often reduce that stress among who
they're working with and who they're
getting stuck with and greatly uh reduce
my stress of having to deal with uh
conflicts of team members who didn't get
along okay just for a quick summary for
this chapter we in this chapter we
analyze the growth and popularity of
teams and organizations we contrasted
groups versus teams talked you about the
difference of the two talked about the
five different types of teams identified
the characteristics of effective teams
showed how organizations can create team
better team players and decided when to
use individuals rather than teams so you
know there that's a really important
thing to think about there are
are certain problems that individuals
can solve better so being part of being
an effective manager of course is
knowing when to deploy a team and when
not to deploy a team because sometimes
people can have Team burnout if they're
on too many teams simultaneously that's
can be a very stressful environment for
people so sometimes uh it's best when
problems can be solved in individual
basis not the former team because it
that's just counterproductive and
wasteful okay that's it for this chapter
I will see you soon for the next chapter
take care
Browse More Related Video
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)