Persuasive speech; Should Someone’s Tattoo or Personal Appearance Factor Into The Hiring Process?

Summary

In this speech, Casa Luci addresses the issue of tattoo discrimination in hiring practices, arguing that it is an outdated and unfair practice. She highlights how tattoos can unfairly block qualified candidates from job opportunities, pointing out a study that shows applicants with visible tattoos are 27% less likely to be hired. Luci also explains how companies that focus on appearance miss out on top talent, referencing successful companies like Microsoft, Apple, and Google. She calls for a shift towards inclusive hiring based on skills and experience, urging listeners to advocate for change.

Takeaways

• 😀 Tattoos can lead to unfair judgment, even before someone opens their mouth, especially in professional settings.
• 😀 Discrimination against individuals with tattoos can result in qualified people being denied job opportunities.
• 😀 A study found that applicants with visible tattoos are 27% less likely to get hired, even when their qualifications exceed others.
• 😀 Tattoo discrimination in hiring practices leads companies to miss out on talented individuals.
• 😀 Companies that implement inclusive hiring practices outperform their competitors by 35%.
• 😀 Employers should focus on skills, qualifications, and experience rather than judging based on appearance.
• 😀 Leading companies like Microsoft, Apple, and Google have adopted inclusive hiring practices and care more about skills than tattoos.
• 😀 Tattoos should not be a factor in hiring decisions, as they do not correlate with someone's ability to perform in a job.
• 😀 Tattoo discrimination harms businesses by narrowing the talent pool and limiting potential hires.
• 😀 Employees should advocate for fairer hiring practices that prioritize talent over appearance, including tattoos.
• 😀 It's important to raise awareness and shift the culture towards evaluating people based on what they can contribute, not their tattoos.

Q & A

Why is tattoo discrimination considered an outdated practice in hiring?

Tattoo discrimination is considered outdated because it judges individuals based on their appearance rather than their qualifications, skills, and experience. In today’s diverse and inclusive work environment, such biases limit opportunities for talented individuals who can contribute significantly to a company.

What percentage of applicants with visible tattoos are less likely to get hired, according to the study from the Journal of Business Ethics?

According to the study, applicants with visible tattoos are 27% less likely to be hired, even when their qualifications are better than others.

How do companies benefit from inclusive hiring practices?

Companies benefit from inclusive hiring practices because they are able to access a wider pool of talented individuals. Research from Harvard Business Review shows that companies with inclusive hiring practices outperform others by 35%.

What are some companies that have adopted inclusive hiring practices regarding tattoos?

Companies like Microsoft, Apple, and Google have adopted inclusive hiring practices that do not discriminate based on visible tattoos. They focus on an individual's ability to perform the job, not their appearance.

What is the key message the speaker wants to convey regarding tattoo discrimination in hiring?

The speaker urges that tattoos should not be a factor in hiring decisions. Instead, employers should prioritize qualifications, skills, and experience. Tattoo discrimination limits opportunities for qualified individuals and harms businesses by narrowing the talent pool.

What action does the speaker suggest for individuals in hiring positions?

The speaker suggests that individuals in hiring positions should advocate for their companies to look at candidates' skills, talents, and qualifications, not their appearance. This helps create a fairer and more inclusive hiring process.

What is the purpose of the petition mentioned by the speaker?

The petition aims to call on lawmakers to protect workers from tattoo bias and ensure that hiring practices do not discriminate against individuals with visible tattoos.

How can people contribute to shifting the culture surrounding tattoo discrimination?

People can contribute by talking about the issue, sharing what they’ve learned with their friends, family, and co-workers, and helping to shift societal perceptions about tattoos in the workplace.

Why does the speaker believe that a person’s ability to do a job is more important than their appearance?

The speaker believes that a person's skills, experience, and passion are what truly matter in the workplace. Tattoos or other aspects of appearance do not determine someone's ability to succeed in a role, and hiring decisions should reflect that.

What are the potential consequences for businesses that continue to discriminate based on tattoos?

Businesses that continue to discriminate based on tattoos risk missing out on talented and qualified employees, which can negatively impact their success and innovation. They also perpetuate outdated and unfair hiring practices.