⁠@CAMELOT331’s Interactions w/ Lawtube People (Nov 13, 2024)

Summary

The speaker shares their negative experiences with people in the legal community, describing encounters with a few individuals who displayed soulless, money-driven behavior and a lack of moral integrity. They express frustration over dishonesty and betrayal, particularly when one individual fabricated a story about them, which was shared with others. Despite this, the speaker praises one individual, Jeff, as a genuine and trustworthy person. Overall, the speaker emphasizes their distaste for the toxic culture they've encountered and their desire to avoid such people in the future.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker has had negative experiences with most individuals in the legal or professional community, feeling betrayed by their actions.
• 😡 The speaker describes certain individuals as soulless and money-hungry, with no moral compass.
• 💸 Some people in this community are portrayed as willing to stab others in the back for a small amount of money, like $5.
• 😤 The speaker expresses frustration at people who act like friends but betray others behind their backs.
• 🚫 The speaker finds dishonesty pervasive, especially in people who fabricate stories to protect their own image or agenda.
• 💔 The speaker is disillusioned with the legal profession or certain individuals within it, suggesting their lack of integrity is widespread.
• 🤢 The speaker feels 'gross' after realizing they’ve been lied to or manipulated by others.
• 🛑 The speaker prefers honesty and directness, stating that they would accept a simple, truthful message instead of being lied to.
• 👀 The speaker mentions that they have proof of others lying, as other creators showed them screenshots of dishonest interactions.
• 🌟 Despite these negative experiences, the speaker emphasizes that one person, Jeff, has remained trustworthy and loyal, calling him a 'true blue' individual.

Q & A

What is the speaker's general opinion of lawyers?

The speaker expresses a negative view of most lawyers, describing them as soulless, money-hungry, and dishonest. However, they mention having a positive experience with one lawyer who is described as 'great' and 'cool'.

How does the speaker describe their interactions with lawyers?

The speaker has had limited interactions with lawyers, only two or three, but suggests that the majority of these individuals were untrustworthy and manipulative, willing to betray their friends for a small sum of money.

What does the speaker mean by saying lawyers have 'zero moral compass'?

The speaker suggests that the lawyers they’ve encountered lack any ethical guidelines, behaving in a completely self-serving and unscrupulous manner, even fabricating stories and betraying others for personal gain.

Why does the speaker feel uncomfortable in their interactions with certain lawyers?

The speaker feels uncomfortable because they perceive the lawyers as dishonest and manipulative. A specific incident is described where a lawyer spread false information about the speaker, which made the speaker feel gross and betrayed.

What would the speaker have preferred instead of being lied about?

The speaker would have preferred honesty, where the lawyer could have directly communicated with them instead of fabricating stories. The speaker values straightforwardness and transparency over deceit.

Who does the speaker trust in the law community?

The speaker expresses trust in one individual lawyer, who they describe as 'true blue' and a 'good dude'. This person is seen as a positive exception in an otherwise negative experience with lawyers.

What is the speaker's reaction to being told fabricated stories by others in the law community?

The speaker feels disgusted and betrayed upon learning that false stories were being spread about them. They note that the situation was unpleasant and left them with a bad impression of those involved.

What does the speaker mean by 'step over your dead corpse for $5'?

This phrase is used to emphasize the extreme level of greed the speaker attributes to certain lawyers. It suggests that these individuals would exploit others without hesitation, even if it meant betraying close friends for a small amount of money.

How does the speaker react to being banned or excluded by others?

The speaker states that if they were excluded or banned, they would prefer direct communication over fabricated stories. They would be okay with being banned as long as there is honest communication and no deceit involved.

What does the speaker suggest about how to handle conflicts within the law community?

The speaker suggests that conflicts should be addressed with honesty and direct communication rather than spreading false narratives. They believe it’s important to approach disagreements or issues openly and transparently, instead of creating unnecessary drama.