BREAKING! CIA Won't Let Trump Win – Will Martial Law Prevent His Inauguration? | Redacted News

Summary

The transcript discusses the potential upheaval surrounding the 2024 presidential election, suggesting that even if Trump wins by a landslide, the 'deep state' may prevent his inauguration through various disruptive tactics. It raises concerns about ballot security, citing incidents of ballot boxes being set on fire in swing states. The conversation predicts intense social unrest and organized protests, which could frame Trump's victory as illegitimate, potentially leading to congressional actions against his presidency. The speakers highlight fears of orchestrated demonstrations that mirror past events, emphasizing the need for vigilance in the political climate leading up to the inauguration.

Takeaways

• 😀 The script suggests that Trump is likely to win the upcoming election by a large margin.
• 😀 It claims that the 'Deep State' will prevent Trump from being inaugurated, potentially through martial law.
• 😀 Reports of ballot boxes being set on fire in swing states are highlighted as evidence of election interference.
• 😀 The hosts express distrust in the mail-in voting process, opting to vote in person instead.
• 😀 There are concerns that civil unrest may occur if Trump wins, akin to the riots seen in 2020.
• 😀 The media is portrayed as complicit in framing protests against Trump as legitimate pro-democracy demonstrations.
• 😀 Whistleblowers from the State Department and FBI are cited, suggesting that they have warned about efforts to block Trump.
• 😀 The script mentions potential pressure on social media companies and the justice department to manage the narrative.
• 😀 The narrative implies a coordinated strategy by opponents of Trump to challenge his election victory.
• 😀 Overall, the discussion reflects a sense of urgency and apprehension about the political climate surrounding the election.

Q & A

What is the central claim regarding Trump’s potential inauguration?

The script suggests that even if Trump wins the election by a landslide, the 'Deep State' will prevent his inauguration on January 20th.

What events are mentioned that indicate opposition to Trump's presidency?

The script mentions incidents of ballot boxes being set on fire in swing states, implying a coordinated effort to disrupt the election process.

What concerns do the speakers express about voting methods?

The speakers express distrust in mailing ballots, opting instead to vote in person due to concerns about ballot safety.

What does Mike Benz warn about the transition period after the election?

Mike Benz warns that the period between November 5 and January 6 will be intense, with potential civil unrest aimed at preventing Trump's return to office.

How does the media's portrayal of protests play into the narrative?

The script claims that the media will frame leftwing protests as pro-democracy movements, using them to justify actions against Trump's electoral victory.

What historical comparisons are made regarding potential unrest?

The script compares the anticipated unrest to the events following January 6, suggesting a similar atmosphere of tension and chaos.

What role do social media companies play according to the script?

The script implies that social media companies will face extreme pressure from the government and advertisers to control narratives surrounding the election.

What is the significance of the term 'astroturfed' protests?

'Astroturfed' protests refer to orchestrated demonstrations that appear grassroots but are actually funded and organized by outside interests, suggesting manipulation of public sentiment.

What do the speakers believe will happen if Trump wins the electoral college?

They predict widespread protests and potential legislative action to block Trump's inauguration, portraying it as a crisis situation.

What broader implications do the speakers suggest about the political climate?

The speakers suggest a deepening divide in the political landscape, with increased hostility towards conservatives and potential for civil conflict.