Belgique : projet d'attentat au Botanique et suivi des mineurs radicalisés - RTBF Info

RTBF Info
7 Mar 202404:29

Summary

TLDRThe script discusses a joint French-Belgian counter-terrorism operation that led to the arrest of three teenagers aged 15 to 17 in France and four young men in Belgium, suspected of planning an Islamist attack on the Botanical Garden. The investigation focuses on the minors, with one showing more advanced plans. Despite the serious threat, no weapons or explosives were found during the arrests. The judicial system's approach to handling radicalized minors is highlighted, emphasizing individualized measures and de-radicalization efforts, with the aim of protecting society and the youth's future.

Takeaways

  • 🔍 France and Belgium share intelligence on terrorism cases, leading to the arrest of three teenagers aged 15 to 17 in France.
  • 🕵️‍♂️ The teenagers are suspected of having contact with four young men arrested in Belgium for an Islamist attack plot against the Botanical Garden.
  • 📱 Analysis of a suspect's phone indicates potential surveillance of the stadium, suggesting a more serious threat.
  • 🚨 The investigation focuses on one of the minors who seemed to have more concrete plans, including potential execution and reconnaissance.
  • 🔫 No weapons or explosives were found during the weekend arrests, indicating the threat level is still under assessment.
  • 🤝 The commonality among the arrested minors is their participation in messaging groups discussing Islamic extremism, jihadism, and violent action.
  • 👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 The judicial system treats young radicalized individuals like any other minor delinquent, with a focus on their personality, the facts, and the potential danger they pose.
  • 🏢 Young radicalized individuals are handled by the youth court and may be placed in a youth protection institution (IPPJ) with a tailored approach.
  • 👨‍🏫 The young person is then supported by a multidisciplinary team trained in deradicalization, aiming to protect society and help the individual reconsider their path.
  • ⏳ A stay in an IPPJ can last several months, and after release, a support team helps the young person reintegrate into society.
  • 📝 The reports from the support team cover both the personality of the young individuals and their families, as well as their relationship to the facts of the case.
  • 🌟 Radicalized youth represent a minority of the cases seen by the Youth Court.

Q & A

  • What is the main focus of the investigation involving the adolescents arrested in France and Belgium?

    -The main focus of the investigation is on the potential terrorist activities, specifically an Islamist attack plot, and the adolescents' involvement in such plans, including their communication with the suspects arrested in Belgium.

  • How many adolescents were arrested in France, and what were they suspected of?

    -Three adolescents, aged 15 to 17, were arrested in France. They are suspected of having been in contact with the four young men arrested in Belgium and are accused of association with terrorists.

  • What was found during the analysis of the phone of one of the suspects arrested over the weekend?

    -The analysis of the phone indicated the existence of surveillance at the current stadium, suggesting a potential target for an attack.

  • What was the age range of the minors arrested, and how does the judicial system handle such cases?

    -The minors arrested were between 15 and 17 years old. The judicial system handles their cases through the youth court, with a judge taking charge of their dossiers and considering their personalities, the severity of their actions, and the potential danger they pose to society.

  • What happens to the minors arrested for radicalization and potential terrorist activities?

    -They are placed under the supervision of a multidisciplinary team, including psychologists, social workers, and specialized educators, with the aim of deradicalization and reintegration into society.

  • What is the role of the public institution for the protection of youth (IPPJ) in handling these cases?

    -The IPPJ can place the young radicalized individuals in either an open or closed regime, where they are then guided by professionals trained in deradicalization efforts.

  • How long can a stay in the IPPJ last, and what happens after release?

    -A stay in the IPPJ can last for several months. After release, a support team helps the young person reintegrate into society, with reports covering both the individual's personality and their relationship with the facts of the case.

  • Are there any differences in how young radicalized individuals are treated compared to other minors accused of different crimes?

    -There is no specific treatment for young radicalized individuals; they are treated based on the same criteria as any other young person, with the law prioritizing family placement unless deemed necessary to place them in an IPPJ.

  • What was the outcome for the four suspects arrested in Belgium?

    -Three of the four suspects were handed over to an investigative judge, and due to their age, they were placed in a closed institution for minors.

  • How does the judicial system ensure the protection of society and the individual in these cases?

    -The system ensures protection by prioritizing the interests of society and the individual, with a focus on deradicalization and providing support for the young person to question their beliefs and consider a new path to prevent recidivism.

  • What is the role of the Brussels judge mentioned in the script?

    -The Brussels judge is involved in the evaluation of the cases, considering the facts, the young person's denial or admission of the facts, and the progress made in relation to the case.

Outlines

00:00

🔍 Joint Counter-Terrorism Efforts and Arrests

The script discusses the collaboration between France and Belgium in sharing intelligence on terrorism, leading to the arrest of three teenagers aged 15 to 17 in France. These individuals are suspected of having contact with four young men arrested in Belgium for planning an Islamist attack on the Botanical Garden. The investigation focuses on one of the minors who appeared to have more concrete plans, including potential reconnaissance and search for weapons or explosives. The script also mentions that no weapons or explosives were found during the arrests, and three of the four suspects have been handed over to a judge for investigation, with one minor placed in a youth institution due to his age. The judicial system's approach to young radicals is highlighted, emphasizing individualized measures and the importance of deradicalization efforts.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Terrorism

Terrorism refers to the systematic use of violence or the threat of violence to create fear and achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives. In the video, it is the central theme as it discusses the interception of adolescents suspected of having connections to a terrorist plot.

💡Intercepted

To intercept means to stop or seize something before it reaches its intended destination, often used in the context of communication or individuals. In the video, it relates to the apprehension of the adolescents who were suspected of terrorist activities.

💡Suspects

A suspect is a person who is believed or suspected to have committed a crime or is being investigated for criminal activity. In the context of the video, it refers to the individuals who were arrested for their potential involvement in a terrorist plot.

💡Botanique

In the context of the video, Botanique likely refers to a venue or location that was identified as a potential target for the terrorist plot. The term is often used to describe a botanical garden, which could be a public place with significant cultural or touristic value.

💡Radicalization

Radicalization is the process by which an individual or group comes to adopt increasingly extreme political, social, or religious ideals and aspirations. In the video, it is a key concept as it relates to the mindset of the young individuals involved in the terrorist plot.

💡Judicial System

The judicial system is the collection of courts, judges, and court personnel that interpret and apply the law in a country. In the video, it is mentioned in the context of how young radicalized individuals are handled within the French legal framework.

💡De-radicalization

De-radicalization refers to the process of changing an individual's radical beliefs or behaviors, often used in the context of counter-terrorism efforts. In the video, it is related to the measures taken to rehabilitate young individuals who have been radicalized.

💡Youth Court

A youth court is a specialized court that handles legal matters involving minors. In the video, it is the court responsible for dealing with the cases of the young individuals arrested for terrorist activities.

💡IPPJ

IPPJ stands for 'Institut Public de Protection de la Jeunesse' (Public Institution for the Protection of Youth), which is a French institution that provides care and education for minors in need of protection or who have committed offenses. In the video, it is where the young radicalized individuals may be placed.

💡Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation in a legal context refers to the process of helping offenders reintegrate into society after serving their sentence or undergoing a corrective program. In the video, it is the goal of the multidisciplinary team working with the young radicalized individuals.

💡Recidivism

Recidivism is the act of a person repeating an undesirable behavior after they have either experienced negative consequences of that behavior or have been treated or trained to extinguish that behavior. In the context of the video, it refers to the risk of the young individuals re-engaging in radical or criminal activities after their release.

Highlights

France and Belgium share intelligence on terrorism cases.

Three adolescents aged 15 to 17 were arrested in France, suspected of contact with four young men arrested in Belgium for an Islamist attack plot.

The Botanical Garden was a potential target for the attack, as indicated by the analysis of a suspect's phone.

One of the minors seemed to have more concrete plans, including potential execution and reconnaissance.

No weapons or explosives were found during the weekend arrests.

Three minors aged 15 to 17 were arrested in France for virtual association with terrorists.

The commonality among the arrested minors is their participation in messaging discussing Islamic extremism, jihadism, or violent action.

Three of the four suspects arrested have been handed over to an investigative judge and placed in a closed institution for minors due to their age.

The judicial system treats young radicalized individuals like any other minor, with no specific treatment applied.

The focus is on tailored work based on the individual's personality, the facts, and the potential danger to the young person and society.

The law requires prioritizing keeping the young person in the family before considering placement in a public youth protection institution (IPPJ).

A multidisciplinary team, including psychologists and social workers, will work on deradicalization and the young person's protection and autonomy.

The young person's stay in IPPJ can last several months, and after release, a support team helps with societal reintegration.

Reports will address the young person's personality, family relationships, and their involvement in the alleged acts.

Young radicalized individuals represent a minority of the cases seen by the Youth Court.

Transcripts

play00:00

la France et la Belgique partagent les

play00:02

informations dans les dossiers de

play00:03

terrorisme c'est ainsi que trois

play00:04

adolescents âgés de 15 à 17 ans ont ét

play00:07

interpelés dans trois villes de France

play00:09

ils sont soupçonnés d'avoir été en

play00:11

contact avec les quatre jeunes hommes

play00:13

arrêtés dimanche en Belgique pour un

play00:15

projet d'attentat islamiste contre le

play00:17

Botanique le point sur l'enquête Rachel

play00:21

crivelaro photo à l'appui le degré de

play00:25

menace se précise un peu plus le

play00:27

Botanique cible potentiel d'un att

play00:30

l'analyse du téléphone d'un des suspects

play00:32

arrêtés ce weekend indique en tout cas

play00:35

l'existence de repérage au stade actuel

play00:38

où on en est de l'enquête il apparaît

play00:40

que un des mineurs semblait avoir des

play00:43

projets plus aboutis que les autres donc

play00:45

c'est plutôt sur un des mineurs que

play00:46

l'enquête se concentre projet plus

play00:48

abouti ça veut dire un peut-être début

play00:51

d'exécution potentiel début d'exécution

play00:53

et notamment par d'éventuels repérages

play00:55

éventuelles recherch d'arbres

play00:56

d'éventuelles recherch d'explosif c'est

play00:57

plutôt dans cette sphère- làà que on est

play01:00

alors menace sérieus ou fanfaronade

play01:03

d'adolescents lors des arrestations de

play01:05

ce weekend ni armes ni explosif n'ont

play01:08

été

play01:09

retrouvé par ailleurs dans la foulée de

play01:11

l'intervention chez nous trois mineurs

play01:14

de 15 à 17 ans ont été arrêtés en France

play01:17

pour association de malfaiteurs

play01:19

terroristes en contact virtuel avec

play01:22

certains des suspects arrêtés en

play01:23

Belgique il ne serait toutefois pas

play01:25

impliqué dans le projet visant le

play01:28

Botanique évidemment ce qui se passe en

play01:29

France doit être évalué avec les

play01:31

autorités françaises mais le point

play01:32

commun entre l'ensemble des mineurs

play01:34

arrêtés c'est leur participation à des

play01:36

messageries dans lesquell il est

play01:38

question d'intégrisme islamique de

play01:40

djihadisme voir d'action violente ce qui

play01:43

ne signifie pas que l'un ou l'autre des

play01:45

personnes d'une ou l'autre des personnes

play01:47

qui sont dans cette messagerie et un

play01:49

projet concret d'attentat chez nous

play01:51

trois des quatre suspects arrêtés ont

play01:53

été mis à disposition d'un juge

play01:55

d'instruction de terr monde et en raison

play01:57

de leur âge placé dans une institution

play02:00

fermé pour

play02:01

mineurs alors justement que fait notre

play02:03

système judiciaire lorsque de jeunes

play02:06

radicalisés pouvant commettre un

play02:07

attentats sont arrêtés où sont-ils

play02:09

placés lorsqu'ils sont mineurs sont-ils

play02:11

traités différemment d'autres mineurs

play02:14

qui sont poursuivis pour d'autres faits

play02:15

et bien réponse avec Stéphanie Lepage et

play02:17

David

play02:18

Brichard comme tout mineur délinquent le

play02:21

sort d'un jeune radicalisé est placé

play02:23

entre les mains du tribunal de la

play02:24

jeunesse un juge va se saisir de son

play02:27

dossier mais pas question d'appliquer un

play02:29

traitement spécifique comme pour tous

play02:31

les jeunes nous faisons un travail sur

play02:32

mesure en fonction de la personnalité

play02:34

des faits évidemment on en tient compte

play02:37

et de la gravité des faits et du danger

play02:39

que cela peut représenter pour le jeune

play02:41

et pour la société donc on tient compte

play02:43

des mêmes critères euh que pour

play02:46

n'importe quel jeune et en fonction de

play02:48

ça la loi nous impose d'ailleurs de

play02:49

toujours privilégier un maintien en

play02:51

famille avant d'envisager un placement

play02:53

s'il est envoyé en IPPJ institution

play02:56

publique de protection de la jeunesse le

play02:58

jeune radicalisé pourra y être placé en

play03:00

régime ouvert ou fermé il sera ensuite

play03:03

encadré par des professionnels formés

play03:05

aux enjeux de la déradicalisation donc

play03:07

prise en charge par une équipe

play03:08

plridisciplinaire donc composée de

play03:10

psychologues assistants sociaux

play03:12

éducateurs spécialisés où on va vraiment

play03:14

essayer prioritairement hein de de

play03:17

travailler dans l'intérêt évidemment de

play03:20

la protection de la société mais bien

play03:21

évidemment aussi de la protection donc

play03:25

du jeunne et l'intérêt du jeune pour

play03:27

amener le jeûne justement à PIR pouvoir

play03:30

davantage autonomiser à pouvoir se

play03:32

remettre en question et envisager une

play03:34

une nouvelle trajectoire pour

play03:36

effectivement infin éviter un maximum le

play03:38

risque de récidive un séjour en IPPJ

play03:41

peut durer de nombreux mois à la sortie

play03:43

le jugement date alors une équipe

play03:45

d'accompagnement pour aider au retour du

play03:47

jeune dans la société ses services lui

play03:49

font ensuite rapport les rapports

play03:51

concernent autant la la personnalité des

play03:54

jeunes et leurs familles que leur

play03:56

rapport au fait qui leur sont reprochés

play03:58

et donc inévitablement les rapports

play04:00

qu'on va recevoir y compris du délégué

play04:02

du du service de la protection de la

play04:04

jeunesse vont aborder les faits la

play04:06

manière dont le jeune à bord de lui-même

play04:08

les fait s'il est dans le dénis et et

play04:10

quel recul il a ou non par rapport au

play04:13

fait selon cette juge bruxelloise les

play04:15

jeunes radicalisés représent une

play04:17

minorité des dossiers rencontrés par le

play04:19

Tribunal de la

play04:28

jeunesse

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Связанные теги
Counter-TerrorismInternational CooperationRadicalizationJuvenile DelinquencyJudicial SystemDe-RadicalizationPublic SafetyCriminal InvestigationYouth RehabilitationSecurity Concerns
Вам нужно краткое изложение на английском?