Sen. Kennedy SHAMES woke "expert", makes her face reality of what she supports

Summary

Republican Senator John Kennedy questions a pro-choice witness about her stance on late-term abortion, using graphic language to describe the dilation and evacuation procedure typically used to terminate pregnancies after 21 weeks. The witness dodges giving a direct answer, saying abortion is complex. Kennedy accuses the committee chair of protecting the witness by cutting off his questioning. The speaker argues Kennedy exposed an important but gruesome topic, lamenting that abortion ends a human life, and says the witness and chair were effectively cowards for avoiding an honest discussion.

Takeaways

• 💬 Senator Kennedy questions a pro-choice witness about their stance on late-term abortion, specifically up to the moment of birth.
• 🙁 The witness responds that the scenario described by Kennedy rarely occurs and expresses discomfort with simplifying the complex issue of abortion to a binary choice.
• 🧑‍⚕️ The discussion touches on the legality of late-term abortion in various U.S. states, including Vermont, New Jersey, Oregon, Colorado, New Mexico, Alaska, and the District of Columbia.
• 🔥 The witness aims to focus on the economics of abortion rather than moral or legal stances, indicating a preference to avoid the polarizing debate on late-term abortion legality.
• 📝 Kennedy insists on a direct answer, framing the question as a straightforward matter of supporting or opposing late-term abortion for a healthy mother and baby.
• 😩 A second expert describes the use of inflammatory language in discussing abortion and highlights the emotional and traumatic aspects overlooked by such discussions.
• 😬 The conversation shifts to the specifics of a dilation and evacuation procedure at 21 weeks, with Kennedy graphically describing the process to emphasize his point.
• 🚫 The chairman interjects to note Kennedy's expired time, leading to a contention over fairness and procedure within the committee meeting.
• 🙊 Kennedy criticizes Senator Whitehouse's handling of the meeting, labeling him a coward for allegedly suppressing further discussion on the topic.
• 💣 The script concludes with an assertion on the importance of discussing abortion, especially the methods used in later stages, and the inherent rights to life.

Q & A

What was the main topic discussed by Senator Kennedy in the script?

Senator Kennedy discussed the topic of late-term abortion, specifically questioning a pro-choice witness about their stance on abortions up to the moment of birth.

Which states and territories were mentioned by Senator Kennedy as allowing abortion up to the moment of birth?

Senator Kennedy mentioned Vermont, New Jersey, Oregon, Colorado, New Mexico, Alaska, and the District of Columbia as places where abortion up to the moment of birth is legal.

How did the pro-choice witness respond to Senator Kennedy's question about supporting abortion up to the moment of birth?

The pro-choice witness expressed ambivalence, emphasizing the complexity of abortion decisions and stating a preference to trust women and their healthcare providers rather than giving a direct yes or no answer.

What procedure did Senator Kennedy describe for aborting a baby at 21 weeks?

Senator Kennedy described a dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedure, which involves dilating the cervix and using instruments to remove the fetus, potentially including crushing the fetus's head to facilitate removal.

What was the reaction of the chairman to Senator Kennedy's time during the discussion?

The chairman informed Senator Kennedy that his time had expired, indicating a need to move on to other senators waiting for their turn to speak.

What criticism did the host of American Wire level against Senator Whitehouse?

The host criticized Senator Whitehouse for being a coward, alleging that he was picking winners and losers in the committee meeting and stopping Senator Kennedy from continuing his line of questioning.

What was the host's stance on the subject of late-term abortion?

The host described late-term abortion as a 'gruesome' and 'disgusting' act, highlighting the pain the fetus could feel and the traumatic impact on individuals involved.

What underlying message did the host convey about the importance of the right to life?

The host emphasized that the right to life is fundamental, suggesting that without it, other rights do not matter, underscoring the importance of discussing and addressing the issue of abortion.

How did the host view the need for discussing abortion, especially late-term abortion?

The host believed that the subject of abortion, particularly late-term abortion, deserves attention and discussion, despite its gruesome nature, to shed light on the realities and implications of the procedure.

What was the host's perspective on forgiveness and trauma related to abortion?

The host acknowledged the traumatic nature of abortion and the difficulty individuals might face in forgiving themselves for undergoing the procedure, indicating a recognition of the emotional and psychological impacts involved.