BOMBSHELL NEW FOOTAGE OF 9/11 ATTACKS CONFIRMS CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF TOWERS | Redacted News
Summary
TLDRThe script discusses a resurfaced video of the 9/11 Twin Towers attack, which some claim shows evidence of a controlled demolition rather than a structural failure due to plane impacts. Ted Walter, Executive Director for the International Center for 911 Justice, analyzes the video, highlighting flashes and structural damage that contradict the official narrative. He emphasizes the significance of eyewitness accounts of explosions and the importance of seeking truth and justice for the victims' families.
Takeaways
- 🌐 A video from the 9/11 Twin Tower attacks resurfaced on Twitter, sparking discussions as if it were new footage.
- 📺 The video was not entirely new; it had been broadcast before, but a significant portion of it was previously unseen and in higher quality.
- 🔍 Ted Walter, Executive Director for the International Center for 9/11 Justice, believes the video confirms a controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and not a collapse due to plane impacts.
- 👀 The video shows flashes of light, particularly on the lower part of the South Tower, which proponents of the controlled demolition theory argue are indicative of demolition charges.
- 🔥 There is a bright flash visible on the northeast corner of the South Tower, which Walter suggests is a demolition charge, contradicting the idea of a natural building collapse.
- 👮♂️ Over 200 eyewitness accounts, including those from first responders and reporters, have described explosions during the collapse of the towers.
- 🏢 World Trade Center Building 7's collapse is also considered suspicious, with no evidence of it being caused by debris from the Twin Towers, and is believed by some to have been brought down by demolition charges.
- 🕵️♂️ The new video provides a clearer view of structural damage to the South Tower, which supports the theory of demolition charges being used.
- 📝 The video's release is historically significant as it captures the immediate reactions of witnesses who perceived the event as an explosion, not a structural failure.
- 📉 The official narrative of the towers' collapse due to fires was introduced after the event, contrasting with the eyewitness accounts of explosions.
- 🔒 There is a concern that much of the original footage and eyewitness accounts supporting the explosion theory have been suppressed or made difficult to find in official channels.
Q & A
What video surfaced on Twitter that was claimed to be new footage of the 9/11 attacks?
-A video of the attacks on the Twin Towers on 9/11 was posted on Twitter, which some users believed to be new footage never seen before, although it was later revealed to be previously broadcasted material with some additional unseen content.
How much of the video was actually new content?
-About 57 minutes of the video was previously unseen footage, while a segment showing the collapse of the South Tower had aired before on Sky News and a Washington DC affiliate of CBS.
What is the position of the speaker regarding the collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11?
-The speaker, Ted Walter, holds the position that the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7 were brought down by controlled demolition, not by the impact of the airplanes.
What significant evidence does the new video provide to support the theory of controlled demolition?
-The new video provides evidence such as visible flashes, particularly on the lower portion of the building as the top starts to go down, and a bright flash on the northeast corner of the South Tower, which the speaker suggests indicates demolition charges.
What is the significance of the flashes seen in the video?
-The flashes are significant because they occur in areas of the building well above the impact zone and where the collapse is happening, suggesting the presence of demolition charges rather than a natural building collapse.
What does the speaker suggest about the bright flash seen on the northeast corner of the South Tower?
-The speaker suggests that the bright flash is indicative of a demolition charge, as it cannot be explained by natural sunlight reflection and is visible in multiple videos from different angles.
What is the 'Journal of 9/11 Studies' and how does it relate to the video?
-The 'Journal of 9/11 Studies' is a publication where a meticulous analysis of the video was published, confirming the presence of flashes in multiple videos, which supports the theory of controlled demolition.
What is the significance of the structural damage seen in the video near the bright flash?
-The structural damage is significant as it appears in areas of the building that should not have been affected by a natural collapse, suggesting that the damage is associated with the detonation of demolition charges.
What are the implications of the video for the families and victims of 9/11?
-The implications for the families and victims are that the video may provide new evidence supporting the theory of controlled demolition, which could potentially lead to further investigations and a reevaluation of the official narrative of the events.
How does the speaker describe the public's initial interpretation of the collapse of the Twin Towers?
-The speaker describes the public's initial interpretation as perceiving the collapse as an explosion or demolition, rather than a structural failure caused by the airplane impacts and subsequent fires.
What is the role of the International Center for 9/11 Justice and how can people access more information?
-The International Center for 9/11 Justice is an organization dedicated to seeking answers for the families and victims of 9/11. People can access more information by visiting their YouTube channel by searching 'i911' or visiting their website at IC911.org.
Outlines
📹 Resurfacing of 9/11 Video Sparks Debate
The script discusses the recent appearance of a video showing the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers, which was initially presented as new footage. It turns out that parts of the video had been broadcast previously, but the release of nearly an hour of unseen footage by filmmaker Case Sugimoto has reignited discussions. Ted Walter, Executive Director for the International Center for 9/11 Justice, confirms that while a segment of the video was familiar, the newly released content in higher quality provides valuable information. The video has been viewed millions of times, and the script suggests that it supports the theory of a controlled demolition of the towers, contrary to the official explanation of the collapses.
🔎 Analyzing New 9/11 Footage for Evidence of Demolition
This paragraph delves into the analysis of the newly surfaced footage, focusing on visual evidence that supports the theory of a controlled demolition. Key points include the observation of flashes of light, particularly on the lower part of the South Tower, which are not consistent with a natural building collapse. The discussion also addresses the skepticism of those who believe the flashes are merely sunlight reflecting off windows, countered by the argument that the flashes are consistent across multiple videos, suggesting a demolition charge. Structural damage to the building's corner, which would not be expected from the top's collapse, further supports this theory. The paragraph also references a paper published in the Journal of 9/11 Studies that provides meticulous analysis of these points.
🗣️ Eyewitness Accounts and Theories Surrounding 9/11
The script moves on to discuss the numerous eyewitness accounts from first responders, police officers, and reporters who described the collapse of the towers as resembling explosions or demolitions. It challenges the official narrative that the towers fell due to the impact of the planes and subsequent fires. The discussion extends to World Trade Center Building 7, which also collapsed without being directly hit by the planes, and the various government agencies that were located within it. The paragraph raises questions about the quick evacuation of the emergency operation center and the suspicious timing of fires that may have been intentionally set to provide a cover story for the building's collapse.
👀 Public Perception and the Impact of New 9/11 Footage
The final paragraph addresses the impact of the new footage on public perception, highlighting how the original interpretation of the event by eyewitnesses was that of an explosion or demolition, rather than a structural failure due to fires. It discusses how this perception was overshadowed by the media's later narrative. The script also touches on the significance of the video for the families of the victims who have been seeking the truth for years. The conversation concludes with the importance of preserving and sharing this information, as well as the dedication to seeking justice and accountability for the events of 9/11.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Twin Towers
💡Controlled Demolition
💡Flash
💡Sky News
💡Case Sugimoto
💡International Center for 9/11 Justice
💡Peace, War, and 9/11
💡Journal of 9/11 Studies
💡Squib
💡Eyewitness Accounts
💡Building 7
Highlights
A video from the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers resurfaced, initially presented as new but was actually broadcast years ago.
The video was not entirely new; it included about 10 seconds of previously aired footage but also contained approximately 57 minutes of unseen footage.
The video has been viewed around 50 million times, sparking renewed interest and discussion about the events of 9/11.
Ted Walter, Executive Director for the International Center for 9/11 Justice, believes the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7 were brought down by controlled demolition.
Newly analyzed video footage shows flashes of light, particularly on the lower part of the South Tower, suggesting a controlled demolition.
A bright flash seen on the northeast corner of the South Tower contradicts the idea of a natural building collapse.
Structural damage observed near the bright flash suggests the presence of demolition charges rather than natural collapse.
A meticulous analysis published in the Journal of 9/11 Studies supports the presence of demolition charges based on the consistency of flashes in multiple videos.
Over 200 eyewitness accounts, including first responders and reporters, report hearing explosions during the collapse of the towers.
World Trade Center Building 7's collapse was not due to debris from the Twin Towers, as officially stated, but likely due to demolition charges.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology concluded that the fires alone, not the debris, caused the collapse of Building 7.
Elevators in Building 7 were ejected from their shafts, indicative of internal explosions rather than external debris impact.
The video's release by case sugimoto brought attention to the original interpretations of the event as an explosion, not a structural failure.
The original interpretation of the event by eyewitnesses was that of an explosion, not a natural building collapse.
The International Center for 9/11 Justice is dedicated to uncovering the truth and seeking justice for the families and victims of 9/11.
The video and its analysis have reignited discussions and brought the topic to the forefront for millions of new viewers.
Transcripts
well last week a video surfaced of the
attacks on the Twin Towers on 911
Twitter users posted this video as if it
was brand new never seen before might
have been never seen for many of us uh
turns out that's not true it this video
was not not new at all it was broadcast
years ago on television but why was it
buried uh and what does it show us and
why has it suddenly surfaced during the
same week that President Biden steps
down from running for reelection
president Trump is nearly assassinated
and gives a speech at the RNC this news
surfaces during that same week it is
curious indeed Ted Walter he's the
executive director for the International
Center for 911 Justice he's dedicated
his life to getting answers for the
families and the victims of 911 he's
also the director of Peace war and 911
which is available on their Channel a
documentary you can watch and Ted joins
us now no better Authority on this
probably in the world to dissect this
video now the video Ted has been viewed
like 50 million times and of course it
was put out there is this is brand new
video but can you explain to our
audience is this video new or just
resurfaced yeah so as I was analyzing
the video uh I discovered that it
actually had aired before at least about
10 seconds or so showing the collapse of
the South Tower which was the first
building to go down on 911 so that
little segment has aired on Sky News and
uh a Washington DC affiliate of CBS
however the the filmmaker or the
videographer case sugimoto released
about 57 minutes of footage um and so
most of that has never been seen before
and and it contains a lot of valuable
information and and the portion of the
south tower that had been seen before is
also now we have it in a much better
quality so we can actually see a lot
more things that we couldn't see before
so it is pretty significant now we
should point out of course your position
I think our position here at redacted is
that this was a controlled demolition of
the towers and that these airplanes were
not the reason these towers came down um
is that an accurate description of your
position on
this oh absolutely 100% yeah the
evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates
that the twin towers as well as World
Trade Center building 7 were brought
down by control demolition so in this
video certainly confirms that in
numerous ways all right let's talk about
it so let's get into it so this new
video that people have never seen before
a large portion of it uh confirms a
controlled demolition of the towers on
911 can you go through some of the
points here that you'd like to make and
we can call out what what caught your
eye kind of looking at this new
footage yeah so I think I think the the
thing that stood out to most people when
they saw this was was the flashes that
are very visible particularly there's a
line of flashes um on the lower portion
of the building as the top starts to go
down um I would also love to draw
people's attention to uh a very bright
flash that occurs further up on the
building this is on the northeast corner
of the of the South Tower um and and
when you think about it there's there's
no reason for a flash a bright flash if
this is just a natural building collapse
to be occurring well above the Impact
Zone or well above where the you know
where the collapse is actually happening
um but we see this bright flash uh and
we also see structural damage uh to the
corner of the building very close to it
um and so naysayers will say well those
are just who knows what that is it's
just the sun reflecting off the windows
well we know that this is actually
something else other than that we think
that it's a demolition charge uh because
you can actually identify same Flash in
numerous videos If you line up the
videos and and you can do this carefully
and line them up uh and we actually just
published a paper two months ago in the
Journal of 911 studies that has has done
this meticulous analysis that shows that
this particular flash can be seen in
numerous videos so there's no way that
if it's a reflection from from the sun
off of a window that you're going to see
that same flash at that same moment from
numerous angles it can only be seen from
one angle um and so we we get this
bright flash uh and then and then and so
you can look at the video of that I've
provided that video so your viewers can
see it we've kind of pointed out where
that flash is and very close to that
flash kind of where the arrow is
pointing you also see structural damage
being done to the corner of the building
again if you have the top that's falling
and it's a rigid block right and the the
the damage that should be done to that
that portion of the building should be
at the bottom why is there structural
damage being inflicted upon you know a
part of the building that's you know
it's 10 or 15 stories higher right and
so we've in that paper I mentioned in
the Journal of 911 studies um by by a
researcher named Corin saurin corgard
you know he he takes it he looks at that
damage from a few different angles uh
now that we have this video we can
really see that damage even much better
you know it's basically a hole a big
hole in the corner of the building so if
it's just window light reflecting off of
Windows it's not going to cause damage
you know to that kind of damage to the
building but so we see that severe
structural damage associated with The
Flash and a couple flashes way above the
zone so so this can really confirms what
you've already seen I mean that's that's
that's powerful right I mean with even
without this video you were able to
determine that there were Charges going
off above where we were supposed to have
this Impact
Zone yes yes so the um I provided a
second video for your viewers to see
where it's another video where um the
researcher saen corgard identified this
this Flash from another angle um and
this is filmed by a guy named Anthony
Rosario and I mean you can see the flash
there very brightly um notice that you
can't see it in the um you can't see the
damage to the building as well because
it's from a different angle but what
that shows you is that this flash
actually was a very three-dimensional
event it wasn't just it was it was
sticking out far from the building right
so so the the new footage helps us
really confirm solidify what we knew and
it provides a much better view of the
actual damage and of course shows the
video to tens of millions of people
who've now who' now seen it for someone
who's just learning about this for the
first time wait a minute there were
demolition charges that brought down the
towers um there were all sorts of
eyewitnesses firefighters police
officers eyewitnesses who confirmed
explosions and demolition Charges going
off did they
not absolutely yeah so there there's
upwards of 200 eyewitness accounts of
explosions going off during the during
the collapse of the towers M Grant the
great majority of them are First
Responders such as firefighters or Port
Port Authority police officers uh but
also you know several dozen news
reporters in fact I uh co-authored a
paper where we identified 36 reporters
Who had who basically described the
collapse of the buildings as being an
explosion or being brought down by
explosives or or that sort of thing or
seeing you know explosions running down
the face of the building so there's
there's overwhelming uh wealth of
eyewitness evidence that explosions were
taking place and of course building
seven which people said oh it was it was
collateral damage basically hit by the
falling Twin Towers that's there's no
evidence of that whatsoever and that it
collapsed with again demolition charges
it appears separate from the Twin Towers
it had nothing it was not touched by the
Twin Towers collapse at all am I right
it was there was some damage done to the
to the South face of the building which
was the face of building seven that was
facing the towers uh but it was I won't
I won't call it minor damage because
that will seem like I'm trying to
downplay it uh but nist the National
Institute of standard technology which
conducted the official investigation
into the collapse of all three buildings
concluded that the damage to the
building didn't actually contribute to
the collapse the damage it was all due
to fires and that even if that damage
had not taken place if the fires had
just traveled through the same fires had
traveled through through the building
they would have brought the building
down anyway allegedly so all that the
debris from the North Tower allegedly
did was start these fires that's even a
question if for the debris could have
started those fires many researchers
believe that the fires were set
intentionally around noon in order to
have a cover story for why the building
would go down and what was in building
seven oh so good question um there there
were many government agencies uh federal
agencies as well as city a city agency
inside the building and we're talking
about you know the Secret Service uh the
FBI the CIA uh the Securities and
Exchange Commission which was at the
time conducting uh very important
investigations into the world Comm and
Enron scandals uh and then you had the
emergency Operation Center for the
office of emergency management of New
York City uh that was installed just a
couple years before 911 on the 23rd
floor and so me you know it's very
suspicious that that the emergency
Operation Center was evacuated so
quickly um on the morning of 911 and and
there's well-known um eyewitness
accounts of explosions two men who tried
to go up to the to the 23rd floor found
it deserted tried to make their way back
down and witnessed explosions when they
got to around the eighth floor of the
building and this the official story
tries to say that those that that was
actually just the North Tower collapsing
uh onto the building but we have very
when you look at the timeline for the
for their account there's no way that
they would have only made it down to the
e8th floor at 1028 when the North Tower
collapsed it clearly happened much
earlier and they both clearly reported
explosions and we have uh actual reports
of significant structural damage inside
of building seven elevator cars being
ejected from their shafts so that's not
going to be caused by debris hitting the
outside of the building you got an
elevator car sitting 40 feet outside of
its its shaft that means basically an
explosion push that elevator car out of
the shaft wow yeah it's very convenient
all of the documents and things that
were scorched in the collapse of
building 7 um in these investigations uh
very very interesting um so I want to go
back to the video here before we get you
out of here Ted and so we talked about
the flashing what else stood out to you
about this new this new footage that's
emerged yeah so um you there's other
really interesting things you can see I
think there there was a very good view
of a a squib or you know an expulsion of
debris and air that occurred just below
below the Impact Zone really before the
towers the top of the building started
come come down and my my friend and
colleague Richard Gage uh made that
observation or his team made the
observation and put it out on his social
media uh and so you can see the video of
that which I provided provided for your
audience uh and then I found a second
video once I saw that I was like Wow
found a second video of that there's
just no reason for a squib to be
shooting out of the building starting to
shoot out of the building before the top
begins to come down and really you had a
you had a massive hole in the building
right where the plane went in so there's
no reason that air would be pushed out
of nearby parts of the building if the
top starts to come down the air will
just be pushed out the hole and yet
you've got this squib shooting out of
the this the um the southeast corner of
of the South Tower right about as the
building starts to go down um so you can
see that from a few different angles I
think the other really fascinating thing
and this goes to the sort of the
historical significance of this video um
in in case sugimoto releasing it is his
friends who watched the first Tower go
down and then when people that they were
with started asking them about it they
all said oh we think it went down it was
an explosion we we think and one of the
one of the witnesses said yeah I don't
think it was the fires and and so I
think that's a real you know it's it's
another there are numerous other
examples of that people who were
recording the event but watching it
Outdoors who were not that far away who
that's that's what they perceived as
soon as it as as building came down and
you know your viewers can watch a couple
of those videos which I I also provided
um they're very powerful and I think
there there're it's significant because
it shows people oh yeah the original
interpretation of what happened the
dominant view of most people who
actually watched this event who were
close to it who were
eyewitnesses they interpret it as an
explosion or as some kind of a you know
demolition or the building blowing up
they did not interpret this as a natural
building collapse and I think that's for
people that are coming to this for the
first time it's it's it helps to realize
that this Theory quote unquote Theory
started from the second the buildings
came down and that's what most people
who are close by observed and so it's a
natural um way to interpret the event
that you're seeing and in fact the idea
that it was a structural failure caused
by fires was that was really introduced
afterwards you know in the in the in the
hours after these buildings went down
that's when you start to see the media
saying
oh it looks like it was a structural
failure it looks like the airplanes and
the fires caused it and all the
reporters who were on the ground saying
that it was an explosion their accounts
were ignored by their colleagues in the
studios and so on so um I think a lot of
those and a lot of those reporters uh
footage has been really blocked and hard
to find right so the official a lot of
these reporters who were there on the
ground at the time one of my co
colleagues at Fox News standing there on
the ground talking about about
explosions and interviewing eyewitnesses
and First Responders about explosions
that they were hearing good luck trying
to find those videos today thank God for
Twitter being able to resurface some of
them but you will not find them on the
official news websites of the of the of
the broadcast networks that initially
aired those interviews right oh yeah you
can you can't find them anywhere related
to the you know Fox News or any of the
other channels that aired them you can
find them in our website our YouTube
channel uh you can find them on the um
you know websites of of other of our
colleagues and our our our community who
are are still research researching this
and trying to get to the bottom of what
happened that day and and get the truth
out and hold some people accountable so
it is still out there in in certain
places that are preserving it I mean at
the heart of this is the families it's
the people that lost their lives and
they were they were sold a bill of goods
they were sold lies right that this was
brought down by terrorists who hijacked
airplanes and we know that nothing could
be further from the truth and this is I
think why you've dedicated your life to
getting answers for the families what
have you heard from the am um any of the
victim's families in the wake of this
new footage and what have they said
about
this you know I haven't communicated
with anybody any any family members uh
specifically about this new footage um
I've been in touch with a couple family
members for other reasons other other
projects that were working on uh
including the the inquest the the the
Campbell family the family of Jeff
Campbell trying to open a new inquest in
the UK um but not about this footage I'm
sure they've seen it and you know for
those who for those families who've been
fighting for almost 23 years to get the
truth you know this the footage for them
is nothing new but I think it it helps
to see that it it get it will encourage
them that tens of millions of people are
seeing this footage for the first time
and that's the dominant discussion you
know if you if you were if you were on X
or on another platform it's not just oh
hey we found some new video of 911 this
important event from 20 years ago it's
oh there's this new footage and the the
dominant discussion is looks like a
controlled demolition what are those
flashes you know so so that's really it
is a
positive well Ted Walter we appreciate
you joining us again he's executive
director for International Center for
911 Justice um you can go to their web
their their YouTube channel can you name
your you YouTube channel so people can
go check out some of these additional
videos if they want to do more of a deep
dive yeah I think if you if you search
i911 on YouTube you'll find us and IC
911.org is is the website where you can
also find a lot of this a lot of this
material
Ted great to see you thank you so much
for the great work as always it's great
to be with you Clayton thank you for
having me back and and thanks for all
the the work that you do as well
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)