Who Really Owns Sabah? Philippines vs. Malaysia (Part 1)
Summary
TLDRThis video script delves into the complex history behind the Sabah dispute, a territorial conflict involving Malaysia and the Philippines. It explores the region's abundant natural resources, the historical claims of the Sultan of Sulu, and the 1878 agreement that sowed the seeds for the current dispute. The script also touches on the post-WWII developments, the 1963 formation of Malaysia, and the ongoing legal battles, including a recent arbitration ruling for a staggering 14.9 billion dollars. The series promises to uncover the historical roots, modern impacts, and the often-overlooked indigenous perspectives of this long-standing geopolitical issue.
Takeaways
- 📰 The Sabah dispute has been a long-running international issue, recently highlighted by headlines in 2022 about the seizure of Malaysian government assets due to a financial claim by the heirs of the Sultan of Sulu.
- 💵 The claim involves a staggering sum of 14.9 billion dollars, which has implications that extend beyond the sultan's descendants, affecting the region of Sabah, also known as North Borneo.
- 🌏 Sabah is a region rich in natural resources such as oil, gas, timber, and palm oil, and is located on the northern part of the island of Borneo, southeast of the Philippines and is currently a state in the Federation of Malaysia.
- 🏛 Historically, Sabah was a source of territorial dispute between the Sultanates of Sulu and Brunei, which emerged during the Islamic expansion in Southeast Asia in the 1300s and 1400s.
- 📜 The modern dispute's origins lie in an agreement made in 1878 between the British North Borneo Company and the Sultan of Sulu, which was poorly worded and has led to legal debates over land ownership.
- 🇬🇧 After World War II, Sabah became a British Crown Colony and later joined the Federation of Malaysia in 1963, amidst the Philippine government's claim over the territory.
- 🇵🇭 The Philippine claim over Sabah began under President Joshua Mahapagual in 1962, who was a descendant of the royal houses of Brunei and Sulu, and was based on historical and legal grounds.
- 🔍 The dispute involves complex international law issues, with both Malaysia and the Philippines having claims and counterclaims over Sabah.
- ⚖️ The heirs of the Sultan of Sulu have been receiving annual payments for Sabah as per the 1878 agreement until 2013, when the payments stopped due to an armed encounter between Malaysian forces and Sulu followers.
- 🚨 The 2013 Lahad Datu incident resulted in a military standoff and diplomatic crisis, further complicating the dispute over the sovereignty of Sabah and the annual payments owed to the sultan's descendants.
- 🌐 The video script emphasizes the importance of understanding the historical context and the impact of the dispute on the local and indigenous people of Sulu and North Borneo, calling for a deeper exploration of the issue.
Q & A
What is the Sabah dispute and why has it gained recent attention?
-The Sabah dispute is an ongoing legal and territorial conflict between the Philippines and Malaysia, with roots in historical land ownership and colonial-era agreements. It has gained recent attention due to the heirs of the Sultan of Sulu claiming a massive financial settlement from the Malaysian government, which amounts to 14.9 billion dollars, and attempts to seize Malaysian government assets globally. This dispute involves complex historical ties, territorial claims, and international arbitration.
What is the historical background of Sabah?
-Historically, Sabah, also known as North Borneo, was a region of territorial dispute between the Sultanates of Sulu and Brunei, both emerging in the 1300s and 1400s during the Islamic expansion across Southeast Asia. The region became a major source of dispute between rival powers in the 1600s and 1700s, and its modern-day dispute origins lie in an agreement made in 1878 between the British North Borneo Company and the Sultan of Sulu [^1^].
What role did the British North Borneo Company play in the Sabah dispute?
-The British North Borneo Company was a British colonial trade and development company that, in 1878, made an agreement with the Sultan of Sulu for access to the region rich in resources like rubber, which led to significant profits from the rubber industry. The legal documents involved in the 1878 agreement were poorly worded, leading to a debate on whether the agreement constituted a lease or an outright sale of the land, which is still contested today [^1^].
How did the dispute evolve after World War II?
-After World War II, the British North Borneo Company closed its business, and Sabah became the British Crown Colony of North Borneo. It later joined the creation of the independent Federation of Malaysia in 1963. The Philippine government, which included Sulu, began pressing its claim over Sabah, initiating the official claim under President Joshua Mahapagal in 1962 [^1^].
What is the current status of the Sabah dispute in terms of legal claims and territorial control?
-As of now, the Malaysian government insists that the sovereign status of Sabah is a non-issue, while the Philippines has tried to bring up the case in international courts. Malaysia is not willing to enter into negotiations regarding the matter. Additionally, the dispute involves the rights of the heirs and descendants of the Sultan of Sulu to annual payments for Sabah as stipulated in the 1878 agreement. The recent international arbitration ruling in 2022 stated that Malaysia owed 14.9 billion dollars to the heirs of the Sultan of Sulu [^1^].
What are the implications of the Sabah dispute for the native and indigenous people of the region?
-The Sabah dispute has significant implications for the native and indigenous people of the region, who have been caught in the middle of the conflict caused by centuries of colonialism and decades of modern geopolitics. The mainstream narrative of the conflict often gives little attention to these marginalized people on both sides of the border in both Sabah and the Sulu Archipelago [^1^].
What was the context of the 1878 agreement between the Sultan of Sulu and the British North Borneo Company?
-In 1878, the Sultan of Sulu entered into an agreement with the British North Borneo Company, which was a British trading company, for the exploitation of resources in territory under his control, including what is now the oil-rich Malaysian state of Sabah. This deal was considered significant and was described as the 'most important transfer obtained by a commercial company since the days of the British East India Company' [^10^].
Why did Malaysia stop the annual payments to the heirs of the Sultan of Sulu in 2013?
-Malaysia stopped the annual payments to the heirs of the Sultan of Sulu in 2013 after an armed incursion by supporters of the former sultanate who wanted to reclaim land from Malaysia. The Malaysian government ruled that Sabah was solely theirs and that they would put a stop to the payments, arguing that no one else had a right over Sabah, which was part of its territory [^10^].
What is the current legal situation regarding the Sulu claimants' attempts to seize Malaysian assets?
-The Sulu claimants' attempts to seize Malaysian assets have faced several legal setbacks. The Paris Court of Appeal decided in favor of Malaysia and set aside a Paris Arbitration Court's purported final award to the so-called Sulu claimants. Additionally, the Hague Court of Appeal dismissed a bid by the claimants, which was another landmark victory for Malaysia, blocking any attempt by the claimants to enforce their claims against the Malaysian government [^15^][^17^].
What is the significance of the New York Convention in relation to the Sulu dispute?
-The New York Convention is a United Nations treaty on international arbitration recognized in 170 countries. The February 2022 ruling by a French arbitration court, which ordered Malaysia to pay the heirs of the last Sultan of Sulu, is claimed by the plaintiff to be legally enforceable outside France through this convention. This means that any Malaysian government-owned asset within nations party to the UN convention could be eligible for the purposes of enforcing the award [^2^].
How has Malaysia responded to the international arbitration ruling in favor of the Sulu claimants?
-Malaysia has been actively challenging the international arbitration ruling in favor of the Sulu claimants in various courts. The country has secured victories in the Paris Court of Appeal and the Hague Court of Appeal, demonstrating the fundamentally flawed nature of the Sulu claim. Malaysia is pursuing its legal battle to ensure that the purported final award is overturned, considering the case a 'sophisticated abuse of the arbitral process and international law' [^4^][^15^].
Outlines
📰 Seizure of Malaysian Government Assets: The Sulu Heirs' Legal Claims
This paragraph introduces a legal dispute that has gained international attention due to the seizure of Malaysian government assets in mid-July 2022. The heirs of the Sultan of Sulu are claiming a staggering $14.9 billion from the Malaysian government, a case that has implications beyond the sultan's descendants, involving the region of Sabah, also known as North Borneo. The video series aims to provide an in-depth historical context to this dispute, which also involves a long-standing disagreement between Malaysia and the Philippines. The narrator, a historian, clarifies that the video content is for educational purposes and does not necessarily reflect personal opinions, and encourages further research using provided sources.
🌏 Sabah: A Region Rich in Natural Resources and Historical Disputes
The second paragraph delves into the geographical and historical significance of Sabah, a region on the northern part of the island of Borneo with vast natural resources, including oil, gas, timber, and palm oil. Sabah's strategic location and wealth have been a source of territorial disputes since the pre-colonial period. The paragraph outlines the historical emergence of the Sultanates of Brunei and Sulu in the 14th century and their influence over the region. It also mentions the political unity and subsequent disintegration of these sultanates, setting the stage for the ongoing territorial dispute.
📜 The 1878 Agreement and the Origins of the Sabah Dispute
This paragraph discusses the pivotal 1878 agreement between the British North Borneo Company and the Sultan of Sulu, which is central to the modern dispute over Sabah. The agreement's ambiguity, whether it constituted a lease or an outright sale of the land, has led to ongoing legal debates. The paragraph also explains the involvement of the Sultan of Brunei and the territories that were part of the agreement. It highlights the confusion and the legal battles that have persisted since the 1880s, including the recent arbitration ruling in 2022.
🏰 Post-World War II Sabah and the Philippine Claim
The fourth paragraph examines the post-World War II period, during which Sabah became a British Crown Colony and later part of the independent Federation of Malaysia in 1963. It details the Philippines' claim over Sabah, initiated by President Joshua Mahapagal in 1962, who was a descendant of the historical union between the Sultanates of Brunei and Sulu. The paragraph also touches on the complex historical agreements, including the Spanish Crown's recognition of Sabah as a British protectorate and the subsequent Madrid Protocol, adding layers to the territorial dispute.
🛡️ Armed Conflicts, Legal Battles, and the Impact on Indigenous People
The final paragraph summarizes the escalation of the Sabah dispute, including the 2013 armed encounter known as the Lahad Datu standoff, which led to the cessation of annual payments from Malaysia to the heirs of the Sultan of Sulu. It reflects on the complexities of the dispute, the role of colonialism, and the impact on the indigenous people of Sabah and the Sulu archipelago. The narrator emphasizes the importance of pursuing claims peacefully and diplomatically, and the need to consider the well-being of those affected by the conflict.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Sulu
💡Sabah
💡British North Borneo Company
💡Operation Merdeka
💡International Arbitration
💡Sultanate of Brunei
💡Sultanate of Sulu
💡Malaysia
💡Indigenous People
💡Colonialism
Highlights
The ongoing legal claims of the heirs of the Sultan of Sulu for a financial settlement from the Malaysian government amounting to 14.9 billion dollars.
Sabah, also known as North Borneo, is a region rich in natural resources like oil, gas, timber, and palm oil, located on the northern end of the island of Borneo.
Sabah is currently a state in the Federation of Malaysia and is less than an hour's sail from the Philippines.
Historically, Sabah was the source of a territorial dispute between the Sultanates of Sulu and Brunei, which emerged in the 1300s and 1400s.
The British North Borneo Company, established by Alfred and Edward Dent, acquired control over Sabah in 1878 for its rubber resources.
The 1878 agreement between the British North Borneo Company and the Sultan of Sulu was poorly worded, leading to legal debates over whether it was a lease or sale of the land.
The Philippines initiated its official claim over Sabah under President Joshua Mahapagala in 1962, prior to the formation of the Federation of Malaysia.
The Philippines' claim over Sabah is based on historical and legal grounds, including an agreement with the Spanish Crown in 1878.
In the late 1960s, the Sabah dispute nearly escalated into a full-blown war with the secret arming of militants in the Philippines for a small-scale invasion of North Borneo.
In 1977, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos declared intentions to drop the claim over Sabah, but the dispute was never officially settled.
Malaysia insists on the non-issue of Sabah's sovereignty, while the Philippines has tried to settle the dispute in international courts.
The heirs of the Sultan of Sulu have been receiving annual payments for Sabah as per the 1878 agreement until 2013, when Malaysia stopped the payments after an armed encounter.
The 2013 Lahad Datu incident, involving armed men from Sulu and the Malaysian military, resulted in casualties, a military standoff, and a diplomatic crisis.
The international arbitration ruling in 2022 stated that Malaysia owed 14.9 billion dollars to the heirs of the Sultan of Sulu for the rights to Sabah.
The Sabah dispute has long-lasting consequences rooted in colonialism and unclear land tenure, affecting the rights and well-being of the indigenous people of Sabah and the Sulu Archipelago.
The video series aims to provide a better understanding of the history behind the dispute over Sabah and its modern-day social, geopolitical, and humanitarian impacts.
Transcripts
in the past few weeks readers of
southeast asian newspapers and people on
social media all over the world may have
come across a long-running dispute and
rather unexpected headlines in mid-july
of this year 2022 many woke up to the
headlines about the unexpected move to
seize malaysian government assets around
the world this involves the ongoing
legal claims of the heirs of the sultan
of sulu to an enormous financial
settlement from the government of
malaysia what shocked many was that the
sum involved is an eye-watering 14.9
billion dollars but the implications of
the case stretch far beyond the sultan's
descendants themselves it all relates to
the region now known as saba aka north
borneo and it also involves a
long-running dispute between the
federation of malaysia and the republic
of the philippines
so where exactly is sabah and why are
people i mean why are countries still
fighting over it
[Music]
welcome back to another history video it
is me kirby aralio your friendly pinoy
historian and if you are new to my
channel and this channel i make videos
about our people's history culture and
everything in between from the
philippines and across southeast asia so
welcome to part one of my three-part
series about sabah aka north borneo and
in today's video we'll be going over an
overview of the history behind the saba
dispute so why exactly are we talking
about sabah i understand that today's
topic is complicated and quite
controversial but i do hope that this
series of videos about saba will help
many of you to dig deeper and understand
this issue better so i'll be including a
list of credible sources and recommended
readings for those of you who are
genuinely interested to learn more let
me also just clarify that today's video
does not necessarily reflect my own
stand and my own personal opinions
regarding the matter but rather as a
historian this is my way of providing my
viewers with a better understanding of
the history behind the dispute over
sabah and again this is just part one
the first among a series of videos i
plan on making regarding this topic and
then in part two we will be digging
deeper into the historical roots of this
conflict and the pre-colonial history of
sabah sulu brunei and what are now
malaysia and the philippines and after
that in part three we will be learning
more about the recent development and
explore the modern day social
geopolitical and humanitarian impacts of
this issue including the recent
arbitration ruling so stay tuned for
more and if you want to help me make
more videos like this to support my
channel and my research please be my
patron on patreon or be a member of my
youtube channel or get copies of any of
my books coloring books and ebooks or
any of the merch linked down below
maraming salamat po or in bahasa milayou
tirimakasi
so where exactly is saba and why are
people i mean why are countries still
fighting over it
so for those who may not be familiar
saba is a region abundant in oil in fact
its capacity is equivalent to about 40
of malaysia's crude oil production the
land of saba abundant in natural
resources like oil gas timber palm oil
and many more lies on the northern end
of the island of borneo in southeast
asia located just south of the
philippines and currently it is also a
state in the federation of malaysia and
literally less than an hour's sale from
the pseudo archipelago historically
speaking throughout the pre-colonial and
colonial period sabah aka north borneo
had been the source of a territorial
dispute between the sultans of sulu and
brunei both sultanates emerged in the
period of islamic expansion across
southeast asia in the 1300s and the
1400s on one hand the sultanate of
brunei was established by sultan
muhammad shah in the 1360s with its
power base located on the western coast
of borneo and it eventually conquered
much of the island of borneo
particularly the coastal regions the
sultanate of sulu on the other hand
emerged from the sudo archipelago found
dead in the 1400s by the revered muslim
scholar and explorer sultan sharif ul
hashem who was also a known descendant
of the prophet muhammad the sultanate of
sulu would later expand to include the
surrounding islands of what is now
southern philippines and the coastal
areas of borneo in what are now malaysia
and indonesia by the 1500s the royal
houses of brunei and sulu were
practically united this was a direct
result of the union between sultan
bulkie of brunei and putri leila
manchenai of zulu in the late 1400s and
already made a video about them their
legendary love story and their impact in
the history of southeast asia so make
sure to check it out after this video
however this political unity of sulu and
brunei would eventually disintegrate and
conflict would soon brew between the
descendants of sultan bolkiah and putri
lelem and chennai asulu became
increasingly more powerful while around
the same time recurring internal
conflicts plagued the royal court in
brunei nonetheless unknown to many
despite such rivalries these inter
marriages between the royal houses of
sulu brunei and luzon would still
continue on for generations if not for
centuries thereafter in the 1600s and
especially in the 1700s the region we
now call saba along with other
territories like the island of palawan
became a major source of dispute between
the rival powers and again in part 2 of
this series we will do a deeper dive
about this earlier conflict and learn
more about how saba or north borneo how
it was given by the sultan of brunei as
a gift to the sultan of sulu in the late
1600s now the origins of the modern day
dispute over saba lie in an agreement
that was made in 1878 between the
nascent british north borneo company and
the sultan of zulu the british north
borneo company aka the north borneo
chartered company was a british colonial
trade and development company that
during this time was just being
established by alfred and edward dent in
partnership with a german businessman
and diplomat baron gustav von overbeck
and known to many there were actually
several agreements that pertain to the
territory we now call saba in the late
1870s so the first one was between the
british company and sultan abdulmumin of
brunei in december of 1877 and then
another one between the british company
and sultan jamal ulazam aka sultan
jamalullah of salud the following month
in january of 1878. it is also important
to note that contrary to popular belief
especially in the philippines the
disputed part of sabah or north borneo
is actually not the entire modern day
malaysian state of sabah but actually
the northern in the eastern regions of
north borneo or sabah as shown in this
map submitted to the international court
of justice or icj in 2001
but anyway back to 1878 the british
north borneo company wanted to have
access to what was otherwise an
undeveloped region surrounded by waters
teeming with so-called pirates for the
simple reason that there was a lot of
rubber available in north borneo and
then over the next several decades they
would make an enormous amount of money
from the rubber industry and the
production of other goods like tobacco
and coconuts much of this was driven by
the robber boom of the early 1900s due
to henry ford's automobile revolution
that took hold at a particularly highly
profitable time so while the british
north borneo company was making a lot of
money in the late 19th and early 20th
centuries a dispute was also humming
along in the background in 1878 when the
company had come into possession of saba
it was not entirely clear to the british
who this part of borneo even belonged to
in order to officially grant it away
hence the two separate agreements won
between the british company and the
sultan of brunei for the western coast
of sabah and another one between the
british company and the sultan of zulu
for the northern and the eastern regions
of sabah which actually pretty much
makes up the majority of the north
borneo territory but we will talk more
about this in my next video so stay
tuned now to make matters even more
confusing the legal documents which were
involved in the 1878 agreement were
either intentionally or unintentionally
poorly worded with the result that it is
still a matter of considerable legal
debate today you know whether the
agreement constituted a lease of the
land aka renting the land from the
sultan of sulu or an outright session or
sale of the land in the form of a lease
in perpetuity and as a result of all of
this from the 1880s onwards and up until
the present day as we've seen in the
recent headlines legal battles are still
being fought to this very day
okay so the british took over sabah in
the 1800s but then they left after world
war ii so what exactly happened after
world war ii let's find out
the saba dispute took on an even greater
significance in the aftermath of world
war ii the island of borneo had been
absolutely devastated during the war and
the british north borneo company
immediately closed up its business saba
then became the british crown colony of
north borneo and it remained as such
until 1963 when sabah along with the
other british colonies in southeast asia
was fully included in the creation of
the independent federation of malaysia
in anticipation of this move to include
saba in the creation of a new country
called malaysia the philippine
government which by now included sulu
had begun pressing its claim over sabah
and this official claim of the republic
of the philippines began under president
joshua mahapagal in 1962. mahapagal
officially initiated the claim right
before the formation of what is now the
federation of malaysia in 1963.
interestingly unknown to many gestato
mahapagalu was himself a direct
descendant of sultan bulky of brunei and
putri leila mentioned i of sulu through
mahapagar's own ancestor la radula
and in the early 1960s sultan muhammad
ismail kiram of sulu sought the help of
a very distant cousin then philippine
president giusthado mahapagal regarding
sulu's claim over sabah and thus in 1962
the sultanate of sulu officially ceded
to the republic of the philippines the
rights to the title of sovereignty and
dominion over north borneo or sabah now
this claim has a strong historical and
legal basis which we will be discussing
in part 2 and part 3 of this series but
it is also worth noting that as early as
the 1940s and the 1950s the philippines
was already pursuing its own claim over
saba so unknown to many in 1878 around
the same time that the british north
borneo company was acquiring control
over what is now sabah the sultan of
sulu had also entered an agreement with
the spanish crown making the sultanate
of selu officially a protectorate of the
spanish empire now to confuse things
even further spain subsequently signed
the madrid protocol with the british and
the germans in 1885 recognizing that
sabah was an area of british influence
as such malaysia and the philippines
both have numerous claims and
counterclaims through which they could
argue that sabah was their territory in
international law and so in the late
1960s it appeared as though the dispute
over sabah could escalate into a
full-blown war as the regime of
makapagal successor then philippine
president ferdinand marcus senior
secretly began arming militants in the
philippines with the goal of launching a
small-scale invasion of north borneo and
this plot was known as operation meldeka
however this never materialized as the
young men which were being trained for
operation merdeka mutinied leading to
the infamous jibida massacre in 1968 and
the subsequent uprisings in the muslim
majority regions of southern philippines
and you can learn more about this in a
separate video i made about operation
mardeka just a few months ago so if you
haven't seen it yet make sure to watch
it after this video interestingly in
1977 during the asean summit held in
kuala lumpur malaysia philippine
president marcus senior declared his
intentions to drop the claim over saba
thereafter tensions between malaysia and
the philippines somewhat cooled down but
in reality the philippines has never
officially dropped its claim over sabah
indeed it was even reaffirmed by the
philippine supreme court in 2011. now
for its part malaysia insists that the
sovereign status of saba is a non-issue
the philippines on the other hand had
tried to bring up the case and settle
the issue in international courts but
malaysia isn't willing to enter into
negotiations concerning the matter now
the other ever-running dispute of course
concerns the rights of the heirs and
descendants of the sultan of sulu to the
annual payments for saba as stipulated
in the 1878 agreement and their claim is
bolstered by the fact that the british
north borneo company paid the sultans of
sulu for the rights to saba in 1878 and
continued to pay for the control of the
region every year since then and since
the 1960s these legal claims have been
made against the federation of malaysia
which asks the successor to the british
interest in the region is liable for the
sum owed to the heirs and the
descendants of the sultan of sulu
unknown to many even to the people in
malaysia and in the philippines these
annual payments were made every year
from 1878 until 2013 but continuing
litigation resulted in the international
arbitration ruling that malaysia owed
14.9 billion dollars to the heirs of the
sultan of sulu in 2022
so if they were still paying from 1878
to 2013 then what exactly happened in
2013
why did malaysia stop paying the heirs
of the sultan of sulu in 2013.
in a surprising and somewhat bizarre new
episode in the long running dispute over
sabah an armed encounter occurred in
2013 between the malaysian military
against a group of approximately 200
armed men from sulu these men were the
followers of the late jamal kiram iii a
claimant to the title of sultan of sulu
and who was among the descendants of the
nine principal heirs of sultan jamal
kiran ii the last sovereign sultan of an
independent sultanate of sulu however it
is also worth noting that since the
death of sultan mahakutakiram of sulu in
1986 there has been a succession crisis
to the throne and the title of sultan of
sulu but this did not mean that there
were no legal heirs of sultan jamal
kiran ii to whom the annual payments for
saba are legally owed to according to
the 1878 agreement in fact as mentioned
earlier the annual payments continued
until 2013. nevertheless the 2013 lehigh
data incident resulted in dozens of
casualties a military standoff and a
diplomatic crisis consequently the
malaysian government stopped the annual
payments to the descendants of the
sultan of sulu regardless of their
involvement or innocence in the armed
encounter and thus the dispute involving
the annual payments owed to the heirs of
the sultan of sulu by malaysia just like
the dispute over the sovereignty of saba
between the federation of malaysia and
the republic of the philippines seems no
closer to resolution in 2022 than it has
ever been over the last several decades
it just goes to show that a poorly
worded legal document rooted in
colonialism and unclear land tenure can
have long lasting consequences and sadly
throughout the mainstream narrative of
this conflict very little attention is
given to the native and indigenous
people of sabah and the sulu archipelago
millions of marginalized people on both
sides of the border who were sadly
caught in the middle of the seemingly
never-ending crisis a conflict caused by
centuries of colonialism and decades of
modern day geopolitics and one more
thing before i go i mean you know since
we all know how many tend to get heated
in the comments section of any videos
mentioning sulu or saba you know before
you get angry let me just make it clear
that i am not saying that we do not have
a claim over saba but within the context
of these historical events saba is
technically still de facto part of
malaysia regardless of the validity and
the strength of our claims the world
currently sees saba as de facto part of
malaysia which means that the federation
of malaysia has effective control over
sabah and the legal jurisdiction over
its citizens we must also remember that
international law requires countries
like the philippines to pursue such
claims and disputes through diplomatic
or peaceful means therefore any
unilateral use of force such as the
attempted operation merdeka by ferdinand
marcus senior in 1968 and even the
lahattato incident in 2013 could be
interpreted especially by malaysia as an
invasion or an act of violence against
the territorial integrity of another
nation state just to be clear i am not
saying that we do not have a rightful
claim over sabah you know as a historian
and a direct descendant of both the
sultans of sulu and the sultans of
brunei i fully understand the strength
of our historical claims over dorth
borneo but also as someone who
diligently studied international law i
also understand the precarious nature
and the complexities of this dispute
because nothing in this dispute is black
and white and you know to be honest my
main concern in this whole issue in this
decades-long conflict you know my main
concern are the rights and the
well-being of the people caught in the
middle millions of marginalized people
on both sides of the border in both
sabah and the sudo archipelago so stay
tuned for my next videos as we dig
deeper into the long history of this
conflict and get a better understanding
of its impact on the people particularly
the local and indigenous people of sulu
and north borneo
and that is it for me today so let me
know what you think about today's topic
in the comments below and again this is
just part one of my three-part series
about the dispute over saba aka north
borneo so stay tuned for parts 2 and 3
to dig deeper and learn more and of
course if you like this video or learn a
thing or two don't forget to like share
this video comment down below and please
subscribe help me reach that 100 000
subscribers mark by the end of this year
so more people can learn more about our
people's history culture and everything
in between from the philippines and
across southeast asia
but of course before we go today shout
out goes to sham is from malaysia johan
from indonesia anjo from the philippines
ryan fillmore from california and
special shout out and special thanks to
my patreon on patreon jake vermes is
of course this video this channel will
not be possible without the love and the
support of all my patrons and all my
subscribers throughout these years
see you next time
jumpa lagi
you
関連動画をさらに表示
Would the Philippines go to War over Sabah?
South China Sea dispute explained
What is the extent of our Philippine territory? (a prelude to the principle of territoriality)
破産後に立花氏が大津氏に和解を申し入れた理由、アルファード返却だけで終わるのか
WEST PHILIPPINE SEA: Territorial Waters of the Philippines but Controlled by China?
ROMANIA e MOLDAVIA si UNISCONO?
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)