SOCIEDADE DO ESPETÁCULO - Convidado: Luiz Felipe PONDÉ

Summary

In this thought-provoking episode of 'F my Brain', host Natália Moyses engages in a deep conversation with philosopher and writer Luís Felipe Pondé about the spectacle society, exploring themes of intimacy, public exposure, and the impact of social media on mental health. Pondé reflects on the commodification of personal lives for relevance and the paradox of seeking authenticity in a world that thrives on curated appearances. The discussion delves into the philosophical implications of our voyeuristic tendencies and the quest for genuine connection in an era dominated by superficial digital interactions.

Takeaways

• 🎙️ The podcast 'F My Brain' discusses topics that impact mental health, with a focus on societal spectacles and the impact of public exposure on individuals.
• 🔥 The episode features philosopher and writer Luí Felipe Pondé, who brings a deep perspective on the nature of society's obsession with spectacles and intimacy.
• 📺 The conversation touches on the role of media and social networks in turning personal lives into public spectacles, often for the sake of relevance or marketing.
• 🤔 Pondé questions the authenticity of public displays of intimacy, suggesting that what is marketed as 'freedom' might not necessarily reflect true liberation or reality.
• 🎭 The concept of 'The Society of the Spectacle' by French philosopher Guy Debord is introduced, highlighting the idea that modern society is driven by appearances and images over substance.
• 💬 The episode explores the impact of constant exposure and opinion-sharing on mental health, suggesting that the noise and restlessness of public discourse may exacerbate existing fragility.
• 👥 The discussion considers the role of the audience in the spectacle, noting that everyone is now a producer and consumer of content, which shapes our perceptions and realities.
• 📚 Pondé reflects on the value of thought in a spectacle-driven society, suggesting that intellectualism is often sidelined in favor of superficiality and quick consumption.
• 🤳 The script acknowledges the positive aspects of social media, such as access to diverse perspectives and the ability to connect with a variety of content, including educational resources.
• 🧐 The conversation concludes with a reflection on the importance of self-affirmation and mental health, encouraging introspection and a focus on authenticity over public perception.

Q & A

What is the main theme of the episode featuring Luí Felipe Pondé?

The main theme of the episode is the concept of 'Society of the Spectacle' and its impact on privacy, intimacy, and mental health in the context of modern media and social networks.

How does Luí Felipe Pondé describe the shift in society's approach to intimacy and public exposure?

Luí Felipe Pondé suggests that society has moved from a lack of privacy to a stage where privacy is invaded by the spectacle of public exposure, often leading to the commodification and distortion of intimacy.

What example does Luí Felipe Pondé use to illustrate the disconnect between talking about sex and actual sexual freedom?

Pondé refers to a Woody Allen film where a character can talk openly about sex but is not necessarily sexually liberated, indicating that talking about intimacy does not equate to actual freedom or experience.

How does the host of the show relate the concept of 'Society of the Spectacle' to the current state of social networks?

The host suggests that social networks have turned everyone into both producers and consumers of spectacle, where personal experiences and opinions are constantly shared and consumed, blurring the lines between public and private.

What is the significance of the 'F my Brain' subscriber club mentioned in the script?

The 'F my Brain' subscriber club is a way for the show to engage its audience more deeply, offering exclusive content, early access to questions for guests, and a sense of community for its subscribers.

How does Luí Felipe Pondé view the role of marketing in the context of the 'Society of the Spectacle'?

Pondé sees marketing as a driving force behind the spectacle, where even personal experiences like intimacy are commodified and sold for attention, contributing to a culture of lies and superficiality.

What historical perspective does Luí Felipe Pondé provide on the concept of privacy?

Pondé discusses how the concept of privacy, as we understand it today, is relatively new historically. He mentions that in the past, knowing one's lineage was important, but privacy in terms of personal space and intimate life was not as defined or valued.

What is the title of the book mentioned by Luí Felipe Pondé that discusses our current culture and time?

The title of the book is 'The Civilization of the Spectacle' by Mário Vargas Losa.

How does the script address the issue of public opinion and the spectacle of personal issues, such as divorce?

The script criticizes the spectacle of personal issues being made public, where audiences consume these situations as entertainment, and professionals like lawyers are brought in to discuss them, turning personal matters into public spectacle.

What is the philosophical concept that the host and Luí Felipe Pondé agree is relevant to the discussion?

The philosophical concept they agree on is Stoicism, which emphasizes the importance of understanding what one can and cannot change, and encourages living in the present moment.

Outlines

00:00

🎙️ Introduction to 'F My Brain' Show

The transcript begins with the host introducing a new episode of the 'F My Brain' show, which discusses topics related to mental health and society's spectacles. The guest for the episode is Luí Felipe Pondé, a philosopher, writer, and professor. The host expresses excitement about having Pondé on the show and mentions the various platforms where the show is available, including YouTube, Spotify, and Instagram. The host also encourages viewers to subscribe and participate in the show's community for exclusive content and opportunities.

05:05

🔥 The Role of Intimacy in the Public Sphere

In this paragraph, the conversation delves into the theme of public exposure and the sharing of intimate details by public figures. The host and Pondé discuss the societal need for exposure and the impact it has on the marketability of individuals, particularly in the context of sexual liberation. Pondé brings up the concept of 'society of the spectacle' by French philosopher Guy Debord, highlighting how reality is being overshadowed by appearances and spectacles. The discussion also touches on the role of social media in making everyone a producer and consumer of spectacles.

10:09

🤔 Pondé's Reflections on the Nature of Exposure

Luí Felipe Pondé shares his thoughts on the phenomenon of public figures exposing their intimate lives, suggesting that it may not always be a genuine expression of freedom but rather a marketing strategy. Pondé also expresses skepticism about the authenticity of what is shared in the public domain, hinting that lies and marketing are pervasive. The conversation hints at the broader implications of the 'society of the spectacle' on individual relevance and societal values.

15:09

🌐 The Impact of Social Networks on Intimacy

The discussion continues with Pondé and the host exploring the effects of social networks on the concept of intimacy. Pondé suggests that the constant need for public figures to stay relevant might be eroding genuine intimacy, as relationships become more about public perception than private connection. The paragraph also touches on the idea that the public's interest in the private lives of others might be driven by a desire for entertainment rather than a genuine concern for the well-being of the individuals involved.

20:12

📚 Pondé's Philosophical Perspective on the Spectacle

Luí Felipe Pondé provides a philosophical perspective on the spectacle, referencing the works of Guy Debord and discussing the historical context of the spectacle in society. Pondé suggests that the spectacle has evolved from a form of propaganda to a pervasive aspect of modern life, where even personal relationships are influenced by the need for public appearance. The conversation also touches on the idea that the spectacle may be a symptom of a broader societal psychosis, where the ability to do anything we want has led to a loss of direction and purpose.

25:18

💬 The Delinquency of Language in the Digital Age

The conversation turns to the misuse of language in the digital age, with Pondé suggesting that the way we communicate today is a reflection of a deeper societal delinquency. The host and Pondé discuss the impact of this on the way we interact with each other and the world, suggesting that the constant stream of information and the demand for instant gratification have led to a decline in the quality of our discourse and our ability to engage in meaningful conversations.

30:19

🎭 The Erosion of Privacy and the Rise of Public Intimacy

Pondé and the host discuss the changing nature of privacy and the increasing trend of sharing intimate details publicly. They explore the idea that the exposure of private life has become a form of currency in the digital age, with people trading on their personal experiences for attention and relevance. The conversation also touches on the historical context of privacy and the evolution of the concept of private life, suggesting that the current obsession with public exposure may be a departure from our historical norms.

35:25

📈 The Influence of Marketing on Personal Authenticity

The discussion delves into the impact of marketing on personal authenticity, with Pondé suggesting that the need to market ourselves has led to a culture of lying and manipulation. The host and Pondé explore the idea that the constant pressure to present an attractive image can lead to a disconnect between our public personas and our private selves. They also discuss the potential consequences of this for our mental health and our ability to form genuine connections with others.

40:26

📚 Pondé's Thoughts on the Civilization of the Spectacle

Luí Felipe Pondé reflects on the concept of the 'civilization of the spectacle' as described by Mário Vargas Losa, discussing the贬值 of intellectual thought in favor of superficial entertainment. Pondé laments the loss of value for serious discourse and the rise of scandal-driven journalism. The conversation highlights the challenges faced by intellectuals in a society that prioritizes spectacle over substance.

45:28

🤝 The Role of Intellectuals in the Digital Age

The conversation concludes with Pondé and the host discussing the role of intellectuals in the digital age. Pondé expresses concern about the commodification of intellectual content and the pressure on intellectuals to conform to market demands. The host reflects on the need for genuine intellectual engagement and the importance of creating space for thoughtful reflection in a society dominated by the spectacle.

50:36

🌟 Pondé's Final Thoughts on Self-Affirmation and Mental Health

In the final paragraph, Pondé emphasizes the importance of self-affirmation and the need to be comfortable with who we are, rather than seeking validation from others. He suggests that introspection and understanding our motivations can contribute to better mental health. The host agrees, highlighting the value of the conversation and the importance of the show's theme of thinking deeply about the world around us.

Keywords

💡Spectacle

The term 'spectacle' in the context of the video refers to the philosophical concept of 'Society of the Spectacle' by Guy Debord, which posits that modern society is dominated by images and representations rather than direct experiences. It is related to the theme of the video as it discusses how individuals and society are influenced by the spectacle of media and public exposure, as seen in the various examples of public figures and their intimate lives being turned into spectacles for public consumption.

💡Intimacy

Intimacy is a central concept in the video, referring to the close, personal, and often private aspects of one's life or relationships. The script discusses the tension between the desire for privacy and the increasing trend of sharing intimate details publicly, especially through media and social networks. It is exemplified by the references to celebrities revealing personal and sexual details, which challenges traditional notions of privacy and public image.

💡Mental Health

Mental health is a significant theme in the video, as it explores the impact of the spectacle society on individuals' psychological well-being. The script suggests that the constant exposure to media and the pressure to perform for an audience can lead to increased anxiety and restlessness. The discussion about finding internal silence and being comfortable with oneself is presented as a potential counterbalance to the noise of the spectacle society.

💡Authenticity

Authenticity in the video is contrasted with the performative aspects of the spectacle society. It is suggested that true authenticity may be found in moments of silence and introspection, away from the constant need for public affirmation. The script implies that the pursuit of authenticity is essential for mental health, as it allows individuals to connect with their genuine selves beyond the curated images presented to the public.

💡Self-affirmation

Self-affirmation is discussed in the context of the need for individuals to seek validation and acceptance from others, often through social media and public platforms. The script critiques this need as a driving force behind the sharing of personal details, suggesting that it may lead to a loss of genuine self-expression and contribute to mental health issues due to the pressure of maintaining a positive public image.

💡Philosopher

The term 'philosopher' is used to introduce Luís Felipe Pondé, a guest in the video who is a philosopher, writer, and professor. His role in the conversation is to provide insights into the themes of spectacle, intimacy, and mental health from a philosophical perspective, grounding the discussion in critical thought and theoretical frameworks.

💡Marketing

Marketing is mentioned in the video as a driving force behind the spectacle society, where the promotion of products, ideas, and even individuals is a key aspect of public life. The script suggests that marketing strategies encourage the commodification of intimacy and personal experiences, turning them into spectacles to attract attention and generate profit.

💡Social Networks

Social networks are portrayed as platforms that facilitate the spectacle society by allowing individuals to curate and share their lives publicly. The script discusses the impact of social networks on privacy and the construction of personal brands, highlighting how they contribute to the erosion of boundaries between public and private life.

💡Celebrity Culture

Celebrity culture is a recurring theme in the video, with the script examining how public figures' lives are turned into spectacles and how this trend influences societal values and behaviors. The discussion points to the intense focus on celebrities' intimate details as a reflection of the society's fascination with the spectacle of their lives.

💡Stoicism

Stoicism is referenced towards the end of the video as a philosophical school of thought that emphasizes self-control, inner strength, and the understanding of what is within one's control. The script suggests that adopting Stoic principles can be a way to navigate the spectacle society by focusing on personal growth and mental health rather than external validation.

Highlights

The show 'F my Brain' explores topics that affect mental health and features philosopher and writer Luí Felipe Pondé.

Discussion on the impact of public exposure of personal intimacy on mental health and societal norms.

Ana Hickman and Edu Guedes' case illustrates the public's fascination with intimate celebrity conflicts.

Luísa Sonza's documentary series reflects on the consequences of oversharing personal life in the media.

Philosopher Pondé suggests that society's preoccupation with spectacle may overshadow genuine sexual freedom.

The concept of 'Society of the Spectacle' by French philosopher Guy Debord is linked to the commodification of experiences.

Pondé critiques the idea that everyone can be an authority in the digital age, suggesting it leads to superficiality.

The role of marketing in shaping our perceptions and the potential negative effects on mental health.

Pondé's view that Homo sapiens may be inherently 'psychotic' due to the rapid changes in societal structures.

The impact of social media on privacy and the performative aspects of online personas.

Reflections on the historical context of privacy and the evolution of intimate relationships in society.

The paradox of increased access to information and the simultaneous desire for superficial content consumption.

Mário Vargas' insights on the trivialization of intellectual thought in the spectacle society.

The challenges faced by intellectuals in maintaining authenticity in an era dominated by spectacle.

The potential positive aspects of social media, such as access to diverse perspectives and educational content.

The importance of stoicism and self-reflection in navigating the complexities of modern society.

Transcripts

fuck my [Music] Brain it's time to give your mind a Boom, a new and Spectacular

Episode of F my Brain is starting here in this space we deal with all those subjects that bug our

minds that take away our sleep and that in the end of accounts affect our mental health and today you

already know you already know today the animal is going to catch fire our theme is attention from the show fuck my

brain I'm going to start with a 10 because our guest today is ridiculously a 10

I'm talking about I'm talking about Luí Felipe Pondé, philosopher, writer, my former professor and

professor at PUC São Paulo and FAAP, columnist at Folha de São Paulo, presenter of the program

Linhas Cruzadas on TV Cultura with my friend Andresa Bone Pondé, man, what a wonderful thing to have

you here so much Thank you, thank you for the invitation, it's nice to see you again, nice to see you

too, very well, very well, very well, now who's here, here are the duo me and inti, master,

a Pocket pocket version of F my Brain, Lu can't be with us for health reasons But

anyway, let's move the boat here and honor her, let's go now before we start because this theme Society

of the spectacle we are going to talk about subjects that you see everywhere you are totally impacted

but I only continue if you click here to register sign up participate Share hit

the bell and I want to remind you that anyone who follows us on YouTube can also become and part of the

subscriber club If you subscribe 489 people here, right, to help us continue with this

wonderful work you have access to which the guests we will bring can ask questions ahead of

time and these answers will only go to subscribers, there will be content already available for

subscribers that are special, very cool things and then they will compete to win an FM Brain mug,

having said that What are the networks on YouTube @canal fmy brain on Spotify @fm Brain We are also

on Google podcast on Deer on Amazon music and pay attention because our Instagram is @fm pbin

ready It's a lot of information to pass on to you, it's good at the beginning remember this we think that she

sleeps and wakes up saying this @fm Brain @fm was looking for telepro it's not from the mind it's like Hi Marina

@canal fmy Brain you know that's basically it's a journey of 25 years looking at the TV and talking for

hours with a teleprompter for hours without So Today I freed myself from the teleprompter and sometimes mistakes

like this come up, right, but that's it, right? Pondé, everything is fine when we define a theme because what to talk about

with Luiz Felipe. Pondé, my God, everything, right? Anything that works that the mind and you You know what

I think is a cheap knot Why do we pay a lot of money to

Pondé ?

luxury I also speak, speak, think and speak, he concatenates his thoughts

Wait, I'm going to do something here, ok, so we looked at what's happening,

each day more and more and curiously, I don't know, in the last six months we've been bombarded with

these stronger themes that involve a lot of people's intimacy, intimacy at its core,

we had a situation with the actress Débora Seco who came time after time exposing

her intimacy quite like this and let's go, I'll read carefully, how does she talk like that, warning of sensitive content

sensitive content sensitive content let's go, Débora Seco revealed that she never spit out the sperm

and even licks it when it falls on her belly

. they are delicious Débora also reported

details of a relationship with another woman, well here we go, just look for the name of the actress

there, Débora Seco talks about bisexuality, she likes anal sex, everything the actress said about it,

to spicy revelations, well then we we have Ana Hickman and Edu Guedes two

important presenters a separation a case of violence a case of financial issues And then exposure was

betrayal and then the world full of opinions about other people's relationships sure it was like that sure

it was done we have Luísa sonza Luísa Sonza, singer, ex-wife of comedian Werson Nunes,

I found an article that says something like this, Luísa Sonza regrets exposure to a series in which she herself exposes

every detail of her life I'm sad in anticipation when the documentary comes out the cancellation that will

come comments Luísa This is one of the first scenes of If I Were Luí aç Son the documentary series the

dilemma becomes clear in that first moment Luísa fears all the unreasonable hatred that receives But responds

with more exposure is the big question of the series of her career how much of this is healthy with

all caution to those who may want to criticize the I bring the names and the lines of these It's not people's judgment,

especially about Débora, it's not a judgment, right, about being a sexually liberated person

definitely not, but that's what we would like to reflect on with you Pondé is that

we increasingly feel that there is a need for Exposure of what we also understand is

very intimate and perhaps that It's not a cry for freedom, it's for the promotion of freedom, for

example, in this specific case, sexual, but often people, artists, in order to stay

alive. Possibly in a market, for sure, and that's why I'm going to stop talking because I've

already said P Cacilda We gave this suggestive title of society of the spectacle Look first, Thank you

for the invitation, nice to be here, look at this thing about talking a lot about sex Ah, I remember a

Wood Allen film, I don't remember which film it is, but I remember the scene that then He was with a girl

at the house, her parents had gone out and so on and she was talking nonsense, you know, she wanted to do this, she

liked to do that type of thing that you were mentioning and then when he picked her up and put

her on top of the sofa and starts trying, let's say, to practice what she said, she jumps out and

he asks, what happened, something like that happened and she says, do you know Freud's oral phase,

that is, then she starts to say that in her therapy she had developed the ability to talk

about sex openly but that this in fact had nothing to do with any sexual performance, that

is, it did not imply that there was in fact any form of sexual freedom there because precisely because

she could only talk and she was enjoying in quotes talking about That's right, of course this scene

for the diary is one of those scenes where the character was pissed that he wanted to get the girl and was

thinking that she was easy with everything she said and when it happened it didn't happen

so I'm not so sure that it wasn't I know her specific case, Débora Seco, but I

'm not so sure that everything that is said out there really happens, right, because it seems to me

that today one of the most common things is lying, you lie all the time, right, because that's marketing, right

? When doing marketing ,

you said that exposing intimacy is often a way for you

to think that you stay relevant because people like to hear dirty things, right? see

with the intimacy of the person what they like what they do, so that seems to me like this, this report,

although I hadn't heard these specific reports, seems to me to be very typical of our time

now. Society of the spectacle, this specifically, this is a concept, ah, of a French philosopher

called guide bor, you know, suddenly you saw in college that those who did communication always go through the

guide debor and it's a a concept that is very linked to May 68, very linked to the idea that

in addition to what you do, you do it for to become a spectacle on television, right, to be filmed from

there to here. The society of the spectacle has even turned into propaganda, advertising, it's as if the

spectacle is sucking away reality as such and what matters is what appears, then I

think it's the most miserable from the Society of Spectacle, these examples you gave, it

's already the stage like Help, I need to be relevant, I just want to comment that we invited Débora

Seco, I contacted two advisors who work with her so that she could participate here, which we

would really like to get to know other layers of Débora, right? So there's an open space here for

us to have conversations that have everything to do with fuck my brain, us talking about celebrity, it's

clear this need to feed on that, right? So I think that since we're Speaking

of television, the Society of Spectacles, it's linked to an issue of image, right, but what?

What shocks me is that today everyone is in this show. I think that the context of the

social networks that we use makes us all producers and consumers of the show

all the time, right, so I communicate everything I post, I'm showing so it's an editable thing

it's a choice and what I consume I'm participating So I really wanted to hear

this from you because today you post And you already justify something, right You just posted and you you

people say oh I just posted but look If you come here and judge me, then like, Where are

we making even our things that are like that, I don't know, just an opinion and we have the

right to have an opinion in the sense that it's private becoming public and then you have that Range of

haters so this whole phenomenon I wanted to hear from you when we become the agents and consumers of the

spectacle and how this is a What do you think if it is negative if it is positive what are we

going as a society Look I must say that In general, I'm going to use the philosophical swear word, then

I'm going to translate my vision, it's always non-Hegelian. Hegel is that dialectic guy, you know,

history is advancing thesis antithesis synthesis, I don't know what a perception is, it is intimately

focused on a vision. of progress of advancement that the story has some meaning I don't think it has

any it's going nowhere you bang your head against the wall you come back you might get something right because

you got it right and then you get it wrong afterwards to say that oh I don't understand even if that's necessarily good

It's not necessarily bad, I think it can cause damage, there are people who can make money

from it, there are people who suddenly, if they don't do this, they can't have any

internal psychic reality, right? It depends on it more and more now I have a suspicion that I've been feeding

some time since the Sapiens species is psychotic I think we are a psychotic species it's

funny I'm serious it's sad it's funny it's famous laughing nervously laughing nervously

laughing nervously laughing S laughing I think we are Sapiens psychotic species means

making a low count of 200,000 years 300,000 years the same as we are today here, biologically,

I mean physiologically and we have lived for millennia millennia millennia millennia since

prehistory just enormous pressure from the enormous environment we were eaten By beast If it killed,

it died young, oh, a lot of women died in childbirth, a lot of children died in childbirth, so we

suffered, we had difficulty eating, when I go to a restaurant I see the agony that the waiter

is in to deal with tastes, take this out, put that in, you can't do that you can't do that, I

feel sorry for the waiter And then I think that until yesterday we ate rats, why? Because it's what we

ate that we can eat, so for example, we are a species

. prehistory humanity all this takes one day we spent 23 hours starving uhm

right eating what we could then all this set of external pressure right from the environment on us

contained our Psychosis why Because we couldn't do almost anything, right we I was trapped there

in very precarious living conditions, in very precarious longevity conditions, right?

And when we started farming and started living together,

living conditions got even worse, right? And then suddenly, roughly speaking, in the last 200 years, we disembarked. doing what we want,

right, we now have a whole range of technology service of what we want, so now The Outbreak, right,

of a species that was already crazy but lived contained, my environment worked like a straitjacket,

this straitjacket disappeared and we're walking around loose You know those

movie images that have been seen in several films that suddenly in war This happens a lot the soldiers are

walking around Europe invasion of Europe I don't know what and suddenly they are face to face with

the Psychiatric Hospital that was bombed and patients walk down the street so this image

we walked down the street and now we are doing everything we want, increasingly doing what

we want. We are even transforming what we want into Law, all the time, right, everything we

want has to be an a priori right, so going back to what you asked, I

I made this introduction to say This is the background that I see in all this, understand, so

this universe of these conversations on social networks and how this happened I think it happened

because the mod is an outbreak it is an outbreak that until now has been reasonably functional that we

know that there are Psychotics who are functional who have outbreaks but are functional I think that until now

the species has been functional but at some point things could get worse in direct proportion

to the fact that we can do even more of what we you want it on a large scale, right? So this thing

from before, you studied communication, you know this very well, that basic theory of communication was

what sender message and receiver now it's everyone sender and receiver so everyone talks

everyone gives opinions and our Species we We didn't learn to speak for something

because we don't things are for something but we didn't learn to speak to get

Talk Headed we learned to speak to talk shit to make fun of to lie to tell

horror stories to bully, right? to convince people to have sex and then the theme that

you were mentioning comes back, so the delinquency with which we use language, so to speak,

today is very clear, I think it is simply the tip of the iceberg of this profound delinquency

that is the history of homo sapiens and prehistory have you seen it Have you seen it It's just that I wanted to imagine,

no, I didn't imagine bringing this image but it's really fun You know that evolution, everyone has seen it,

right? The whole thing then

arrives and he sits down at the computer and there is one last image of the computer and then someone turns around and says,

come back , it went wrong.

dolphin that will be better, the problem is that

there is no way to go back, right, there is no restart, and there is no way to go back, if you saw Douglas Adams with

Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxies, everything is possible, it's just a matter of pressing the button there, that This

is part of Psychosis, uh, everything is possible, you can restart everything all the time, right? I understand

that we will always return, whether we want to or not, to this issue of exposure, social networks,

television and everything else, but I would like to get into a little point now. a little deeper about

intimacy because we are connected, we have a lot of friends and see people and see I don't know what

if what but I don't think we've ever been Where is it so far away and so without intimacy with people

couples are Without intimacy, you know, intimacy is something that strips us naked. I think that having

intimacy makes us even more fragile, maybe it disarms you a lot, that's why you say

that intimacy is shit, intimacy is shit. That's right

, so I wanted to talk to you a little to understand your view on intimacy and yours and on

intimacy today and I first suspect that intimacy, if it hasn't yet fallen under the condemnation

of what is politically correct, will probably fall, I mean intimacy is politically

incorrect, right, because it is One of the things that hinders intimacy today, I agree with

you, there are a lot of people who write about this, that even couples would have difficulty having

intimacy, including sex, sexual activity decreases, even among young people, right, we know that the

birth rate is plummeting the birth rate plummets precisely in societies that have more

Progress, you know, where everyone works, men and women, everyone is free, they are so free, so free,

so free that they don't have sex and hey And then there are no children, oh, of course that there are people who have sex and also don't

have children, but the fact is that apparently there is one at the same time who talks a lot about sex,

as you mentioned, and about sexual intimacy, right?

person you choose to have sex with spits, doesn't spit, swallows, doesn't swallow, I mean, now it's become a

thing that's everywhere, famous figures speaking, but I have the impression that today

it's you, the relationships. They are so dependent on agreements and expectations, you know, you get

into a relationship So you have a whole series of topics that you have to hit to see if it works

Right, to begin with, intimacy in a couple is not something like that you find

very funny when we talk like that, not because we respect each other a lot, right, and I

keep thinking, but how can you have good sex if you respect each other? That 's what respect is all the time,

right? So, ah, one of the characteristics that our outbreak seems to me is that thanks to marketing, even

now we are lying scientifically, right, in a systematic, rationalized way, what I

said was politically incorrect, intimacy doesn't seem to me Ah that you can

necessarily associate intimacy with absolute respect, which doesn't mean the violence that everyone

talks about, it means I'm oh, I'm here, I'm always moving, looking at the continent of

politically correct nonsense from afar, right, I know it's there, I I look from afar, I continue to sail towards

the coast, right? Ah, so it seems to me that it's a lot of verbiage, a lot of expectations, right? And then you

meet a person and in fact, sometimes intimacy, including sexual intimacy, happens unexpectedly.

You don't expect it and suddenly you're there Do you want to see one of the things that this contradiction seems common to me,

for example it has always been said that you shouldn't eat meat where you earn your bread n That

order is you shouldn't eat meat where you earn your bread and today that's all that is everything is within a

legal object, there is compliance, there is a process, but at the same time it is well known that the

work environment is one of the most erotic there is, because people are there coexisting, creating,

solving problems, spending the whole day together, going out to eat Then later you're going to celebrate,

I don't know what, take a deal here take a deal there, get close, it's admiration, it's

admiration, it's the achievement of things that were difficult, you go there, it's almost a thing, it's a team, it's

a thing. of let's team erotic deeply erotic and we know that compliance in general

doesn't love eroticism compliance is not erotic it is the anti-exactly this has the anti-erotic and

there is the anti-erotic the anti-erotic because the erotic is dangerous in work environment Although,

as has been said since Greece in philosophy, Eros is a force that not only leads you to coitus. Eros

leads you to creativity, leads you to fulfillment. Intimacy in the historical sense that intersects with

the idea of ​​private life, for example, right? There is a multi-volume work on the history of private life

that was published in Brazil, I think in the 80s by the company right at the beginning of the company,

it's from the letters that privacy was never exactly as we think it is today

or was before the networks For example, knowing who your father was was a very rare thing,

why? Because if you went down the social strata, using the expression in the chronicle for the Middle Ages,

but if you went down the social stratum, there wasn't much of this thing that we see in the cinemas. the

girl marrying the boy, she with the little flower on her head, there wasn't much of that, right? In reality, the

groups were mixed, no one really knew who the father was, he lived in something called a relative,

an expression translated into Portuguese which was, in reality, if he lived where he could to live,

everyone stayed together and had sex in front of everyone, including those who were not

aristocrats and such, it was important to know who the father was Because it was important to know what the

heritage lineage was, who gave what, right, but even so aristocrats have sex with people

around them, right? There's a wonderful film from the 90s, I don't know if you've seen it because at the time you

probably weren't born, so it's a film called a Spanish film called

re rei astonished and reina desnuda but I didn't watch it because I I've heard it, I think, but I haven't seen it, it's from the 90s, right,

the amazed king and the naked queen, a Spanish film, right, and the problem is that they're crazy about each

other, that was a problem because they had sex [ __ ] and she enjoyed [ __ ] Then she screamed

inside the castle and everyone was worried about the couple's honor since the queen was obsessed with

having sex with the king and the king was crazy, amazed as he says by the naked queen So the counselors there

Including the church Spanish film, right, very Catholic In this sense, at the time, they made a committee

of people who stayed around the two's beds so that they could have sex and if they could contain themselves

the enjoyment enjoy because he has to have a child the guy she doesn't because she has to have a child but in no way

expresses it Any noise any moan any verb associated with what was happening in the

sexual act and then the nuns kept praying to help but then no one will enjoy the nun vol So that's

it but what happens in the film is what happens in the scene goes wrong, right Of course it goes wrong but

the idea is exaggerated The film is a comedy, right, but it is a very interesting comedy That's precisely why

it first shows the idea that private sex, for example, is not an obvious thing, right? It has always

existed in any way, even if you think about Rome, an important civilization, you

had a woman walking alone on the street, the guy could put her against the wall and have sex, and although For

this not to happen to her, she had to be accompanied either by a slave or someone from the family

to show that she was a housewife, certain that she had a house and that she had protection because

otherwise the guy would lean her against the wall and have sex outside. So, that's okay, so the organization of

private life is a fairly recent thing, castles didn't have room divisions,

there weren't any divisions, right, many of the Horses slept inside with people,

right, they entered the space with horses, so this all shows that if the notion of privacy,

the experience of privacy is a reasonably recent experience in the history of the species, there is

intimacy, so, let's say, the most subjective part within the idea of ​​privacy,

this then stops to grow and flourish, it is extremely delicate, so you can end

her in 2 minutes maybe we are ending her since she didn't

exist for so long so in the end we are nothing new we are just going back to what was already said we

are moving forward and boy he just got try it then, but this curious detail that I kept

thinking about throughout the construction he did is that we went from not having privacy to having a

privacy that is quite lame to what is legal and a lie, that's what's really crazy because we

are very bad with the private because intimacy is increasingly difficult so in the good part let's

say about the private which is you actually having something nice with another person is scarce

But what I think is a The big problem is that the private person who comes to the public is a liar and we

are lying about it all the time And then it generates a movement where you look and talk about the

other person's life, it's more interesting, the other person is better than me, the other is more interesting the other has

more sex than me the other's marriage is better than mine because what is exposed in private

is a lie it makes sense you advertise it is because social networks is digital marketing So

you are selling everything all the time your sex, your mockery, your pizza

,

right ?

So I was developing this theme about lying and marketing and then one of the girls from the

company who was there watching me said this Pondé, are you talking to people from commercial

here, everyone knows that everyone lies all the time, right? aa when everything

turns into Business, lying is a necessary method for things to happen but

I'm not talking about a gross lie, I say no, I have a Porsche, I don't, that's not it, it's more

along the lines of what you're saying, so you go adjusting the image here, putting the filter there, telling

a little story, inventing a short story so that it creates something relevant, of

course, if you see a beautiful woman talking about her intimate sexual habits, that can make

fifth graders super attached, right? suddenly you start to talk about this conversation

between friends at happy hour, tell a story like that about lame, suck, swallow I don't know what

and then people suddenly start drinking, this could work to make a couple there

decide to practice that thing. night so there is a positive function there also someone keeps

saying this kind of thing it could help it could help Congratulations I thought it was cool Let's continue like this, right?

the goal Double the goal and no and of course everything has a positive and negative side It depends on how we look at it

and I when we talked about the title and I remembered that I had a book that looks like the

title of our conversation which is the civilization of the spectacle so pay attention to those who are just listening I

'm showing the book by the author Mário Vargas loses the civilization of the spectacle an x-ray of our

time and our culture and me this book It's already a few years old so it's Our culture and our time

based in 2013, right? It's been a while, about 10 years, and it was already starting like this, starting

now, the differences appear very quickly, right, but tiktok didn't exist, for example tiktok, there are just

a few points that I wanted to bring up, which have a lot of emphasis. mine here is something very crazy he says

in the civilization of the spectacle the intellectual will only be interested if he enters the fashion game and becomes

a buffoon the real reason for the total loss of interest of society as a whole in intellectuals

is a direct consequence of the negligible value that thought has in the civilization of the spectacle so

I'm going to redo this sentence because it moves me, this sentence is good, this sentence is the value that

the tiny value that thought has in the civilization of the spectacle, we don't, we don't worry, we don't

worry It doesn't matter, he doesn't want to enter into thought, we want consumption at a speed and a

superficiality so incredible and preferably something bizarre, eschatological, strange and later on

he starts talking about journalism, which is the part that also hurts us because We should not

be surprised if the most notable cases of reaching large audiences by

press organizations today are not achieved by serious publications that seek Rigor, truth and objectivity

in the description of current affairs, but by so-called celebrity magazines, transforming information

into an instrument of entertainment is Open little by little the doors of legitimacy to what was previously

confined to marginal and almost clandestine journalism scandal, disloyalty, gossip,

violation of privacy, if not in worse cases, defamation, slander and unfounded news, then

some quotes from this very rich book by the Nobel Prize for Literature Mário Vargas, the loss of the civilization

of Spectacular I think it's so sad sad I already read this book a few years ago and it's been

consuming me Pondé it's been consuming me because it's not what people care about, it's not people don't

want it and because people You know what's worse You're in the It's kind of me because damn

when I open something that makes me have to stop and reflect and I'm one of the

people who likes to stop and reflect, but then a day at work, a tiring day, a

day full of things I want, many times you want a quick consumption of great nonsense And then you

get that most bizarre scatological title And then you say Damn, swear and that, in some way,

maybe takes me a little away from the Current Reality, that is a way out and the violence that more and more

it takes over all channels, the more bizarre the crime, the more it generates an audience, this part I

skip because I really don't consume this kind of thing for health's sake, but today we increasingly

seem to feed on what violates us more than that that makes us feel

less because I'm not that person with that success I'm not that wonderful person I don't

have that body Inc I'm getting older and I don't have it and she doesn't apparently apparently

isn't getting older and we also don't seek the greatest human sadness and we live consuming

the misfortunes of the world because in the past you didn't have news from the whole world all the time

today you have news about human misfortune all the time it was just the accident on the Marginal so the

Psychotic Sapiens Psychotic is getting sicker every day because he also he feeds on what makes

him worse and worse but the craziest thing Before I let Pondé talk is that we are also replacing

some psychoses with others like the number of people who watch videos on the internet of people

squeezing an ingrown toenail is scary That's it, man, no joke, squeezing balls

, but da eh da These days, I was remembering a friend, Wow, who was telling me that her grandmother puts it in her

YouTube A on television and you keep watching the ingrown toenail channel that keeps exploding, what does that

say about us as a society? It says that this is who we are. I don't know as a society, but

your friend's grandmother. My friend's grandmother is strange. that before there wasn't that, now there is, so if she could,

she could see that, fun, her fun is there, right, people, now I wanted to go back to this thing that

this quote from Lossa is specifically in relation to intellectuals, right, I remember one

of Nelson's chronicles, one a theme that Nelson always repeated, right? He said that without the repetitions

he was nobody, right? And when there is May 68, precisely linked to the society of the spectacle and

he comments on a photo that was circulated at the time and is still famous today, Sartre's distributing

leaflets among the Students at that time he had migrated to be a Maoist because the

Soviet Union had fallen into moral disgrace because of the as if the Mayan regime would not also fall into

disgrace later And then Nelson commenting he makes a series of comments including listen May

68 because it says that the most 68 was just because the boys were angry because they couldn't

go to the girls'

dormitory The important thing is that he makes

the following comment and Sartre, in the middle of all those idiots, pretending that he is also an idiot

because otherwise he won't be heard by them, right, so ooo Nelson writes something that goes very much

in line with what you were quoting here that of course, Nelson had already said several times

that democracy is the regime, one of its characteristics is because it is the quantitative regime,

it has made idiots discover that they are the majority, right, so we have to

understand the comment about Sartre within this broader sociological comment, right, so I

have no doubt that what was described of the intellectual entering the regime of

the spectacle, right, and that this ends up causing many intellectuals to lose their space,

including When you see intellectuals concerned with transmitting self-help content, transmitting

motivational content, right, I personally think it's super humiliating, I mean, oh, and

they often say what they're expected to say to

the brand, because one of the things that today one of the censorships on intellectual life today is not

state censorship because I think that censorship today is liquid, it comes from several different instances, it is

when you have sponsorship, yes, because there are many sponsors today, they go straight over the

content you produce. Yes, they want you to produce this content or that content and if you

don't produce the content he wants then he doesn't sponsor you, it's linked to cancellation, for

example, right, so this whole process of you entering the game being the intellectual, there's still one more I play

in this thing about the intellectual who is not in the situation, but it seems to me that the specific niche is the

majority of intellectuals who operate within the ideological register to serve a political party,

what is called an organic intellectual, right, to serve a political party, to speak about what

even You do it because this can also catapult your career, make employment viable, right? So,

humanity has always been exposed to all kinds of miserable pressure and we continue to be exposed

to all kinds of miserable pressure. I don't know, for about 100 years, so as not to exaggerate too much. After all,

we started to think that this wouldn't happen one day that it would be possible to escape this, it's the same

thing I was talking about yesterday with someone who said no, but the wars are coming back, right?

It's not the wars that are coming back, history is coming back. There's always been war, that doesn't

mean it's legal And today there's still a problem when you say there's always been war, some fool comes along

and thinks you're saying that war is legal , right?

a few small wars that remained small in the sense that they were

local to big powers directly doesn't mean that it can't happen again, right

?

But you know what you're talking about, something comes to me that's like this, right? Today I'm a

journalist. As you know, today I work with marketing and branding and the biggest hiring

is the biggest demand for my work, my work is brand building. personal construction

of authority on social networks of a person of a person, right? So this idea of ​​this construction of

authority, which is it's so crazy to see us talk about this emptying of the intellectual in the

era we're in because I think, sadly, it's a something that I talk about a lot is that even this

construction of authority that we do in a digital format so that an infoproduct can be sold,

so a lecture, a mentorship, a course because ultimately it is the final product for sale, it is a

fast intellectual, it is an intellectual formulated is an intellectual for quick consumption five steps

to, uh, five steps to why be intelligent Exactly because when you really have it,

it's a sadness and a pain that I exchange a lot with the team and even with the clients that

I I say when a person comes that it actually seems that when someone comes who really has a lot to

contribute but doesn't want to surrender to the Formula format, they're not going to be successful by calling it

a success, right? They're full of followers Because in fact we lost this capacity, I think, to

take time to reflect and search, so it's as if aaaa we need this even to

survive as an intellectual, I don't know if it's making sense that I'm commenting, you know, and we become

a reduction. Ah yes, of course, see Who

said that it is possible for everyone to be intelligent? Who said that it is possible for everyone to be intelligent

in the sense of having consistent content built over years because for you

to have consistent content built over years? you

have to have spent a lot of time reading, for example, to have a solid repertoire,

right, and so I have no doubt when you say that suddenly someone with

a greater density may appear and that person doesn't fit into the Formula, it's because they don't it will really fit because the

formula is not for you to be very dense oh our contemporary world does not support deity

it does not support anything if it is very dense suddenly someone will sue you for the density

you presented because he felt humiliated by the fact that he couldn't keep up with

the density No ,

it's not difficult to imagine the world we're in

. humor So this thing you talked about about building authority, I

had never heard of this story about building authority. Even though I recognized the phenomenon when

you gave the name, I've heard about building a personal brand, for example, right? It must be a cousin in

some way. from the same place is the construction of a personal brand that everyone will be able to

impose themselves on the networks like Marc guys, it's obvious that this is a lie I agree with this

and I agree, it's obvious that it's a lie that you will in fact Oh you, you can So wanting to sell the

infoproduct associated with someone from a specific intellectual who in reality doesn't even need to

build it or build her as an authority, in reality she is lending

her being to that product because the authority is established in that person because we

you are able to recognize authority, right, no, not that authority that you recognize because

it cuts off your head That one you also recognize but this other type of authority now

when you have to build an authority a priori When the person doesn't have it then you have it

there are the formulas, right, to be able to sell, it is clear that this becomes a mass product, authority like the one

you said, that it is more dense, it is luxury, luxury does not exist, mass PR has never existed and will never exist,

it is a rare thing, difficult, we come from an idea that everyone can lie absolutely anything and

it's hard because I want to, Marina, I want to be able to, I want to be able to do everything, I want to be able to have success,

I want to be able to have the perfect life, I want to be able to, I'm saying this as an idea, okay, because I don't

I have no intention of any of these things anymore, I want today to be well, to continue breathing, that's

what I want, that's a big thing, right

? fact, but we come up with this idea more and more

because it sounds really good and then we're going to change the name of our conversation to society

of what sounds good because we're living in the idea that everything is for everyone all the

time we all have the same capabilities and the same skills and the same I'm not going to say the word

right because the right creates a lot of confusion, right, rights, access to that, that, we all have the

rights But our lives, our paths, our stories will take us to moment

Different, right, so a person who had such a condition will have more difficulties than a

person who had less but can go much further than the one who had it because Y may not use

what they had well, right? Nothing is written in stone but it is a society that today loves and depends

on this hand on the head, this affection, everyone can let's go together eee 10 steps and everyone

succeeded and capitalism needs this type of procedure to a large extent in the sense not only

capitalism or the communist regime Soviet also needed the entire regime that deals with the idea of

​​human beings as a mass that you will have to offer sell buy anything in

relation to that ah of At some point you need to say things to nice people

in the case of capitalism and Hence marketing is the great science of lying Oh you need

to put your hand over your head all the time because if you don't put your hand over your head it means

the person can leave, that's what we call journalism nowadays, Your Excellency, the reader. he

may be a total idiot but he is an excellence because he , added to several others, will imply

the vehicle's lack of support or not, this contradiction, right? a gigantic mass

of individuals who can be completely idiots but who you have to please all the time

because they are a business ,

right? Of course, at the same time.

you can have niches within

capitalism of people who want to acquire a certain type of content and don't want to be treated

like a happy idiot, they want you to treat them like adults, there are still people like that, right

? smaller niche, quantitatively speaking, but it continues

to exist and in this sense, poverty in a country also manifests itself in this sense. For example, we,

who are a poor country, tend to have fewer niches with this characteristic, if you

are a richer country, you tends to have more niches with this characteristic because the diversity

So it's not that the market doesn't buy products that have the quality of content it supports, but the

poorer the market is, therefore the more miserable it is, the more difficult it is for you to find niches where

you can address the people as an adult but it still exists, I can just make a point

about the way we've been talking about, you know, all the advances, for example, technology and social networks and how

we are being impacted by what is offered in the media, in a way with with much more of

the negative but I also have a point The other day I was at the bakery and I looked at PR tele bread on the plate

a loaf of bread on the plate comes out of the cream cheese and a medium is like that that's all I ask for eh and then I looked

at the television And for a change for a change death murder corruption death murder corruption

death robbery murder corruption I said my God and I when I was in the newsroom I had

an epic epic moment I was having breakfast after working one morning and when

I looked at the TV I went eating the cheese bread, the recording of the boy started, I don't remember

his name, Thank God, I barely remember some of the traumatic things he did, crying and asking

his mother not to do a deal with him, see, it was a child who died, murdered by his stepmother and

by the father, something like that and there's the audio of this child, man, when I saw that in the newspaper that I

I was working passing by in the morning and I went to put the cheese bread in my mouth I almost threw up

I started crying I went back to the office I put my finger in the face of one of my colleagues I won't mention

the name I love he said don't do it anymore That's why you guys have to warn people that there's going to be

sensitive content and why do you have to put it up in the morning? Who says good morning after seeing something like that,

it's not possible? that whole thing was out of balance

and then I'm back to living it now but he knew you were right too

maybe no no because in the idea of ​​journalism acia is aud no no and it's news it's news news

and audience and putting this in helps you learn that person for longer Because there is a Popular acclaim

See all of this is at stake, all of this is on the table now, as a human being, I

was there recently, let's go to this week's day, having breakfast, I was there again,

man, he killed and was stabbed and I was killed I said, man, who says good morning to the newspaper but there's nothing

to do, there's nothing useful to post, there's nothing cool And then I remember, well, you put the cool stuff, the person

changes the channel because they're going to see the misfortune on the other one, so that's what the good news is boring is boring

now to say what I was seeing and what positive comes from that I go to the social network

and the algorithms of my social network put sad guru to appear to me Fal

Pondé lines to speak to me cute dogs people doing trills right And then I'm consuming something

that makes me feel much better than what apparently gets more attention than most

people and I'm wondering if most people on the internet are actually watching death

murder you don't see other things, so today there is also a way to look for ways to get

in touch with things that weren't so simple before, I said, for example, the SAD guru, but that's a

figure you're talking about, before I would only go to FAAP, he would have them at PUC, right, it was FAAP or PUC Paulinho FAAP

brother OK, so, today, through the networks of this society of spectacle, we are also

able to have access to people that before we wouldn't have, which is a positive point, I think, but there is the

issue that you create your own show when you do this I'm in a show

cute dogs talk marriage proposals wonderfully resist you like this you know

I love super cool marriage proposals and and husband is listening to you say that oh El he

asked me by parachuting you I was together I was together with him I was together with him

his husband launched her husband launched this trend of we are 18 years together next you marry me

I leave you here I was literally holding you I told him he jumped he asked asked me

in wedding went to jump before me because he then had an extra surprise down there

and then when he went to jump I said don't die while he jumps but anyway and I like

that you are still jumping to this day, right we are jumping to this day and and another thing What I love

is the revelation that you're pregnant like I told my mother, not like I told my family those

reactions that it's cute but pregnant out of place or pregnant in the right place like married pregnant in the right place

married tells the mother then the whole family cries at the funny things what people do anyway, that's

it, it's just to relax a little bit, our social networks, this digital content, it actually

produces and there's the possibility of you getting in touch with things that you wouldn't get in

touch with, it's all mixed up, right, because so on. example classics courses on social media,

right books Ah, when the pandemic started, this really took off, right? And that's actually from the students' point of view,

right? What students are looking for today is And then the teacher doesn't have a video that talks about this book,

right? There's a summary, so, you don't even need to read it, it's just a video like 3 minutes about this

thing, so social media offers you all kinds of things and it can offer you content

with density and content without density, that's what I was saying. So you have niches in which you

can find content with density and my experience, for example, with social networks, which

is an experience that I consider Marcelo, Marcelo Taz says that my experience with networks

social media is like Safe sex is with condoms is an experience with condoms with social media is

because like that because I don't go to social media, right And whoever manages my social media is a

company, right, and it's not that they lie, everyone knows that It's not like they say Look at Pemas, it

's not CL and I answer questions from followers on the YouTube channel, right? They make a selection then I

select it on top of their selection and we record it Ah, I won't say your name if I selected your

question But when I say a question, you'll know it's you, yes, and over these years I

imagine that I've been on YouTube 2015, maybe it'll be almost 10 years in a little

while over these 10 years, I clearly see that there are better questions. than before swear This

is incredible this incredible my followers like the followers that I have over these

years are followers who understand what I do right they understand that if they come

this way where does the mass go on social networks they won't go scroll and I'm just going to talk about philosophy or

similar subjects, of course, from time to time girls ask for one of these tools that I don't

make a difference between one and the other, no I, of course I know what Instagram is, I don't know that what I

meant I meant within these tools different sectors ah they want to know if I like

that country or they want to know where I'd like to go I've never been are questions that touch on

private life but they're not intimate, right? of the relationship it is mediated by questions that

are of philosophical theological social political content, I don't know, so professional questions, right, and over

this time the questions became clearer, some of them better, the sillier questions

disappeared. I end this because I think this has to do with the type of the type of relationship

that has been built over these almost 10 years, yes, right, they know what I do, what

interests me, what doesn't interest me And if they don't have that vibe, I won't have a relationship

with them , they spent the year so learning

, there are some who take the DP, right?

he's going to do what we're doing here, we don't know, we don't

even know if this is going to happen now, if now I'm talking to you and there's a dog face, for

example, it might happen, I think I'm going to go last. question, I looked at you

with the air that I was going to listen, but I'm not going to listen, I'm going to the last question, I promise, I

think there's a question of when we also talk about the idea of ​​public and private, how

These limits are well lost , right? It's how much you think you have the right to give an opinion

simply about everything in relation to others, that's really stupid, right?

that I always say, right? I'm a viewer of

reality shows because I think it's a reflection of the society that we always live like Left

and Naked like that, not Left and Naked No, people, you learn to survive, you wait for

a day having to apply what you're doing, no, but I tried to do the fire, it's because I do it,

I like to do trails, people who aren't naked, but I like to do trails, Ah, you don't do it naked, hello,

I'm intimate here, my business is, it's BBB reality voice of these things I like everything And then

I had a BBB thing in this last one in this last edition, right, there was a

participant who ended up hitting on another participant And then obviously there was a woman out here

and there was all that context and he was there was a woman out here and he hit on this about a

participant in the program he forgot he had a camera so I don't know how but maybe yes and

it's obvious this woman already saw this It's already moved like I'm separated, I want to divorce

and this woman gained a huge audience, the woman here attracted like nothing, right? Then you could

elaborate on whether it's cheating, isn't it, but anyway, there was no kiss, there was nothing, but there was flirting And that's when

people leave when they are eliminated they go to Ana Maria Braga's breakfast and he went to breakfast

Ana Maria Braga's morning and a lawyer came in to talk about the divorce, like,

it's an issue that is up to two people and the planet is giving so much opinion that it's not like that, but

why should a lawyer come in? Look at the circus Look at the spectacle we are

experiencing, right? Where are we as viewers of a divorce that is not ours to do

with? So I would like to hear from you, in parallel with this, how much the society of the

spectacle affects our mental health. so we can finish Ah, you've opened another program

now Ok, we can schedule it and you've opened another program because that's how you see, eh, a priori,

I would say that I think we always like to discuss other people's lives, gossip, right,

as I said we used to say. We were there around the fire, I don't know, 50,000 years ago and so on, surely we

're talking shit, gossiping, inventing lies, we were there, it's some romantic moment

looking at the moon, taking someone to look at the moon with ulterior motives, it was always used for ulterior motives.

intentions, but like that, and it seems to me that this type of enjoyment that you're talking about about someone.

So, everyone is watching the lawyer discuss that issue. It's a mixture of this

prehistoric habit with the idea that now I'm scientific in being prehistoric so I'm

being told by a professional how it works Divorce who knows one day I'll need this or

I'm going through this and so on now if this whole universe affects our mental health which as I said

at the beginning I already think it is precarious never, I don't think it exists In fact it went wrong, there's no way to

go back, right, if in some way it adds negative value to a health that is already precarious, I have the

impression that to some extent, yes, because the noise increases, the noise increases, the anxiety

restlessness and see I was talking about our life in prehistory I really like prehistory I

've already taught a course and PR history kind of ruins your perception of time, right Why say no because the

60s say the 60s it was yesterday nothing right, right? It's a Blink of an Eye, right, when you're thinking about

100,000 years and so on, but surely we evolved in an environment of silence Yes, it was certainly an

environment of silence Wow, B was a silent environment where there were no noises at that level, there

wasn't a There were a lot of people around you, you didn't have a lot of demands, you obviously

didn't have any agendas, that's why we even survived because we died a lot, both in

childbirth and in physical violence, as well as the child being born, if we didn't have enough time and

interest in sex we hadn't survived It's true because we reproduced reproduced

reproduced reproduced and we managed to overcome a whole difficult process of continuing to exist But

one thing is certain we evolved in an environment of silence Wow incredible, an audience like that

Hello from us Lu Felipe P You're kidding me, by the way, did you hear me Oh, how sad it is, it's time for

boom myin

and when it's time for good times, Natália moans, moans with suffering, because what we wanted more was to stay here for 3 hours

talking, start a second program and everything else, Natália, master, let's win my friend Let's

finish off this wonderful, difficult conversation, my friend, first of all, I would like to thank Pondé very much for coming,

Pondé, thank you for the invitation, man, it was delicious, it's always a privilege to have an intellectual,

since there's a lack of it, it's always a privilege to be able to listen, to be able to, right, to have some time

to think about something. little reasoning reflect letting the mess of the mind act Wow what's left

of this program for me man Besides that we must be reset but we can't do that and we can't and

we can't the future is complicated the vision of the Future is complicated But it's a reflection that I think

that today we make almost all the choices in our lives for each other, you know, I think that

a phenomenon of the Society of Spectacle is that almost everything you are doing you

are doing to look like something, yes You It seems to make an impression, right? So if we

can find a space to hear our voice, which is probably in silence, even though you

said that we have these moments of internal silence so that we can truly understand the essence of the

People, what they really are ours and that we stop being just reproducers of things, right because we

we are reproducing we are acting and you run the risk of discovering that your essence

was so good

, right?

in the character , right

?

classical philosophical saw recollection in oneself recollection in oneself is a classic theme Mara

Machado What is your BM eh I reflect a lot on why I do things more and more

I think that age This is also helping, right, because you You don't see a photo, you see a film, right? So

, what about why I'm making something that is a post, that is a speech, is it

really useful for people or is it a need for self-affirmation? Yes, because what

I understand is but what happens is a need for self-affirmation for us to need to be well-liked and

well-liked is a word, okay, people, it's a conjugation that we haven't used much but ok, because

will they like what I put or won't I put it because I'm going to generate a noise and I'm

not going to be popular anymore, so why am I doing some things, right? What am I

wanting to do with these My movements and how much of my day, let's think, people in general,

and how much of my day do I spend with attitudes that they are a reflection of the need for self-affirmation, which

is very important for our mental health And then, okay, let's work on this with a psychologist.

Let's work on this with fronts that will make us more comfortable in ourselves, we

need to be more comfortable in being where I am than the way I am at the moment I am and living

the way I'm living because this will definitely be a very powerful one for our

physical and mental health and I want to end with a paid hashtag Pau for thinkers That's it, it's a

wonderful hashtag Pau for thinkers the name of the program isn't for nothing, isn't it for nothing, dear

luí felip, Pondé with you your good ending Look, I could say that my good ending is having known

about tastes in relation to the right sex of important figures, habits and such Imaginary food right

, but I would say outside of that aspect ,

this is what I think you two almost found each other in what

you said now, right? difficult things about comfort is because you

already have products that are offered to you saying that if you buy them you will have comfort and this

comfort that you say has to do with the idea of ​​withdrawal, right, which is a classic theme in

philosophy, so I I would say that for me the good thing about this program, as you say, is that at the end

of the day, you two come back to a theme that comes from stoicism Ah, you said that

word. It's over, the program of we didn't agree, we didn't agree, I'll do

the best. Stoicism work on this channel you pay a lot for stoicism a lot for stoicism is

a great philosophical school Without a doubt very elegant and one of its characteristics is

precisely this idea of ​​recollection within you, knowing the difference between what you can change

and what you can't You can, right, try to live in the moment you are now and not plan

ahead all the time and I think this is a very essential thing, even though you diagnosed me

with history throughout my conversation with you because I presented each step. but I didn't know

that you liked stoicism stoicism is what we call philosophy the stoic constant

because stoicism is ancient Greek, right? Then Roman and so on, but it's always present Thanks

to de li, it's always present. Liberator and this person here Thank you very much,

thank you guys, what a wonderful thing, what a spectacular program and if you liked it

First, let's enjoy, help the algorithm and if you are not part of our

YouTube subscription club, enter 489 to help the project continue and that the We will always have

new and different content exclusive for you and they will show our channels, let's go on YouTube @canal

fmy brain on Spotify @fm Brain We are also on diezer Google podcast Amazon music and on the

submarines we are also present and on the international space station you can also

hear us kissing the astronauts EH All we need is our Instagram @fm pbin people Luis Felipe

Pondé do show Let's review this conversation, it was incredible, a kiss, thank you very much, thank you very much,

thank you very much, and see you on Thursday, bye bye [Music]