Prabowo Tolak Hukuman Mati untuk Koruptor, Ini Alasannya

Summary

Prabowo Subianto, Indonesia’s presidential candidate, expressed his opposition to the death penalty for corruption, emphasizing that it doesn't allow for correction if mistakes are made in the legal process. He argued that while the law permits capital punishment for corruption, it has not been implemented by past Indonesian leaders. Prabowo stressed the importance of deterrence and proposed asset confiscation for corrupt individuals, though he highlighted the need for fairness in such actions. His stance on the matter was shared during an interview with national media editors in April 2025.

Takeaways

• 😀 Prabowo Subianto opposes the death penalty for corruption, stating that it does not allow for corrections if mistakes occur during the legal process.
• 😀 Prabowo believes that the death penalty is final, and a minor mistake in judgment (like a 0.1% error) could lead to irreversible consequences, such as executing an innocent person.
• 😀 He emphasizes the importance of allowing for the possibility of rectification in legal matters, rather than accepting irreversible outcomes like the death penalty.
• 😀 Prabowo mentions that no Indonesian president has ever implemented the death penalty for corruption, despite the law allowing it.
• 😀 He highlights that even though the law permits the death penalty in corruption cases, its actual implementation has been delayed or avoided in practice by previous leaders.
• 😀 Prabowo refers to historical figures like President Sukarno and President Soeharto, noting that they did not carry out death penalties for corruption, despite having the legal authority to do so.
• 😀 While rejecting the death penalty, Prabowo stresses the need for strict measures to combat corruption and send a strong deterrent message.
• 😀 He acknowledges the importance of punishment but advocates for approaches other than capital punishment to achieve deterrence and fight corruption effectively.
• 😀 Regarding the idea of bankrupting corrupt individuals, Prabowo agrees that the state has the right to seize assets obtained illegally but insists that justice must guide such actions.
• 😀 Prabowo underscores that fairness and justice should be at the core of any punitive measures against corruption, ensuring that any penalties are applied fairly and equitably.

Q & A

What is Prabowo Subianto's stance on the death penalty for corruption?

Prabowo Subianto opposes the death penalty for corruption, arguing that it is irreversible and doesn't allow for correction if a judicial mistake is made. He believes that there is always a small chance (0.1%) that a person could be innocent.

Why does Prabowo believe the death penalty is problematic?

Prabowo believes that the death penalty is problematic because it is a final decision, and if a mistake is made in the judicial process, there is no way to correct it. This leaves no room for potential exoneration.

Has any Indonesian president implemented the death penalty for corruption?

No, no Indonesian president has enforced the death penalty for corruption, even though the law allows it. Prabowo references historical leaders like Sukarno and Suharto, who had the power to do so but did not.

What is the significance of Prabowo mentioning Sukarno and Suharto in his statement?

By mentioning Sukarno and Suharto, Prabowo highlights that despite having the legal framework to apply the death penalty for corruption, these past leaders did not implement it, suggesting that the death penalty may not be the solution.

What does Prabowo say about the effectiveness of the death penalty in deterring corruption?

While Prabowo rejects the death penalty, he acknowledges the importance of creating a deterrent effect to prevent corruption. He advocates for a firm approach but does not believe execution is the best solution.

How does Prabowo suggest corruption should be addressed in Indonesia?

Prabowo believes that corruption should be addressed with a strong, effective approach that includes deterrence and justice. He emphasizes the importance of taking firm actions but without resorting to the death penalty.

What is Prabowo's view on asset confiscation for corrupt individuals?

Prabowo supports the idea that the state has the right to seize assets obtained through corruption. However, he stresses that this action should be conducted fairly and justly, ensuring due process.

What does Prabowo mean by 'finality' when discussing the death penalty?

By 'finality,' Prabowo refers to the irreversible nature of the death penalty. Once executed, the decision cannot be undone, which he views as a significant flaw in the system.

What historical context does Prabowo provide regarding the death penalty?

Prabowo mentions that throughout Indonesia's history, no president has ever enforced the death penalty for corruption, even though the law allows it. He notes that previous leaders, such as Sukarno and Suharto, did not carry out executions for corruption.

Why does Prabowo emphasize the importance of fairness in legal actions against corruption?

Prabowo emphasizes fairness because he believes that justice should be upheld in all legal processes. He wants to ensure that actions like asset confiscation are conducted with proper legal procedures and that no one is unfairly punished.