خسرنا 2,800,000 ريال .. القصة كاملة 💰

Summary

The speaker shares a personal story about a legal battle involving a fraudulent check, a father exploiting his son's mental condition, and the challenges faced in recovering lost money and property. Despite the frustration and initial legal setbacks, the speaker reflects on important lessons learned, such as the necessity of thorough business vetting and caution when handling large sums. Through this experience, the speaker emphasizes accountability, the importance of protecting oneself in business transactions, and the value of sharing such stories for personal growth and helping others avoid similar mistakes.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker's business deal was derailed by a bad check from the son, which led to a complicated legal battle.
• 😀 The father of the son claimed his child was mentally unaware and used this as a defense to avoid responsibility.
• 😀 Despite the legal victory for the father, the speaker and his team felt deceived and betrayed by the situation.
• 😀 The speaker felt his reputation was harmed by being wrongly accused of scamming a mentally unaware person.
• 😀 The speaker reflects on the legal case and highlights that the father had power over his son’s decisions, including financial matters.
• 😀 The situation was complicated by the father having full legal control over his son, including the ability to make financial decisions for him.
• 😀 The speaker expresses frustration about not asking for a deposit or more information about the father before proceeding with the deal.
• 😀 The speaker regrets not taking precautions, such as asking for a deposit when dealing with the check, which was later found to be fraudulent.
• 😀 The speaker emphasizes the importance of doing thorough background checks before entering business deals, especially when dealing with someone’s mental competence.
• 😀 The speaker shares his lessons learned from the experience, stressing that vigilance and preparation are key to avoiding such complications.
• 😀 In addition to the business issue, the speaker is starting a YouTube channel to share personal experiences, lessons, and future content with his audience.

Q & A

What was the main issue discussed in the transcript?

The main issue discussed in the transcript involves a business deal gone wrong, where the speaker got involved with a father and son, and the son was later deemed 'unaware' or 'unfit' to make decisions due to a legal document provided by the father.

Why did the speaker question the authenticity of the son's condition?

The speaker questioned the authenticity of the son's condition because the son appeared to be capable of managing his own affairs and business conversations, which contradicted the claim that he was 'unaware' or mentally unfit.

How did the legal document impact the case?

The legal document declaring the son as 'unaware' was crucial in the case, as it absolved the father from responsibility for the son’s actions, allowing the father to avoid punishment despite being involved in the fraudulent situation.

What lesson did the speaker learn from this experience?

The speaker learned the importance of being cautious in business transactions, especially when dealing with legal matters, and emphasized the need to verify details and ask the right questions, such as asking for a deposit or verifying the mental state of those involved.

How did the father’s actions affect the speaker's reputation?

The father’s actions led to the speaker’s reputation being tarnished, as they were accused of taking advantage of the son, despite their efforts being honest and the situation being manipulated by the father.

What role did the lawyer play in the situation?

The lawyer played a significant role in advising the speaker that the father, as the legal guardian of the son, was responsible for the son’s actions, and thus the father needed to be held accountable for the financial loss.

What did the speaker believe about the son's capability to handle business matters?

The speaker believed the son was fully capable of handling business matters, as evidenced by his involvement in business discussions, which contradicted the claim that he was mentally unfit.

What was the ultimate outcome of the legal case?

The ultimate outcome of the legal case was that the father won, but it was not due to his innocence—it was because the son was deemed 'unaware,' which prevented the father from facing consequences for the fraudulent activities.

How did the speaker feel about the situation after it unfolded?

The speaker felt frustrated, helpless, and deceived. They expressed anger over the injustice of the situation and the way their reputation was damaged due to the father's manipulative actions.

What personal reflection did the speaker share regarding their actions in the business deal?

The speaker reflected that despite their good intentions, they may have been too trusting and not cautious enough, particularly when dealing with the father and son. They admitted that they should have been more careful and taken steps like asking for a deposit or investigating the father's background.