赖清德当选,习近平落选,时代周刊百大风云人物背景分析。|赖清德|蔡英文|马英九|习近平|邓小平|毛泽东|李强|彭载舟|时代周刊|王局拍案20240423
Summary
TLDRThis video delves into the political landscape of China, focusing on key figures like Xi Jinping, Li Qiang, and Wang Huning. The speaker critiques the selection process for Time Magazine's 'Person of the Year,' highlighting the oversight of influential figures such as Xi and Li Hongzhi. The discussion also touches on a groundbreaking scientific experiment by Tomoyuki Hayashi, which could revolutionize human reproduction. The speaker emphasizes the impact of these political and scientific figures on global society, urging a broader perspective on influence and societal change.
Takeaways
- 😀 Xi Jinping's political influence is immense, and his absence from *Time* magazine's 'Person of the Year' list has been criticized, despite his significant global presence.
- 😀 Xi Jinping's third term marks a significant shift in the Communist Party, breaking the 40-year rule of term limits and transitioning to a potential lifetime leadership system.
- 😀 The selection of *Time* magazine's influential figures often overlooks Chinese political figures who are crucial in shaping China's future, such as Wang Huning and Li Hongzhi.
- 😀 Wang Huning, an architect of major Chinese political theories, is seen as more influential than other prominent figures but was not recognized by *Time* magazine.
- 😀 Li Hongzhi, leader of Falun Gong, has had a massive influence both in China and internationally, commanding millions of followers, yet has been overlooked by major global publications.
- 😀 Despite controversies in his early career, Li Hongzhi's influence, including his controversial health claims, makes him a notable figure deserving recognition in global influential lists.
- 😀 The *Time* magazine list of 100 influential people often misses key figures whose impact on the future of human society, such as scientists, should also be considered.
- 😀 Tomoyuki Hayashi, a scientist who developed groundbreaking research on reproductive biology, was included in *Time* magazine's influential list due to his transformative experiment on creating eggs from male cells.
- 😀 Hayashi's discovery could change the future of human reproduction, enabling same-sex couples to have biological children, which would have significant ethical and societal implications.
- 😀 The speaker criticizes the selection process for overlooking figures who have shaped political and scientific landscapes, emphasizing that their influence will have long-term consequences on global society.
Q & A
Why does the speaker believe Xi Jinping should have been elected this year?
-The speaker believes Xi Jinping should have been elected because 2023 was the first year of his third term, which represented a break from the Communist Party's 40-year-old game rules, marking a significant shift towards a lifetime system. This unprecedented change made it unreasonable for Xi not to be elected.
What is the speaker’s opinion on the election of Li Qiang instead of Xi Jinping?
-The speaker considers it unreasonable for Li Qiang to be elected over Xi Jinping, arguing that Xi Jinping's position and influence are far more justified than Li Qiang's. Li Qiang’s election seems less justified in comparison, especially given the historical significance of Xi's third term.
Why does the speaker think Xi Jinping was overlooked as Person of the Year by Time magazine?
-The speaker suggests that Time magazine failed to select Xi Jinping as Person of the Year despite his immense influence, partly due to a lack of sharpness in Western society's judgment of Chinese politics. The speaker also points out that while figures like the #MeToo movement and environmental activists were chosen, Xi Jinping was not.
What is the significance of Wang Huning's influence, according to the speaker?
-The speaker emphasizes that Wang Huning has been the architect of significant political theories in China, influencing all major political figures from Jiang Zemin to Xi Jinping. His impact on Chinese politics is immense, and yet he was overlooked by Time magazine, which the speaker views as a failure to recognize his true importance.
Who is Li Hongzhi and why does the speaker believe he should be included among influential figures?
-Li Hongzhi is the founder of Falun Gong, a spiritual movement that gained significant traction in China and abroad. The speaker argues that Li's influence is considerable, given the large following he commands, and despite some controversial statements in his past, he should be recognized as one of the most influential figures in China.
What was the controversy surrounding Li Hongzhi's past interview with Time magazine?
-Li Hongzhi's interview with Time magazine in 1999 featured some bizarre statements, such as claiming that Falun Gong practitioners could fly and that aliens were interested in human bodies. These comments left a lasting impression on the magazine, which might have influenced their decision to not include him as a Person of the Year, despite his significant influence.
How does the speaker compare the recognition of political figures and scientists in terms of societal influence?
-The speaker highlights the importance of recognizing not only political figures but also scientists who shape the future of society. For example, the speaker cites a groundbreaking experiment by Japanese scientist Tomoyuki Hayashi, which could have profound ethical and societal impacts, such as enabling same-sex couples to have children.
What is the significance of Tomoyuki Hayashi’s experiment, according to the speaker?
-Tomoyuki Hayashi’s experiment, in which male somatic cells were transformed into eggs that could be fertilized by male sperm, is groundbreaking. The speaker notes that this could lead to significant changes in human reproduction, allowing same-sex couples to have biological children, which would have profound implications for social structures and ethics.
What ethical and societal implications does the speaker foresee from Hayashi’s experiment?
-The speaker foresees that Hayashi's experiment could lead to changes in the social structure of human society. Specifically, it could allow same-sex couples to have biological children, which would raise new ethical questions and challenges regarding human reproduction and family structures.
What is the speaker's general opinion on Time magazine's approach to selecting influential figures?
-The speaker criticizes Time magazine for its limited perspective on influential figures, particularly in China. The speaker believes Time fails to fully recognize the importance of political figures like Xi Jinping, Wang Huning, and Li Hongzhi, as well as scientists who could have a profound impact on the future of human society, such as Tomoyuki Hayashi.
Outlines

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.
Améliorer maintenantMindmap

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.
Améliorer maintenantKeywords

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.
Améliorer maintenantHighlights

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.
Améliorer maintenantTranscripts

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.
Améliorer maintenantVoir Plus de Vidéos Connexes

官场说:李强好棒棒! ~ 我台可能是全网唯一①个尬吹李强的频道

Chine : quelle puissance ? | L'essentiel du Dessous des Cartes | ARTE

Dulu Keluarganya Dihancurkan Komunis, Sekarang Jadi Penguasa Cina! Era Xi Jinping! |LearningGoogling

'You're Not My Buddy, Vladimir!' How to Over-Analyze APEC

Un siècle d’histoire de la Chine en 8min

"Sanità" globale, UE e NATO nel mirino di Trump - Gabriele Sannino
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)