Don’t Buy the Wrong Resolution - 1080p vs 1440p vs 4K
Summary
TLDRDieses Video vergleicht drei 27-Zoll-Monitore von AOC mit unterschiedlichen Auflösungen: 1080p, 1440p und 4K. Obwohl alle drei 144-Hz-Gaming-Monitore sind, unterscheidet sich ihr Hauptmerkmal in der Bildauflösung. Der 4K-Monitor bietet eine atemberaubende Bildschärfe, während der 1080p-Monitor aufgrund seiner geringen Pixeldichte bei Nahbetrachtung nicht so ansprechend wirkt. Der 1440p-Monitor bietet einen guten Kompromiss zwischen Bildschärfe und Framerate, besonders für schnelle Spiele. Das Video diskutiert auch die wirtschaftliche Aspekte und die Leistungsabläufe bei verschiedenen Auflösungen, schließlich lobt es die Beliebtheit von 1440p-Monitoren als eine ausgewogene Option zwischen Kosten, Bildauflösung und FPS.
Takeaways
- 🖥️ Die drei Monitore haben jeweils einen 27-Zoll-IPS-Bildschirm und werden alle als Gaming-Monitore beworben, obwohl sie unterschiedliche Auflösungen haben.
- 🔍 Der 4K-Monitor bietet eine deutlich bessere Bildschärfe und -qualität im Vergleich zu 1440p und 1080p, besonders beim Anzeigen von Text und scharfen Kanten.
- 💲 4K-Monitore sind teurer als 1440p- und 1080p-Monitore, mit dem 4K-Modell in dem Video für über 900 Euro erhältlich.
- 🎮 Für schnelle Spiele wie E-Sport-Titel kann die Auflösung von 1080p ausreichen, da die Bildqualitätssteigerung durch höhere Auflösungen nicht immer einen signifikanten Vorteil darstellt.
- 📉 Ein Upgrade auf 4K kann zu einer erheblichen Verringerung der FPS führen, im Durchschnitt um 47% im Vergleich zu 1080p, während das Upgrade von 1080p auf 1440p zu einer geringeren FPS-Verringerung von durchschnittlich 28% führt.
- 👀 Die 1440p-Monitore bieten einen guten Kompromiss zwischen Bildqualität, FPS und Kosten und sind daher sehr beliebt.
- 💡 Die Wahl der Auflösung hängt von den Prioritäten ab: 4K ist besser für Textbearbeitung, Content-Nutzung und langsame, bildschirmfüllende Spiele, während 1440p für schnelle Spiele geeigneter ist.
- 📏 Die Pixeldichte ist entscheidend für die Schärfe des Bildes; kleinere Monitore mit derselben Auflösung können aufgrund einer höheren Pixeldichte besser aussehen.
- 🤔 Der Begriff 'Retina-Display' bezieht sich auf eine Auflösung, bei der individuelle Pixel nicht mehr wahrnehmbar sind; für Monitore sollte man mindestens 57 Pixel pro Grad des Sehfeldes erreichen.
- 🛒 Squarespace wird in dem Video als Sponsor erwähnt und bietet eine einfache Möglichkeit, eigene Websites zu erstellen, mit vielen Vorlagen und individueller Anpassung.
- 🔗 Der Link für Squarespace wird mit einem Rabattcode 'teclas' für 10% Ersparnis beim ersten Einkauf einer Website oder Domain bereitgestellt.
Q & A
Was sind die Hauptunterschiede zwischen den drei AOC-Monitoren im Video?
-Die Hauptunterschiede liegen in der Auflösung: Einer hat 1080p, einer 1440p und der dritte ein 4k Display, alle in 27-Zoll IPS-Panels und von AOC.
Welche Auflösung wird für Bildbearbeitung und ähnliche Aufgaben empfohlen?
-Für Bildbearbeitung und Aufgaben, die eine hohe Auflösung erfordern, wird die 4k-Auflösung empfohlen, da sie die meisten Details bietet.
Wie beeinflusst die Auflösung die Leistung in Spielen?
-Eine höhere Auflösung kann die FPS in Spielen verringern, da mehr Pixel pro Sekunde verarbeitet werden müssen. Das Video vergleicht die FPS-Verluste zwischen 1080p, 1440p und 4k.
Was bedeutet 'Retina-Display' und welche Bedeutung hat es für Monitore?
-Ein 'Retina-Display' ist ein Begriff von Apple für eine Auflösung, die so hoch ist, dass Einzelpixel nicht mehr wahrnehmbar sind. Für Monitore bedeutet dies, dass man bei einer gewissen Pixeldichte keine Verbesserung der Bildqualität mehr sieht.
Wie hoch ist die ideale Pixeldichte (PPI) für einen Monitor, um als 'Retina-Display' zu gelten?
-Steve Jobs nannte 300 PPI als die ideale Pixeldichte für ein 'Retina-Display'. Für Monitore ist jedoch eine Pixeldichte von 57 Pixeln pro Grad Sehfeld ausreichend.
Welche FPS-Verluste wurden im Video bei der Auflösungssteigerung von 1080p zu 1440p und von 1440p zu 4k gemessen?
-Der FPS-Verlust von 1080p zu 1440p beträgt durchschnittlich 23, während der Sprung von 1440p zu 4k einen Verlust von durchschnittlich 40 FPS zur Folge hat.
Welche Rolle spielt die Pixeldichte (PPI) bei der Wahl eines Monitors?
-Die Pixeldichte ist entscheidend für die Schärfe des Bildes. Je höher die Pixeldichte, desto schärfer und klarer das Bild auf dem Monitor aussieht.
Welche Empfehlung gibt das Video für Spieler, die schnelle, bildintensive Spiele spielen?
-Für Spieler, die schnelle, bildintensive Spiele bevorzugen, wird eine 1440p-Monitor empfohlen, da er einen guten Kompromiss zwischen Auflösung, FPS und Kosten bietet.
Welche Sponsoren wurden im Video erwähnt und in welchem Zusammenhang?
-Squarespace wurde als Sponsor erwähnt, der es ermöglicht, Websites zu erstellen und optimiert. AOC hat die Monitore für die Vergleichsstudie zur Verfügung gestellt, aber ohne direkter Sponsoring-Deal.
Wie unterscheidet sich die Bildqualität zwischen 1080p, 1440p und 4k auf einem 27-Zoll-Monitor?
-Die Bildqualität ist bei 4k Monitoren am besten, gefolgt von 1440p und dann 1080p. 4k bietet die meisten Details, während 1080p bei naher Betrachtung Pixel deutlich sichtbar sind.
Welche anderen Faktoren sollten bei der Wahl eines Monitors berücksichtigt werden, wenn nicht nur Gaming-Performance wichtig ist?
-Neben der Gaming-Leistung sollte die Bildqualität für Textverarbeitung, Inhaltskonsum und die Eignung für kreative Arbeiten berücksichtigt werden.
Wie wirkt sich die Auflösung auf die Sichtbarkeit von Details in Spielen aus?
-Eine höhere Auflösung ermöglicht eine bessere Sichtbarkeit von Details, was bei Spielen, die eine sorgfältige Beobachtung erfordern, wie etwa Langstreckenschützen, wichtig sein kann.
Welche anderen Monitorgrößen werden im Video als alternative Optionen für 1080p und 1440p erwähnt?
-Ein 24-Zoll-Monitor wird als alternative Option für 1080p erwähnt, da die höhere Pixeldichte bei dieser Größe die Bildqualität verbessert.
Outlines
🖥️ Bildschirmauflösung im Vergleich
Dieses Video präsentiert einen Vergleich von drei 27-Zoll-IPS-Bildschirmen der Marke AOC, die alle als Gaming-Monitore beworben werden. Obwohl sie ähnliche Spezifikationen haben, unterscheiden sie sich in der Auflösung: 1080p, 1440p und 4K. Der 4K-Monitor bietet eine bemerkenswerte Verbesserung der Bildschärfe, während die 1080p-Option aufgrund ihrer geringen Pixeldichte bei naher Betrachtung nicht so ansprechend ist. Der 1440p-Monitor bietet eine gute Balance zwischen Bildschärfe und Preis. Das Video wird von Squarespace gesponsert, einem Service, der es einfach macht, eigene Websites zu erstellen und zu personalisieren.
🔍 Pixeldichte und Retina-Bildschirme
Der zweite Absatz konzentriert sich auf die Bedeutung der Pixeldichte und des Begriffs 'Retina-Bildschirm'. Apple definiert einen Retina-Bildschirm als solchen, der 57 Pixel pro Grad des Sehfeldes hat, was bedeutet, dass individuelle Pixel nicht mehr wahrnehmbar sind. Die Berechnungen zeigen, dass selbst ein 24-Zoll-1080p-Monitor als Retina-Bildschirm gilt, wenn der Betrachter eine gewisse Distanz aufrechterhält. Jedoch fallen die FPS in Spielen signifikant, wenn man von 1080p auf 4K hochrüstet, was die Wahl eines 1440p-Monitors für eine bessere Leistung bei einer akzeptableren Kosten empfiehlt.
🎮 Auflösung und Gaming-Erfahrung
Der dritte Absatz diskutiert die Auswirkungen der Bildschirmauflösung auf das Gaming-Erlebnis. Obwohl 4K-Monitore eine scharfe und klare Darstellung bieten, kann die höhere Auflösung zu einer signifikanten Verringerung der FPS führen, insbesondere in schnellen, ereignisreichen Spielen. 1440p-Monitore bieten eine gute Balance zwischen Bildqualität und Leistung, während 1080p-Monitoren aufgrund ihrer höheren FPS für Spiele, die einen hohen Bildwiederholratenbedarf haben, bevorzugt werden sollten. Der Abschnitt hebt auch hervor, dass 4K für langsame, narrative geprägte Spiele oder für die Arbeit mit Text und Inhalten die beste Option ist, während 1440p für die meisten Spieler die beste Kompromisslösung darstellt.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡IPS-Panel
💡Auflösung
💡Gaming-Monitor
💡Bildwiederholrate
💡Pixeldichte
💡Retina-Display
💡FPS (Frames pro Sekunde)
💡Render-Auflösung
💡E-Sports
💡Hardware
💡Squarespace
Highlights
Three different AOC gaming monitors with 27-inch IPS panels are compared: 1080p, 1440p, and 4K.
The 1080p and 1440p monitors both have a refresh rate of 165Hz, but are tested at 144Hz for the video.
The 4K monitor provides an impressive display quality, especially noticeable with text and graphics.
High resolution, such as 4K, is beneficial for photo editing but may not be necessary for all gaming scenarios.
The 4K monitor costs significantly more than the 1440p and 1080p monitors, with a noted price jump.
A 1080p monitor may be large and affordable but lacks the pixel density of higher resolutions, especially at closer viewing distances.
A smaller 24-inch 1080p monitor has a higher pixel density and looks better than a 27-inch 1080p monitor.
The 1440p monitor offers a balance between cost, resolution, and frame rate for gaming.
The 4K monitor's pixel density (163 PPI) looks noticeably better than the 1440p monitor, but may not be necessary for all users.
The term 'Retina display' refers to a resolution where individual pixels are not distinguishable to the human eye.
Apple's 'Retina display' standard is based on pixels per degree of field of view rather than PPI alone.
Even a 24-inch 1080p monitor can qualify as a 'Retina display' at certain viewing distances.
4K resolution on a 27-inch monitor is beneficial for slow-paced, cinematic games but may not be necessary for fast-paced games.
Upgrading to 4K can result in a significant drop in FPS, impacting the gaming experience in fast-paced games.
1440p monitors are popular as they offer a good compromise between resolution, frame rate, and cost.
For competitive esports titles, the higher resolution may provide a slight advantage in visibility but minimal impact on FPS.
The video provides a comparison between IPS and VA panels for those interested in different monitor technologies.
Transcripts
each of these three monitors has a
27-inch ips panel and all of them are
from aoc and being advertised as gaming
monitors but yeah as you probably have
guessed from the title of this video one
of them is a 1080p monitor one is a
1440p monitor and the other one has a 4k
display all in the same 27-inch form
factor by the way this video is not
sponsored by aoc but they were kind
enough to lend me these three monitors
which are perfect for this comparison
this video is sponsored by squarespace
though more on them later in this video
so how much of a difference does the
resolution really make when the other
specs are fairly similar i mean these
are our 144hz gaming monitors of the
same size with the same panel tag and
they even are from the same brand okay
to be fair the full hd and qhd monitors
both technically have a refresh rate of
165 hertz but for the sake of this video
we'll have them running at 144 hertz so
the designing factor really is the
resolution but does a high resolution
actually look that much better even for
things like gaming or is it only really
usable for photo editing and stuff like
that well i gotta admit that i was
genuinely impressed when i turned on the
4k monitor for the first time believe it
or not but despite that i've tested a
ton of monitors i've never actually
experienced a 27 inch 4k display and
honestly having all those pixels cramped
onto a relatively small 27 inch screen
looks amazing so yeah you'll notice
right away that everything even the text
and graphics and the plain normal file
explorer just look so much smoother i
mean take a look at the 1440p display in
comparison text by no means looks bad
here but you can clearly see that this
is text being displayed on a monitor
that has individual pixels whereas the
text on the 4k display looks much more
like ink basically now i wouldn't say
that i can clearly like see or even
count individual pixels on the 1440p
monitor at least not from a normal view
and distance but despite that there is a
certain roughness to text and other
sharp edges that clearly makes it look
worse than the 4k display but yeah text
and such looking smoother truly isn't a
big enough reason to sell a kidney for a
4k monitor at least not for most people
i assume and let's face it high refresh
rate 4k monitors are expensive the one
that i have here retails for over 900
euros which is somewhat on the expensive
side even for a 4k 144hz monitor the
average price of the 10 most popular 4k
monitors in germany right now is about
680 euros so that's still a massive 96
price jump from 4040p monitors and 1440p
monitors on average are 79
more expensive than the 1080p count
parts so with this 1080p monitor right
here we're certainly getting a lot of
screen real estate for our money and i'm
going to admit that a large but
affordable monitor like this seems
pretty appealing at first i mean for
roughly 200 bucks that's a nice and
large ips screen right here that's just
as big as the other two monitors which
both are much more expensive but as soon
as you take a closer look it's pretty
clear as to why this is so much cheaper
than the other two the individual pixels
are just huge and easily visible at a
normal viewing distance i really have to
move back quite far until the image
actually looks cohesive and smooth
i'm a bit over one meter or about four
feet away from the monitor now and only
at this distance the image actually
starts looking good but yeah there are
probably not a lot of people who sit
this far from their monitor my typical
viewing distance looks a bit more
something like this
which is about 50 to 60 centimeters away
from the screen and here the 1080p
resolution does not look good at all
here you can compare 1080p and 4k side
by side while i tell you about today's
sponsor squarespace squarespace makes
starting your own website super easy
they have loads of templates for all
kinds of websites so i made a decent
looking website in just a few minutes by
starting with one of their templates to
really give your website a unique look
the design panel offers hundreds of
custom settings that allow for deep
customization and every design
automatically works on mobile as well
you can try out the design process for
free and when you're ready to launch
your own website use the code teclas to
save 10 of your first purchase of a
website or a domain or just go to
squarespace.com
tagless back to the video now i said
that the 1080p monitor doesn't look good
up close but that's not to say that
every 1080p monitor looks bad at this
viewing distance a smaller 24 inch
monitor like this with the same
resolution really looks substantially
better than its 27-inch counterpart and
that's thanks to its higher pixel
density so how sharp the image looks
really isn't a matter of the absolute
resolution but mostly a combination of
the resolution and the size of the
screen the bigger screen only has 82
pixels per inch while the smaller 24
inch panel uses 93 pixels for every inch
so if you're on a budget i'd suggest
getting a 24 inch 1080p monitor instead
1080p just isn't enough when you're
sitting close to a big 27 inch screen
now if you have a bit more money to
spend and want a larger monitor you can
also just go for a 27-inch 1440p monitor
instead despite that the display is
larger this has an even higher pixel
density of 109 ppi so is this high
enough to give us the perfect image well
i wish it was but the 27 inch 4k display
with its 163 ppi does look noticeably
better but that raises the question of
how many pixels per inch we really need
like when does the image look perfect
already and when are we starting to hit
diminishing returns territory now i
guess you've heard the term retinal
display before
what's that
well that's basically apple's marketing
speech for a display resolution that's
high enough that you can't see
individual pixels anymore so when a
display is classified as retina adding
more pixels beyond that should pretty
much be unnoticeable and it really
shouldn't add much to the image quality
so would either of these monitors
qualify as a retina display now back in
2010 when steve jobs introduced the
iphone 4 he stated that 300 ppi was this
magic number at which the human eye
basically won't notice individual pixels
anymore that seems pretty high at first
considering the 4k monitor right here
has about half of that but remember the
300 ppi number is for a phone which
typically is held up really close to the
face and therefore covers quite a large
portion of our field of view so how can
we transfer that to a monitor that
typically isn't that close in your face
well it turns out apple calls a display
retina when it has at least 57 pixels
for every degree of our field of view
this might sound a bit complicated at
first but once we've done all the math
it's actually pretty straightforward so
here are the ppd numbers for some common
display resolutions and sizes remember
the goal is to hit 57 ppd and yeah even
the 24-inch 1080p monitor manages to
qualify as a retina display so how's
that possible while the 24-inch 1080p
monitor only qualifies as a retina
display when we type in a viewing
distance above 90 centimeters which is
pretty far 60 centimeters would be far
more realistic and well at this distance
only 4k monitors qualify not even the
27-inch 1440p display i gonna have this
dock linked down below in case you want
to play around with these numbers so 4k
monitors actually make sense even with a
reasonably small 27-inch panel so why
are 4040p 27-inch monitors so popular
then well even when ignoring how much
money you can save by going with a 4040p
monitor instead of a 4k1 you just can't
ignore these numbers this is called
warzone running in 4k on a relatively
decent gaming pc with competitive low
settings and this honestly is not much
fun to play we're averaging just shy of
70 fps which isn't exactly great for a
fast paced game like warzone also tried
lowering the render resolution to 75
percent which brought me a bit closer to
100 fps but at this point you could also
just get a low res monitor instead and
save some money a 1080p monitor will of
course achieve the highest fps my fps
took a 23 hit from 1080p to 1440p which
is kind of acceptable for an upgrade
like this i mean going from about 150
fps to 115 fps is definitely noticeable
but so is the better image quality we're
getting from 1440b the 40
fps hit from the upgrade to 4k though is
just too much in my opinion the
additional sharpness and detail just
isn't that noticeable while playing fast
paced games having 40
less fps is very much noticeable though
and such an fps hit is not just
exclusive to warzone or my particular
hardware i crunched some numbers from
hardware unboxed who tested 12 games on
15 different gpus and on average the 4k
upgrade reduces the fps by 47
while going from 1080p to 1440p leads to
28 lower fps so as an easy to remember
rule of thumb planning to lose about a
quarter of your fps when upgrading from
1080p to 440b and be ready to lose half
of your fps from 1440p to 4k however
there are exceptions to this for
instance if you heavily cpu limited in
certain games you might not lose any fps
with a resolution upgrade or just very
few for example this is veteran running
in 4k with competitive settings and my
2070 super has no issues pushing close
to 300 fps in a crowded death match i
used the spike pen scenario as a
benchmark and here i got a whopping
371 fps and 4k with my somewhat dated pc
hardware both the 4040p and 1080p
numbers don't really look that much
better so there really isn't a
noteworthy fps hit with esports titles
like velerand visually though there is a
difference rounded edges for instance
like on the head of the dummy look a lot
more like they're actually round with a
high resolution monitor everything looks
less fuzzy and that's especially
noticeable between 1080p and 1440p now
better looking edges or details is
clearly not something that would win you
rounds and competitive esports titles
though take a look at what happens when
the character model is at a 50 meter
distance on the 1080p monitor it becomes
somewhat difficult to even tell the head
and torso of the dummy apart it's
clearly not as easy to see as with the
1440p or even 4k display and in my
opinion this is enough to make hitting
headshots just a bit more difficult in
this distance with the 1080p monitor
considering that upgrading to 1440p only
has a minimal impact on the framerate
it's maybe about time to move to 1440p
for games like veteran unless of course
you're looking for the absolute highest
refresh rate because only 1080p will
give you these crazy high refresh rates
above 300hz at least until the 360hz
4040p monitors arrive but even then
1080p would probably continue being the
default option for the highest refresh
rate monitors and if you're after that
i'd really suggest getting a smaller 24
inch display and 4k well there's no
doubt that this is the superior
resolution even on a 27 inch screen if a
sharp and clear looking image for
working with text consuming content or
playing slow paced cinematic games is
your number one priority then go for it
if you can also afford the hardware to
drive all these pixels of course it does
look noticeably better than 4040p that's
already true for a 27-inch monitor and
for larger monitors 4k becomes even more
important though for fast-paced games
like first-person shooters and such it's
really not worth the additional
investment 4k monitors are so much more
expensive and decent graphics cards
aren't cheap either so yeah it really
makes sense that 1440p monitors are so
popular as these really are great
compromise between resolution fps and
cost i'll leave some of my favorite
4040p monitors linked down below and in
case you're wondering if you should get
a monitor with an ips panel or with a v8
panel instead i've made a comparison
video about that as well which is linked
on screen right now
thanks for watching this next video
Weitere ähnliche Videos ansehen
Best Gaming Monitors of 2024: 1440p, 4K, Ultrawide, 1080p, HDR and Value Picks - June Update
540Hz gaming is something else.
BILLIG = BESSER? | Huion Kamvas 16 (2021) Grafikdisplay im Test
Der Liebe- und Knutschen-Check | Reportage für Kinder | Checker Tobi
Das Dreieck der Nachhaltigkeit - Darum geht's in Erdkunde 3
Silber - Das erste Buch der Träume | Kapitel 21
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)