UNIVERSITY DEBATE: MUSLIM VERSUS PHILOSOPHER | DOES GOD EXIST?

Summary

In this thought-provoking dialogue, participants explore the nature of existence, purpose, and the existence of God. They delve into philosophical and religious perspectives, discussing the logical necessity of a Creator, the intricacies of DNA, and the metaphysical aspects of consciousness. The conversation challenges materialistic views, advocating for a personal spiritual journey to experience and understand the divine, highlighting Islam's emphasis on a consistent and rational conception of God.

Takeaways

• 🤔 The speaker is questioning the purpose of life, suggesting a common existential crisis about living, working, and eventually dying.
• 📚 There's a discussion about the contradictions found in religious texts, specifically Christianity, from an anthropological perspective.
• 🧐 The importance of philosophy is highlighted, with the speaker sharing their love for the subject and its role in understanding reality.
• 🔬 The conversation touches on the existence of God, arguing that evidence for a non-physical entity cannot be confined to physical evidence.
• 🌟 It's suggested that every era has had prophets teaching a specific method to understand and connect with the divine, indicating a universal religious truth.
• 🧬 The complexity of DNA and its inherent 'language' is used as an argument for intelligent design, implying a conscious force behind the universe.
• 🌌 The concept of God in Islam is explained as a non-physical, conscious, and intelligent force that is not embodied and exists outside the universe.
• 🔮 The idea of the universe not causing itself is presented, suggesting that a non-physical cause is necessary, which aligns with the concept of God in Islam.
• 📖 The Holy Quran is mentioned as a source of divine revelation, with the speaker arguing its teachings about the creation and eventual end of the universe.
• ⏳ The concept of entropy and the eventual 'heat death' of the universe is discussed, implying a finite universe contrary to the idea of an eternal universe.
• 💡 The conversation concludes with the idea that personal spiritual experience and sincere prayer are the keys to finding and knowing God, beyond academic knowledge or background.

Q & A

What is the main theme of the conversation in the transcript?

The main theme of the conversation is the existence of God, the purpose of life, and the philosophical and religious perspectives on these topics.

What is the speaker's view on the contradictions in Christianity?

The speaker believes that there are literal contradictions in Christianity from an anthropological perspective, which make it difficult to consider it believable.

What role does philosophy play in understanding reality according to the speaker?

The speaker sees philosophy as integral in understanding the greater concept of reality, as it allows for the exploration of various questions and ideas, even if some of them are unanswerable or lead to misery.

What is the speaker's stance on the concept of God in Islam?

The speaker believes that the concept of God in Islam is consistent with human rationality and that God is an intelligent, conscious, and non-physical force that is outside the universe.

How does the speaker address the idea of evidence for God's existence?

The speaker argues that evidence for God's existence cannot be confined to the physical realm, as God is non-physical. They suggest that testimonial truth and the teachings of prophets provide a method to ascertain the existence of God.

What is the speaker's view on the role of DNA and its complexity in the argument for God's existence?

The speaker sees the complexity and language within DNA as evidence of a conscious, intelligent force, arguing that the intricate mechanisms within DNA point to a designer rather than random chance.

How does the speaker respond to the idea that the universe could be infinite?

The speaker challenges the idea of an infinite universe by arguing that the probability of the universe's formation and existence is too improbable to be attributed to chance, and that the concept of an infinite regress does not hold up under scrutiny.

What is the speaker's perspective on the beginning and end of the universe?

The speaker, referencing the Holy Quran, suggests that the universe had a beginning and will have an end, with God being the ultimate force behind both the creation and the eventual conclusion of the universe.

How does the speaker view the relationship between science and religion in understanding the universe?

The speaker believes that both science and religion have roles in understanding the universe. They argue that while science provides evidence for the Big Bang and the expansion of the universe, religion offers a method to understand the metaphysical aspects and the purpose behind existence.

What is the speaker's advice for those struggling to find purpose in life?

The speaker suggests that individuals should look to their personal experiences and engage in sincere prayer and reflection to find purpose. They emphasize that Islam offers a path to understanding one's purpose and connection with God.

Outlines

00:00

🔍 Exploring Purpose and Philosophical Inquiry

The conversation starts with a discussion on the purpose of life, touching on existential questions and the role of philosophy in understanding reality. Alexis, a philosophy student, expresses her admiration for philosophy despite its often unresolved questions. The speaker elaborates on how philosophy raises important questions but sometimes fails to provide definitive answers.

05:02

🧠 Evidence of God's Existence and the Limits of Materialism

The speaker argues that the existence of God cannot be confined to physical evidence alone, as God is not a physical being. He asserts that religious teachings, specifically those from prophets, provide a method to ascertain eternal truths. The analogy of trusting others for ice cream flavor recommendations is used to illustrate how humans rely on testimonial truths.

10:02

🌌 The Universe's Beginning and the Role of God

The discussion shifts to the beginning of the universe, referencing the Holy Quran's stance on the universe's creation and expansion. The speaker emphasizes that the universe is not eternal and points to the concept of entropy as scientific evidence supporting this view. The argument is made that God, being outside the physical realm, initiated creation.

15:03

🔄 Entropy, Infinite Regress, and the Necessity of a Creator

The speaker addresses the philosophical question of infinite regress, arguing that an infinite being, like God, does not require a creator. He criticizes the idea of the universe's eternal existence and stresses the improbability of a random creation of life. The conversation touches on the necessity of an intelligent force behind the universe's order and complexity.

20:05

🧬 DNA, Randomness, and the Probability of Intelligent Design

Using the complexity of DNA and the improbability of life arising by chance, the speaker argues for intelligent design. He challenges the atheistic perspective that relies on low probability events and stresses the need for an intelligent cause behind the universe's intricate design. The analogy of consistently rolling a six on a dice is used to illustrate the argument.

🛠 Constructing the Metaphysical Argument

The speaker elaborates on the metaphysical nature of intelligence and intent, arguing that these non-physical attributes point to a deliberate and intelligent creator. He highlights the finely-tuned constants of the universe as evidence of an underlying intelligent force. The discussion concludes with the idea that personal experience and sincere prayer are key to understanding and knowing God.

🌟 Thirst for Purpose and Spiritual Opportunity

Addressing the human need for purpose, the speaker describes Islam's approach to finding meaning through genuine, personal experience with God. He asserts that everyone deserves spiritual opportunity and emphasizes the importance of sincere prayer and personal spiritual experiments in discovering divine truth.

🎲 Probability, Coincidences, and the Search for Truth

The speaker argues against attributing the universe's order to random coincidences, using the analogy of rolling dice to emphasize the improbability of such an occurrence. He advocates for recognizing an intelligent designer behind the universe's complexity and order, and the importance of rigorous philosophical inquiry in understanding this concept.

Keywords

💡Purpose

The concept of 'purpose' in the video script refers to the existential question of why humans exist and what their ultimate goal or meaning in life is. It is a central theme as the speaker contemplates life's trajectory from birth to death and ponders the activities in between. The script mentions, 'live, marry, children, job, die,' illustrating the common life path and questioning what else there could be beyond these milestones.

💡Philosophy

Philosophy is presented as a field of study that seeks to understand the nature of reality, knowledge, and existence. The speaker, who is a philosophy major, finds it 'flawless' and integral to understanding the world. The script discusses the role of philosophy in posing questions that many great philosophers have grappled with, often without finding definitive answers, as seen in the line 'philosophy has an integral role and understanding the greater concept of reality.'

💡Existence

'Existence' is a fundamental concept in the script, particularly in the context of the existence of God and the universe. The discussion revolves around whether there is a higher power or consciousness behind the creation and continuation of existence, as highlighted by the phrases 'existence project' and 'the existence of God.'

💡Religion

Religion is portrayed as a source of guidance and a method for ascertaining eternal truths. It is presented as a system that has historically provided a way to understand and connect with the divine, as indicated by the mention of 'the prophets of God' and 'religion has brought in every era.'

💡Evidence

The term 'evidence' is discussed in the context of proving the existence of God. The script contrasts physical evidence, which is sought by materialistic perspectives, with the non-physical nature of God. It suggests that evidence for a non-physical entity must be sought through different means, as in 'the evidence of God to the laboratory' and 'evidence for a thing that's non-physical be physical.'

💡Consciousness

Consciousness is a key concept in the script, especially when discussing the metaphysical aspects of creation and the nature of God. It is implied that the universe and life within it are the result of a conscious, deliberate, and intelligent force, as seen in 'a consciousness of the thing itself' and 'the mind of God are metaphysical.'

💡Creation

'Creation' is used to describe the origin of the universe and life. The script debates whether the universe could have created itself or if it required an external force, as indicated by 'the universe can't cause itself' and 'nothing physical can cause itself.'

💡Big Bang

The 'Big Bang' is mentioned as a scientific concept that explains the beginning of the universe. The script references this theory to discuss the start of spacetime and the expansion of the universe, as in 'this concept of the Big Bang the expansion of the universe.'

💡DNA

DNA is used in the script as an example of complexity and language within the biological realm. It is presented as evidence of an intricate system that cannot be easily explained by random chance, as shown by 'DNA has one of the most complex languages conceivable inside of it.'

💡Intelligent Design

Intelligent design is implied throughout the script as the idea that the universe and life within it are too complex to have arisen without the guidance of an intelligent force. This is suggested by the discussion of the building of structures and the complexity of DNA, as in 'the only reason the building is constructed, is because we in the Physical Realm with the minds and the bodies that we have, have constructed it.'

Highlights

The existential question of purpose in life and the exploration of whether Christianity is true.

The role of philosophy in understanding the greater concept of reality and its potential to lead to a miserable life if unanswered.

The importance of respectful and loving conversations in exploring different beliefs and philosophies.

The argument that God's existence is supported by evidence that transcends the physical realm.

The challenge of defining evidence for a non-physical entity like God in a materialistic world.

The concept that every eternal truth has a specific method to ascertain it, as taught by the prophets of God.

The idea that rational beings should rely on each other's experiences and beliefs to understand the truth.

The discussion on the contradictions in the Bible and the historical accuracy of religious texts.

The Quranic concept of God as an intelligent, conscious, and non-physical force behind all creation.

The philosophical debate on the existence of God and the challenge of disproving His existence.

The exploration of the universe's beginning and the scientific evidence supporting the Big Bang theory.

The argument that the universe is not eternal, based on the Quranic perspective and scientific understanding of entropy.

The philosophical challenge of proving the existence of 'nothing' and the implications for the universe's origin.

The discussion on the necessity of an intelligent force behind the creation of the universe and the laws of physics.

The idea that the universe's complexity and order suggest a deliberate and intelligent design.

The philosophical and scientific debate on the likelihood of the universe being infinite versus having a finite beginning.

The argument that the existence of God is a matter of personal experience and the challenge of disproving it through empirical evidence.

The discussion on the role of prayer and personal spiritual experiences in understanding the existence of God.

The philosophical exploration of the metaphysical aspects of consciousness, intent, and intelligence in relation to the creation of the universe.

The challenge of explaining the physical construction of the universe by non-physical means.

Transcripts

what is my purpose right like I have no

idea my question yeah I'm like dude live

like live marry children Job die what

else am I going to do that's how you can

even tell if Christianity is true or not

it's clear there's like literal

contradictions anthropologically that

make it impossible we're the existence

project and we try to have respectful

loving

conversations what's your name Alexis

and what are you studying philosophy are

you liking it I love philosophy I think

it's in my mind Flawless it's

interesting you you're a philosophy

major and philosophy has an integral

role and understanding the greater

concept of reality but you know if you

look at all the greatest philosophers

they ask questions and many of them died

miserable unable to answer them so

philosophy is which is what I'm probably

going to do which is what I'm doing

right now hopefully not well you know

you're on a you're on a very very

important course philosophy is great at

asking some very good questions and some

very bad ones and that's okay yeah

because in that laborator that's the fun

part right it allows you to be you know

in all Realms I I that's really well put

so we're out here saying hey from a

whether you want it from a philosophical

perspective whether you want from a

scientific perspective whether you want

from an intellectual perspective God

Almighty exists with such resounding

evidence the question is unfortunately a

lot of

materialistic uh reductionist minded

people have tried to confine evidence

the word evidence of God to the

laboratory and they want us to bring

some physical piece of evidence whereas

we know that God is Not physical so how

can the evidence for a thing that's non-

physical be physical yeah that's pretty

obvious what we're saying is that

actually

there's a method by which and there has

to be for every Eternal truth there has

to be a specific way to ascertain it

what we're arguing here is that that is

what religion has brought in every era

the prophets of God have all taught a

specific method it's like a testimonial

truth exactly yeah exactly for example

camera person's new to La so we've been

trying to show him around right we're

lining up at a new place for ice cream

and we want to know what flavor to try

you kind of go with what people are

saying the reason is that we are not the

only rational being in the universe and

we acknowledge that our rationality and

our ability to glean the truth is not

the end all of it that's why we lean our

on our fellow human beings so we're out

here saying that look all the prophets

of God demonstrated the existence of God

and they showed us a way to know it's

not fair for you and I to remain

suspended in doubt forever we should

know if God exists I'm trying to get out

of that right now that's exactly what

religion teaches is hate deconstructed

Christianity so I'm in that mode of like

okay now I know that that's not

historically anthropologically correct

just looking at the facts there's

contradictions okay so keep going so I'm

a Muslim and uh of course there are

parts of the Bible that have remained

untouched relatively speaking and they

are accurate large parts of the Bible

that just are not and that's a

historical fact we have to face so so

we're here speaking about the quranic

concept of God because actually what we

say is the concept of God that was

postulated by every prophet of God in

every era to Every Nation we as human

beings being creative and liking to do

things for our own devices have changed

you know adulterated those things the

concept of God is not a bearded man in

the sky it postulates that look if

there's creativity in nature then the

force behind all of that the Ultimate

Force at the end of everything the cause

of all causes the prime mover the

uncaused cause whatever the grand

architect whatever you want to call it

that is an intelligent force it is a

conscious force and it's not embodied no

there's no physical there's nothing

physical about it has to be outside is

it just the entire universe like working

together in a way has well number one

it's outside of the universe because the

universe can't cause itself a thing

physical thing can't cause itself

another you I mean it's on the person

who postulates that it can cause itself

to show things that cause themselves

which they don't so if a thing caused

let's say the flow of time or physical

matter or energy whatever ever it is

that began all of this it has to be

outside of those things you asked a

really good question about communication

in the end that's what it comes down to

can we communicate can it communicate

with us can we have a relationship does

it make an impact in our life that's

what we're arguing we've been talking

about DNA with people DNA has one of the

most complex languages conceivable

inside of it that's a language and then

it has mechanisms within itself that

interprets those languages then for

example the way that forces we say that

forces are blind forces are interacting

they have a relationship with each other

very complicated relationship with one

another another they and then there's a

lawgiver because there are specific

principles for example we say that there

are about 30 fundamental principles of

the universe all of them are working

together you change even you change one

of them everything falls apart so that's

why we're saying that how can it be the

thing that has given every single

particle in this universe it's language

including you and I itself is not

capable of communicating H I think uh

it's interesting when you say it has to

be outside of the universe because then

it brings it down to a fundamental

metaphysical question of has the you

know whole universe always been what's

the likelihood of that versus like that

some that something came from nothing

and that nothing even exists can we

prove that nothing exists okay can we

look to anything that gives us any

evidence that such a thought nothingness

exists you'd have to you know that's a

very very hard claim in philosophy that

I've uh

actually written on can I respond to

both of them yeah very respectfully the

first point about the universe being

Eternal the Holy Quran rejects that the

book that we believe is revealed from

God and that's the measuring stick if a

book claims to be the abrahamic

monotheistic kind of conceptionist yes

generally speaking generally speaking

I'm questioning the whole thing like

first you have to question Judaism if

Judaism is true therefore Christianity

or Islam could be true so first you have

to figure out is that one true yeah it

was the origin correct and then if the

origin was correct then you can think

about whether the other one was correct

I love it I wish more people thought

like you the the Holy Quran says that

Moses peace be upon Him Jesus peace be

upon Him Muhammad peace be upon him uh

they are all true prophets of God we

muddled and meddled our way into their

teachings they were human beings like

all other human beings they demonstrated

God Almighty through extremely

compelling signs nothing unnatural but

something that was extremely impressive

to the people of that time that was

their connection with God coming back to

your point about the beginning of the

universe yes there was a beginning and

from a science perspective we have a

substantial amount of evidence that's

substantial the original conception in

all of abrahamic monotheism so I can

speak uh in terms of the Holy Quran

which is the only book that even its

opponents acknowledge has been unchanged

for the last 14400 years since it was

revealed to the prophet Muhammad peace

be upon him so it says do not the

disbelievers see the ones who don't

believe in God that the heaven in the

Earth was all a closed up Mass not

nothing it was all a closed up mass and

we caused it to blow out a Sunder

suddenly and then the Holy Quran also

speaks about the fact that we are the

ones who brought this universe into

existence we are the ones who continue

to go on expanding it so this concept of

the Big Bang the expansion of the

universe but it also says that just as

the universe was created it will be

rolled up like the rolling of Scrolls

and we will create again so it's kind of

like the beginning of SpaceTime end of

SpaceTime beginning of space time end of

space time okay so that essentially

means that but it's not

Eternal because the Holy Quran also says

that in the end the the thing that was

at the beginning it was not nothing it

was God Almighty and at the end when

everything is finished it will be God

Almighty and the reason I mean

scientifically we know because of

entropy even if it takes trillions and

trillions of years eventually there will

be no ability of the universe to use

energy in any useful way let alone to

have chemistry and what interesting

actually yeah that's something important

in philosophy we actually rely on a lot

is um that you're going to constantly be

going towards entropy always you know

continuing that way I don't want to take

too long to sum to sum up the

fundamental you know basis of your

argument is that something came from

nothing sorry let me please clarify it's

not that something came from nothing God

Almighty was there he's not a physical

being whatever he is he is far outside

of the phys IAL dimensions of this

universe as we understand it maybe you

wouldn't have to have the Assumption of

nothing CU you could assume you know God

you know uh you could replace the idea

of does nothing exist with God has

always existed and then you know space

can I elaborate this point very quickly

the idea is you know Richard Dawkins and

various atheists love to use the

argument from infinite regress and they

say we have to continuously at infinum

ask who created this and then who

created thing before that and who

created why do we stop at god well what

is Richard Dawkins proposing as a

philosophy major you can appreciate he's

proposing an Infinity but if God

Almighty himself is the infinity then

you don't ask about the where that

Infinity came from or the beginning of

an Infinity because definitionally there

is no beginning to an Infinity so it's

almost like you know people might

mistake it as oh the Big Bang means that

there must have been nothing and it has

to come from something but really there

could have always been something that we

could consider in

mhm infinity and then that then you know

starts and ends you know

our cons yeah like for example let's

let's call it a mind we have to

understand it relative to whatever we

hey how's it going what do you think

we're here in La for the last almost 10

days and I'm challenging anyone on the

street because I think that we've been

very unfair with this subject and there

is a substantial amount of evidence you

name the branch of science and there is

a stupendous amount of intellect in

trying to replicate any of that so to

say that our experience dictates that we

need intellect to for example try to

produce DNA step by step from inorganic

chemistry it could be random sorry it

could be random oh absolutely but if

you're and if you're willing to go with

the lowest possible probability if you

understand the numerics involved with

just how utterly improbable it is for

things to be absolutely but nobody in

their right mind ever Wagers on the

lowest conceivable problem probability I

think that if you can come up with the

SpaceTime like birth of SpaceTime idea

then even if it is random or if it's not

I think that could be irrelevant yes you

know yesterday someone was trying to say

and and atheists will lean on this till

the ends of the Earth with due respect

they will say well the universe is

infinite they'll do their best but I'm

sorry you've only had 13.8 billion years

and when you factor in the denominator

of only 13.8 billion years that highly

improbable number exponentially raised

to the power of another exponential

number increases it's like you never

wager on the lowest conceivable number

in any decision in life why would you

wager on the purpose of your life or

possibly the Ultimate Reality of the

universe with the lowest number

conceivable whereas we know and our

experience dictates that when something

de for example the building behind you

okay let's say we explain away every

single constituent every brick every

physical aspect Every chemical aspect

every philosophical aspect is explained

that doesn't take away our observed

repeated experience of the fact that

there was an intelligent architect and

intelligent beings that put things

together so to say there's been an

infinite amount of time is an untruth of

the most profound proportion but that's

the thing I feel like even with like

basically everything with

um the existence of SpaceTime and with

the Infinity of infinity and with the

possible finity of infinity and um even

I was I saw your sign and I was walking

and I was like hm because you can't

prove one thing or the other right um I

I think respectfully I can you um if we

um if we change the question if we

change the question to God does not

exist prove me wrong how would you prove

me okay so I'll use uh examples of

atheists right okay the militant

atheists who actually believe that God

certainly does not exist and have said

that even if they hear Richard Dawkins

for example one of the most famous names

I'll use him he was asked in an

interview famously It's All Over YouTube

If God Almighty directly beckoned unto

you and spoke to you and said I am here

would you believe he said probably not

this is what we're saying is the unfair

lens with which this subject is being

dealt with many young minds

impressionable Minds who are easily

impressed by the jargon that is used by

many atheists start to look at this in

an unfair way all we're saying is look

not everyone is a philosopher what is

your major anthropology not everyone is

an anthropologist that's how you

gety that's how I deconstructed

Christianity That's essential those

arguments anthropological argument

that's how you can even tell if

Christianity is true or not it's clear

there's like literal like contradictions

anthropologically that make it

impossible at least in my sight to be

considered believable you and I'm I'm a

big fan of philosophy like I really like

philosophy so like this question for me

has no answer like because it's just

like okay I'm um the only um example

that I could come up up come up with was

um like Freud's unconscious and

conscious mind and everything right

because Freud's theory is the only thing

that can prove

itself and it cannot be disproven

through you know empirical evidence and

whatever whatever the only reason why we

it can only be a theory and the only

people who can indeed believe it are the

people who believe it so God would be

kind of like God's existence would be

kind of the same thing okay because

God's existence is the proof for God's

existence you can't exactly like pick

things and be like oh yes then he

definitely exists because you can't

disprove it either so I I love what you

said if I can respond to this point so I

agree with you that in so far as our

rationality is concerned our human logic

is concerned our human faculty and

ability to deconstruct things Tinker

with the subatomic particles in the

universe elasticize our philosophical

abilities or concern it will only take

us to perhaps the conclusion if we are

unbiased there should be something

behind everything perhaps there is a

Creator oh yeah Islam challenges that

Islam says the only thing that a person

can truly trust Beyond 100% is your

personal exper experience Islam says

here is a recipe it has pointed to a

version of God that is so consistent

with human reason so consistent with

human rationality that it says you and I

look you're not everyone is a

philosopher I'm a Muslim Imam not

everyone is an

anthropologist the key to finding God

and knowing god Islam says nobody

deserves to remain suspended in doubt

and suspicion especially about why we're

here and if we have a Creator right that

is the definition of Hell in Islam the

definition of hell is genuinely coming

to the conclusion the false conclusion

it postulates that we are just an

accident we have no purpose exactly and

that is I mean lately I have been

struggling with you know like like I

have no idea I'll make question yeah I'm

like dude live like live marry children

Job die what else am I going to do can I

do what is my purpose right because you

see people with like they're born with a

purpose they know what they're here for

and for us who you know are trying to

find it everywhere else and also within

ourselves it's very difficult to find a

reason and Man Without reason Man

Without purpose is almost nothing we

don't know how to live that's why we

have we have had for as long as we have

lived we have had something like we want

a connection with everything want a

connection I always say say look thirst

is by inference evidence for water but

far greater than our physical thirst is

our thirst for purpose Islam says it's

not about how educated someone is how

much wealth someone has What ethnicity

they belong to what religion they grew

up in every human being should have

equal access of opportunity of spiritual

opportunity nowadays it's all about

equality of opportunity equality what

about spirituality it has to be

something that men and women alike

humankind alike a thousand years ago

10,000 years ago had that is the faculty

of genuine sincere prayer the laboratory

of the human soul conduct the experiment

and in the end if there is a day of

judgment you say God I asked you you

know my heart of hearts you created me

if that is true I asked you and that is

by asking God directly and experiencing

him in an observable measurable

repeatable way and then how do you do

that in a world in a place and in a

Physical Realm for example there's

information and data flowing through us

right now there's insane amounts of your

DNA for example how did DNA come with

our environment 247 who told the atoms

to behave in the way that they did so

that they become RNA eventually who told

RNA to communicate with each other and

continuously increase but maybe that's

the thing maybe no one told them maybe

it is a Consciousness a consciousness of

the thing itself right because then you

can come back to all the ideas of unity

and why like we all that we all come

from a single cell you know all living

things and all material things come from

a certain Unity of some kind I agree but

nothing physical can cause itself it has

to be caused by something else exactly

nothing is made everything is

transformed okay physical determinism so

it's like once you have a physical sub

like you know if you have dominoes if

you push the dominoes over each Domino

who who pushed the Domino that's who

pushed pushed the first Domino exactly

and who created the Domino that's what I

mean you cannot Escape The Logical

necessity every single argument that a

person presents you need an intelligent

and or powerful force behind all of that

there's no yeah do you like I'm like I

was giving the example of the building I

don't know if you were here let's say

this building is constructed and we you

know the building is constructed the

only reason the building is constructed

is because we in the Physical Realm with

the minds and the bodies that we have

have constructed it that's the only

reason right but in a realm that is

because here God I feel like is more

like a metap physical it's it's it has

to be outside of our universe exactly so

how does something non-physical

construct something physical we as

physical beings can only construct

physical things and ideas I love that

idea and I love that question so the

idea of metaphysical that's what we're

exactly saying the Consciousness is

metaphysical a mind is metaphysical

everything as you go outside the

Physical Realm demands that for example

everything that you need to build with

intent to construct with intellect is

metaphysical intelligence is

metaphysical right intent is

metaphysical all of these things that we

call the mind of God are metaphysical

and so that is why we say that when as

soon as you leave the Physical Realm and

we need a non-physical thing to have

caused this then it makes sense that

that thing is conscious and deliberate

and intelligent and that is why at every

step for 13.8 billion years what was

chosen and selected we give the four

fundamental forces the six fundamental

26 fundamental constants in physics you

change each e either even one of them

and stars cannot form hydrogen cannot

form let alone life let alone an

interesting organic chemistry at what

point is it scientific and methodical

and unbiased to dub 13.8 billion years

of astronomically impossible

coincidences rather than saying okay

everything seems to point in a very

particular direction maybe there's

something pushing it like I give the

example of a dice you roll a dice you

get one out of it's a one out of six

chance to roll a six you roll it again

it's one out of 36 you roll it again

it's like 1 250 one over 256 and it

keeps going and going you're 10 or 500

or one billion rolls of the dice later

if you keep getting six you're going to

be like someone's weighted that dice

that's what we're

saying I like that this is really um

you're really rigorous philosophically

I've been looking for this so what's the

next step there's a very interesting