BREAKING NEWS - Ahli Roy Suryo Cs Selesai Diperiksa Polda Metro Jaya Kasus Ijazah Jokowi

Summary

The transcript discusses a legal proceeding involving the investigation of falsified documents, particularly focusing on the examination of linguistic and forensic evidence. Experts like Prof. Aceng provide insights into how linguistic analysis is used to assess whether certain statements qualify as defamation or manipulation. The discussion emphasizes that questioning the validity of documents should not automatically be considered criminal activity. The speakers argue that the case should be dismissed as there is no legal basis for the accusations, highlighting the importance of verifying the authenticity of documents and ensuring due process.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker expresses gratitude to the media for their patience and cooperation in the ongoing investigation regarding the authenticity of certain documents.
• 😀 Prof. Aceng, a forensic linguistics expert, has provided initial testimony regarding the analysis of language data related to the case, but further expert testimony is scheduled to continue later.
• 😀 Two suspects, Pak Rismonian Parasolan and Pak Roy Suryo, have been questioned so far, and the investigation will resume with more suspects in future sessions.
• 😀 Prof. Aceng's role is to analyze the language data without stepping into the territory of the document's authenticity, which is outside of his expertise.
• 😀 The investigation is focused on analyzing whether the language used in the statements could constitute defamation or libel, with an emphasis on whether statements made were harmful or misleading.
• 😀 There has been an emphasis on ensuring that the legal procedures for investigation and expert testimony are followed correctly, and there are concerns about how the case has been handled up to this point.
• 😀 The investigation also involves experts in criminal law, including Pak Ganjar Laksamanaabon and Pak Asmi Sahputra, who will continue their testimonies regarding the case's legal implications.
• 😀 The investigation has faced delays due to the complexity of the data, including YouTube recordings and other media, requiring meticulous review and analysis.
• 😀 The defense argues that the investigation may have been mishandled, as the accusations against the suspects are based on their research into the documents, rather than any malicious intent.
• 😀 There is an ongoing debate about the legitimacy of certain documents, with allegations that discrepancies in graduation dates reported by a university rector have contributed to public confusion.

Q & A

What is the main purpose of the press conference described in the transcript?

The main purpose of the press conference is to provide updates on an ongoing legal investigation involving several suspects, including Pak Roy and Pak Rismonian. The press conference focuses on the progress of expert witness testimonies, particularly from a linguistics expert, Prof. Aceng.

What role does Prof. Aceng play in the investigation?

Prof. Aceng is serving as an expert witness in linguistics, particularly forensic linguistics. He has been asked to analyze the language used in various communications, such as YouTube recordings, to determine whether they contain elements of defamation or criminal conduct.

What is the significance of the two dates mentioned regarding the graduation certificate of Joko Widodo?

The two conflicting dates (5 November and 23 October) regarding Joko Widodo's graduation certificate have caused confusion. This discrepancy is significant because it raises questions about the legitimacy of the document, contributing to the ongoing investigation into the authenticity of his diploma.

How does the investigation plan to move forward with the expert testimony?

The investigation plans to proceed by scheduling additional expert testimonies, particularly from criminal law experts, who will review the evidence and provide their analysis. The linguistics expert testimony will continue as more data is analyzed.

What is the stance of the defense team regarding the charges of defamation and forgery?

The defense team argues that the charges of defamation and forgery are unfounded. They believe that questioning or analyzing a document should not be considered a criminal act, especially when it involves research or academic analysis.

What is the role of the digital forensics and research experts mentioned in the script?

The digital forensics and research experts are tasked with analyzing electronic evidence, such as recordings and documents, to verify the authenticity of claims made about Joko Widodo's graduation and related documents.

Why is forensic linguistics considered important in this investigation?

Forensic linguistics is considered important because it can provide an objective analysis of the language used in communications that are under investigation. This could help determine whether any statements made are defamatory, misleading, or criminal in nature.

What concerns does the defense team have regarding the handling of the case?

The defense team expresses concern that the investigation is being handled in a way that could lead to an unjust outcome. They argue that procedures are not being followed properly, and that the investigation might unfairly target those questioning the authenticity of Joko Widodo's documents.

What is the significance of the experts and witnesses being called in the case?

The significance of the experts and witnesses being called is to provide independent and professional insights into the case. These experts are tasked with offering objective analysis, which could help clarify whether the actions under investigation, such as questioning a diploma, are criminal or legally acceptable.

How does the defense team view the media's role in the case?

The defense team acknowledges the media's role in bringing attention to the case and providing updates. However, they also express frustration at the media's portrayal of the case and the delays in providing clear information regarding the investigation's progress.