Liz Cheney Recirculates Elise Stefanik Jan. 6 Statement | The View

Summary

The script captures a heated discussion on 'The View' about the political feud between Liz Cheney and Elise Stefanik. Cheney reignited the dispute by reposting Stefanik's old statement condemning the January 6th Capitol attack, contrasting it with Stefanik's current stance. The hosts criticize Stefanik for her changing views and aligning with Trump, labeling her a 'total crackpot' and questioning her motives. They commend Cheney for her consistency and exposing Stefanik's flip-flop. The conversation also touches on Stefanik's perceived sycophancy towards Trump, her influence on Harvard's recent resignation, and the broader implications of her actions on her political future.

Takeaways

• 📺 Whoopi introduces a segment discussing the revived feud between Liz Cheney and Representative Elise Stefanik, focusing on Stefanik's changed stance since her 2021 condemnation of the January 6 attack.
• 🔥 Cheney reposted Stefanik's old statement condemning the January 6 attack to highlight Stefanik's apparent change in perspective over time.
• 🤔 Stefanik expresses concerns about the treatment of January 6 'hostages', comparing the Capitol riot to BLM protests and emphasizing election integrity.
• 🙄 Whoopi questions Stefanik's commitment to democracy, given her conditional recognition of election outcomes.
• 🔮 Cheney labels Stefanik as a 'total crackpot', illustrating the deepening rift between them.
• 📝 Ana Navarro reflects on Stefanik's transformation from a promising young congresswoman to a Trump sycophant, highlighting recent controversies.
• 🚫 Sunny Hostin criticizes Stefanik for comparing January 6 rioters to hostages, considering it offensive and anti-Semitic.
• ❓ Panelists ponder Stefanik's endgame, suspecting her aspirations for relevance and power within a Trump-led political landscape.
• 👨‍💻 Alyssa Farah Griffin notes the mentorship history between Cheney and Stefanik, suggesting that Stefanik may eventually regret her current political trajectory.
• 👯 Panel discussion implies that politicians closely aligned with Trump, like Stefanik, may face long-term accountability issues once Trump's influence wanes.

Q & A

What was the main point of contention between Liz Cheney and Elise Stefanik?

Cheney reposted an old statement by Stefanik condemning the January 6th attack and calling for the rioters to be prosecuted. This contrasts with Stefanik's more recent remarks sympathizing with the rioters.

How did Stefanik's view on the January 6th attack seem to change over time?

In 2021, Stefanik clearly condemned the attack as violent and destructive. More recently, she expressed concern over the 'treatment' of the January 6th 'hostages' and drew comparisons to the BLM protests.

Why did Cheney call Stefanik a 'total crack pot'?

It was in reaction to Stefanik's shifting stance on the Capitol attack and rioters over time, as well as her recent questionable remarks sympathizing with the rioters and comparing them to hostages.

What was significant about Stefanik taking down her old statement?

It shows that she likely recognizes how much her current position contradicts her past condemnation of the attack. She seems to want to hide that contradiction.

What does Cheney's 'receipt' for the old statement demonstrate?

It demonstrates Cheney's sharp political instincts in holding politicians accountable for their shifting stances. She kept the receipt for 3 years before using it at the opportune time.

What is Stefanik's political end game according to the panelists?

She likely hopes to gain ongoing political relevance, power, and possibly the VP slot in a future Trump administration by appealing strongly to his base.

Why did the panelists criticize Stefanik's hostage comparison?

They found it highly insensitive given the recent traumatic hostage situation, and considered it a false equivalence that diminishes the severity of the Capitol attack.

What is ironic about Stefanik's shift away from Cheney?

Cheney used to be Stefanik's mentor, and Stefanik has now gone completely against Cheney's principles for political gain.

How might Stefanik come to regret her political shift?

When Trump finally fades from power, Stefanik may remember her past principles and realize that her betrayal of them was not worth the temporary gains.

Who wins in the 'contest' of sucking up to Trump between Scott and Stefanik?

The panelists imply it's hard to judge who goes further in appealing to Trump's base - both Scott and Stefanik pander significantly.