Hukuman Eks Dirut Pertamina Jadi 13 Tahun Penjara - [Newsline]

Summary

On February 28, 2025, Indonesia's Supreme Court delivered a ruling on the cassation case of Karen Agustiawan, the former executive of PT Pertamina Persero, who was sentenced to 13 years in prison for corruption related to the procurement of liquefied natural gas (LNG) between 2011 and 2014. The court also imposed a fine of Rp 50 million, with a 6-month prison substitute. The corruption case, which started from a 2009 LNG deal, caused a national loss of over Rp 1 trillion. Agustiawan's sentence was a heavier punishment than the original ruling, which had been 9 years.

Takeaways

• 😀 The Indonesian Supreme Court issued a cassation ruling on February 28, 2025, which increased the prison sentence for Karen Agustiawan, a former employee of PT Pertamina Persero, in a corruption case.
• 😀 Karen Agustiawan was sentenced to 13 years in prison and fined IDR 50 million, with a 6-month substitute prison sentence if she fails to pay the fine.
• 😀 The ruling was based on violations of the Anti-Corruption Law (Tipikor) and the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP), specifically Articles 3, 55, and 64.
• 😀 This sentence is harsher than the previous verdict from the Corruption Court, which sentenced her to 9 years in prison in June 2024.
• 😀 The corruption case involved the procurement of liquefied natural gas (LNG) between 2011 and 2014, which was investigated by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK).
• 😀 Karen Agustiawan was named a suspect in September 2023, stemming from a contract for LNG purchases dating back to 2009.
• 😀 The agreement involved the supply of LNG over 20 years, but problems arose when global gas prices fell, and domestic LNG supply increased.
• 😀 As a result, surplus LNG had to be sold at a loss on the market, which KPK claims caused a financial loss to the country of IDR 1.1 trillion.
• 😀 The LNG procurement scandal involves a contract with an American company and covers the period from 2011 to 2021.
• 😀 The case highlights the significant financial mismanagement in energy sector deals and emphasizes the legal actions taken against those involved in corruption.

Q & A

What was the ruling of the Supreme Court regarding Karen Agustiawan's case?

The Supreme Court ruled on February 28, 2025, to increase the prison sentence for Karen Agustiawan, a former executive at PT Pertamina Persero, to 13 years. The court also imposed a fine of Rp50 million, with a 6-month prison term as a substitute if the fine is not paid.

What specific legal violations did the court find Karen Agustiawan guilty of?

Karen Agustiawan was found guilty of violating Article 3 of the Anti-Corruption Law (Tipikor) as well as Articles 55 and 64 of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP).

How does the Supreme Court's decision compare to the previous ruling by the Tipikor Court?

The Supreme Court's decision imposed a heavier sentence than the Tipikor Court's ruling, which had sentenced Karen Agustiawan to 9 years in prison in June 2024.

What is the case about?

The case involves allegations of corruption in the procurement of liquefied natural gas (LNG) by PT Pertamina between 2011 and 2014. The accusations stem from a 2009 sales agreement for LNG that led to financial losses for the state.

What led to the corruption charges against Karen Agustiawan?

The charges were based on an LNG sales agreement made in 2009. The deal resulted in excess LNG supplies due to a drop in global gas prices, causing the LNG to be sold at lower-than-expected prices, which allegedly resulted in state losses.

How much financial loss did the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) accuse Karen Agustiawan of causing?

The KPK accused Karen Agustiawan of causing state losses totaling Rp1.1 trillion due to the mismanagement of the LNG procurement deal.

When was Karen Agustiawan formally named a suspect by the KPK?

Karen Agustiawan was officially named a suspect by the KPK in September 2023.

What was the duration of the LNG supply contract mentioned in the case?

The LNG supply contract mentioned in the case was agreed upon for a 20-year period, starting in 2009.

What was the issue with the LNG supply in Indonesia?

The issue arose from a surplus of LNG in Indonesia, which had to be sold on the open market at lower prices after global gas prices dropped and domestic supply outpaced demand.

What is the significance of the ruling against Karen Agustiawan in terms of its broader implications?

The ruling against Karen Agustiawan is significant because it highlights the ongoing efforts of the Indonesian government to address corruption in state-owned enterprises, particularly in large-scale procurement deals involving natural resources.