Lebih Parah dari Tangerang, Siapa Pemilik Pagar Laut Bekasi yang Dibongkar Nusron?

Summary

The transcript discusses the manipulation of land records and the issuance of certificates for land that was originally identified as sea. It focuses on the involvement of various entities, including individuals and companies, in altering land maps and claims, leading to legal and administrative disputes. There are concerns regarding the authenticity of land titles and the role of government bodies like BPN in issuing certificates. The document outlines the steps being taken to address the situation, including potential legal actions and the call for transparency and accountability in handling these land issues.

Takeaways

• 😀 There are 84 landowners involved in the land registration program in Segarat Jaya.
• 😀 The NIB (land identification number) was moved and the map was shifted, creating confusion about land ownership.
• 😀 The land was originally designated as 11 hectares, but through data manipulation, the total land area has increased to 509 hectares (now totaling 581 hectares with additions).
• 😀 Some of the land was initially designated as beachfront (red areas), and new titles were issued for certain land parcels like those owned by PT Mega Agung Nusantara.
• 😀 Listrindo is a company involved with land outside the coastal boundaries but is still part of the confusion due to boundary changes.
• 😀 There are multiple entities involved, including PT and individual landowners, with the issue involving both private and state-owned land.
• 😀 There are ongoing legal actions to cancel certificates that were issued based on incorrect land data, specifically for SHGB certificates (rights to build).
• 😀 The BPN (National Land Agency) has acknowledged its role in issuing these problematic certificates and has committed to investigating the manipulation of land data.
• 😀 The process of invalidating certain land certificates will involve legal procedures, including calls for cancellation from the courts if necessary.
• 😀 The authorities are working with various institutions, including KKP (Marine Affairs Ministry), to handle issues related to maritime land and the shifting of the land's boundaries.

Q & A

What is the main issue discussed in the transcript?

The main issue revolves around the manipulation of land mapping data and the unauthorized transfer of land ownership, which has affected both private landowners and entities involved in land management.

What is the significance of the 'PTSL program' mentioned in the transcript?

The PTSL (Program Tanah Sistimatis Lengkap) program is a land certification initiative in Indonesia that aims to provide clear legal ownership for land. The land in the discussion was part of this program, but it appears to have been manipulated.

Who are the stakeholders involved in this issue?

The main stakeholders include individual landowners (84 in total), PT Mega Agung Nusantara, PT Listrindo, the BPN (National Land Agency), and the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (KKP).

What was the impact of the land data manipulation?

The manipulation of land mapping data resulted in a shift in land boundaries, converting what was once registered as land into sea areas, and potentially impacting land ownership and usage rights.

What specific action is being taken to address the issue?

The BPN intends to revoke the land certification of the entities involved and return the land back to its original status. Additionally, legal actions may be pursued against those responsible for the manipulation.

What role does the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (KKP) play in this matter?

The KKP is involved because the manipulation involved changing land boundaries that affected coastal and sea areas. They will coordinate with other entities to resolve the issue.

What is the status of the land certificates issued in 2013 and 2017?

The certificates issued in 2013 and 2017 were found to be problematic, with some areas being mapped incorrectly. The authorities are considering legal steps to revoke or adjust these certificates.

Why can't the BPN immediately cancel the disputed land certificates?

The BPN cannot automatically cancel the certificates because the land's registration status has exceeded a five-year period, as stipulated by Indonesian regulations. Instead, they will first consult with the entities involved to seek cancellation.

What is the proposed solution if the landowners do not agree to cancel the certificates voluntarily?

If the landowners refuse to voluntarily cancel the certificates, the authorities will take the matter to court, seeking a legal ruling to invalidate the land titles.

What was the discrepancy between the individual landowners and the companies involved in the land manipulation?

The individual landowners (11 people) had their land data manipulated differently from the companies (PT Mega Agung Nusantara and PT Listrindo), with the latter involved in larger-scale mapping alterations that affected a much broader area.