Medicare's Midlife Crisis Part Two: Barriers to reform

The Macdonald-Laurier Institute
12 Nov 201510:04

Summary

TLDRIn this video, Brian Lee Crowley discusses the pressing need for reform in Canada's Medicare system, highlighting its underperformance despite high costs compared to other universal health care systems. He challenges the misconceptions surrounding the Canada Health Act, arguing that it allows for innovative delivery models. Crowley emphasizes that entrenched interest groups hinder necessary changes, and that merely increasing funding has not led to improvements. He advocates for a national dialogue to explore effective health care delivery models, drawing parallels with successful reforms in other countries, ultimately asserting that change is both possible and essential for the health of Canadians.

Takeaways

  • 😀 Canada's healthcare system faces a pressing need for reform despite high expenditures and public support.
  • 📉 Compared to other countries with universal healthcare, Canada's system delivers fewer services, longer wait times, and higher costs.
  • 🔍 The Canada Health Act is often misunderstood; it allows for public administration of healthcare without dictating specific delivery methods.
  • 💰 Increased funding in the past, such as through the Canada Health Accord, often perpetuated the status quo rather than leading to meaningful changes.
  • ⚠️ Resistance to reform comes from entrenched interest groups, including unions and professional associations, who prioritize their interests over systemic improvements.
  • 🌍 Successful healthcare reforms in places like Saskatchewan and Sweden illustrate the potential benefits of incorporating private sector solutions.
  • 👥 Public sentiment shows that while Canadians value universal healthcare, their day-to-day experiences often reveal dissatisfaction with services.
  • 🔄 Effective healthcare reform requires overcoming myths about the Canada Health Act and recognizing that more funding alone is not the solution.
  • 📊 A national conversation is essential to explore and adopt more efficient healthcare delivery models.
  • 🚀 Change in the healthcare system is not only possible but necessary for the overall health and well-being of Canadians.

Q & A

  • What is the main issue discussed in the video?

    -The video discusses the need for reform in Canada's health care system, highlighting its inefficiencies and the barriers to implementing changes.

  • What principle do most Canadians cherish regarding health care?

    -Most Canadians cherish the principle that no person should go without care due to an inability to pay.

  • How does Canada's health care system compare to other countries with universal health care?

    -Canada's health care system is said to underperform compared to other countries with universal health care, as they often provide more comprehensive services, shorter waiting times, and spend less overall.

  • What are some obstacles to Medicare reform mentioned in the video?

    -The video mentions both real and imagined barriers to reform, including misconceptions about the Canada Health Act and the influence of entrenched interest groups.

  • What did former federal health minister Pierre Pettigrew suggest regarding private delivery?

    -Pierre Pettigrew suggested that provinces might experiment with private delivery, which sparked significant political backlash and controversy.

  • What is the distinction between 'publicly administered' and 'publicly delivered' in the Canada Health Act?

    -The Canada Health Act states that the system should be publicly administered but does not dictate that services must be publicly delivered, allowing for private clinics as long as they are funded by the public sector.

  • What was the impact of the expired Canada Health Accord negotiated by Paul Martin?

    -The expired Canada Health Accord injected billions into the health system but did not result in meaningful change; instead, it primarily benefited interest groups through increased salaries.

  • How did Saskatchewan's approach to health care differ after the introduction of new funding?

    -After new funding, the Saskatchewan government chose not to close 25 rural hospitals as previously planned, illustrating how increased funding can maintain the status quo instead of facilitating necessary changes.

  • What examples are given of countries that have successfully reformed their health care systems?

    -The video mentions Sweden, which privatized its largest hospital with positive outcomes, and Britain, where reforms were pursued despite public affection for the National Health Service.

  • What is the suggested way to overcome the entrenched interests in Canada's health care system?

    -The video suggests that allowing competing providers and breaking up the old health care monopoly may reduce the influence of entrenched interest groups and improve the system for the benefit of Canadians.

Outlines

plate

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.

Upgrade durchführen

Mindmap

plate

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.

Upgrade durchführen

Keywords

plate

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.

Upgrade durchführen

Highlights

plate

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.

Upgrade durchführen

Transcripts

plate

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.

Upgrade durchführen
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Ähnliche Tags
Healthcare ReformCanada Health ActPublic AdministrationPrivate DeliveryPolicy DiscussionUniversal CareSaskatchewan SuccessInterest GroupsInternational ModelsMedical System
Benötigen Sie eine Zusammenfassung auf Englisch?