Why the Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum failed | 7.30
Summary
TLDRLe référendum sur la création d'une Voix autochtone en Australie a été battu, suscitant une grande déception parmi les travailleurs de la santé autochtones et les dirigeants comme Jill Gallagher. Malgré les efforts pour sensibiliser et gagner le soutien, la campagne a rencontré des obstacles tels que la désinformation et l'opposition du parti libéral. Les dirigeants autochtones soulignent l'importance de ne pas abandonner et de continuer à lutter pour la reconnaissance et les droits des Premières Nations, malgré la défaite et les défis politiques et sociaux persistants.
Takeaways
- 🗳️ Le référendum sur la Voix indienne a été rejeté, avec un vote majoritaire dans presque tous les états et territoires.
- 📉 L'atmosphère après l'annonce du résultat a été triste et déçue, montrant l'impact émotionnel de la défaite.
- 🤔 Des dirigeants autochtones comme Jill Gallagher se demandent s'il y avait un meilleur moyen de gagner, soulignant la nécessité de compréhension du projet par la population.
- 📢 Le camp non-officiel a eu un démarrage rapide et a été très actif, avec des voix fortes de l'opposition comme le sénateur Jacinta Price.
- 🕰 Des inquiétudes étaient déjà présentes quant à la préparation du camp oui et la nécessité d'un report du vote pour améliorer la compréhension du projet.
- 📅 Le gouvernement a maintenu la date du référendum pour 2023, malgré les recommandations de report.
- 📉 Les sondages montraient une baisse de soutien pour la Voix au lancement de la campagne officielle Yes 23.
- 🚫 L'opposition du Parti Libéral a été perçue comme un coup fatal pour la proposition, soulignant l'importance du soutien bipartite.
- 🤝 Des leaders autochtones ont cherché à compromettre sur les pouvoirs de la Voix pour gagner le soutien, mais cela n'a pas été perçu comme possible par tous.
- 📖 Il y a eu une critique sur le fait que le gouvernement n'ait pas publié de législation provisoire détaillant le projet de la Voix.
- 📉 Le camp non a pris une avance considérable avec des messages forts, mettant en garde contre les implications perçues de la Voix.
- 🚫 Des campagnes de désinformation et de intimidation, notamment via les médias sociaux, ont été utilisées pour discréditer le projet et inculquer de la peur.
- 📉 La défaite a laissé un vide politique et a exacerbé les traumatismes existants dans les communautés autochtones.
- 🏗️ Les dirigeants autochtones appellent à des changements concrets pour combler le fossé, soulignant que le statu quo ne peut pas continuer.
- 🔥 Malgré la défaite, les Premières Nations utiliseront cet échec comme une source d'inspiration pour se battre pour les droits autochtones à l'avenir.
Q & A
Quelle était la question principale soumise au référendum en Australie?
-La question principale du référendum était de savoir si un "Voice" ou une voix indigène devait être créée dans la Constitution australienne.
Comment les résultats du référendum ont-ils été accueillis par les travailleurs de la santé autochtones qui ont suivi la couverture en direct ?
-Les résultats ont été accueillis avec une atmosphère triste et désolée, car presque chaque état et territoire a voté contre la création de la voix indigène.
Quels facteurs ont contribué à la défaite du référendum pour la voix indigène?
-La défaite a été attribuée à un manque de compréhension de la part du public sur la nature de la voix, une campagne non-officielle efficace du côté du non, et une préparation insuffisante de la part du camp du oui.
Quelle a été la position de la National Party et de Senator Amanda Stoker sur le référendum ?
-La National Party et la sénatrice Amanda Stoker se sont rangées du côté du non, Amanda Stoker devenant l'une des voix les plus audibles contre le référendum.
Quels ont été les efforts pour sensibiliser et éduquer les Australiens sur la proposition du référendum ?
-Les efforts pour informer et éduquer les Australiens ont commencé tardivement, ce qui a été critiqué comme un facteur contribuant à la défaite du référendum.
Quelle a été la stratégie de la campagne du non et comment cela a-t-elle influencé les résultats ?
-La stratégie de la campagne du non consistait à utiliser la désinformation et à inculquer de la peur chez les électeurs, ce qui a pris une tournure raciste et intimidante, ce qui a probablement influencé les résultats.
Quels ont été les effets de la défaite du référendum sur les communautés autochtones ?
-La défaite a laissé un vide politique et a exacerbé les traumatismes existants dans les communautés, sans groupe national représentatif pour conseiller les gouvernements.
Quelle a été la recommandation de certains militants des Premières Nations concernant la date du référendum ?
-Certains militants des Premières Nations ont recommandé de reporter le référendum à 2024 pour gagner plus de temps pour construire le soutien nécessaire.
Quels étaient les arguments principaux de la campagne du oui pour la création de la voix indigène ?
-Le camp du oui a plaidé pour la reconnaissance des peuples autochtones dans la Constitution et la création d'une structure pour qu'ils puissent顾问 les gouvernements sur les questions qui les concernent.
Quelle a été la position de Mick Gooda, l'un des concepteurs de la proposition de la voix, après l'annonce de l'opposition du Parti Libéral ?
-Mick Gooda a appelé publiquement les autres leaders autochtones à un compromis sur les pouvoirs de la voix, espérant ainsi ramener le soutien de ceux qui s'étaient opposés à la proposition.
Quelle a été la réponse de Pat Turner, qui dirige la Coalition of Peaks, à la défaite du référendum ?
-Pat Turner a exprimé son inquiétude que le référendum ait détourné l'attention des politiques nécessaires pour réduire les inégalités, et a souligné l'importance de se concentrer sur les actions concrètes pour les communautés autochtones.
Outlines
🗳️ Défaite du référendum sur la Voix indienne
Ce paragraphe décrit la déception et la tristesse des travailleurs de la santé autochtone après le résultat du référendum qui a rejeté la création d'une Voix indienne dans la Constitution australienne. Il met en lumière les efforts de leaders comme Jill Gallagher pour reconnaître les peuples autochtones et aborde les préoccupations quant à la préparation et la compréhension du projet par la population. La campagne 'Yes 23' a rassemblé un grand nombre de bénévoles et de fonds, mais a rencontré des difficultés face à une campagne 'Non' bien organisée. Les défis de la campagne sont examinés, y compris la lenteur du lancement et la séparation des efforts entre différents groupes, ce qui a mené à une campagne divisée.
🤝 Appels à la compromission et la recherche d'un consensus
Dans ce paragraphe, on évoque les efforts de Mick Gooda, l'un des concepteurs de la Voix, pour trouver un terrain d'entente après que le soutien a fléchi suite à l'annonce de Peter Dutton. Il y a une discussion sur l'opportunité d'une compromission et les obstacles rencontrés pour gagner le soutien conservateur. Les critiques sur le gouvernement pour ne pas avoir publié de législation provisoire sur la conception de la Voix sont également abordées. La campagne du 'Non' est décrite comme ayant fortement ancrée son message dans l'esprit du public, ce qui a créé un défi pour le 'Oui'. Les efforts des communautés autochtones pour sensibiliser et éduquer sur la Voix avant le référendum sont soulignés, ainsi que les conséquences de la défaite sur les politiques et les communautés autochtones.
🔥 Utilisation de la défaite comme motivation pour la lutte future
Le dernier paragraphe se concentre sur la résilience et la détermination des communautés autochtones d'utiliser cette défaite comme source d'inspiration pour les combats futurs. Il est question d'honneurer les luttes passées des anciens et de continuer leur combat malgré les obstacles. Le paragraphe met en exergue l'importance de ne pas abandonner et de poursuivre l'action pour améliorer les conditions de vie et les droits des peuples autochtones en Australie.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡référendum
💡voie
💡Aborigènes d'Australie
💡campagne de non
💡président du gouvernement
💡préservation de la paix
💡campagne officielle
💡Libéraux
💡compromise
💡législatif provisoire
💡propagande
💡lutte future
Highlights
The ballot paper for the referendum was the same across the country, presenting a simple yes or no choice.
Aboriginal health workers gathered to watch the live coverage of the referendum results with high hopes.
The indigenous voice referendum was defeated, with nearly every state and territory voting no.
The atmosphere after the defeat was dismal, with many needing time to process the outcome.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders, like Auntie Jill Gallagher, pondered if there was a better strategy for winning.
There were concerns that not enough citizens fully understood what the indigenous voice represented.
The unofficial no campaign gained momentum quickly, with the National Party and Senator Jacinta Price leading the opposition.
Some first nations campaigners urged the government to delay the vote, fearing the yes case was ill-prepared.
Despite recommendations to postpone, the government held the referendum in 2023.
Yes 23, the official campaign, struggled with declining support and slow launch.
Lissa Baldwin Roberts of GetUp expressed concerns about the campaign's delay and urged for a quicker response.
There was a disagreement on strategy between GetUp and Yes 23, leading to separate campaigns.
The Liberal Party's opposition to the voice in April was seen as a significant blow to the proposal's chances.
Mick Gooda, an architect of the proposed voice model, called for compromise to regain conservative support.
Thomas Mayo, a campaigner, believed that conservative support was never genuinely sought.
The government's decision not to release draft legislation on The Voice was seen as a critical mistake.
The no campaign used misinformation and fear-mongering tactics, claiming The Voice would lead to land theft and increased racism.
Indigenous leaders faced intimidation and racist attacks on social media during the campaign.
First Nations communities made last-ditch efforts to rally support, but it was too late.
The defeat of the voice referendum has left a policy vacuum and exacerbated existing trauma in Aboriginal communities.
Indigenous leaders are calling for immediate action to address poverty and other issues, rather than focusing solely on the voice.
Despite the loss, First Nations people are determined to continue the fight and honor the struggles of their ancestors.
Transcripts
[Music]
the ballot paper is the same everywhere
across the country it's a choice between
yes or no a two horse
racing on warer country in inner city
Melbourne just over 2 weeks ago a few
dozen Aboriginal health workers gathered
to watch live coverage of the referendum
results hope is also a very powerful
medicine in less than 90 minutes it was
clear that nearly every state in
territory had voted no to the creation
of an indigenous voice so there it is
the indigenous voice referendum has been
defeated the atmosphere in the room was
pretty uh dismal I mean quietly I um a
lot of people kept saying to me are you
okay are you okay and of course you say
yes I am yes I am um but I needed a bit
of time by myself just
to probably offload by
myself after the crushing defeat of the
voice referendum Aboriginal and torist
straight Islander leaders like Auntie
Jill Gallagher are back at work
busy gundar Elder Auntie Jill fought for
years to see her people recognized in
the Constitution but she's now wondering
if there was a better way to win The
Voice campaign how many citizens out
there fully understood what this voice
was not
lost don't think we lost it on the basis
of uh what the yes campaign did we were
honest um we reached as many Australians
as we could we worked
hard together we can embrace the ulo
statement from the
heart after he was elected last year
Anthony albanesi promised he'd hold a
referendum in his first term as prime
minister for the next few months
Australians didn't hear much about the
voice but by November the unofficial no
campaign leapt out of the gate the
National Party lined up for the no case
and Senator jint Amber jimpa price
became one of the loudest voices
opposing the referendum we have to stop
dividing our nation along the lines of
race within weeks some seasoned first
nations campaigners were urging the
government to delay the vote over fears
that the yes case was Ill prepared and
few Australians understood the
proposal we understand that we need to
win a double majority so we need to win
the popular vote and the majority of
states that we needed the time to build
the support in a space where there
wasn't a noisy advertising no campaign
so we made a recommendation that if you
wanted to win this you needed to run it
in 2024 to postpone might have been to
make it uh you know to cancel it forever
there was no guarantee that would go
there to wait wait for whoever's elected
next term uh you know in the next
federal Parliament you just don't
know the government stuck to a 2023
referendum
[Music]
date yes 23 became the official campaign
and was built by indigenous leaders
unionists and non-indigenous political
operatives from the left and the right
it brought in around 70,000 volunteers
and millions in philanthropic f funding
and donations but when yes 23 launched
polls showed support for the voice was
declining bungong woman Lissa Baldwin
Roberts leads the progressive campaign
group get up she grew increasingly
concerned that yes 23 was slow to launch
in the official campaign there was such
a huge delay in getting a campaign out
the door there were plenty of people
that I talked to uh you know in
indigenous leadership who were seeing
this and asking questions and I was
saying to them you're absolutely right
we need to have been out there we have
to go we have to go now Lissa Baldwin
Roberts says she then urged yes 23 to
tap into getup's logistical expertise
and experience in running campaigns with
Aboriginal communities we're a big
Movement we have a lot of uh technical
skill there's a lot of money in that
campaign you could have brought them
into the campaign and so to disregard
indigenous knowledges in a campaign
about us to me I thought was
reprehensible yes yes yes but get up and
yes 23 ultimately could not agree on
strategy and ran separate campaigns we
were on the ground you know we were
working in First Nations communities uh
in indigenous communities we had the
land councils uh that um that put
resources towards
it when the Liberal Party announced in
April that it would oppose the voice
many indigenous leaders believed the
proposal was as good as dead in the
water okay thank you very much for you
need
bipartisanship bipartisan support to get
a referendum up mick gooda was one of
the architects of the proposed 24p
person voice model with the yes case
hemorrhaging support after dutton's
announcement he took a bold step and
pleaded publicly for other indigenous
leaders to compromise on the powers of
the voice I was approached by people
from the right who said look if we can
compromise on the question there might
be an opportunity to have another crack
at getting D and and little proud back
on side yes 23 campaigner Thomas Mayo
doesn't think there was any compromise
or detail that would have won
conservative support I didn't feel like
they were ever going to come on board
with anything I thought everything that
they had uh that they were proposing
wasn't from a genuine Place uh the 15
questions that uh Peter Dutton put out
you know were only looking for more
reasons to oppose it uh certainly didn't
feel that he was ever uh there to
discuss things with us in good
faith mck gooda was one of several
Aboriginal leaders who was dismayed that
the government chose not to put out
draft legislation on The Voice design I
thought that was another fital mistake
we made by not releasing the detail they
should have just said having Regional
structures we going have a state each
jurisdiction will have a state voice and
then we'll have a national voice what
could be more simple than that people
have got to know what they're voting for
and if they don't vote
don't know what they're voting for they
generally vote no today I announced that
referendum day will be the 14th of
October by the time a six- week
referendum campaign on The Voice began
in Earnest in late August the no
campaign messaging had gained a strong
foothold if you don't understand if you
don't know the detail if you don't know
vote no C issues yeah I guess that's
what you can call
a fe fight with misinformation The Voice
will be at sick on steroids The Voice
will be used to steal Australian land
and assets exposing indigenous people
across the country to increased levels
of racism and
abuse it was expected that we would have
a robust campaign the disinformation was
not just uh uh about being dishonest to
the Australian people to confuse them
and to cause fear uh but it was also
about
intimidation um there was a mobilization
of uh social media um and it was there
was a lot of racist vitriol um it was
targeted um at leaders especially
indigenous leaders to try and scare us
or try and intimidate us out of speaking
up um it was uh it was unprecedented as
a campaigner honestly I've never seen a
campaign like this in this country in
terms of the way that racism was
mobilizing the debate and for us it
wasn't just about losing it was about
the damage that was being done the idea
that our kids are going to school every
single day and having to deal with this
[Applause]
debate in the final weeks before the
vote First Nations communities did all
they could to rally for
yes it was way too late we should have
been informing and educating people well
before that um um uh referendum date was
called
the stunning defeat of the voice
referendum now leaves a policy vacuum
and it's heightened existing trauma in
communities across the country many
Aboriginal families still live in abject
poverty and there is no National
representative group that can advise
governments indigenous leaders say the
status quo cannot continue I think that
uh the government needs to show its
confidence in a and Australia and the
efforts that we've made especially in
closing the Gap now I'm sick to death of
process I'm sick to death of red tape I
want the rubber to hit the road and the
money to get at in at Community level to
be able Pat Turner leads the Coalition
of Peaks dozens of the major indigenous
organizations across Australia she's
concerned the referendum has taken focus
of policies needed to close the gamp
there's been a huge focus on the voice
but now that's done in dusted
you know we have to move on with closing
the Gap I've met with every cabinet in
Australia except the albanesi cabinet
which I'm hoping to do uh before we meet
again in National cabinet the government
has told 7:30 its efforts towards
closing the Gap have continued
consistently throughout the
campaign this year when we held the
referendum the Gap has widened uh and so
you know I I thought it was um if we
didn't take this opportunity we would be
wanding uh probably for another 20
years despite their heartache First
Nations people will use this defeat as
fire for the next
fight I think we go back to our old
people and we look at the struggles they
went through but they kept fighting and
I think that's where we've got to go
back to and and honor those people who
came before us and we can't give
up
Weitere ähnliche Videos ansehen
BLV Quang Huy: Chiến lược của HLV Troussier chưa hiệu quả nhưng phù hợp để tuyển Việt Nam tiến xa
How do you end a 30-year war?
What was The Indian Removal Act?
CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO | ¿Qué es la "ebullición global" de la que advierte la ONU? | EL PAÍS
LA GUERRA CIVIL ESPAÑOLA EN 3 MINUTOS - DRAW - 🧐
What barriers exist in women's sport?
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)