Rating EVERY Call of Duty From 0-10 (Campaign and Multiplayer)

Summary

In this video, the host ranks all mainline Call of Duty games from worst to best, evaluating both their single-player campaigns and multiplayer modes on a scale of 1 to 10. The host provides brief insights into each game, sharing personal opinions and experiences, and invites viewers to share their thoughts in the comments. The video also discusses an upcoming series where the host will play and review every Call of Duty game, and announces a sponsorship by PrizePi, a daily fantasy sports platform.

Takeaways

• 🎮 The video creator is producing content ranking Call of Duty games on campaign and multiplayer aspects.
• 🗓 The ranking includes all major AAA releases from Call of Duty 1 to Modern Warfare 3.
• 🤔 The creator aims to provide concise reviews, limiting discussion to 30 seconds per game aspect.
• 📈 A scale of 1 to 10 is used to rate each game's campaign and multiplayer modes.
• 🎥 The video is sponsored by Prize Pick, a daily fantasy sports platform in North America.
• 🚀 The creator plans to play and review every Call of Duty game over the next year.
• 🛠 The video creator acknowledges that subjective ratings may lead to disagreements among viewers.
• 💭 Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare is praised for its revolutionary campaign and multiplayer introductions.
• 🏆 Black Ops 1 is considered to have one of the best campaigns, scoring a 9.5 out of 10.
• 📉 Call of Duty: Vanguard is regarded as having the worst campaign and below-average multiplayer.
• 📊 The best overall multiplayer experience is attributed to Black Ops 2, while the worst is shared between Call of Duty: Ghosts and Modern Warfare 2.

Q & A

What was the main purpose of the video?

The main purpose of the video was to rate and rank every Call of Duty game, including both campaign and multiplayer aspects, on a scale of 1 to 10.

How did the speaker plan to follow up the video?

The speaker planned to follow up by playing and reviewing every single Call of Duty game over the next year, starting in February, providing reviews, story summaries, and other content.

What was the video sponsored by and what does it offer?

The video was sponsored by Prize Pick, which is described as the largest daily fantasy sports platform in North America where users play against the numbers by picking players and their stats.

What was the speaker's rating for the campaign of Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare?

The speaker gave the campaign of Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare an 8 out of 10.

How did the speaker describe the campaign of Call of Duty: Vanguard?

The speaker described the campaign of Call of Duty: Vanguard as the worst story in any Call of Duty campaign ever, giving it a 1.5 out of 10.

Which Call of Duty game had the most well-rounded campaign and multiplayer according to the speaker?

According to the speaker, Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 had the most well-rounded campaign and multiplayer, receiving a 9 out of 10 for both aspects.

What was the speaker's main issue with the multiplayer of Call of Duty: Ghosts?

The speaker's main issue with the multiplayer of Call of Duty: Ghosts was the incredibly fast time to kill, which led to a campy play style and was not enjoyable for them.

How did the speaker feel about the campaign of Call of Duty: World at War compared to Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare?

The speaker felt that the campaign of Call of Duty: World at War was not as good as Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, lacking the same depth and character focus, but still appreciated it for its World War II story and realism.

What was the speaker's overall best and worst rated multiplayer experiences?

The speaker's overall best rated multiplayer experience was Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 with a 9 out of 10, while the worst was Call of Duty: Ghosts with a 4 out of 10.

Which Call of Duty game had a campaign that the speaker found unrelatable and disliked the most?

The speaker found the campaign of Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare to be the most unrelatable and disliked it the most, giving it a 2 out of 10.

What was the speaker's approach to rating the games?

The speaker's approach to rating the games was to limit the discussion to about 30 seconds per campaign or multiplayer, providing a brief explanation and then giving a score on a scale of 1 to 10.