XReal Air 2 Pro VS Meta Quest 3 - Can VR/AR enhance your productivity?

Summary

In this video, the host explores whether VR and AR devices like the Apple Vision Pro, Meta Quest 3, and X-Real Air2 Pro can enhance productivity or if a traditional large monitor is still superior. After testing these devices for various tasks, the host concludes that while they offer unique features like portability and immersive experiences, they currently can't replace a good widescreen monitor for long-term productivity due to issues like limited field of vision, motion sickness, and discomfort from prolonged use.

Takeaways

• 🤔 The video explores whether devices like Apple Vision Pro, Meta Quest 3, or Xreal Air2 Pro glasses can enhance productivity compared to using a large monitor.
• 💸 The creator doesn't own an Apple Vision Pro due to its high price but uses the Meta Quest 3 and Xreal Air2 Pro glasses for comparison.
• 🕶️ Xreal Air2 Pro glasses are much smaller and lighter than Meta Quest 3 but require connection to a companion device like a MacBook, and they have limited field of view and screen size.
• 🎛️ The Meta Quest 3 is a self-contained VR headset with a much wider field of view and superior resolution, but it's bulky and heavy, making long-term use uncomfortable.
• 🖥️ The Xreal Air2 Pro glasses provide a basic virtual display, acting as an additional monitor when plugged in, but the screen feels small, and the field of vision is limited.
• 🎮 Both devices have some drawbacks for productivity: the Xreal glasses cause motion sickness in virtual mode, and the Meta Quest 3 feels too heavy for prolonged use.
• 🖱️ The virtual desktop software on the Meta Quest 3 shows significant lag when using a mouse, making it impractical for productivity tasks.
• ⚙️ The Immersed app works better for Meta Quest 3 in creating a smooth, lag-free virtual workspace with virtual monitors, but the device's weight remains a challenge.
• 💻 The Xreal glasses are great for media consumption and provide some privacy for work in public places, but they're not as efficient for complex tasks.
• 🏁 The conclusion is that neither the Meta Quest 3 nor the Xreal Air2 Pro can fully replace a traditional large monitor for productivity.

Q & A

What was the initial discussion that prompted the video's exploration?

The discussion began when the video creator's colleagues mentioned they bought the Apple Vision Pro to enhance their productivity, which led to the question of whether such devices can genuinely improve productivity or if a large monitor is still superior.

What are the two devices compared in the video for productivity purposes?

The video compares the Meta Quest 3, a popular VR headset, and the X Real Air2 Pro glasses, which are one of the more popular glasses format displays, to determine their effectiveness for productivity.

What are the specifications of the Meta Quest 3 mentioned in the video?

The Meta Quest 3 is a full VR headset with color video pass-through, two LCD screens each with a resolution of 2,640 by 2,280, a Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 processor, 8 GB of RAM, and 128 GB of storage.

What are the key features of the X Real Air2 Pro glasses as described in the video?

The X Real Air2 Pro glasses feature two micro OLED screens with full HD resolution per eye, electrochromatic dimming lenses for variable light control, and a face plate for additional darkness. They are significantly smaller and lighter than the Meta Quest 3.

How does the field of view (FOV) differ between the X Real Air2 Pro glasses and the Meta Quest 3?

The X Real Air2 Pro glasses have a field of view (FOV) of about 46°, which is quite limited, while the Meta Quest 3 offers a much larger FOV of 110°, allowing for a more immersive peripheral vision.

What software does the video creator use to test the productivity of the X Real Air2 Pro glasses?

The video creator uses the Nebula software to test the productivity of the X Real Air2 Pro glasses, which allows for the creation of virtual desktops and an extended workspace.

What issues were encountered when using the virtual desktop feature with the X Real Air2 Pro glasses?

The virtual desktop feature with the X Real Air2 Pro glasses caused motion sickness due to a noticeable judder and motion lag, making it difficult for the video creator to use for an extended period.

How does the comfort level of the Meta Quest 3 compare to the X Real Air2 Pro glasses?

The Meta Quest 3 is much heavier and less comfortable for prolonged use compared to the X Real Air2 Pro glasses, which are lightweight and comfortable to wear.

What app is used to test the productivity of the Meta Quest 3, and what were the findings?

The Immersed app is used to test the productivity of the Meta Quest 3. The video creator found it to be more usable than Virtual Desktop for productivity tasks, with better mouse tracking and the ability to set up a workspace with virtual displays.

What is the conclusion of the video regarding the use of VR and AR devices for productivity?

The conclusion is that neither the X Real Air2 Pro glasses nor the Meta Quest 3 can realistically replace a good widescreen monitor for productivity. The glasses have a limited FOV and the VR headset, despite offering a better FOV and smoother experience, is too heavy and uncomfortable for long periods of use.