AICE History Paper 1 b

Summary

This video tutorial focuses on ACE History Paper 1 Question B, guiding students through the process of analyzing four sources to support or challenge a given assertion. It covers the rubric, formatting tips, and essential elements for a successful response. The instructor advises against sequential source analysis, suggesting instead to group sources by their stance and to include a concluding paragraph summarizing the sources' overall support or challenge to the prompt. The video also emphasizes the importance of textual evidence and understanding the rubric for achieving higher scores.

Takeaways

• 😀 The video focuses on question B of the East history paper 1, which is a source analysis question involving all four sources (A-D).
• 📚 The video provides a detailed look at the rubric for question B, which is different from question A and goes up to level 5, with a passing score starting at level 3.
• 📝 It's emphasized that students should not write about the sources in sequential order but should group sources that support or challenge the statement together.
• 💡 Formatting tips are given, such as starting with the strongest argument and ending with a paragraph that answers the overall question.
• ⏰ The video suggests allocating at least 30 minutes to answer question B due to its significance and point value in the exam.
• 🔍 Students are advised to read the questions carefully to understand what is required, such as supporting or challenging a statement with evidence from the sources.
• 📈 The rubric breakdown explains that level 0 and 1 are non-passing levels, while level 2 is the minimum passing level where students use sources to support or challenge a statement.
• 📋 Level 3 requires evidence of both support and challenge for all four sources, level 4 adds contextual knowledge and credibility analysis, and level 5 includes an overall analysis of how well the sources support or challenge the assertion.
• 📖 The video mentions the importance of providing textual evidence from the sources to back up any claims made in the response.
• 🤓 Practice with the rubric is encouraged to internalize the levels and requirements, which will help in performing well on the actual exam.

Q & A

What is the main focus of the video?

The video focuses on providing guidance for answering Question B of the AP European History Paper 1 exam.

How does Question B differ from Question A on the exam?

Question B requires analyzing all four sources (A to D), whereas Question A only requires looking at two sources.

What are the key phrases that students should look for in the exam questions?

Students should look for phrases like 'support the view', 'support the assertion', or 'support this view', which indicate the need to analyze how the sources support or challenge a given statement.

What is the significance of the rubric levels for Question B on the AP exam?

The rubric levels indicate the depth of analysis and the quality of the response. Level 3 is the minimum passing level, while levels 4 and 5 represent higher levels of analysis and contextual understanding.

Why is it important to provide textual evidence when analyzing the sources?

Providing textual evidence is crucial because it supports the analysis and shows that the student's claims are grounded in the content of the sources.

What is the recommended approach to writing the response for Question B?

It is recommended to group sources that support or challenge the statement together in the response, rather than writing about each source sequentially.

Why should students avoid writing about the sources in sequential order?

Writing about the sources in sequential order can make the response appear disjointed and may not effectively demonstrate a sustained judgment on the overall question.

How can students demonstrate a higher level of analysis in their response?

Students can demonstrate a higher level of analysis by including contextual knowledge, addressing credibility and reliability of the sources, and providing a sustained judgment on how well the sources support or challenge the assertion.

What is the significance of the final paragraph in the response?

The final paragraph is significant as it should answer the question in the prompt overall, providing a synthesis of the analysis and evidence presented in the response.

What is the advice for time management when answering Question B?

It is advised to allocate at least 30 minutes for Question B, as it is the longest part of Paper 1 and carries the most points.

Outlines

00:00

📚 Introduction to ACE History Paper 1 Question B

This paragraph introduces the focus of the video, which is Question B of the ACE History Paper 1. It contrasts Question B with Question A, highlighting that while both are source analysis questions, Question B requires analysis of all four sources compared to Question A's two. The video aims to provide general information about Question B, delve into the rubric, discuss formatting tips, and offer general advice for success. The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding the question requirements fully, especially the directive to analyze all four sources (A to D), not just two.

05:03

🔍 Analyzing the Rubric for Question B

The speaker delves into the rubric for Question B, explaining the differences between the rubrics for Questions A and B, particularly noting that Question B's rubric scales up to Level 5. The paragraph outlines the criteria for non-passing levels (0 and 1) and the passing levels (2 and above), with a focus on the need to both support and challenge the statement with evidence from all four sources. Level 3 requires evidence for support and challenge for all sources, Level 4 adds contextual knowledge and source credibility, and Level 5 includes an analysis of how well the sources support or challenge the assertion, with a sustained judgment throughout the response.

10:05

📝 Formatting Tips for Effective Answering

The final paragraph offers advice on how to structure the response to Question B effectively. It discourages writing about each source sequentially, which can appear disjointed and lack a sustained judgment. Instead, the speaker recommends grouping sources that support or challenge the statement together and leading with the strongest argument. It also stresses the importance of a final paragraph that answers the question in the prompt, considering the evidence and credibility of the sources. The advice aims to help students organize their thoughts clearly and present a coherent analysis that meets the rubric's requirements.

Keywords

💡ACE History Paper

The ACE History Paper refers to a specific examination paper in the Advanced Placement (AP) program for history. In the context of the video, it is the subject of a tutorial or guidance video, where the presenter is offering insights on how to approach and succeed in the examination. The script mentions 'ACE history paper 1 question B', indicating that the focus is on a particular section of the exam.

💡Source Analysis

Source analysis is a critical skill in historical studies where students evaluate the content and context of primary and secondary sources to draw conclusions. The video script discusses how to analyze sources A to D for question B of the ACE History Paper, emphasizing the need to support or challenge assertions based on the sources provided.

💡Rubric

A rubric in an educational context is a set of criteria that clarify how students will be assessed. The video script mentions looking at the rubric for question B, which outlines the levels of performance and the points awarded for each level. It's crucial for students to understand the rubric to know what is expected to achieve a passing grade.

💡Support and Challenge

In the context of the video, 'support' and 'challenge' refer to the actions of backing up or contradicting a historical assertion using evidence from the sources. The script explains that students must demonstrate how each source either supports or challenges the given assertion, which is a key part of answering question B effectively.

💡Textual Evidence

Textual evidence is direct引用 or information taken from the sources that students use to support their analysis. The video script stresses the importance of providing textual evidence for each source when arguing whether it supports or challenges the assertion, as this is a requirement for achieving higher levels on the rubric.

💡Credibility and Reliability

Credibility and reliability pertain to the trustworthiness and accuracy of the sources used in an analysis. The video script mentions that for higher levels on the rubric, students must consider the credibility and reliability of the sources, which involves assessing the author's authority and the source's potential biases.

💡Formatting Tips

Formatting tips refer to the structural and organizational advice given to students for presenting their answers in a clear and effective manner. The video script provides specific suggestions on how to format responses to question B, such as grouping sources that support or challenge the assertion together and writing a concluding paragraph that summarizes the overall analysis.

💡Sequential Order

Sequential order, as discussed in the video, refers to the temptation to write about each source in the order they appear (A, B, C, D). The presenter advises against this approach for question B, suggesting instead that sources should be grouped by how they support or challenge the assertion, which can lead to a more coherent and analytical response.

💡Level 3 to Level 5

These levels refer to the different tiers of performance on the rubric for question B. Level 3 marks the beginning of the passing range, where students must support and challenge the assertion for all four sources with evidence. Level 4 adds the requirement of including contextual knowledge and analyzing source credibility. Level 5 is the highest level, where students must provide an analysis of how well the sources support or challenge the assertion, demonstrating a sustained judgment.

💡Sustained Judgment

Sustained judgment is the ability to maintain a coherent and consistent argument throughout the response. The video script mentions that for the highest levels on the rubric, students must show a sustained judgment on how the sources support or challenge the assertion, which involves a thorough analysis and conclusion that answers the prompt.

Highlights

Focus on ACE History Paper 1 Question B, which requires analyzing all four sources.

Question B differs from Question A by necessitating a look at all sources rather than just two.

Past exam questions illustrate the need to support or challenge a given view across all sources.

Students often misunderstand the term 'sources A to D' to mean only A and D, but it refers to all four.

The rubric for Question B extends up to level 5, with a passing threshold at level 3.

Level 0 of the rubric awards no points for irrelevant comments or lack of source analysis.

At level 1, students may describe sources without linking them to the question, earning 1-5 points.

Level 2 requires using sources to support or challenge a statement, earning 6-10 points.

Level 3 is the entry to the passing range, requiring evidence of support and challenge for all sources.

Level 4 adds contextual knowledge and credibility analysis, earning 16-20 points.

Level 5 involves a comprehensive analysis of source support or challenge, scoring 21-25 points.

Formatting tips discourage sequential source analysis and encourage grouping sources by their stance.

It's recommended to start with the strongest argument and end with a conclusion that answers the prompt.

Allocate at least 30 minutes to answer Question B due to its significance and point value.

Ensure all four sources are addressed and that textual evidence is provided for each.

Familiarize yourself with the rubric to guide your preparation and exam responses.

Transcripts

hey guys in this video we'll be talking

about East history paper one question

dee if you're looking for general

information about paper 1 or detailed

information about question a please

check out the other video ace history

paper 1 question a that will have all

the information you're looking for but

for today's video we're gonna be

focusing on question B in this video

we're gonna be going over some general

information about the question looking

in depth at the rubric discussing some

formatting tips and finally going over

there's some general things to remember

and a couple tips for you if you're

looking for that reliability stands

which is a very key component to this

question please check out the other

video about credibility but for now

let's go ahead and get started

all right so let's look at question B

here question B is a slightly different

than question a although they're both

still source analysis questions question

a ask you to look at two sources where

question B asks you to look at all four

other questions let's go ahead and take

a look at a couple of the questions here

these are three different questions from

a past ace exam the first one is from

the European option second from the

American and third from the

International option these are actually

the orders you would see them on the

actual ace exam when you sit down the

first part of the test first couple

pages is European the middle part is the

American section and the final couple

pages is the International part of the

test now if you look here we look at the

word e here I wants to point out

something for you as you can see here it

says sources A to D this there's awful

lot of students for some reason I'll

have students read this and think this

means sources a and D when in fact this

means all four sources so regardless of

the wording here which I have to say ace

has switched up the wording him has

gotten a little bit better they will now

say sources a through D a lot of times

but regardless of how its worded you

need to divert sources a B C and D the

next thing to note in these questions is

what you're supposed to be really

looking at here if you look here it says

support the view support the assertion

or support this view for these three

questions so you're looking at how far

sources a through D all of them support

the view in the rest of the question so

let's go ahead and look at the question

this is the meat of what you're doing

here you need to be reading and

analyzing these sources based on the

statements in the prompts so let's look

at the American one here real quick how

far do sources a to D support the

assertion that a civil war had commits

commenced in Kansas in 1856 so through

your reading under sources you're going

to be focusing on that specific question

here so when you read source a you're

gonna see if it supports that a Civil

War had commenced in Kansas in 1856 and

remember here it can show weak support

strong support moderate support weak

chat weekly challenge the assertion

strongly challenged the assertion or

moderately challenged the assertion and

have to be 100% one way or the other and

that's the same way you see it on the

European option and also for the

international option here so it's

important to make sure you're reading

your actual questions carefully now that

you've got the questions looked at and

you know what you're supposed to be

doing let's go ahead and take a look at

the rubric here to analyze what you need

to be doing to make sure you pass this

part of the exam

alright now let's take a look at the

rubrics here now the rubric for question

B is different than for question a and

in fact for both of your a s level at

papers for your ace exam you're gonna

have two different rubrics for both

papers question is have there own

rubrics and B's have their own rubrics

now the big difference between your

question a rubrics and your question B

rubrics is the level it goes up to so

for this one since we're working on

paper one question B here paper this B

level goes up to level 5 so we're going

from level 0 all the way up to level 5

like all the other ACE rubrics you're

passing range begins at level 3 so let's

go ahead and break down each level of

the rubric here all right so let's

briefly begin with the non passing

levels starting out with level 0 level 0

which gets you a grand total of zero

points as you can imagine here if you

get a level 0 you're not providing any

relevant comment on the sources or the

issue meaning whatever you're writing

about if you wrote anything at all has

absolutely nothing to do with the

information at hand the sources or the

question level 1 here you're not using

valid you're not making valid uses of

the sources this is um you can range

here from one point up to 5 points so

you might describe the sources and

explain the content of the sources

without actually linking it to the

question or you might discuss the actual

question without actually giving any

reference to the sources that would get

you into the level 1 range level 2 which

is also not passing looks similar to

part of the rubric for question a here

you're using the sources to support for

challenge the statement this gets you

when you are from 6 to 10 points so in

other words you're looking at the

sources and only answering it from one

angle so you're only saving and giving

information about how the sources

support the statement and the question

or potentially which one's challenged a

statement and you're not giving detail

about both and that's an important thing

here you have to support and challenge

the statement which brings us up to our

passing range now let's go into depth on

the passing hp's level 3 is where you

get into the e range and on up so let's

go ahead and take a detailed look there

alright level 3 this is where you

support

and it challenged the statement for all

four of your sources this means that you

have to give evidence for both now each

one of your sources is not going to both

support and challenge the statement you

don't have to do that for each one of

the sources what you have to do is say

source a supports the statement and then

give evidence source P challenges the

statement then give evidence and then

say from the same and then the same for

sources C and D so you're really looking

here that you're trying to do both your

finding evidence of support and

challenge because there will be at least

one point of the sources that does the

opposite of the other so you have to

have that support and challenge with all

four of the sources and key here is you

have to actually provide evidence you

have to give textual evidence for what

you're stating so I give you here an

example of how you might format this

with source age challenges the assertion

that and then insert whatever was in the

prompt by and then give your direct

evidence from your source to fall into

level three here you only you get from

eleven to fifteen points here for your

level three so if you just do that

information for all four of their

sources and nothing else you will fall

into the level three range finally the

highest score but you'll fall into that

level three range and at least scrape a

knee now moving on to level four which

can get you anywhere from 16 to 20

points level 4 you have to do everything

you did in level 3 plus you need to make

sure you're adding in that contextual

knowledge so what do you know about the

topic or the source that's not

specifically written inside the source

so if it's written by Abraham Lincoln

what do you know about Abraham Lincoln

that is relevant to the overall topic

here you also here get in your

credibility and reliability aspect of

your sources I'm not going to go into

detail with this right here because I've

made a completely other video that

really goes into depth about what you

need to do for your credibility and

reliability so for a level 4 here what

you're doing you might have source a

challenges the assertion that whatever's

from the prompt by your evidence and

then give me a couple more go into

further explanation about your analysis

here and they were note however source 8

has some credibility issues do too and

insert your encrypt your credibility

analysis now I know this might sound

confusing but this is

only one of those practice makes perfect

things so don't be too thrown off if you

do not get this right away this takes

time this takes practice now let's move

on up to level five which gets you

twenty one to twenty five points these

are the big point total here so of

course you're doing everything you did

in level 3 and level 4 plus you're

giving an analysis of how well the

sources support more challenges the

assertion so in other words you need to

add in and show support for whether or

not this or strongly supports the

statement and the prompt moderately or

weakly now you can't just say it weakly

supports the statement without giving

any evidence of why it's weak you have

to give that full evidence there as well

and this gives you also that sustained

judgment on how well the sources support

the prompt so this would be like a final

paragraph where you really I would say

truly thoroughly answering the question

overall do the sources support the

assertion that the Civil War had

commenced in Kansas and then give me

evidence about how the sources prove

that or just go against it so that would

be what you need to do for your level 5

all right now let's go over some

formatting tips unlike the other ace

papers question 1 our paper one question

bead doesn't have a really strong clear

formatting guideline here

granted you can get out you can format

your papers any way you choose to

however there are certain ways that just

make it more clear what you're doing and

make it easier for the actual scores

these a little different here for paper

1 so but I'm gonna give you some tips

here and some strong suggestions but

first I'm gonna start with what I would

highly suggest you don't do and that's

to write about the sources in sequential

order what I mean by that is I'm highly

encouraging not to write one paragraph

on source a one paragraph in source be a

third paragraph on source see a fourth

paragraph on source C and then a final

paragraph to wrap it together there's a

couple reasons for that

one it looks like you're not really

putting a whole lot of thought into the

question in this case your formatting

can actually help prove that you're

creating a sustained judgement as you

write your paper this just looks like

your went ahead dover ID inquest or say

wrote down what you thought without

actually piecing it together for the

overall question here on whether or not

they support the statement it looks lazy

and in fact it actually takes a little

bit more time so I'm gonna highly

suggest you don't do that so what I

would suggest you do is group your

sources what I mean by this is if source

a and D both support the statement in

the question write about them together

in one paragraph show they how they

supplement each other and work with the

question do that with all of your

sources

that's one highly recommended aspect

also but your first part you should

write about your very first paragraph

should of course be your strongest

argument so don't just jump in with

source a if you're going to write about

how the if your overall arguments going

to be that the sources support the

statement but source a challenge is it

don't write about source a first let's

say sources C and D or what your

strongest argument is write about them

in your first paragraph that shows what

you're really thinking about it in the

context of the overall question here and

finally don't forget a final paragraph

that actually I would say answers the

question in the prompts so let's go

ahead and look at

examples of formatting here all right so

this is an example of something you

might choose to do let's say for your

first paragraph your strongest argument

is that sources B and D support the

statement in the question so you're

gonna write about sources B indeed give

your support and analyze the credibility

for both of them your second paragraph

would be about sources and see if they

challenge it together give support and

analysis for each an analyst credibility

for both of these and then finally a

third paragraph that where you overall

the state whether the sources argue at

the prompt you're actually answering the

question here I would say with providing

evidence with how the credible evidence

how and with the credibility consider so

you're proving that the source is

overall support or challenge the

statement in the prompt another option

here is that what's say one of your

sources here is neutral so you might

actually end up with four paragraphs

here to the paragraph about the sources

that support paragraph about your

sources that may challenge and a third

paragraph about a neutral source

remember here you're also organizing

them based off of what your strongest

argument is but don't forget that final

paragraph here that's very important

here to get that level four and five

range is basically answering the

question again overall do the sources

agree with the prompts with evidence of

how and with that credibility considered

so if you follow those formatting tips

you're going to be following your way

and finally let's look at some things to

remember as you're writing your paper

one question be remembered to try to

give yourself at least 30 minutes this

is the longest part of your question

paper 1 and it's worth the most points

so you need to try to make sure that you

get yourself as much time to answer this

question but don't sacrifice from

actually doing well on question a but

just keep in mind this one is worth the

most points so you also might want to

write this part of your test question

first you might want to answer this one

first when it can see actual tests also

make sure you use all four sources

regardless of what the wording says

don't get caught up on that a to D we

answer with all four sources and make

sure you get all four sources written

down which is also important to look

back at that time don't run outta time

here it means to make sure that you get

all four sources also don't forget to

provide that textual evidence for all

four of the sources you would need to

prove what you're saying based off of

the sources themselves so give that

evidence and finally follow the rubric

learn it like the back of your hand make

sure when you sit down there on test day

you know what you need to do to pass

this test

so I would really encourage you to

practice as much as you can with the

rubric not necessarily memorizing it but

if you work with it and look at it while

you're writing it and while you're

practicing these throughout the year

it'll really help you commit to the

rubric to memory and that's paper one

question me if you have any questions

please leave them in the comments below

and of course feel free to check out any

of the other ace history videos on this

page thank you for watching