It's Time to Discuss the Elephant in the Room...

Growing Up In Scientology
4 May 2024131:09

TLDRThe video transcript features a detailed discussion by the host regarding the ongoing conflicts within the former Scientology community, particularly addressing the drama and infighting involving the Aftermath Foundation. The host expresses his intention to address the 'elephant in the room' and to discuss the situation rationally. He outlines three main issues: the internal disputes within the community, his personal situation involving his marriage and relationships, and the controversy surrounding the handling of information by certain Aftermath Foundation members. The host also criticizes the Foundation's board members for attacking former Scientologists and discusses the role of Mike Rinder and Leah Remini in the conflicts. He further accuses Remini of enabling and encouraging an individual to create defamatory content about him, which he considers a form of 'fair game' tactics. The host calls for an end to the hostilities and invites a truce, provided that it does not involve silencing criticism of Scientology's past practices and key figures.


  • 📢 The speaker addresses the ongoing drama and infighting within the former Scientology community, particularly focusing on the actions of the Aftermath Foundation board members.
  • 🚫 The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of intervention by Aftermath Foundation leaders, such as Leah Remini and Mike Rinder, against the attacks by board members on fellow former Scientologists.
  • 🤔 The speaker questions why the Aftermath Foundation board members continue to engage in behavior that contradicts the organization's code of conduct, and why they do not put an end to the attacks.
  • 😣 The speaker shares personal experiences of being targeted by individuals using his private life to discredit him, including false rumors about his health status.
  • 🔍 The speaker investigates and reveals a coordinated campaign against him, involving the spread of rumors and the encouragement of attacks by individuals outside the Scientology community.
  • 📛 The speaker calls out specific individuals, including Matt Pesh and Leah Remini, for their roles in the ongoing conflict and for their apparent hypocrisy regarding the treatment of former Scientologists.
  • 💔 The speaker discusses the betrayal and manipulation of his personal life, including his marriage, by those who were once close to him, and how this information is being used against him.
  • 🤝 The speaker emphasizes the importance of unity within the movement against Scientology and the need to focus on the common goal rather than internal conflicts.
  • 📉 The speaker suggests that the actions of certain individuals are damaging the credibility and effectiveness of the movement to expose the abuses of Scientology.
  • 🚫 The speaker refuses to be silenced and commits to continuing his work to expose Scientology, regardless of the personal attacks he is facing.
  • ✊ The speaker ends with a call for an end to the infighting and a return to focusing on the mission of helping people leave Scientology and raising awareness of its abuses.

Q & A

  • What is the main issue being discussed in the transcript?

    -The main issue discussed is the ongoing drama and infighting within the former Scientology community, particularly focusing on the actions of the Aftermath Foundation board members and their criticism of other former Scientologists.

  • Why does the speaker believe the drama within the community is harmful?

    -The speaker believes it is harmful because it distracts from the primary goal of exposing the abuses of Scientology and supporting those who wish to leave the organization.

  • What is the 'elephant in the room' referred to in the title?

    -The 'elephant in the room' refers to the underlying issue or unspoken truth that the Aftermath Foundation board members, particularly Leah Remini and Mike Rinder, are attacking and undermining other former Scientologists who criticize them or their actions.

  • What is the speaker's stance on the criticism of Mike Rinder?

    -The speaker believes that while Mike Rinder has done valuable work in exposing Scientology, he is not above criticism and should be able to withstand scrutiny, especially given his past role in the organization.

  • Why does the speaker feel betrayed by certain individuals?

    -The speaker feels betrayed because individuals he once considered allies or friends, such as Leah Remini and Mike Rinder, are now supporting or engaging in actions that attack or undermine him and his work.

  • What is the speaker's view on the use of personal information to attack others?

    -The speaker condemns the use of personal information to attack others, referring to it as a form of 'fair game' tactics that are unethical and destructive.

  • What is the relationship between the speaker and the woman who has been making videos about him?

    -The woman making videos about the speaker is someone he had an on-and-off relationship with for about four years. Their relationship ended, and she has since been making videos criticizing him.

  • Why does the speaker believe the conflict within the community is escalating?

    -The speaker believes the conflict is escalating because influential figures like Leah Remini and Mike Rinder are not only failing to quell the infighting but are actively encouraging it, particularly against those who criticize them.

  • What does the speaker suggest as a solution to the ongoing conflict?

    -The speaker suggests that if the Aftermath Foundation board members and their agents stopped attacking former Scientologists, the temperature of the conflict would significantly decrease.

  • What is the significance of the OSA files mentioned in the transcript?

    -The OSA files are documents that Mike Rinder allegedly took with him when he left Scientology and later provided to the FBI. They contain records that could expose actual crimes and cover-ups within the Church of Scientology.

  • Why is the speaker pursuing legal action?

    -The speaker is pursuing legal action against a woman who has been making slanderous statements online about his marital status, which he claims are false and damaging to his reputation.



😀 Addressing the Elephant in the Room

The speaker begins by addressing the audience on the SPTv channel, acknowledging the recent drama and infighting within the community. They express their intention to discuss the issues calmly and rationally, noting the presence of former Scientologists criticizing each other. The speaker also mentions their own channel's focus on exposing Scientology rather than engaging in personal disputes.


😔 The Ongoing Drama and Its Impact

The speaker delves into the negative impact of the drama and infighting, particularly the involvement of the Aftermath Foundation board members. They question why the situation hasn't been resolved, especially when figures like Leah Remini and Mike Rinder could potentially intervene. The speaker also discusses their personal life, including their separation from their wife and the subsequent backlash they faced when this information was made public.


😠 Dealing with Personal Attacks

The speaker recounts their experience with an individual they had a relationship with, who has now begun to publicly accuse the speaker of being abusive after learning that the speaker is divorcing his wife and entering a new relationship. The speaker expresses surprise and dismay at the support this individual has received from members of the Aftermath Foundation.


🤔 The Connection Between Personal and Public Drama

The speaker ties together the various strands of drama, questioning the motivations behind the attacks from the Aftermath Foundation board members and others. They discuss a video they made about the victims of Danny Masterson and Brian Kent, and the subsequent email they received from Matt Pesch, an Aftermath Foundation board member, which they believe triggered a series of events leading to a deeper understanding of the situation.


😡 Responding to False Rumors

The speaker shares an email from Matt Pesch, which included a false rumor about the speaker having a sexually transmitted disease. They address the absurdity of the rumor and question why Pesch and others would spread such information. The speaker also discusses the role of a fake Anonymous Twitter account in the spread of rumors and threats.


🤨 The Role of Leah Remini and Mike Rinder

The speaker criticizes Leah Remini and Mike Rinder for their perceived roles in the ongoing drama, suggesting that they are responsible for the actions of the Aftermath Foundation board members. They discuss the power dynamics within the community and the need for accountability, expressing disappointment at what they see as hypocrisy from figures they had previously respected.


👥 The Broader Implications of the Conflict

The speaker reflects on the broader implications of the conflict, emphasizing the importance of the movement to expose Scientology and the potential harm caused by infighting. They argue that all members of the community, including themselves, should be open to criticism and that no one should be considered untouchable.


📚 The Aftermath Foundation and Its Alleged Misdeeds

The speaker provides a detailed account of their interactions with the Aftermath Foundation, including allegations of the foundation's board members and associates engaging in behavior contrary to its stated goals. They discuss specific incidents and individuals, expressing their disappointment and outlining their reasons for taking a stand against certain actions.


🤔 The Motives Behind the Attacks

The speaker ponders the motives behind the attacks from Leah Remini and others, suggesting that there may be a connection to their criticism of Mike Rinder. They emphasize their own commitment to transparency and honesty, even when discussing difficult personal matters.


📖 The Issue with OSA Files

The speaker discusses the controversy surrounding the OSA (Office of Special Affairs) files, which Mike Rinder allegedly took from Scientology and later shared within the community. They question the intentions behind the handling of these files and why certain individuals were given access while others were not.


😤 The Final Stand on Accountability

In the concluding part, the speaker reiterates the importance of holding everyone accountable for their actions, including high-profile figures in the anti-Scientology movement. They express their willingness to face criticism and challenge others to do the same, advocating for a community that focuses on its goals rather than internal conflicts.


🎸 Ending on a Musical Note

The speaker concludes the video with a brief musical interlude, offering a lighter note after the heavy discussion. They also provide information on how viewers can access more of their content or subscribe to their channel.




Scientology is a set of religious beliefs and practices that was developed in the early 1950s by L. Ron Hubbard. In the video, it is discussed as an organization with alleged abusive practices and is the central topic of criticism and exposure efforts by the speaker and others in the community.


Infighting refers to conflict or rivalry within a group. The speaker mentions infighting within the community of former Scientologists, particularly focusing on the negative impact it has on their collective goals and the 'drama' it creates.


An ex-Scientologist is someone who was previously a member of the Church of Scientology but has since left the organization. The video discusses the experiences and actions of ex-Scientologists, their criticism of the church, and their involvement in exposing its alleged abuses.

💡Aftermath Foundation

The Aftermath Foundation is an organization that provides support to victims of Scientology. It is mentioned in the video as a source of controversy, with the speaker discussing perceived attacks from its board members and questioning its ethical conduct.

💡Fair Game

Fair Game is a term that was historically used within Scientology to describe the treatment of critics or enemies of the Church, often involving attempts to destroy their reputations or harass them. The speaker accuses others of using 'Fair Game' tactics against him and other critics of Scientology.

💡Private Life

Private life refers to aspects of a person's life that are not public or shared with others. The speaker discusses his own private life, particularly his marital status, and how it has been made public and used against him by others to discredit his work against Scientology.

💡Code of Conduct

A code of conduct is a set of rules or principles that outline acceptable behavior. The video references the code of conduct of the Aftermath Foundation board members and questions their adherence to it, given the alleged attacks on former Scientologists.

💡STI (Sexually Transmitted Infection)

An STI is an infection that is spread through sexual contact. In the video, the speaker addresses a rumor that he has an STI, which he vehemently denies. This rumor is used as an example of the personal attacks he is facing.


Anonymous is a loosely associated international group of activists who engage in protests and other actions against various institutions, including the Church of Scientology. The speaker discusses a fake Twitter account pretending to be Anonymous and how it is being used to spread threats.


Slander is the act of making a false spoken statement that harms the reputation of another person. The speaker mentions slander in the context of false claims being made about him online, for which he states he is pursuing legal action.

💡Open Marriage

An open marriage is a type of marriage in which the partners have agreed to be non-monogamous, allowing for romantic or sexual relationships with others. The speaker discusses his marital arrangement as an 'open marriage' and how it has been misrepresented by others to attack his character.


The speaker addresses the 'elephant in the room', referring to ongoing drama and infighting within the former Scientology community.

The speaker expresses concern over the negative impact of this conflict on the business of exposing Scientology.

Mentions of specific individuals, including Mike Rinder and Leah Remini, who are criticized for their lack of action against ongoing attacks within the community.

The speaker discusses the creation of the New SPTv Foundation as a positive outlet post the controversy with the Aftermath Foundation.

Details of personal drama involving the speaker's separated status and relationships are shared to provide context for the ongoing attacks.

The speaker reveals that they are in the process of divorcing their wife, despite previous statements about an open marriage arrangement.

A woman, upset over the end of her relationship with the speaker, has been creating content criticizing him, which is endorsed by the Aftermath Foundation board members.

The speaker condemns the behavior of the Aftermath Foundation board members for publicly attacking other former Scientologists.

Matt Pesh, an Aftermath Foundation board member, sends an email to the speaker, which is discussed as a catalyst for the video's discussion.

The speaker outlines a coordinated campaign against them, including false rumors of an STD, which they find absurd but concerning if true.

A fake Twitter account pretending to be 'Anonymous' is exposed as a source of threats against the speaker and the SPTv Foundation.

Leah Remini and other Aftermath Foundation members are called out for liking and retweeting threats made by the fake 'Anonymous' account.

The speaker calls for an end to the hypocrisy and the divisive tactics being used within the community, urging a refocusing on the goal of exposing Scientology.

The speaker offers support to their wife, who has been unwittingly involved in the controversy, and addresses the manipulation of her words.

A call to action for the community to unite against the common enemy, Scientology, rather than fighting amongst themselves.

The speaker asserts their willingness to be open to questions and criticisms, inviting dialogue in the spirit of transparency.