How I rate limit without third party services
TLDRThe video discusses the importance of rate limiting in web applications to prevent abuse and maintain a good user experience. The speaker shares how they implemented a simple rate limiter by IP and by key (such as user ID) in their application. The rate limiter allows a certain number of requests within a specified time period, and throws an error if the limit is exceeded. The speaker notes that while this in-memory approach works well for a single server, it can run into issues when scaling up to multiple servers or a serverless environment. In such cases, using a centralized store like Redis is recommended. The video provides a practical example of how to implement rate limiting, and suggests ways to further refine the approach for different types of actions and environments.
Takeaways
- 🛡️ Implementing rate limiting is crucial for web applications to prevent abuse and ensure a good user experience.
- 🚫 Without rate limiting, malicious users can flood the system with data, leading to a poor experience and strain on the database.
- 💡 The speaker has created a custom rate limiter that allows a specified number of requests within a certain period, using an interface that is easy to implement.
- 🔒 An action error is used to handle exceptions within the rate limiting process, which can be displayed in the user interface.
- 📈 The rate limiter initially works in memory, which is suitable for single server setups, but can run into issues when scaling up.
- ⚖️ For scaling, using a centralized data store like Redis can help maintain consistent rate limiting across multiple servers.
- 🌐 The rate limiter function checks the IP address from the request headers, considering 'x-forwarded-for' or 'x-real-ip' if set.
- 🔄 The rate limit tracking uses a JavaScript object as a map to keep track of IP addresses and their request counts and expiration times.
- 🚦 If the request count exceeds the limit within the time window, an error is thrown to prevent further requests.
- 🔑 An alternative approach is to rate limit by a key, such as a user ID, which can be more effective for authenticated users.
- 🧹 Code cleanup and abstraction allow for easier maintenance and the potential to switch to different storage solutions like Redis in the future.
- 📚 The speaker advises keeping the rate limiter simple and considering the potential for abuse or edge cases where the system might need to scale or handle high traffic.
Q & A
What is the primary reason for implementing rate limiting in web applications?
-Rate limiting is crucial in web applications to prevent abuse by malicious users who could otherwise flood the system with data, leading to a poor user experience and increased strain on the database and backend systems.
How does the rate limiter in the script work?
-The rate limiter works by allowing a certain number of requests within a specified time period for each IP address. It uses an in-memory JavaScript object to track the count and expiration time of requests.
What is the potential issue with using an in-memory rate limiter when scaling up a system?
-An in-memory rate limiter can run into issues when scaling up because each server instance operates independently. This means that with multiple servers behind a load balancer, a user could potentially bypass the rate limit by making requests through different servers.
What is the suggested solution for handling rate limiting in a scaled environment?
-For a scaled environment, it's recommended to use a centralized data store like Redis to keep track of rate limits. This ensures that the rate limiting is consistent across all instances of the application.
How does the rate limiter identify the user's IP address?
-The rate limiter identifies the user's IP address by checking the request headers for 'x-forwarded-for' or 'x-real-ip'. If these headers are set, it uses the value; otherwise, it returns null.
What is the significance of using 'action error' in the script?
-The 'action error' is used because the rate limiting functionality is wrapped in a 'next safe action' library, which requires an 'action error' to display errors in the user interface.
How can rate limiting be applied based on a user ID instead of an IP address?
-Rate limiting can be applied based on a user ID by using a 'rate limit by key' approach, where the key is a specific identifier such as the user's ID. This provides a more granular level of control, especially for authenticated users.
What is the benefit of abstracting rate limiting logic into a function?
-Abstracting the rate limiting logic into a function allows for easier maintenance and potential refactoring. It also enables the application to easily switch to different rate limiting strategies, such as using an external service like Redis, without major code changes.
What is the potential downside to using a large in-memory JavaScript object for rate limiting?
-The potential downside is that if the application receives a high volume of traffic over a long period, the in-memory object could grow very large, which could lead to performance issues or even a denial of service if it's filled with random IP addresses.
How can the rate limiter be improved to handle default rate limiting for authenticated actions?
-The rate limiter can be improved by implementing a middleware function that applies a default rate limit to all authenticated actions. This can be done by using a 'rate limit by key' approach with a unique key for each action, such as the user ID combined with a descriptor for the action.
What is the purpose of the toast message that appears when rate limits are exceeded?
-The toast message serves as a user-friendly way to notify the user that their request has been rate-limited and cannot be processed at the moment. It provides immediate feedback without requiring a full page reload or additional server requests.
Outlines
🛡️ Implementing Rate Limiting for Web Applications
The first paragraph discusses the necessity of implementing rate limiting in web applications to prevent abuse and ensure a good user experience. The speaker shares an example where a user can create groups in an application and how, without rate limiting, a malicious user could flood the system with data. They introduce a custom rate limiter they've created that allows a specified number of requests within a certain time frame. The rate limiter uses an IP-based approach and throws an 'action error' when limits are exceeded. The paragraph also touches on the limitations of this in-memory approach when scaling up to multiple servers or using a load balancer, suggesting the use of a centralized system like Redis for more robust rate limiting.
🔄 Refactoring and Abstracting Rate Limiting Logic
The second paragraph focuses on refactoring the rate limiting code to make it more reusable and less verbose. The speaker demonstrates how to create a more generic function that can be used for both public endpoints limited by IP address and authenticated endpoints limited by a key, such as a user ID. They also discuss the potential for the rate limiting data to grow over time and the need to consider this when building a system. The paragraph concludes with the speaker abstracting the rate limiting logic further to allow for default rate limiting across all authenticated actions, showcasing the power of the abstraction to easily adjust and scale the rate limiting strategy.
Mindmap
Keywords
Rate Limiting
Web Applications
Malicious User
In-Memory
Load Balancer
IP Address
X-Forwarded-For and X-Real-IP
Action Error
Next Safe Action Library
Rate Limit by Key
Global Rate Limiting
Highlights
The importance of rate limiting for web applications to prevent abuse and maintain a good user experience.
Creating a custom rate limiter is easier than expected and can be done in-house.
Rate limiting by IP can be effective for single server setups but may encounter issues when scaling.
Using a centralized data store like Redis can help maintain consistent rate limiting across multiple servers.
Rate limiting can be implemented by IP or by a unique key, such as a user ID, for more granular control.
The rate limiter can be abstracted into a function for easier maintenance and potential future changes.
Action errors are used in the UI to display errors when the rate limit is exceeded.
A simple in-memory solution can work for small to medium traffic, but larger applications may require a more robust solution.
Rate limiting can prevent denial of service attacks by limiting the number of requests from a single source.
The rate limiter function can be tested by attempting to perform an action that should trigger the limit.
For authenticated endpoints, rate limiting by user ID can provide a more secure and personalized approach.
Default rate limiting can be applied to all authenticated actions to prevent abuse.
Individual actions can have their own specific rate limits for more fine-tuned control.
The rate limiter can be adjusted to fit the needs of different actions within an application.
The rate limiter implementation is designed to be simple and straightforward for easy understanding and use.
The use of a toast message provides user feedback when a rate limit is exceeded.
The rate limiter can be easily extended or modified to use different storage solutions like Redis for scaling.
The speaker encourages viewers to provide feedback and share their own rate limiting methods.